The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  McCarthy, Marie ^a   Keller, Brad ^b   Kontos, Despina ^b   Boghossian, Leigh ^c   McGuire, Erin ^b   Bristol, Mirar ^a   Chen, Jinbo ^b   Domchek, Susan ^c   Armstrong, Katrina ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; BODY MASS; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CAUCASIAN; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; GENETICS; MUTATION; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENES, BRCA2; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUTATION; ODDS RATIO; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924275600     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-014-0509-4     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716-26. Published errata appear in Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:199-200, and Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:688.
2. Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:481-92. A published erratum appears in Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:658.
3. Chubak J, Boudreau DM, Fishman PA, Elmore JG. Cost of breast-related care in the year following false positive screening mammograms. Med Care. 2010;48:815-20.
4. Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:502-10.
5. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1879-86.
6. Rockhill B, Spiegelman D, Byrne C, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA. Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:358-66.
7. Wacholder S, Hartge P, Prentice R, Garcia-Closas M, Feigelson HS, Diver WR, et al. Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:986-93.
8. Gail MH. Discriminatory accuracy from single-nucleotide polymorphisms in models to predict breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1037-41.
9. Gail MH, Mai PL. Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:665-8.
10. Gail MH. Value of adding single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes to a breast cancer risk model. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:959-63.
11. Mealiffe ME, Stokowski RP, Rhees BK, Prentice RL, Pettinger M, Hinds DA. Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1618-27.
12. Dite GS, Mahmoodi M, Bickerstaffe A, Hammet F, Macinnis RJ, Tsimiklis H, et al. Using SNP genotypes to improve the discrimination of a simple breast cancer risk prediction model. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:887-96.
13. Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R25.
14. Husing A, Canzian F, Beckmann L, Garcia-Closas M, Diver WR, Thun MJ, et al. Prediction of breast cancer risk by genetic risk factors, overall and by hormone receptor status. J Med Genet. 2012;49:601-8.
15. Barlow WE, White E, Ballard-Barbash R, Vacek PM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Carney PA, et al. Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1204-14.
16. Boyle P, Mezzetti M, La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, Decarli A, Robertson C. Contribution of three components to individual cancer risk predicting breast cancer risk in Italy. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2004;13:183-91.
17. Colditz GA, Rosner B. Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:950-64.
18. Rosner B, Colditz GA. Nurses' health study: log-incidence mathematical model of breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:359-64.
19. Pfeiffer RM, Park Y, Kreimer AR, Lacey Jr JV, Pee D, Greenlee RT, et al. Risk prediction for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in white women aged 50 y or older: derivation and validation from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001492.
20. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:409-30.
21. Burnside ES, Chhatwal J, Alagoz O. What is the optimal threshold at which to recommend breast biopsy? PLoS One. 2012;7:e48820.
22. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
23. Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, et al. Pathologic findings from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer. 2006;106:732-42.
24. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology. 1999;211:845-50.
25. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006;239:385-91.
26. Poplack SP, Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Wells WA, Carney PA. Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network. Radiology. 2000;217:832-40.
27. Lo JY, Markey MK, Baker JA, Floyd Jr CE. Cross-institutional evaluation of BI-RADS predictive model for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:457-63.
28. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:35-40.
29. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd Jr CE. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:773-8.
30. Flowers CI, O'Donoghue C, Moore D, Goss A, Kim D, Kim JH, et al. Reducing false-positive biopsies: a pilot study to reduce benign biopsy rates for BI-RADS 4A/B assessments through testing risk stratification and new thresholds for intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139:769-77.
31. Armstrong K, Handorf EA, Chen J, Bristol Demeter MN. Breast cancer risk prediction and mammography biopsy decisions: a model-based study. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44:15-22.
32. The Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda. 2011. www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool. Accessed 1 Nov 2013.
33. Cox A, Dunning AM, Garcia-Closas M, Balasubramanian S, Reed MW, Pooley KA, et al. A common coding variant in CASP8 is associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2007;39:352-8. A published erratum appears in Nat Genet. 2007;39:688.
34. Stacey SN, Manolescu A, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Gudmundsson J, Gudjonsson SA, et al. Common variants on chromosomes 2q35 and 16q12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:865-9.
35. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, Pharoah PD, Thompson D, Ballinger DG, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature. 2007;447:1087-93.
36. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, Cox DG, Yeager M, Hankinson SE, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2007;39:870-4.
37. Stacey SN, Manolescu A, Sulem P, Thorlacius S, Gudjonsson SA, Jonsson GF, et al. Common variants on chromosome 5p12 confer susceptibility to estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2008;40:703-6.
38. Garcia-Closas M, Hall P, Nevanlinna H, Pooley K, Morrison J, Richesson DA, et al. Heterogeneity of breast cancer associations with five susceptibility loci by clinical and pathological characteristics. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000054.
39. Thomas G, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, Yeager M, Wacholder S, Cox DG, et al. A multistage genome-wide association study in breast cancer identifies two new risk alleles at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1). Nat Genet. 2009;41:579-84.
