Sensitivity of high-resolution idealized simulations of thunderstorms to horizontal resolution and turbulence parametrization

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Volumn 141, Issue 687, 2015, Pages 433-448

  Verrelle, A ^a   Ricard, D ^a   Lac, C ^a  

^a CENTRE NATIONAL DE RECHERCHES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES   (France)

Author keywords

Deep convective cloud; Horizontal grid spacing; Meso NH model; Turbulence

Indexed keywords

CLOUDS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; KINETICS; MIXING; PRECIPITATION (METEOROLOGY); RAIN; TURBULENCE; WEATHER FORECASTING;

DEEP CONVECTIVE CLOUDS; DEEP MOIST CONVECTION; HORIZONTAL GRID SPACING; HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION; MICROPHYSICAL PROCESS; MULTICELLULAR SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL PROPERTIES; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY;

KINETIC ENERGY;

CLOUD COVER; CLOUD MICROPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONVECTIVE SYSTEM; PARAMETERIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUPERCELL; THUNDERSTORM; TURBULENCE;

EID: 84924456303     PISSN: 00359009     EISSN: 1477870X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qj.2363     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adlerman EJ, Droegemeier KK. 2002. The sensitivity of numerically simulated cyclic mesocyclogenesis to variations in model physical and computational parameters. Mon. Weather Rev. 130: 2671-2691.
2. Baldauf M, Seifert A, Förstner J, Majewski D, Raschendorfer M, Reinhardt T. 2011. Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: Description and sensitivities. Mon. Weather Rev. 139: 3887-3905.
3. Bechtold P, Bazile E, Guichard F, Mascart P, Richard E. 2001. A mass-flux convection scheme for regional and global models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 127: 869-886.
4. Bougeault P. 1982. Cloud-ensemble relations based on the gamma probability distribution for the higher-order models of the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 39: 2691-2700.
5. Bougeault P, Lacarrere P. 1989. Parameterization of orography-induced turbulence in a mesobeta-scale model. Mon. Weather Rev. 117: 1872-1890.
6. Bryan GH, Morrison H. 2012. Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parametrization of microphysics. Mon. Weather Rev. 140: 202-225.
7. Bryan GH, Wyngaard JC, Fritsch JM. 2003. Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Weather Rev. 131: 2394-2416.
8. Colella P, Woodward PR. 1984. The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 54: 174-201.
9. Couvreux F, Rio C, Guichard F, Lothon M, Canut G, Bouniol D, Gounou A. 2012. Initiation of daytime local convection in a semi-arid region analysed with high-resolution simulations and AMMA observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138: 56-71.
10. Cuxart J, Jiménez M. 2007. Mixing processes in a nocturnal low-level jet: An LES study. J. Atmos. Sci. 64: 1666-1679.
11. Cuxart J, Bougeault P, Redelsperger JL. 2000. A turbulence scheme allowing for mesoscale and large-eddy simulations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 126: 1-30.
12. Davies T, Cullen MJP, Malcolm AJ, Mawson MH, Staniforth A, White AA, Wood N. 2005. A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 131: 1759-1782.
13. Dirmeyer PA, Cash BA, Kinter JL, Jung T, Marx L, Satoh M, Stan C, Tomita H, Towers P, Wedi N, Achuthavarier D, Adams JM, Altshuler EL, Huang B, Jin EK, Manganello J. 2012. Simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall in global climate models: Resolution versus parametrization. Clim. Dyn. 39: 399-418.
14. Durran DR. 1989. Improving the anelastic approximation. J. Atmos. Sci. 46: 1453-1461.
15. Fiori E, Parodi A, Siccardi F. 2009. Dealing with uncertainty: Turbulent parametrizations and grid-spacing effects in numerical modelling of deep moist convective processes. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 9: 1871-1880.
