"Entrenched practices and other biases": Unpacking the historical, economic, professional, and social resistance to de-implementation

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Montini, Theresa ^a   Graham, Ian D ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

De implementation; Evidence based medicine; Social science

Indexed keywords

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HISTORY; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; MASTECTOMY; POLITICS; RADICAL MASTECTOMY; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, RADICAL; POLITICS; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84924249910     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-015-0211-7     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998;317:465-8.
2. Gabbay J, le May A. Practice-based evidence for healthcare: clinical mindlines. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2011.
3. Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13-24.
4. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Lavis JN, Hill SJ, Squires JE. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation science: IS. 2012;7:50.
5. Ioannidis JP. Evolution and translation of research findings: from bench to where? PLoS clinical trials. 2006;1:e36.
6. Montini T, Slobin K. Tensions between good science and good practice: lagging behind and leapfrogging ahead along the cancer care continuum. Research in the Sociology of Health Care. 1991;9:127-40.
7. Prasad V, Ioannidis JP. Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices. Implementation science: IS. 2014;9:1.
8. Dowd III CN. A study of twenty-nine cases of cancer of the breast submitted to operation. Ann Sug. 1898;27:285-302.
9. Halsted WS. I. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20:497-555.
10. Gross SW. A clinical study of carcinoma of the breast, and its treatment. Am J Med Sci. 1888;XCV:341-56.
11. Gross SW. The treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Med Surg Rep. 1888;LIX:499-502.
12. Fowler GR. Some experiences in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the breast. Brooklyn Med J. 1890;IV:718-27.
13. Oliver JC. Cancer of the breast: remarks on pathology and treatment. Med Surg Rep. 1895;LXXIII:125-8.
14. Meyer W. An improved method of the radical operation of carcinoma of the breast. Med Rec. 1894;XL:746-9.
15. Leopold E. A darker ribbon: breast cancer, women, and their doctors in the twentieth century. Boston, Mass: Beacon; 1999.
16. McWhirter R. The value of simple mastectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of cancer of the breast. Br J Radiol. 1948;21:599-610.
17. McWhirter R. Simple mastectomy and radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 1955;28:128-39.
18. Crile G. Simplified treatment of cancer of the breast: early results of a clinical study. Ann Surg. 1961;153:745-58.
19. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: treatment of early stage breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;1992:1-187.
20. Atkins H, Hayward JL, Klugman DJ, Wayte AB. Treatment of early breast cancer: a report after ten years of a clinical trial. Br Med J. 1972;2:423-9.
21. Jatoi I, Proschan MA. Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol. 2005;28:289-94.
22. Yang SH, Yang KH, Li YP, Zhang YC, He XD, Song AL, et al. Breast conservation therapy for stage I or stage II breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1039-44.
23. National Cancer Institute. NCI dictionary of cancer terms. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health; 2014. http://www.cancer.gov/dictionary.
24. Graham I. I believe therefore I practise. Lancet. 1996;347:4-5.
25. Muñoz E, Shamash F, Friedman M, Teicher I, Wise L. Lumpectomy vs mastectomy. The costs of breast preservation for cancer. Arch Surg. 1986;121:1297-301.
26. Palit TK, Miltenburg DM, Brunicardi FC. Cost analysis of breast conservation surgery compared with modified radical mastectomy with and without reconstruction. Am J Surg. 2000;179:441-5.
27. Montini T, Ruzek S. Overturning orthodoxy: the emergence of breast cancer treatment policy. Res Sociol Health Care. 1989;8:3-32.
28. Wilson Company HW. Readers' guide to periodical literature. Minneapolis: H.W. Wilson Co.; 1905.
29. Ulrich CF. Ulrich's international periodicals directory. New York: R.R. Bowker; 1965.
30. "Breast cancer debate: mastectomy study." Newsweek. 121. (November 16, 1970).
31. Maisel AQ. "Controversy over breast cancer: radical mastectomy." Reader's Digest. 1971;151-156
32. Campion R. "Right to choose: mastectomy?" McCalls. 1972;64+.
33. "Breast cancer: the retreat from radical surgery." Consumer Reports. 1981;24-30.
34. Block JL, Goldsmith C. "I said no to my doctors (decision to have mastectomy or radiation therapy)," Good Housekeeping. 1983; vol. March: p. 92+.
35. Silberner J. "Breast cancer: death to the radical? (mastectomy versus lumpectomy).". Science News. 1985;127(11):165.
36. Snider AJ. "Patient should have a choice: mastectomy decision; views of G. Crile, Jr." Science Digest. 1973;54-55
37. "Breast removal for cancer may soon be outdated (views of Bernard Fisher)." Jet. 1985;69(15):25.
38. Weiss R. "New treatment may reduce breast surgeries (chemotherapy followed by lumpectomy and radiation)." Science News. 1989;325-6
39. ABC News. (March 13, 1985) Breast cancer: support for lumpectomy. Nightline
40. Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526-33.
41. Gomez SL, Lichtensztajn D, Kurian AW, Telli ML, Chang ET, Keegan TH, et al. Increasing mastectomy rates for early-stage breast cancer? Population-based trends from California. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:e155-7.
42. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. "National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - breast cancer". Fort Washington, Pennsylvania; 2009. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
43. West C. Routine complications: troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1984.
44. Canadian Institute for Health Information. "Breast cancer surgery in Canada 2007-2008 to 2009-2010". Ottawa, Ontario. https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productFamily.htm?locale=en&pf=PFC1936. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
45. Epstein S. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996.
46. Graham ID. Episiotomy: challenging obstetric interventions. Oxford. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Science; 1997.
47. Graham ID, Logan J, Davies B, Nimrod C. Changing the use of electronic fetal monitoring and labor support: a case study of barriers and facilitators. Birth. 2004;31:293-301.
48. Montini T, Bero LA. Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development. Tob Control. 2001;10:218-24.
49. Bowen S, Graham ID. Integrated knowledge translation. In: Straus SE, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons/BMJ/Book; 2013. p. 14-23.
50. Ong BN, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Bower P, Sanders T, Morden A, et al. Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self-management behaviour in chronic conditions. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36:226-38.
51. Aggarwal NK, Nicasio AV, DeSilva R, Boiler M, Lewis-Fernandez R. Barriers to implementing the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview: a qualitative study. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2013;37:505-33.
52. Obstfelder A, Engeseth KH, Wynn R. Characteristics of successfully implemented telemedical applications. Implementation science: IS. 2007;2:25.
53. Timmermans S, Berg M. The practice of medical technology. Sociol Health Illn. 2003;25:97-114.
54. Wertz RW, Wertz DC. Lying-in: a history of childbirth in America. Expandedth ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989.
55. Barley SR. Technology as an occasion for -structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social-order of radiology departments. Adm Sci Q. 1986;31:78-108.
56. Guyatt G. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;268:2420-5.