Why workflows break - Understanding and combating decay in Taverna workflows

2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on E-Science, e-Science 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Zhao, Jun ^a   Gomez Perez, Jose Manuel ^b   Belhajjame, Khalid ^c   Klyne, Graham ^a   Garcia Cuesta, Esteban ^b   Garrido, Aleix ^b   Hettne, Kristina ^d   Roos, Marco ^d   De Roure, David ^a   Goble, Carole ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b ISOCO   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUXILIARY RESOURCES; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; END-USERS; ROOT CAUSE; SCIENTIFIC METHOD; WORK-FLOWS; WORKFLOW EXECUTION;

EID: 84873681172     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/eScience.2012.6404482     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Open archives initiative object reuse and exchange, 2008.
2. I. Altintas, O. Barney, and E. Jaeger-Frank. Provenance collection support in the kepler scientific workflow system. Provenance and annotation of data, pages 118-132, 2006.
3. S. Bechhofer, I. Buchan, D. De Roure, P. Missier, J. Ainsworth, J. Bhagat, P. Couch, D. Cruickshank, M. Delderfield, I. Dunlop, M. Gamble, D. Michaelides, S. Owen, D. Newman, S. Sufi, and C. Goble. Why linked data is not enough for scientists. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2011.
4. Khalid Belhajjame. Semantic replaceability of escience web services. In eScience, pages 449-456. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
5. Khalid Belhajjame, Oscar Corcho, Daniel Garijo, Jun Zhao, Paolo Missier, David Newman, Raul Palma, Sean Bechhofer, Esteban Garc Cuesta, Jose Manuel Gomez-Perez, Graham Klyne, Kevin Page, Marco Roos, Jose Enrique Ruiz, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Lourdes Verdes-Montenegro, David De Roure, and Carole A. Goble. Workflow-centric research objects: First class citizens in scholarly discourse. In Proceeding of SePublica2012, pages 1-12, 2012.
6. Khalid Belhajjame, Carole A. Goble, Stian Soiland-Reyes, and David De Roure. Fostering scientific workflow preservation through discovery of substitute services. In eScience, pages 97-104. IEEE Computer Society, 2011.
7. P.E. Bourne, T. Clark, R. Dale, A. De Waard, I. Herman, E. Hovy, D. Shotton, et al. Improving future research communication and e-scholarship: a summary of findings- macquarie university researchonline. 2012. http://force11.org/white-paper.
8. S.P. Callahan, J. Freire, E. Santos, C.E. Scheidegger, C.T. Silva, and H.T. Vo. Vistrails: visualization meets data management. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, pages 745-747. ACM, 2006.
9. F. Calore, D. Lombardi, Enrico Mussi, Pierluigi Plebani, and Barbara Pernici. Retrieving substitute services using semantic annotations: A foodshop case study. In Business Process Management Workshops. Springer, 2007.
10. Z. Chen and L. Moreau. Implementation and evaluation of a protocol for recording process documentation in the presence of failures. Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes, pages 92-105, 2008.
11. S. Chin, K. Kim, and Y.S. Kim. A process-based quality management information system. Automation in Construction, 13(2):241-259, 2004.
12. P. Ciccarese, M. Ocana, L.J. Garcia Castro, S. Das, and T. Clark. An open annotation ontology for science on web 3.0. J Biomed Semantics, 2(Suppl 2):S4, 2011.
13. D. Crawl and I. Altintas. A provenance-based fault tolerance mechanism for scientific workflows. Provenance and Annotation of Data and Processes, pages 152-159, 2008.
14. D. De Roure, C. Goble, and R. Stevens. The design and realisation of the myexperiment virtual research environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems, 25:561-567, 2009.
15. M. Gamble, C. Goble, G. Klyne, and J. Zhao. Mim: A minimum information model vocabulary and framework for scientific linked data. 2012. in submission.
