Stakeholder mapping for the governance of biosecurity: a literature review

Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-38

  Reed, M S ^a   Curzon, R ^a  

^a BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agriculture; biosecurity; governance; invasive alien species; participation; plant and animal disease; plant and animal health; stakeholder analysis; stakeholder mapping

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84924457050     PISSN: 1943815X     EISSN: 19438168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1943815X.2014.975723     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. AndriofJ, WaddockS. 2002. Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In: RahmanSS, WaddockS, AndriofJ, HustedB, editors. Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Sheffield: Chapter 1Greenleaf.
2. ArmitageD, MarschkeM, PlummerR. 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change. 18:86–98.
3. ArnsteinS. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Plann Assoc. 35(4):216–224.
4. BarryJ, ProopsJ. 1999. Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol Econ. 28:337–345.
5. BeierleTC. 2002. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Anal. 22:739–749.
6. BelalAR. 2002. Stakeholder accountability or stakeholder management: a review of UK firms’ social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting (SEAAR) practices. Corporate Social Responsibility Environ Manage. 9(1):8–25.
7. BerkesF. 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage. 90:1692–1702.
8. BermanSL, WicksAC, KothaSL, JonesTM. 1999. Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Acad Manage J. 42(5):488–506.
9. BiggsS, MatsaertH. 1999. An actor-oriented approach for strengthening research and development capabilities in natural resource systems. Public Adm Dev. 19:231–262.
10. BillgrenC, HolmenH. 2008. Approaching reality: comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy. 25:550–562.
11. BotsPWG. 2007. Analysis of multi-actor policy contexts using perception graphs. Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.
12. BotsPWG, van TwistMJW, van DuinJHR. 2000. Automatic pattern detection in stakeholder networks. In: Nunamaker JF, Sprague RH, editors. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-ROM) January 4–7, 2000; Manoa (HI): Computer Society Press. Available from: http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2000/0493/02/04932016.pdf.
13. BrodySD. 2003. Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management. J Plann Educ Res. 22(4):407–419.
14. CaltonJM, KurlandNB. 1996. A theory of stakeholder enabling: giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse. In: BojeT, editor. Postmodern management and organizational Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
15. CarrollAB. 1993. Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati (OH): SouthWestern Publishing.
16. ChevalierJM, BucklesDJ. 2008. SAS2: a guide to collaborative inquiry and social engagement. New Delhi (India): Sage.
17. ClarksonMBE. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad Manage Rev. 20:65–91.
18. CookDC, LiuS, MurphyB, LonsdaleWM. 2010. Adaptive approaches to biosecurity governance. Risk Anal. 3(9):1303–1314. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01439.x.
19. ConradE, CassarLF, ChristieM, FazeyI. 2011. Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning. Environ Plann C: Government and Policy. 29(5):761–782.
20. CornwallA. 2008. Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J. 43(3):269–283.
21. CuppenE. 2012. Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods. Policy Sci. 45(1):23–46.
22. CuppenE, BreukersS, HisschemollerM, BergsmaE. 2010. Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecol. Econ. 69:579–591.
23. DaleAP, LaneMB. 1994. Strategic perspectives analysis: a procedure for participatory and political social impact assessment. Soc Nat Resour. 7:253–267.
24. de LopezTT. 2001. Stakeholder management for conservation projects: a case study of Ream National Park. Cambodia. Environ Manage. 28:47–60.
25. de VenteJ, ReedMS, StringerLC, ValenteS, NewigJ. Forthcoming. How does the context and design of participatory decision-making processes affect their outcomes? Evidence from sustainable land management in global drylands. Ecology & Society.
26. DietzT, SternPC, editors. 2008. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision-making. panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington (DC): National Research Council.
27. DonaldsonA. 2008. Biosecurity after the event: risk politics and animal disease. Env Plan A.40:1552–1567.
28. DonaldsonA, LoweP, WardN. 2002. Virus-crisis-institutional change: the foot and mouth actor-network and the governance of rural affairs in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis.42:201–214.
