Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  King, Katherine F ^a   Kolopack, Pamela ^a,d   Merritt, Maria W ^b,c   Lavery, James V ^a,d  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community engagement; Ethics; Global health; Legitimacy; Respect

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ETHICS; HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GLOBAL HEALTH; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84924328818     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-84     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Glickman SW, McHutchison JG, Peterson ED, Cairns CB, Harrington RA, Califf RM, Schulman KA: Ethical and scientific implications of the globalization of clinical research. N Engl J Med 2009, 360(8):816-823.
2. London AJ: Justice and the human development approach to international research. Hastings Cent Rep 2005, 35(1):24-37.
3. Horton R: Is global health neocolonialist? Lancet 2013, 382:1690.
4. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, Sangkuma U, Mock PA, MAppStats, Leethochawalit M, Chiamwongpaet S, Kitisin P, Natrujirote P, Kittimunkong S, Chuachoowong R, Gvetadze RJ, McNicholl JM, Paxton LA, Curlin ME, Hendrix CW, Vanichseni S, for the Bangkok Tenofovir Study Group: Anti-retroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): A randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2013, 381:2083-2090.
5. Loff B, Jenkins C, Ditmore M, Overs C, Barbero R: Unethical clinical trials in Thailand a community response. Lancet 2005, 365:1618-1619.
6. Jintarkarnon S, Nakapiew S, Tienudom N, Suwannawong P, Wilson D: Unethical clinical trials in Thailand a community response. Lancet 2005, 365:1617-1618.
7. Warren M: Listening to women's Voices in HIV Prevention. Huffington Post; [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchellwarren/listening-towomensvoice-b-2829570.html].
8. Biehl J, Petryna A: Critical global health. In When People Come First: Critical Studies in Global Health. Edited by Biehl J, Petryna A. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2014:1-20.
9. Participants in the Community Engagement and Consent Workshop, Kilifi, Kenya, March 2011: Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts: reviewing and developing research and practice. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2013, 8(4):1-18.
10. President's Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues in Research, International Research Panel: Research Across Borders; [http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/IRP-%20Research%20Across%20Borders.pdf].
11. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues: Moral Science: Protecting Participants in Human Subjects Research; [http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/Moral%20Science%20-%20Final.pdf].
12. Cox LE, Rouff JR, Svendsen KH, Markowitz M, Abrams DI, the Terry Biern: Community programs for clinical research on AIDS. Community advisory boards: Their role in AIDS clinical trials. Health Soc Work 1998, 23(4):290-297.
13. Buchanan D, Sifunda S, Naidoo N, Reddy P, James S: Assuring adequate protections in international health research. A principled justification and practical recommendations for the role of community oversight. Public Health Ethics 2008, 1(3):246-257.
14. Reddy P, Buchanan D, Sifunda S, James S, Naidoo N: The role of community advisory boards in health research: divergent views in the South African experience. J Soc Asp HIV/AIDS 2010, 7(3):2-8.
15. Bandewar SVS, Kimani J, Lavery JV: The origins of a research community in the majengo observational cohort study, Nairobi Kenya. BMC Public Health 2010, 10:630.
16. Upshur REG, Lavery JV, Tindana PO: Taking Tissues Seriously Means Taking Communities Seriously. Ethics: BioMedCentral Medical; 2007:8(11). doi:10.1186/1472-6939-8-11.
17. Mfutso-Bengu JM, Taylor TE: Ethical jurisdictions in biomedical research. Trends Parasitol 2002, 18:231-234.
18. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS): Good participatory practice guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials. Secondth edition. Geneva, Switzerland; 2010.
19. Clinical Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement: Principles of Community Engagement. Second edition. NIH Publication no 11-7782; 2011 [http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE-Report-508-FINAL.pdf].
20. Dickert NW, Sugarman J: Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health 2005, 95:1123-1127.
21. Dickert NW: Re-examining respect for human research participants. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2009, 19:311-338.
22. Darwall SL: Two kinds of respect. Ethics 1977, 88:36-49.
23. Gutmann A, Thompson D: Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 2009.
24. Subramaniam TSS, Lee HL, Ahmad NW, Murad S: Genetically modified mosquito: The Malaysian public engagement experience. Biotechnol J 2012, 7:1321-1327.
25. Editorial: Letting the bugs out of the bag. Nature 2011, 470:139.
26. Weijer C, Emanuel E: Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science 2000, 289:1142-1144.
27. Lavery JV, Tinadana PO, Scott TW, Harrington LC, Ramsey JM, Ytuarte-Nuñez C, James AA: Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends Parasitol 2010, 26(6):279-283.