A decision support system for prioritizing investments in an energy efficiency program in favelas in the city of Rio de Janeiro

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 22, Issue 1-2, 2015, Pages 89-99

  Ribas, José Roberto ^a   da Silva Rocha, Mariana ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b Light Serviços de Eletricidade S A   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Decision support system; Energy efficiency; Energy theft; Fuzzy AHP; Pacified communities; Social investment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924798600     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mcda.1524     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Belton V, Stewart TJ. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
2. Bokenkamp G, et al. 2010. Assessment of policy instruments and electricity generation technologies. In The Social Cost of Electricity: Scenarios and Policy Implications, Markandya A, Bigano A, Porchia R (eds). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham; 231-272.
3. Buoro D, et al. 2013. Multicriteria optimization of a distributed energy supply system for an industrial area. Energy 58: 128-137.
4. Chang DY. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95: 649-655.
5. Datta A, et al. 2011. Green energy sources (GES) selection based on multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). International Journal of Energy Sector Management 5: 271-286.
6. Deb K, et al. 2012. On the sizing of a solar thermal electricity plant for multiple objectives using evolutionary optimization. Applied Soft Computing 12: 3300-3311.
7. Doumpos M, Zopounidis C. 2002. Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
8. Ehrgott M, Figueira JR, Greco S. 2010. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer: New York.
9. Ferreira P, Araujo M, Kelly MEJ. 2010. The integration of social concerns into electricity power planning: a combined Delphi and AHP approach. Energy Systems, Handbook of Power Systems 343-364.
10. Figueira J, Roy B. 2002. Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure. European Journal of Operational Research 139: 317-326.
11. Firjan. 2010. Pesquisa nas Favelas com Unidades de Polícia Pacificadora da Cidade do Rio de Janeiro. FIRJAN: Rio de Janeiro.
12. Gál T, Stewart TJ, Hanne T. 1999. Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
13. Klir GJ, Yuan B. 1995. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River.
14. Liu G, et al. 2011. Sustainability indicator of renewable energy system based on fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods. Advanced Materials Research 361-363: 1263-1273.
15. Liu G, Baniyounes AM, Rasul MG. 2013. General sustainability indicator of renewable energy system based on grey relational analysis. International Journal of Energy Research 37. DOI: 10.1002/er.3016
16. Martinez LJ, Lambert JH, Karvetski CW. 2011. Scenario-informed multiple criteria analysis for prioritizing investments in electricity capacity expansion. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 96: 883-891.
17. Maystre LY, et al. 1994. Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE: description, conseils pratiques et cas d'application à la gestion environnementale. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes: Lausanne.
18. Munda G. 2004. Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research 158: 662-677.
19. Neves LP, et al. 2009. Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: a case study in energy efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research 199: 834-845.
20. Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F. 2011. A fuzzy AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach applied to combined cooling, heating and power production systems. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 10: 497-517.
21. Pictet J, Bollinger D. 2005. The silent negotiation or how to elicit collective information for group MCDA without excessive discussion. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 13: 199-211.
22. Ribeiro F, Ferreira PV, Araujo MMT. 2011. A Methodology to Address Social Concerns on Electricity Planning. Universidade do Minho: Minho.
23. Ribeiro F, Ferreira P, Araujo M. 2013. Evaluating future scenarios for the power generation sector using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool: the Portuguese case. Energy 52: 126-136.
24. Roth S, et al. 2009. Sustainability of electricity supply technology portfolio. Annals of Nuclear Energy 36: 409-416.
25. Roy B. 1985. Méthodologie multicritèrie d'aide la décision. Economica: Paris.
26. Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48: 9-26.
27. Saaty TL. 2005. Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 14: 1-36.
28. Saaty TL, Vargas LG. 2012. How to make a decision: models, methods, concepts & applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science 175: 1-21.
29. Stein EW. 2013. A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22: 640-654.
30. Sun D, Sung WP, Chen R. 2011. A study on the post-evaluation of the social environment of the cloud model-based wind power project. Applied Mechanics and Materials 71-78: 2341-2346.
31. Tang Y, Beynon M. 2005. Application and development of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process within a capital investment study. Journal of Economics and Management 1: 207-230.
32. Unsihuay-Vila C, et al. 2013. Multistage expansion planning of generation and interconnections with sustainable energy development criteria: a multiobjective model. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 33: 258-270.