Effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation on Sensory Functions

The Stimulated Brain: Cognitive Enhancement Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 181-205

  Chaieb, Leila ^a   Saiote, Catarina ^b   Paulus, Walter ^b   Antal, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Brain stimulation; Neuroplasticity; Perception; TDCS; Visual

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924667549     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404704-4.00007-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Accornero N., Li Voti P., La Riccia M., Gregori B. Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization. Experimental Brain Research 2007, 178:261-266.
2. Antal A., Begemeier S., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Prior state of cortical activity influences subsequent practicing of a visuomotor coordination task. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:3157-3161.
3. Antal A., Boros K., Poreisz C., Chaieb L., Terney D., Paulus W. Comparatively weak aftereffects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimulation 2008, 1:97-105.
4. Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A., Bartfai O., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2004, 45:702-707.
5. Antal A., Kincses T., Nitsche M., Paulus W. Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Experimental Brain Research 2003, 150:375-378.
6. Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Modulation of moving phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation of V1 in human. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1802-1807.
7. Antal A., Kriener N., Lang N., Boros K., Paulus W. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the visual cortex in the prophylactic treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 2011, 31:820-828.
8. Antal A., Nitsche M., Kincses T., Kruse W., Hoffmann K., Paulus W. Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 19:2888-2892.
9. Antal A., Nitsche M., Kruse W., Kincses T., Hoffmann K., Paulus W. Direct current stimulation over V5 enhances visuomotor coordination by improving motion perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:521-527.
10. Antal A., Nitsche M., Paulus W. External modulation of visual perception in humans. Neuroreport 2001, 12:3553-3555.
11. Antal A., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A. Electrical stimulation and visual network plasticity. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2011, 29:365-374.
12. Antal A., Varga E., Kincses T., Nitsche M., Paulus W. Oscillatory brain activity and transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1307-1310.
13. Bak M., Girvin J.P., Hambrecht F.T., Kufta C.V., Loeb G.E., Schmidt E.M. Visual sensations produced by intracortical microstimulation of the human occipital cortex. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1990, 28:257-259.
14. Barker A.T., Jalinous R., Freeston I.L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985, 1:1106-1107.
15. Berryhill M.E., Wencil E.B., Branch Coslett H., Olson I.R. A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe. Neuroscience Letters 2010, 479:312-316.
16. Bindman L.J., Lippold O.C., Redfearn J.W. The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting aftereffects. The Journal of Physiology 1964, 172:369-382.
17. Bolognini N., Fregni F., Casati C., Olgiati E., Vallar G. Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Research 2010, 1349:76-89.
18. Bolognini N., Rossetti A., Casati C., Mancini F., Vallar G. Neuromodulation of multisensory perception: A tDCS study of the sound-induced flash illusion. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:231-237.
19. Boroojerdi B., Prager A., Muellbacher W., Cohen L.G. Reduction of human visual cortex excitability using 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 2000, 54:1529-1531.
20. Brindley G.S., Lewin W.S. The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. The Journal of Physiology 1968, 196:479-493.
21. Bullard L.M., Browning E.S., Clark V.P., Coffman B.A., Garcia C.M., Jung R.E., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation's effect on novice versus experienced learning. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 213:9-14.
22. Chadaide Z., Arlt S., Antal A., Nitsche M.A., Lang N., Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation reveals inhibitory deficiency in migraine. Cephalalgia 2007, 27:833-839.
23. Chaieb L., Antal A., Paulus W. Gender-specific modulation of short-term neuroplasticity in the visual cortex induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. Visual Neuroscience 2008, 25:77-81.
24. Chi R.P., Fregni F., Snyder A.W. Visual memory improved by non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Research 2010, 1353:168-175.
25. Clark V.P., Coffman B.A., Mayer A.R., Weisend M.P., Lane T.D., Calhoun V.D., et al. TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects. NeuroImage 2012, 59:117-128.
26. Costa T.L., Nagy B.V., Barboni M.T., Boggio P.S., Ventura D.F. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates human color discrimination in a pathway-specific manner. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2012, 3:78.
27. Creutzfeldt O.D., Fromm G.H., Kapp H. Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Experimental Neurology 1962, 5:436-452.
28. Fertonani A., Pirulli C., Miniussi C. Random noise stimulation improves neuroplasticity in perceptual learning. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2011, 31:15416-15423.
29. Feurra M., Paulus W., Walsh V., Kanai R. Frequency specific modulation of human somatosensory cortex. Frontiers in Psychology 2011, 2:13.
30. Floel A., Suttorp W., Kohl O., Kurten J., Lohmann H., Breitenstein C., et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiology of Aging 2012, 33:1682-1689.
31. Foerster O. Beitrage zur Pathophysiologie der Sehbahn und der Sehsphare. Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie 1929, 39:463-485.
32. Gall C., Sgorzaly S., Schmidt S., Brandt S., Fedorov A., Sabel B.A. Noninvasive transorbital alternating current stimulation improves subjective visual functioning and vision-related quality of life in optic neuropathy. Brain Stimulation 2011, 4:175-188.