29. DonaldsonT, PrestonL. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Acad Manage Rev. 20:65–91.
30. DougillAJ, FraserEDG, HoldenJ, HubacekK, PrellC, ReedMS, StaglS, StringerLC. 2006. Learning from doing participatory rural research: lessons from the Peak District National Park. J Agric Econ. 57:259–275.
31. EdenC, AckermannF. 1998. Making strategy: the journey of strategic management. London: Sage.
32. EnticottG, FranklinA. 2009. Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void: the case of bovine tuberculosis. Sociologia Ruralis.49(4):375–393.
33. FazeyI, FazeyJA, FazeyDMA. 2005. Learning more effectively from experience. Ecol and Soc.10(2):4. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/art4/.
34. FazeyI, FazeyJA, SalisburyJG, LindenmayerDB, DoversS. 2006. The nature and role of experiential knowledge for environmental conservation. Environ Conserv. 33:1–10.
35. FERA. 2010. Explanatory memorandum to the bee diseases and pestscontrol (England) (Amendment) Order 2010. No. 2363, Points7.1-7.3.
36. FieldhouseEJ. 1999. Environmental involvement of Birmingham SME's with empirical analysis of awareness, involvement and influencing factors [unpublished MA dissertation]. [Birmingham]: UCE.
37. FreemanRE. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston (MA): Pitman.
38. FriedmanAL, MilesS. 2004. Stakeholder theory and communication practice. J Commun Manage. 9:89–97.
39. FriedmanAL, MilesS. 2006. Stakeholders: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. FritschO, NewigJ. 2012. Participatory governance and sustainability: findings of a meta-analysis of stakeholder involvement in environmental decision making. In: BrousseauE, DedeurwaerdereT, SiebenhünerB, editors. Reflexive governance for global public goods. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press. p. 181–204.
41. FroomanJ. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad Manage Rev. 24:191–205.
42. GarmendiaE, StaglS. 2010. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe. Ecol Econ. 69:1712–1722.
43. GerritsL, EdelenbosJ. 2004. Management of sediments through stakeholder involvement: the risks and value of engaging stakeholders when looking for solutions for sediment-related problems. J Soils Sediments. 4(4):239–246.
44. GilmourJ, BeilinR. 2007. Stakeholder mapping for effective risk communication. Melbourne: Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis. Available from: www.acera.unimelb.edu.au/materials/core.html.
45. GilmourJ, BeilinR, SysakT. 2011. Biosecurity risk and peri-urban landholders - using a stakeholder consultative approach to build a risk communication strategy. J Risk Res. 14(3):281–295.
46. GrayS, ChanA, ClarkD, JordanR. 2012. Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social-ecological decision-making: benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecol Model. 229:88–96.
47. GrimbleR, ChanMK. 1995. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective. Nat Resour Forum. 19:113–124.
48. HansenB, ed. 1994. Report on the seminar on integration of indigenous peoples and their knowledge. Reykjavik (Iceland): Ministry for the Environment (Iceland), Ministry of the Environment (Denmark), and the Home Rule of Greenland (Denmark Office, Copenhagen, Denmark).
49. HareM, Pahl-WostlC. 2002. Stakeholder categorisation in participatory integrated assessment. Integr Assess. 3:50–62.
50. HargadonAB. 2002. Brokering knowledge: linking learning and innovation. Res Org Behav. 24:41–85.
51. HarrisonJS, FreemanRE. 1999. Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Acad Manage J. 42(5):479–487.
52. HartSL, SharmaS. 2004. Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Acad Manage Executive. 18:7–18.
53. HermansLM. 2008. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art21/Exploring the promise of actor analysis for environmental policy analysis: lessons from four cases in water resources management. Ecol Soc. 13(1)
54. HillCW, JonesTM. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. J Manage. Stud. 29:131–154.
55. HinchliffeS. 2007. Geographies of nature. London: Sage.
56. HjortsoCN, ChristensenSM, TarpP. 2005. Rapid stakeholder and conflict assessment for natural resource management using cognitive mapping: the case of Damdoi Forest Enterprise, Vietnam. Agric Hum Values. 22(2):149–167.
