High-dimensional cluster analysis with the masked EM algorithm

Neural Computation

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2379-2394

  Kadir, Shabnam N ^a   Goodman, Dan F M ^b,c   Harris, Kenneth D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 84924522347     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00661     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akaike,H. (1974).Anew look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2. Bouveyron, C., & Brunet-Saumard, C. (2012). Model-based clustering of highdimensional data: A review. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 71, 52-78.
3. Calabrese, A., & Paninski, L. (2011). Kalman filter mixture model for spike sorting of non-stationary data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 196(1), 159-169.
4. Carin, L.,Wu, Q.,Carlson, D., Lian,W., Stoetzner, C.,Kipke, D., . . . Dunson,D. (2013). Sorting electrophysiological data via dictionary learning and mixture modeling. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 61, 41-54.
5. Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273-297.
6. Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 39, 1-38.
7. Einevoll, G. T., Franke, F., Hagen, E., Pouzat, C., & Harris, K. D. (2012). Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22(1), 11-17.
8. Ekanadham, C., Tranchina, D., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2013). A unified framework and method for automatic neural spike identification. Journal of NeuroscienceMethods, 22, 47-55.
9. Fraley,C.,&Raftery, A. E. (2002).Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458), 611-631.
10. Franke, F., Natora, M., Boucsein, C., Munk, M. H. J., & Obermayer, K. (2010). An online spike detection and spike classification algorithm capable of instantaneous resolution of overlapping spikes. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 29(1-2), 127-148.
11. Friedman, J. H., & Meulman, J. J. (2004). Clustering objects on subsets of attributes (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (StatisticalMethodology), 66(4), 815-849.
12. Gasthaus, J., Wood, F., Gorur, D., & Teh, Y. W. (2008). Dependent Dirichlet process spike sorting. InD. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio,& L. Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 497-504). Cambridge,MA: MIT Press.
13. Ghahramani,Z.,&Hinton,G. E. (1996). The EMalgorithm for mixtures of factor analyzers (Tech. Rep. CRG-TR-96-1). Toronto: University of Toronto.
14. Harris, K. D., Henze, D. A., Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., & Buzśaki, G. (2000). Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84(1), 401-414.
15. Harris, K. D., Kadir, S. N., & Goodman, D. F. M. (2000-2013). KlustaKwik. https:// sourceforge.net/projects/klustakwik/files/.
16. Harris, K. D., Kadir, S. N., & Goodman, D. F. M. (2013). Masked KlustaKwik. https://klusta-team.github.com/klustakwik.
17. Lewicki, M. S. (1998). A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 9(4), R53-R78.
18. Marre, O., Amodei, D., Deshmukh, N., Sadeghi, K., Soo, F., Holy, T. E., & Berry, M. J. (2012). Mapping a complete neural population in the retina. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(43), 14859-14873.
19. McLachlan, G. J., Peel, D., & Bean, R. W. (2003). Modelling high-dimensional data by mixtures of factor analyzers. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41(3), 379-388.
20. Meila, M. (2003). Comparing clusterings by the variation of information. In B. Schölkopf & M. K. Warmuth (Eds.), Learning theory and kernel machines (pp. 173- 187). New York: Springer.
21. Pillow, J. W., Shlens, J., Chichilnisky, E. J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2013). A modelbased spike sorting algorithm for removing correlation artifacts in multi-neuron recordings. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e62123.
22. Prentice, J. S., Homann, J., Simmons, K. D., Tkacik, G., Balasubramanian, V., & Nelson, P. C. (2011). Fast, scalable, Bayesian spike identification for multielectrode arrays. PLoS ONE, 6(7), e19884.
23. Quian Quiroga, R., Nadasdy, Z., & Ben-Shaul, Y. (2004). Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Computation, 16(8), 1661-1687.
24. Raftery, A. E., & Dean, N. (2006). Variable selection for model-based clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(473), 168-178.
25. Sahani,M. (1999). Latent variable models for neural data analysis. Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology.
26. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.
27. Shoham, S., Fellows,M. R.,& Normann, R. A. (2003). Robust, automatic spike sorting using mixtures of multivariate t-distributions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 127(2), 111-122.
28. Takahashi, S., Anzai, Y., & Sakurai, Y. (2003). Automatic sorting for multi-neuronal activity recorded with tetrodes in the presence of overlapping spikes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89(4), 2245-2258.
29. Wood, F., Black,M. J. (2008).Anonparametric Bayesian alternative to spike sorting. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 173(1), 1-12.