Meta-level sentiment models for big social data analysis

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 86-99

  Bravo Marquez, Felipe ^a,b   Mendoza, Marcelo ^c   Poblete, Barbara ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b Yahoo Labs Santiago   (Chile)

^c DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Chile)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Meta level features; Opinion mining; Sentiment classification; Social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIG DATA; DATA MINING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

META LEVELS; OPINION MINING; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; TWITTER;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84924582295     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, F. Sebastiani, Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, Malta, 2010.
2. R. Baeza-Yates, L. Rello, How Bad Do You Spell?: The Lexical Quality of Social Media, The Future of the Social Web, Papers from the 2011ICWSM Workshop, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, AAAI Workshops, 2011.
3. M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang, Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW) Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings, Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology University of Florida, 2009.
4. F. Bravo-Marquez, M. Mendoza, B. Poblete, Combining strengths, emotions and polarities for boosting Twitter sentiment analysis, in: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, WISDOM '13, New York, USA, 2013, pp. 2:1-2:9.
5. E. Cambria, R. Speer C. Havasi, A. Hussain, SenticNet 2: a semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis, in: FLAIRS Conference, 2012, pp. 202-207.
6. E. Cambria, A. Hussain, Sentic Computing, Techniques, Tools, and Applications, Springer, 2012.
7. E. Cambria, A. Livingstone, A. Hussain, The hourglass of emotions, in: Cognitive Behavioural Systems, Springer, 2012, pp. 144-157.
8. E. Cambria, B. Schuller, Y. Xia, C. Havasi, New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis, IEEE Intell. Syst. 28 (2) (2013) 15-21.
9. E. Cambria, D. Olsher, D. Rajagopal, SenticNet 3: a common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Quebec City, Canada, 2014.
10. E. Cambria, B. White, Jumping NLP curves: a review of natural language processing research, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 9 (2) (2014) 48-57.
11. P. Carvalho, L Sarmento, M.J. Silva, E. de Oliveira, Clues for detecting irony in user-generated contents: oh...!! it's so easy;-), in: Proceeding of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion Hong Kong, China, 2009.
12. A. Esuli, F. Sebastiani, Sentiwordnet: a publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining, in: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2006.
13. A. Go, R. Bhayani, L. Huang, Twitter sentiment classification using distant supervision, Technical report Stanford University, 2010.
14. P. Gonçalves, M. Araújo, F. Benevenuto, M. Cha, Comparing and combining sentiment analysis methods, in: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Online Social Networks, COSN '13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 27-38.
15. L. Jiang, M. Yu, M. Zhou, X. Liu, T. Zhao, Target-dependent Twitter sentiment classification, in: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Vol. 1, 2011, pp. 151-160.
16. E. Kouloumpis, T. Wilson, J. Moore, Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the OMG!, in: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2011.
17. K. Liu, W. Li, M. Guo, Emoticon smoothed language models for Twitter sentiment analysis, in: Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2012.
18. B. Liu, Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies series, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.
19. G.A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, K. Miller, Wordnet: an on-line lexical database, Int. J. Lexicogr. 3 (1990) 235-244.
20. S.M. Mohammad, P.D. Turney, Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon, Comput. Intell. 29 (3) (2013) 436-465.
21. S.M. Mohammad, S. Kiritchenko, X. Zhu, Nrc-canada: building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation Exercises (SemEval-2013), Atlanta, Georgia, USA, June 2013.
22. H. Saif, Y. He, H. Alani, Alleviating data sparsity for Twitter sentiment analysis, in: Workshop of Making Sense of Microposts co-located with WWW, 2012.
23. F. Nielsen, A new anew: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs, in: Proceedings of the ESWC2011 Workshop on 'Making Sense of Microposts': Big Things Come in Small Packages, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 30, 2011.
24. M. Grassi, E. Cambria, A. Hussain, F. Piazza, Sentic web: a new paradigm for managing social media affective information, Cogn. Comput. 3 (3) (2011) 480-489.
25. D.J. Olsher, Full spectrum opinion mining: integrating domain, syntactic and lexical knowledge, in: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, IEEE, 2012, pp. 693-700.
26. A. Pak, P. Paroubek, Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, Malta, 2010.
27. B. Pang, L. Lee, Opinion mining and sentiment analysis, Found. Trends Inform. Retr. 2 (2008) 1-135.
28. R. Plutchik, The nature of emotions human emotions have deep evolutionary roots, a fact that may explain their complexity and provide tools for clinical practice, Am. Sci. 89 (4) (2001) 344-350.
29. J. Read, Using emoticons to reduce dependency in machine learning techniques for sentiment classification, in: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Michigan, USA, 2005.
30. M. Thelwall, K. Buckley, G. Paltoglou, Sentiment strength detection for the social web, J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 63 (1) (2012) 163-173.
31. A. Charng-Rurng Tsai, C. Wu, R. Tzong-Han Tsai, J. Yung-jen Hsu, Building a concept-level sentiment dictionary based on commonsense knowledge, IEEE Intell. Syst. 28 (2) (2013) 22-30.
32. T. Wilson, Z. Kozareva, P. Nakov, A. Ritter, S. Rosenthal, V. Stoyonov, Semeval-2013 task 2: sentiment analysis in Twitter, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Association for Computation Linguistics, 2013.
33. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, P. Hoffmann, Recognizing contextual polarity in phraselevel sentiment analysis, in: Proceedings of Human Language Technologies Conference/Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2005.
34. R. Xia, Z. Chengqing, X. Hu, E. Cambria, Feature ensemble plus sample selection: domain adaptation for sentiment classification, IEEE Intell. Syst. 28 (3) (2013) 10-18.
35. C. Zirn, M. Niepert, H. Stuckenschmidt, M. Strube, Fine-grained sentiment analysis with structural features, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (IJCNLP), Chiang Mai, Thailand, 2011, pp. 336-344.