SenticNet 3: A common and common-sense knowledge base for cognition-driven sentiment analysis

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue , 2014, Pages 1515-1521

  Cambria, Erik ^a   Olsher, Daniel ^b   Rajagopal, Dheeraj ^c  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE BASE; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84908152207     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Anderson, J., and Pirolli, P. 1984. Spread of activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10:791-799.
2. Bizer, C.; Jens, L.; Kobilarov, G.; Auer, S.; Becker, C.; Cy- ganiak, R.; and Hellmann, S. 2009. Dbpedia - A crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7(3): 154-165.
3. Bollacker, K.; Evans, C.; Paritosh, P.; Sturge, T.; and Taylor, J. 2008. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In SIGMOD, 1247-1250.
4. Cambria, E., and Hussain, A. 2012. Sentic Computing: Techniques, Tools, and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
5. Cambria, E., and White, B. 2014. Jumping NLP curves: A review of natural language processing research. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 9(2):48-57.
6. Cambria, E.; Olsher, D.; and Kwok, K. 2012. Sentic activation: A two-level affective common sense reasoning framework. In AAAI, 186-192.
7. Carlson, A.; Betteridge, J.; Kisiel, B.; Settles, B.; Hruschka, E.; and Mitchell, T. 2010. Toward an architecture for never- ending language learning. In AAAI, 1306-1313.
8. Dempster, A.; Laird, N.; and Rubin, D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal statistical Society, Series B 39(1):1-38.
9. Di Fabbrizio, G.; Aker, A.; and Gaizauskas, R. 2013. Summarizing on-line product and service reviews using aspect rating distributions and language modeling. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(3):28-37.
10. Elliott, C. D. 1992. The Affective Reasoner: A Process Model of Emotions in a Multi-Agent System. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston.
11. Gangemi, A.; Presutti, V.; and Reforgiato, D. 2014. Frame- based detection of opinion holders and topics: A model and a tool. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 9(1):20- 30.
12. Garci'a-Moya, L.; Anaya-Sanchez, H.; and Berlanga- Llavori, R. 2013. A language model approach for retrieving product features and opinions from customer reviews. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(3): 19-27.
13. Gruber, T. 2007. Collective knowledge systems: The social web meets the semantic web. Web Semantics 6(1):4-13.
14. Kuo, Y., and Hsu, J. 2012. Planning for reasoning with multiple common sense knowledge bases. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2(3): 1-24.
15. Lau, R.; Xia, Y.; and Ye, Y. 2014. A probabilistic generative model for mining cybercriminal networks from online social media. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 9( 1):31-43.
16. Lenat, D., and Guha, R. 1989. Building Large Knowledge- Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
17. Lodge, M., and Taber, C. 2005. The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology 26(3):455-482.
18. Manning, C. 2011. Part-of-speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics? In Gelbukh, A., ed., Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, volume 6608 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. 171-189.
19. Olsher, D. 2013. COGVIEW & INTELNET: Nu- Anced energy-based knowledge representation and integrated cognitive-conceptual framework for realistic culture, values, and concept-affected systems simulation. In IEEE SSCI, 82-91.
20. Olsher, D. 2014. Semantically-based priors and nuanced knowledge core for big data, social AI, and language understanding. Neural Networks.
21. Paice, C. 1990. Another stemmer. SIGIR Forum 24:56-61.
22. Poria, S.; Gelbukh, A.; Hussain, A.; Howard, N.; Das, D.; and Bandyopadhyay, S. 2013. Enhanced SenticNet with affective labels for concept-based opinion mining. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2):31-38.
23. Rajagopal, D.; Olsher, D.; Cambria, E.; and Kwok, K. 2013. Commonsense-based topic modeling. In Proceedings, KDD WISDOM, 6. ACM.
24. Rao, D., and Ravichandran, D. 2009. Semi-supervised polarity lexicon induction. In EACL, 675-682.
25. Sniderman, P.; Brody, R.; and Tetlock, P. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
26. Speer, R., and Havasi, C. 2012. Concept Net 5: A large semantic network for relational knowledge. In Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing. Springer.
27. Strapparava, C., and Valitutti, A. 2004. WordNet-Affect: An affective extension of Word Net. In LREC, 1083-1086.
28. Suchanek, F.; Kasneci, G.; and Weikum, G. 2007. Yago: A core of semantic knowledge. In WWW, 697-706.
29. Tsai, A.; Tsai, R.; and Hsu, J. 2013. Building a concept- level sentiment dictionary based on commonsense knowledge. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2):22-30.
30. Weichselbraun, A.; Gindl, S.; and Scharl, A. 2013. Extracting and grounding context-aware sentiment lexicons. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(2):39-46.
31. Westen, D. 2002. Implications of developments in cognitive neuroscience for psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Harv Rev Psychiatry 10(6):369-73.
32. Wiebe, J.; Wilson, T.; and Cardie, C. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation 39(2): 165-210.
33. Wu, W.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; and Zhu, K. 2012. Probase: A probabilistic taxonomy for text understanding. In SIGMOD, 481-492.
34. Xia, R.; Zong, C.; Hu, X.; and Cambria, E. 2013. Feature ensemble plus sample selection: A comprehensive approach to domain adaptation for sentiment classification. IEEE Intelligent Systems 28(3): 10-18.