Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 93, Issue , 2015, Pages 91-101

  López Gómez, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ageing; Autonomy; Care; Innovation; Socio technical arrangements; Telecare

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

AGEING; AUTONOMY; CARE; SOCIOTECHNICAL; TELECARE;

INNOVATION;

AUTONOMY; DISABILITY; ELDERLY POPULATION; INNOVATION;

EID: 84924353485     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. de Moustier G. Aging at Home: The Story of Odile URL:. http://www.gratianedemoustier.com/Resources/gdemoustierodilen.jpeg.
2. Polivka L., Moody H.R. A debate on the ethics of aging: does the concept of autonomy provide a sufficient framework for aging policy?. J. Aging Identity 2001, 6(4):223-237.
3. Walker A. The emergence and application of active aging in Europe. Soziale Lebenslaufpolitik, VS Verlag fuÇr Sozialwissenschaften 2010, 585-601. G. Naegele (Ed.).
4. Malanowski N., Ozcivelek R., Cabrera M. Active ageing and independent living services. The Role of Information and Communication Technology, European Commission 2008, (URL: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1561).
5. Joyce K.A., Loe M., Joyce K.A., Loe M. Technogenarians: Studying Health and Illness Through An Ageing, Science, and Technology Lens 2010, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester; Malden, MA.
6. Brownsell S., Bradley D. Assistive Technology and Telecare. Forging Solutions for Independent Living 2003, The Polity Press, Bristol.
7. Stenner P., McFarquhar T., Bowling A. Older people and 'active ageing': subjective aspects of ageing actively. J. Health Psychol. 2011, 16(3):467-477.
8. López D., Domènech M. Embodying autonomy in a home telecare service. Sociol. Rev. 2009, 56(s2):181-195.
9. Crabtree A. Design in the Absence of Practice: Breaching Experiments, DIS2004, ACM, August 1-4, Cambridge Massachusetts USA 2004, 59-68.
10. Blaschke M., Freddolino P., Mullen E. Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. Br. J. Soc. Work. 2009, 39(4):641-656.
11. Söderlund R. The role of information and communication technology in home services: telecare does not satisfy the needs of the elderly. Health Inform. J. 2004, 10(2):127-137.
12. Roberts C., Mort M. Reshaping what counts as care: older people, work and new technologies. ALTER - Eur. J. Disabil. Res. 2009, 3(2):138-158.
13. López D., Callén B., Tirado F., Domènech M. How to become a guardian angel? Providing safety in a home telecare service. Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms 2010, 73-91. transcript-Verlag, Bielefeld. A. Mol, I. Moser, J. Pols (Eds.).
14. Roberts C., Mort M., Milligan C. Calling for care: 'disembodied' work, teleoperators and older people living at home. Sociology 2011, 46(3):490-506.
15. Pols J. The heart of the matter. About good nursing and telecare. Health Care Anal. 2010, 18(4):374-388.
16. Milligan C., Roberts C., Mort M. Telecare and older people: who cares where?. Soc. Sci. Med. 2011, 72(3):347-354.
17. López D., Sánchez-Criado T. Dwelling the telecare home: place, location and habitality. Space Cult. 2009, 12(3):343-358.
18. Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2012, 42(1):121-142.
19. Pols J., Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol. Health Illn. 2011, 33(3):484-498.
20. Hyysalo S. Representations of use and practice-bound imaginaries in automating the safety of the elderly. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2006, 36(4):599-626.
21. Neven L. 'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol. Health Illn. 2010, 32(2):335-347.
22. Sevenhuijsen S. The place of care: the relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Fem. Theory 2003, 4(2):179-197.
23. Kittay E.F., Jennings B., Wasunna A.A. Dependency, difference and the global ethic of longterm care. J. Polit. Philos. 2005, 13(4):443-469.
24. Katz S. Growing older without aging? Positive aging, anti-ageism, and anti-aging. Generations 2001, 25(4):27-32.
25. Agich G.J. Dependence and Autonomy in Old Age 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York.
26. Hale B., Barrett P., Gauld R. The Age of Supported Independence 2010, Springer, Dordrecht; Heidelberg; London; New York.
27. Winance M. Care and disability. Practices of experimenting, tinkering with, and arranging people and technical aids. Care in Practice. On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms 2010, 93-117. transcript-Verlag, Bielefeld. A. Mol, I. Moser, J. Pols (Eds.).