33. Halko M.A., Datta A., Plow E.B., Scaturro J., Bikson M., Merabet L.B. Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS. NeuroImage 2011, 57:885-891.
34. Kanai R., Chaieb L., Antal A., Walsh V., Paulus W. Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Current Biology 2008, 18:1839-1843.
35. Kraft A., Kehrer S., Hagendorf H., Brandt S.A. Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 33:2349-2358.
36. Kraft A., Roehmel J., Olma M.C., Schmidt S., Irlbacher K., Brandt S.A. Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 207:283-290.
37. Laczo B., Antal A., Niebergall R., Treue S., Paulus W. Transcranial alternating stimulation in a high gamma frequency range applied over V1 improves contrast perception but does not modulate spatial attention. Brain Stimulation 2011.
38. Ladeira A., Fregni F., Campanha C., Valasek C.A., De Ridder D., Brunoni A.R., et al. Polarity-dependent transcranial direct current stimulation effects on central auditory processing. PLoS One 2011, 6:e25399.
39. Lang N., Siebner H.R., Chadaide Z., Boros K., Nitsche M.A., Rothwell J.C., et al. Bidirectional modulation of primary visual cortex excitability: A combined tDCS and rTMS study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007, 48:5782-5787.
40. Liebetanz D., Nitsche M., Tergau F., Paulus W. Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced aftereffects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain 2002, 125:2238-2247.
41. Loui P., Hohmann A., Schlaug G. Inducing disorders in pitch perception and production: A reverse-engineering approach. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 2010, 9:50002.
42. Mancini F., Bolognini N., Haggard P., Vallar G. tDCS modulation of visually-induced analgesia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2012.
43. Merton P.A., Morton H.B. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 1980, 285:227.
44. Meyer B.U., Diehl R., Steinmetz H., Britton T.C., Benecke R. Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: Influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. Supplement 1991, 43:121-134.
45. Nitsche M.A., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Priori A., Lang N., Antal A., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation 2008, 1:206-223.
46. Nitsche M., Fricke K., Henschke U., Schlitterlau A., Liebetanz D., Lang N., et al. Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology 2003, 553:293-301.
47. Nitsche M., Jaussi W., Liebetanz D., Lang N., Tergau F., Paulus W. Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29:1573-1578.
48. Nitsche M., Nitsche M., Klein C., Tergau F., Rothwell J., Paulus W. Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology 2003, 114:600-604.
49. Nitsche M., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology 2000, 527(Pt 3):633-639.
50. Nitsche M., Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology 2001, 57:1899-1901.
51. Olma M.C., Kraft A., Roehmel J., Irlbacher K., Brandt S.A. Excitability changes in the visual cortex quantified with signal detection analysis. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2011, 29:453-461.
52. Penfield W., Boldrey E. Somatic motor and sensory representation in the cerebral cortex of man as studied by electrical stimulation. Brain 1937, 60:389-443.
53. Penfield W., Rasmussen T.L. The cerebral cortex of man: A clinical study of localization of function 1950, Macmillan, London.
54. Penolazzi B., Di Domenico A., Marzoli D., Mammarella N., Fairfield B., Franciotti R., et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on episodic memory related to emotional visual stimuli. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10623.
55. Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., Merabet L.B. Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2012, 26:616-626.
56. Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Halko M.A., Kenkel S., Jackson M.L., Pascual-Leone A., et al. Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: A comparative case study. PM&R 2011, 3:825-835.
57. Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Jackson M.L., Merabet L.B. Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation 2012, 15:367-373.
58. Ragert P., Vandermeeren Y., Camus M., Cohen L.G. Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119:805-811.
59. Rogalewski A., Breitenstein C., Nitsche M., Paulus W., Knecht S. Transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts tactile perception. The European Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 20:313-316.
60. Sabel B.A., Henrich-Noack P., Fedorov A., Gall C. Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: The "residual vision activation theory". Progress in Brain Research 2011, 192:199-262.
61. Schmidt E.M., Bak M.J., Hambrecht F.T., Kufta C.V., O'Rourke D.K., Vallabhanath P. Feasibility of a visual prosthesis for the blind based on intracortical microstimulation of the visual cortex. Brain 1996, 119(Pt 2):507-522.
62. Schwiedrzik C.M. Retina or visual cortex? The site of phosphene induction by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2009, 3:6.
63. Sherman S.M., Spear P.D. Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. Physiological Reviews 1982, 62:738-855.
64. Siniatchkin M., Sendacki M., Moeller F., Wolff S., Jansen O., Siebner H., et al. Abnormal changes of synaptic excitability in migraine with aura. Cerebral Cortex 2012, 22:2207-2216.
65. Spiegel D.P., Hansen B.C., Byblow W.D., Thompson B. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation reduces psychophysically measured surround suppression in the human visual cortex. PLoS One 2012, 7:e36220.
66. Terhune D.B., Tai S., Cowey A., Popescu T., Cohen Kadosh R. Enhanced cortical excitability in grapheme-color synesthesia and its modulation. Current Biology 2011, 21:2006-2009.
67. Terney D., Chaieb L., Moliadze V., Antal A., Paulus W. Increasing human brain excitability by transcranial high-frequency random noise stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2008, 28:14147-14155.
68. Varga E.T., Elif K., Antal A., Zimmer M., Harza I., Paulus W., et al. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the parietal cortex modifies facial gender adaptation. Ideggyógyászati Szemle 2007, 60:474-479.
69. Zaehle T., Rach S., Herrmann C.S. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13766.