16. Yolanda Gil, Ewa Deelman, Mark H. Ellisman, Thomas Fahringer, Geoffrey Fox, Dennis Gannon, Carole A. Goble, Miron Livny, Luc Moreau, and Jim Myers. Examining the challenges of scientific workflows. IEEE Computer, 40(12):24-32, 2007.
17. Yolanda Gil, Varun Ratnakar, Jihie Kim, Pedro Antonio Gonzalez-Calero, Paul Groth, Joshua Moody, and Ewa Deelman. Wings: Intelligent workflow-based design of computational experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(1), 2011.
18. F. Giunchiglia and R. ChenuAbente. Scientific knowledge objects v. 1. Technical report, Technical Report DISI-09-006, University of Trento, 2009.
19. Carole A. Goble, David De Roure, and Sean Bechhofer. Accelerating scientists' knowledge turns. In Proceedings of The 3rd international IC3K joint conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management., 2012. in press.
20. P. Groth, A. Gibson, and J. Velterop. The anatomy of a nanopublication. Information Services and Use, 30(1):51-56, 2010.
21. B.M. Hales and P.J. Pronovost. The checklist-a tool for error management and performance improvement. Journal of critical care, 21(3):231-235, 2006.
22. J. Hunter. Scientific publication packages-a selective approach to the communication and archival of scientific output. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(1):33-52, 2008.
23. S. Köhler, S. Riddle, D. Zinn, T. McPhillips, and B. Ludäscher. Improving workflow fault tolerance through provenance-based recovery. In SSDBM, pages 207-224. Springer, 2011.
24. D. Koop, E. Santos, P. Mates, H.T. Vo, P. Bonnet, B. Bauer, B. Surer, M. Troyer, D.N. Williams, J.E. Tohline, et al. A provenance-based infrastructure to support the life cycle of executable papers. Procedia CS, 4:648-657, 2011.
25. Kevin Lee, Rizos Sakellariou, Norman W. Paton, and Alvaro A. A. Fernandes. Workflow adaptation as an autonomic computing problem. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Workflows in support of large-scale science, WORKS '07, pages 29-34, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
26. R. Littauer, K. Ram, B. Ludäscher, W. Michener, and R. Koskela. Trends in use of scientific workflows: Insights from a public repository and recommendations for best practices. In The Seventh International Digital Curation Conference, 2011.
27. Phillip Mates, Emanuele Santos, Juliana Freire, and Cláudio T. Silva. Crowdlabs: Social analysis and visualization for the sciences. In SSDBM, pages 555-564. Springer, 2011.
28. B. Matthews, A. Shaon, J. Bicarregui, and C. Jones. A framework for software preservation. International Journal of Digital Curation, 5(1), 2010.
29. Paolo Missier, Stian Soiland-Reyes, Stuart Owen, Wei Tan, Aleksandra Nenadic, Ian Dunlop, Alan Williams, Tom Oinn, and Carole A. Goble. Taverna, reloaded. In SSDBM, pages 471-481. Springer, 2010.
30. David Newman, Sean bechhofer, and David De Roure. myexperiment: An ontology for e-research. In Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse in conjunction with the International Semantic Web Conference, 2009.
31. Thomas M. Oinn and Et Al. Taverna: lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 18(10):1067-1100, 2006.
32. David De Roure, Khalid Belhajjame, and Et Al. Towards the preservation of scientific workflows. In Procs. of the 8th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (iPRES 2011). ACM, 2011.
33. C.F. Taylor, D. Field, S.A. Sansone, J. Aerts, R. Apweiler, M. Ashburner, C.A. Ball, P.A. Binz, M. Bogue, T. Booth, et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the mibbi project. Nature biotechnology, 26(8):889-896, 2008.
34. P. Van Gorpa and S. Mazanekb. Share: a web portal for creating and sharing executable research papers. Procedia Computer Science, 4:589-597, 2011.
35. I. Wassink, P.E. van der Vet, K. Wolstencroft, P.B.T. Neerincx, M. Roos, H. Rauwerda, and T.M. Breit. Analysing scientific workflows: Why workflows not only connect web services. In 2009 World Conference on Services - I, pages 314-321, 2009.