28. Thygesen H., Moser I. Technology and good dementia care: an argument for an ethics-in-practice approach. New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care 2010, 129-147. Ashgate, New York. M. Schillmeier, M. Domènech (Eds.).
29. Leigh Star S. The ethnography of infrastructure. Am. Behav. Sci. 1999, 43(3):377-391.
30. Langstrup H. Chronic care infrastructures and the home. Sociol. Health Illn. 2013, 35(7):1008-1022.
31. Callon M. Economic Markets and the Rise of Interactive Agencements: From Prosthetic Agencies to Habilitated Agencies 2008, 29-56. The MIT Press, Cambridge London. T. Pinch, R. Swedberg (Eds.).
32. Brandt E., Binder T., Malmborg L. Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction. OZCHI 2010, ACM, November 22-26, Brisbane, Australia 2010, 400-403.
33. Denis J., Pontille D. Material ordering and the care of things. CSI Working Papers Series, Paris 2013, (URL: http://hal-ensmp.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00875511).
34. Winance M. Trying out the wheelchair: the mutual shaping of people and devices through adjustment. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2006, 31(1):52-72.
35. Moreira T.E. Self, agency and the surgical collective: detachment. Sociol. Health Illn. 2004, 26(1):32-49.
36. Danholt P. Factish relations: affective bodies in diabetes treatment. Health 2012, 17(4):375-390.
37. Sánchez-Criado T., López D., Roberts C., Domènech M. Installing Telecare, Installing Users, Science, Technology & Values 2014, (forthcoming, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243913517011).
38. López D. The securitization of care spaces: lessons from telecare. New Technologies and Emerging Spaces of Care 2010, 39-56. Ashgate, New York. M. Schillmeier, M. Domènech (Eds.).
39. Bowlby S. Friendship, co-presence and care: neglected spaces. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2011, 12(6):605-622.
40. Twigg J. Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing Soc. 2000, 20(04):389-411.
41. Latour B. Factures/fractures: from the concept of network to the concept of attachment, RES. Anthropol. Aesthet. 1999, 36:20-31.
42. Stengers I. Introductory notes on an ecology of practices. Cult. Stud. Rev. 2005, 11(1):183-196.
43. Hennion A. Attachments: things that hold us. The First European Pragmatism Conference, 19-20 September, Roma 2012.
44. Suchman L. Working relations of technology production and use. Comput. Supported Coop. Work 2013, 2(1-2):21-39.
45. Dankl K. 31m2 and style. Design Anthropology: Object Culture in the 21st Century 2011, 212-228. Springer, Wien; New York. A.J. Clarke (Ed.).
46. Brereton M. Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman. Interactions 2013, 20(4):20-24.
47. Design Anthropology: Object Culture in the 21st Century 2011, Springer, Wien; New York. A.J. Clarke (Ed.).
48. Haddon L. Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Can. J. Commun. 2011, 36(2):311-323.
49. Akrich M. Les objects techniques et leurs utilisateurs. Les objets dans l'action: De la maison au laboratoire, Editions de l'Ecole des hautes études de sciences sociales, Paris 1993, 36-57. B. Conein, N. Dodier, L. Thévenot (Eds.).
50. Subasi G.Fitzpatrick, Malmborg L., Östlund B. Design culture for ageing well: designing for 'situated elderliness'. Human Factors in Computing and Informatics 2013, 581-584.
51. Palen L., Aaløkke S. Of pill boxes and piano benches. "Home-Made" Methods for Managing Medication, CSCW '06, ACM, November 4-8, Banff, Alberta, Canada 2006, 79-88.
52. Loe M. Doing it my way: old women, technology and wellbeing. Sociol. Health Illn. 2010, 32(2):319-334.
53. Peine A., Rollwagen I., Neven L. The rise of the "innosumer"-rethinking older technology users. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 2014(82):199-214.
54. Östlund B. Silver Age Innovators: A New Approach to Old Users 2011, 15-26. Springer. F. Kohlbacher, C. Herstatt (Eds.).
55. Essén A., Östlund B. Laggards as innovators? Old users as designers of new services & service systems. Int. J. Des. 2011, 5(3):89-98.
56. Peine A., Herrmann A.M. The sources of use knowledge: towards integrating the dynamics of technology use and design in the articulation of societal challenges. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79(8):1495-1512.
57. Thrift N. Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification. Econ. Soc. 2006, 35(02):279-306.
58. Puig de la Bellacasa M. 'Nothing comes without its world': thinking with care. Sociol. Rev. 2012, 60(2):197-216.