Towards Reproducibility in Scientific Workflows: An Infrastructure-Based Approach

Scientific Programming

Volumn 2015, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Santana Perez, Idafen ^a   Pérez Hernández, María S ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROGRAMMING THEORY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENT; EXECUTION ENVIRONMENTS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS; SCIENTIFIC WORKFLOWS; SEMANTIC MODEL; SOFTWARE AND HARDWARES; USE CASE SCENARIO;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84924363457     PISSN: 10589244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2015/243180     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. P. Mesirov, "Accessible reproducible research," Science, vol. 327, no. 5964, pp. 415-416, 2010.
2. Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman et al., "Examining the challenges of scientific workflows," Computer, vol. 40,no. 12, pp. 24-32, 2007.
3. C. Drummond, "Replicability is not reproducibility: nor is it good science," in Proceedings of the Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning Workshop at the 26th ICML, 2009.
4. K. Belhajjame, O. Corcho, D. Garijo et al., "Workflow-centric research objects: first class citizens in scholarly discourse," in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Semantic Publishing, Crete, Greece, 2012.
5. D. de Roure, K. Belhajjame, P. Missier et al., "Towards the preservation of scientific workflows," in Proceedings of the the 8th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (iPRES '11), Singapore, 2011.
6. V. G. Cerf, "Avoiding 'bit rot': long-term preservation of digital information," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 915-916, 2011.
7. J. Zhao, J. M. Gomez-Perez, K. Belhajjame et al., "Why work-flows break - understanding and combating decay in Taverna workflows," in Proceedings of the IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science, pp. 1-9, October 2012.
8. D. de Roure, C. Goble, and R. Stevens, "Designing themyexperiment virtual research environment for the social sharing of workflows," in Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on E-Science and Grid Computing (E-SCIENCE '07), pp. 603-610, IEEE, Washington, DC, USA, December 2007.
9. T. Oinn, M. Greenwood, M. Addis et al., "Taverna: Lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences,"Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1067-1100, 2006.
10. I. Wassink, P. E. van der Vet, K. Wolstencroft et al., "Analyzing scientific workflows: why workflows not only connect web services," in IEEE Congress on Services 2009, L. J. Zhang, Ed., pp. 314-321, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif, USA, July 2009.
11. P. Mates, E. Santos, J. Freire, and C. T. Silva, "Crowdlabs: social analysis and visualization for the sciences," in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management (SSDBM '11), pp. 555-564, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
12. B. Giardine, C. Riemer, R. C. Hardison et al., "Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis," Genome Research, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1451-1455, 2005.
13. M. Reich, T. Liefeld, J. Gould, J. Lerner, P. Tamayo, and J. P. Mesirov, "GenePattern 2.0," Nature Genetics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 500-501, 2006.
14. B. Matthews, A. Shaon, J. Bicarregui, J. Catherine, J. Woodcock, and E. Conway, Towards a Methodology for Software Preservation, 2009.
15. 2011, http://www.executablepapers.com/.
16. P. Van Gorp and S. Mazanek, "Share: a web portal for creating and sharing executable research papers," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 589-597, 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science, 2011.
17. G. R. Brammer, R. W. Crosby, S. J. Matthews, and T. L. Williams, "Paper mache: creating dynamic reproducible science," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 658-667, 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science (fICCSg'11).
18. P. Bonnet, S. Manegold, M. Bjørling et al., "Repeatability and workability evaluation of SIGMOD 2011," SIGMOD Record, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 45-48, 2011.
19. B. Howe, "Virtual appliances, cloud computing, and reproducible research," Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, Article ID 6193081, pp. 36-41, 2012.
20. Reproducibility in computational and experimental mathematics, 2012.
21. F. Chirigati, D. Shasha, and J. Freire, "ReproZip: using provenance to support computational reproducibility," in Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance, 2013.
22. P. J. Guo, "CDE: run any Linux application on-demand without installation," in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Large Installation System Administration (LISA '11), USENIX Association, Berkeley, Calif, USA, December 2011.
23. S. Strodl, R. Mayer, G. Antunes, D. Draws, and A. Rauber, "Digital preservation of a process and its application to escience experiments," in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (IPRES '13), 2013.
24. Puppet Labs, Puppet, http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet.
25. Opscode, Chef, http://www.opscode.com/chef/.
26. S. Azarnoosh, M. Rynge, G. Juve et al., "Introducing precip: an api for managing repeatable experiments in the cloud," in Proceedings of the IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom '13), pp. 19-26, Bristol, UK, December 2013.
27. M. Gavish and D. Donoho, "A universal identifier for computational results," Procedia Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 637-647, 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science (fICCSg '11).
28. M. Hauder, Efficient text analytics with scientific workflows [M.S. thesis], University of Augsburg, Institute for Software and Systems Engineering, Augsburg, Germany, 2011.
29. Systemtap, http://sourceware.org/systemtap/.