16. Fiori E, Parodi A, Siccardi F. 2010. Turbulence closure parametrization and grid spacing effects in simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci. 67: 3870-3890.
17. Fovell RG, Mullendore GL, Kim SH. 2006. Discrete propagation in numerically simulated nocturnal squall lines. Mon. Weather Rev. 134: 3735-3752.
18. Gal-Chen T, Somerville RC. 1975. On the use of a coordinate transformation for the solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 17: 209-228.
19. Hirahara YIJ, Ishimizu T. 2011. Trial operation of the local forecast model at JMA. CAS/JSC WGNE Res. Act. Atmos. Ocean Model. 41: 5.11-5.12.
20. Honnert R, Masson V, Couvreux F. 2011. A diagnostic for evaluating the representation of turbulence in atmospheric models at the kilometric scale. J. Atmos. Sci. 68: 3112-3131.
21. Houze RAJ. 1993. Cloud Dynamics, International Geophysics 53. Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
22. Janjic ZI. 2003. A non-hydrostatic model based on a new approach. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 82: 271-285.
23. Kain JS, Weiss SJ, Bright DR, Baldwin ME, Levit JJ, Carbin GW, Schwartz CS, Weisman ML, Droegemeier KK, Weber DB, Thomas KW. 2008. Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Weather and Forecasting 23: 931-952.
24. Khairoutdinov MF, Krueger SK, Moeng CH, Bogenschutz P, Randall DA. 2009. Large-eddy simulation of maritime deep tropical convection. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 1: 15, doi: 10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.15.
25. Klemp JB, Wilhelmson RB. 1978. The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci. 35: 1070-1096.
26. Krauss TW, Marwitz JD. 1984. Precipitation processes within an Alberta supercell hailstorm. J. Atmos. Sci. 41: 1025-1035.
27. Lafore JP, Stein J, Asencio N, Bougeault P, Ducrocq V, Duron J, Fischer C, Héreil P, Mascart P, Masson V, Pinty JP, Redelsperger JL, Richard E, Vilà-Guerau de Arellano J. 1997. The Meso-NH atmospheric simulation system. Part I: Adiabatic formulation and control simulations. Ann. Geophys. 16: 90-109.
28. Langhans W, Schmidli J, Schär C. 2012. Bulk convergence of cloud-resolving simulations of moist convection over complex terrain. J. Atmos. Sci. 69: 2207-2228.
29. Lean HW, Clark PA, Dixon M, Roberts NM, Fitch A, Forbes R, Halliwell C. 2008. Characteristics of high-resolution versions of the Met Office Unified Model for forecasting convection over the United Kingdom. Mon. Weather Rev. 136: 3408-3424.
30. Lemon LR, Doswell CA. 1979. Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesocyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis. Mon. Weather Rev. 107: 1184.
31. Lilly DK. 1986. The structure, energetics and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization. J. Atmos. Sci. 43: 126-140.
32. Mesinger F, Arakawa A. 1976. 'Numerical methods used in atmospheric models', Technical Report, vol. 1, GARP Publications Series No. 17. WMO/ICSU Joint Organizing Committee: Geneva, Switzerland.
33. Moeng CH, Sullivan PP, Khairoutdinov MF, Randall DA. 2010. A mixed scheme for subgrid-scale fluxes in cloud-resolving models. J. Atmos. Sci. 67: 3692-3705.
34. Narita M, Ohmori S. 2007. Improving precipitation forecasts by the operational non-hydrostatic mesoscale model with the Kain-Fritsch convective parametrization and cloud microphysics. Preprints, 12th Conference on Mesoscale Processes, paper 3.7, Waterville Valley, NH. American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA.
35. Parodi A, Tanelli S. 2010. Influence of turbulence parametrizations on high-resolution numerical modeling of tropical convection observed during the TC4 field campaign. J. Geophys. Res. 115: D00J14, doi: 10.1029/ 2009JD013302.