57. HowardN. 1989. The manager as politician and general: the metagame approach to analysing cooperation and conflict. In: RosenheadJ, editor. Rational analysis for a problematic world: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty, and conflict. Chichester (UK): Wiley; p. 239–261.
58. HowellsJ. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res Policy. 35:715–728.
59. HydenG, MugabeJ. 1999. Governance and sustainable development in Africa: the search for economic and political renewal. In: Okoth-OgendoHWO, TumushabeGW, editors. Governing the environment: political change and natural resources management in eastern and southern Africa. Nairobi: African Centre for Technological Studies.
60. JensenK. 2004. BSE in the UK: why the risk communication strategy failed. J Agr Environ Ethic.17:405–423.
61. JolibertC, Max-NeefM, RauschmayerF, PaavolaJ. 2011. Should we care about the needs of non-humans? A tool for environmental conflict resolution and sustainable organization of living beings. Environ Policy Governance. 21:259–269.
62. JonkerJ, FosterD. 2002. Stakeholder excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm. Corporate Social Responsibility Environ Manage. 9:187–195.
63. KilgourDM, HipelKW. 2005. The graph model for conflict resolution: past, present, and future. Group Decis Negotiation. 14(6):441–460.
64. KlerkxL, HallAJ, LeeuwisC. 2009. Strengthening agricultural innovation capacity: are innovation brokers the answer? No 19, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology, United Nations University.
65. KlerkxL, LeeuwisC. 2008. Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technocation. 28:364–378.
66. KoontzTM. 2005. We finished the plan, so now what? Impacts of collaborative stakeholder participation on land use policy. Policy Stud J. 33:459–481.
67. KoontzTM, ThomasCW. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management?Public Admin Rev. 66:111–121.
68. KontogianniaAD, PapageorgioubEI, TourkoliasaC. 2012. How do you perceive environmental change? Fuzzy cognitive mapping informing stakeholder analysis for environmental policy making and non-market valuation. Appl Soft Comput. 12:3725–3735.
69. KujalaJ, HeikkinenA, LehtimakiH. 2012. Understanding the nature of stakeholder relationships: an empirical examination of a conflict situation. J Bus Ethics. 109:53–65.
70. LawJ. 1994. Organising modernity. London: Wiley Blackwell.
71. LyallC, TaitJ, editors. 2004. Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance. In: New modes of governance: developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk and the environment. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate. p. 1–18.
72. MacArthurJ. 1997. Stakeholder analysis in project planning: origins, applications and refinements of the method. Project Appraisal. 12:251–265.
73. MartinA, SheringtonJ. 1997. Participatory research methods: implementation, effectiveness and institutional context. Agric Syst. 55:195–216.
74. MatherC, MarshallA. 2011. Biosecurity's unruly spaces. Geogr J. 177(4):300–310.
75. MayeD, DibdenJ, HigginsV, PotterC. 2012. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environment and Plan A.44:150–168.
76. McVeaJ, FreemanR. 2005. A names-and-faces approach to stakeholder management. J Manage Inquiry. 14(1):57–69.
77. MeagherL, KettleA, ReedMS, SangsterM. Forthcoming. Review of the impact of the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Strategic Research Portfolio on policy and practice. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
78. MillerD. 1999. Risk science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE. Social Sci Med. 49:1239–1255.
79. MillsPR, Dehnen-SchmutzK, IlberyB, JegerM, JonesG, LittleR, MacLeodA, ParkerS, PautassoM, PietravalleS, MayeD. 2011. Integrating natural and social science perspectives on plant disease risk, management and policy formulation. Philos. Trans. R Soc B: Biol Sci. 366(1573):2035–2044.