40. Ahmed S, Thomas G, Ghoussaini M, Healey CS, Humphreys MK, Platte R, et al. Newly discovered breast cancer susceptibility loci on 3p24 and 17q23.2. Nat Genet. 2009;41:585-90.
41. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90:1371-88.
42. Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM, Cecchini RS, Atkins JN, et al. Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2727-41.
43. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.
44. Park JH, Gail MH, Greene MH, Chatterjee N. Potential usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphisms to identify persons at high cancer risk: an evaluation of seven common cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2157-62.
45. Warren Andersen S, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE, Hampton JM, Figueroa JD, Skinner HG, et al. The associations between a polygenic score, reproductive and menstrual risk factors and breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:427-34.
46. Chen J, Pee D, Ayyagari R, Graubard B, Schairer C, Byrne C, et al. Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1215-26.
47. Mazouni C, Sneige N, Rouzier R, Balleyguier C, Bevers T, Andre F, et al. A nomogram to predict for malignant diagnosis of BI-RADS Category 4 breast lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102:220-4.
48. Weaver DL, Vacek PM, Skelly JM, Geller BM. Predicting biopsy outcome after mammography: what is the likelihood the patient has invasive or in situ breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12:660-73.
49. Suzuki R, Orsini N, Saji S, Key TJ, Wolk A. Body weight and incidence of breast cancer defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status-a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:698-712.
50. Huo D, Zheng Y, Ogundiran TO, Adebamowo C, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, et al. Evaluation of 19 susceptibility loci of breast cancer in women of African ancestry. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:835-40.
51. Zheng Y, Ogundiran TO, Adebamowo C, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Rebbeck TR, et al. Lack of association between common single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TERT-CLPTM1L locus and breast cancer in women of African ancestry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:341-5.
52. Chen F, Chen GK, Millikan RC, John EM, Ambrosone CB, Bernstein L, et al. Fine-mapping of breast cancer susceptibility loci characterizes genetic risk in African Americans. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4491-503.
53. Hutter CM, Young AM, Ochs-Balcom HM, Carty CL, Wang T, Chen CT, et al. Replication of breast cancer GWAS susceptibility loci in the Women's Health Initiative African American SHARe Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1950-9.
54. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Shetty PB, Guan X, Nyante SJ, Luo J, Brennan DJ, et al. FGFR2 and other loci identified in genome-wide association studies are associated with breast cancer in African-American and younger women. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:1417-23.
55. Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Rosenberg L, Cozier YC, Cupples LA, Adams-Campbell LL, Palmer JR. Polymorphisms in the TOX3/LOC643714 locus and risk of breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1320-7.
56. Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Rosenberg L, Rotimi CN, Cupples LA, Boggs DA, Adeyemo A, et al. Genetic variants on chromosome 5p12 are associated with risk of breast cancer in African American women: the Black Women's Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123:525-30.
57. Rebbeck TR, DeMichele A, Tran TV, Panossian S, Bunin GR, Troxel AB, et al. Hormone-dependent effects of FGFR2 and MAP3K1 in breast cancer susceptibility in a population-based sample of post-menopausal African-American and European-American women. Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:269-74.
58. Zheng W, Cai Q, Signorello LB, Long J, Hargreaves MK, Deming SL, et al. Evaluation of 11 breast cancer susceptibility loci in African-American women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2761-4.
59. Long J, Zhang B, Signorello LB, Cai Q, Deming-Halverson S, Shrubsole MJ, et al. Evaluating genome-wide association study-identified breast cancer risk variants in African-American women. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58350.
60. Palmer JR, Ruiz-Narvaez EA, Rotimi CN, Cupples LA, Cozier YC, Adams-Campbell LL, et al. Genetic susceptibility loci for subtypes of breast cancer in an African American population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:127-34.
61. Huang T, Hong J, Lin W, Yang Q, Ni K, Wu Q, et al. Assessing interactions between common genetic variant on 2q35 and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk: evidence based on 26 studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69056.
62. Wang X, Zhang L, Chen Z, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Rewuti A, et al. Association between 5p12 genomic markers and breast cancer susceptibility: evidence from 19 case-control studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e73611.
63. Yu Y, Chen Z, Wang H, Zhang Y. Quantitative assessment of common genetic variants on chromosome 5p12 and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72154.
64. Wu S, Cai J, Wang H, Zhang H, Yang W. Association between 1p11-rs11249433 Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: evidence from 15 case-control studies. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72526.
65. Gu C, Zhou L, Yu J. Quantitative assessment of 2q35-rs13387042 polymorphism and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk. PLoS One. 2013;8:e66979.
66. Chen Q, Shi R, Liu W, Jiang D. Assessing interactions between the association of common genetic variant at 1p11 (rs11249433) and hormone receptor status with breast cancer risk. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72487.
67. Michailidou K, Hall P, Gonzalez-Neira A, Ghoussaini M, Dennis J, Milne RL, et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2013;45:353-61. e1-e2.