36. Petch J, Brown A, Gray M. 2002. The impact of horizontal resolution on the simulations of convective development over land. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128: 2031-2044.
37. Pierrehumbert RT. 1984. Local and global baroclinic instability of zonally varying flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 41: 2141-2162.
38. Pinty JP, Jabouille P. 1998. A mixed-phase cloud parametrization for use in mesoscale non-hydrostatic model: Simulations of a squall line and of orographic precipitations. Proceedings Conference of Cloud Physics, Everett WA, 217-220. American Meteorological Society: Boston, MA.
39. Redelsperger JL, Sommeria G. 1981. Méthode de représentation de la turbulence d'échelle inférieure à la maille pour un modéle tri-dimensionnel de convection nuageuse. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 21: 509-530.
40. Redelsperger J, Sommeria G. 1986. Three-dimensional simulation of a convective storm: Sensitivity studies on subgrid parametrization and spatial resolution. J. Atmos. Sci. 43: 2619-2635.
41. Ricard D, Lac C, Riette S, Legrand R, Mary A. 2013. Kinetic energy spectra characteristics of two convection-permitting limited-area models AROME and Meso-NH. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 139: 1327-1341.
42. Rotunno R. 1981. On the evolution of thunderstorm rotation. Mon. Weather Rev. 109: 577-586.
43. Rotunno R, Klemp JB. 1982. The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Weather Rev. 110: 136-151.
44. Saito K, Fujita T, Yamada Y, Ishida Ji, Kumagai Y, Aranami K, Ohmori S, Nagasawa R, Kumagai S, Muroi C, Kato T, Eito H, Yamazaki Y. 2006. The operational JMA non-hydrostatic mesoscale model. Mon. Weather Rev. 134: 1266-1298.
45. Seity Y, Brousseau P, Malardel S, Hello G, Bénard P, Bouttier F, Lac C, Masson V. 2011. The AROME-France convective-scale operational model. Mon. Weather Rev. 139: 976-991.
46. Seity Y, Ricard D, Léger J, Pietrisi M. 2014. Evaluation of increased horizontal and vertical resolutions in AROME-France deterministic forecasts for convective events. ALADIN-HIRLAM Newsl. 2: 16-19. http://www.cnrm.meteo.fr/aladin/spip.php?article260 (accessed 22 April 2014).
47. Skamarock WC. 2004. Evaluating mesoscale NWP models using kinetic energy spectra. Mon. Weather Rev. 132: 3019-3032.
48. Skamarock WC, Klemp JB. 2008. A time-split non-hydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. J. Comput. Phys. 227: 3465-3485.
49. Stout G, Huff F. 1953. Radar records Illinois tornadogenesis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 34: 281-284.
50. Takemi T, Rotunno R. 2003. The effects of subgrid model mixing and numerical filtering in simulations of mesoscale cloud systems. Mon. Weather Rev. 131: 2085-2101.
51. Warren RA, Kirshbaum DJ, Plant RS, Lean HW. 2013. A 'Boscastle-type' quasi-stationary convective system over the UK Southwest Peninsula. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140: 240-257.
52. Weisman ML, Klemp JB. 1982. The dependence of numerically simulated convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon. Weather Rev. 110: 504-520.
53. Weisman ML, Klemp JB. 1984. The structure and classification of numerically simulated convective storms in directionally varying wind shears. Mon. Weather Rev. 112: 2479-2498.
54. Weisman ML, Skamarock WC, Klemp JB. 1997. The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Weather Rev. 125: 527-548.
55. Weisman ML, Davis C, Wang W, Manning KW, Klemp JB. 2008. Experiences with 0-36-h explicit convective forecasts with the WRF-ARW model. Weather and Forecasting 23: 407-437.
56. Wyngaard JC. 2004. Toward numerical modeling in the 'Terra Incognita'. J. Atmos. Sci. 61: 1816-1826.
57. Zhang M, Zhang DL. 2012. Subkilometer simulation of a torrential-rain-producing mesoscale convective system in East China. Part I: Model verification and convective organization. Mon. Weather Rev. 140 184-201.