80. MillstoneEP, van ZwanenbergP, MarrisC, Levi-dowL, TorgersenH. 2004. Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. Seville (Spain): Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
81. MitchellRK, AgleBR, WoodDJ. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev. 22:853–886.
82. MitroffI. 1983. Stakeholders of the organisational mind: toward a new view of organisational policy making. London: Jossey-Bass.
83. MouratiadouI, MoranD. 2007. Mapping public participation in the water framework directive: a case study of the Pinios River basin, Greece. Ecol Econ. 62(1):66–76.
84. Murray-WebsterR, SimonP. 2006. Making sense of stakeholder mapping. PM World Today. 8:12–13.
85. NerlichB, BrownB, CrawfordP. 2009a. Health, hygiene and biosecurity: tribal knowledge claims in the UK poultry industry. Health, Risk & Soc.11(6):561–577.
86. NerlichB, BrownB, WrightN. 2009b. The ins and outs of biosecurity: bird ‘flu in East Anglia and the spatial representation of risk. Sociologia Ruralis.49(4):344–359.
87. NewigJ. 2007. Does public participation in environmental decisions lead to improved environmental quality? Towards an analytical framework. Int J Sustain Commun. 1:51–71.
88. NewigJ, FritschO. 2009. Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective?Environ Policy Govern. 19(3):197–214.
89. NissenME, LevittRE. 2004. Agent-based modelling of knowledge dynamics. Knowledge Manage Res Pract. 2:169–183.
90. NgV, SargeantJM. 2012. A stakeholder-informed approach to the identification of criteria for the prioritization of Zoonoses in Canada. PLoS ONE. 7(1):.
91. NovakJD. 1993. How do we learn our lesson? Taking students through the process. Sci Teacher. 60:50–55.
92. OstromE. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
93. PatelM, KokK, RothmanDS. 2007. Participatory planning in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences and opportunities created by stakeholder involvement in scenario construction in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy. 24:546–561.
94. PhillipsonJ, LiddonA. 2007. Common knowledge? An exploration of knowledge transfer. Rural Economy and Land Use Programme Briefing Series No 6. Available from: http://www.relu.ac.uk/news/briefings/RELU-Brief6%20Common%20Knowledge.pdf.
95. PhillipsonJ, LoweP, ProctorA, RutoE. 2012. Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research. J Environ Manage. 95(1):56–65.
96. PierreJ, PetersBG. 2000. Governance, politics and the state. London: Macmillan.
97. PitelisC, WahlM. 1998. Edith Penrose: pioneer of stakeholder theory. Long Range Plann. 31(2):252–261.
98. PotterC, HarwoodT, KnightJ, TomlinsonI. 2011. Learning from history, predicting the future: the UK Dutch elm disease outbreak in relation to contemporary tree disease threats. Phil Trans R Soc B. 366:1966–1974. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0395.
99. PrellC, HubacekK, QuinnCH, ReedMS. 2008. ‘Who's in the network?’ When stakeholders influence data analysis. Syst Pract Action Res. 21:443–458.
100. PrellC, HubacekK, ReedMS. 2009. Social network analysis and stakeholder analysis for natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 22:501–518.
101. PrellP, ReedMS, RacinL, HubacekK. 2010. Competing structures, competing views: the role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions. Ecol Soc. 15(4):34. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art34/.
102. ReedMS. 2007. Participatory technology development for agroforestry extension: an innovation-decision approach. Afr J Agric Res. 2:334–341.
103. ReedMS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 141:2417–2431.
104. ReedMS, BonnA, BroadK, BurgessP, FazeyIR, FraserEDG, HubacekK, NainggolanD, RobertsP, QuinnCH, et al. 2013. Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework. J Environ Manage. 128:345–362.
