메뉴 건너뛰기
Addiction
Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 549-550
Guidance for reporting qualitative manuscripts
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
EID: 84924666872     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/add.12857     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (14)
References (7)
  • 1
    • 0035857966 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials
    • Moher D., Schulz K. F., Altman D. G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-4.
    • (2001) Lancet , vol.357 , pp. 1191-1194
    • Moher, D.1    Schulz, K.F.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 2
    • 39649090053 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
    • von Elm E., Altman D. G., Egger M., Pocock S. J., Gøtzsche P. C., Vandenbroucke J. P., STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 344-9.
    • (2008) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.61 , pp. 344-349
    • von Elm, E.1    Altman, D.G.2    Egger, M.3    Pocock, S.J.4    Gøtzsche, P.C.5    Vandenbroucke, J.P.6
  • 3
    • 1442354597 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement
    • Des Jarlais D. C., Lyles C., Crepaz N., the TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 361-6.
    • (2004) Am J Public Health , vol.94 , pp. 361-366
    • Des Jarlais, D.C.1    Lyles, C.2    Crepaz, N.3
  • 4
    • 69449100622 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement
    • the PRISMA Group. . ; : . DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
    • Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D. G., the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.339 , pp. b2535
    • Moher, D.1    Liberati, A.2    Tetzlaff, J.3    Altman, D.G.4
  • 5
    • 36549063576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
    • Tong A., Sainsbury P., Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-57.
    • (2007) Int J Qual Health Care , vol.19 , pp. 349-357
    • Tong, A.1    Sainsbury, P.2    Craig, J.3
  • 6
    • 14844355678 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to peer review a qualitative manuscript
    • In: Godlee F., Jefferson T. editors., 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books;-.
    • Clark J. P.. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript. In: Godlee F., Jefferson T. editors. Peer Review in Health Sciences, 2nd edn. London: BMJ Books; 2003, pp.219-35.
    • (2003) Peer Review in Health Sciences , pp. 219-235
    • Clark, J.P.1
  • 7
    • 85054111845 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Qualitative research checklist 31.05.13. Available at:(accessed 13 January 2015).
    • Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Qualitative research checklist 31.05.13. Available at: http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_product/uploads/CASP%20Qualitative%20Research%20Checklist%2031.05.13.pdf (accessed 13 January 2015).

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.