105. ReedMS, DougillAJ, BakerT. 2008. Participatory indicator development: what can ecologists and local communities learn from each other?Ecol Appl. 18:1253–1269.
106. ReedMS, FazeyI, StringerLC, RaymondCM, Akhtar-SchusterM, BegniG, BigasH, BrehmS, BriggsJ, BryceR, et al. 2011. Knowledge management for land degradation monitoring and assessment: an analysis of contemporary thinking. Land Degrad Dev. 24:307–322.
107. ReedMS, FraserEDG, DougillAJ. 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ. 59:406–418.
108. ReedMS, GravesA, DandyN, PosthumusH, HubacekK, MorrisJ, PrellC, QuinnCH, StringerLC. 2009. Who's in and why? Stakeholder analysis as a prerequisite for sustainable natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 90:1933–1949.
109. RennO. 2008. Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London (UK): Earthscan.
110. SabatierPA, LeachWD, LubellM, PelkeyNW. 2005. Theoretical frameworks explaining partnership success. In: SabatierPA, FochtW, LubellM, TrachtenbergZ, VedlitzA, MatlockM, editors. itors. Swimming upstream. Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press; p. 173–199.
111. SchillerC, WintersM, HansonHM, AsheMC. 2013. A framework for stakeholder identification in concept mapping and health research: a novel process and its application to older adult mobility and the built environment. BMC Public Health. 13:428.
112. ScholesE, ClutterbuckD. 1998. Communication with stakeholders: an integrated Approach. Long Range Plann. 31(2):227–238.
113. ScholzJT, StiftelB. 2005. Introduction: the challenges of adaptive governance. In: ScholzJT, StiftelB, editors. Adaptive governance and water conflict: new institutions for collaborative planning. Washington (DC): Resources for the Future Press; p. 1–11.
114. ScottK, ReedMS, BradleyS, BryceR, CurzonR. 2013. Honey bee health: mapping, analysis and improved understanding of stakeholder groups to help sustain honey bee health. Defra Final Report, Project Code PH051. London.
115. StanghelliniPSL. 2010. Stakeholder involvement in water management: the role of the stakeholder analysis within participatory processes. Water Policy. 12(5):675–694.
116. StarikM. 1995. Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. J Bus Ethics. 14:207–217.
117. Stoll-KleemannS, WelpM, editors. 2006. Towards a more effective and democratic natural resources management. In: Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: theory and practice. Berlin: Springer; p. 17–39.
118. StoneHL. 2002. Graphically modeling stakeholder values. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 38(4):1019–1026.
119. StringerLC, PrellC, ReedMS, HubacekK, FraserEDG, DougillAJ. 2006. Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of socio-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc. 11:39.
120. SvendsenA. 1998. The stakeholder strategy: profiting from collaborative business relationships. San Francisco (CA): Berrett Koehler.
121. TebugSF, NjungaGR, ChagundaMGG, MapembaJP, Awah-NdukumJ, WiedemannS. 2014. Risk, knowledge and preventive measures of smallholder dairy farmers in northern Malawi with regard to zoonotic brucellosis and bovine tuberculosis. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 81(1). Art. #594. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v81i1.594.
122. TullbergJ. 2013. Stakeholder theory: some revisionist suggestions. J Socio-Econ. 42:127–135.
123. TumushabeGW, Okoth-OgendoHWO. 1999. Governing the environment: political change and natural resources management in eastern and southern Africa. Nairobi (Kenya): African Centre for Technological Studies.
124. WardN, DonaldsonA, LoweP. 2004. Policy framing and learning the lessons from the UK's foot and mouth disease crisis. Env Plan C: Gov Polic. 22:291–306.
125. YemshanovD, McKenneyDW, PedlarJH, KochFH, CookD. 2009. Towards an integrated approach to modelling the risks and impacts of invasive forest species. Environ. Rev. 17:163–178.