Review of clinical outcomes-based anchors of minimum clinically important differences in hip and knee registry-based reports and publications

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 98-103

  Romero, Lucas ^a   Nieuwenhuijse, Marc ^b   Carr, Andrew ^c   Sedrakyan, Art ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTER; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84924227797     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00464     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome measures and health economic aspects of total hip arthroplasty. A study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; 2010.
2. Neuburger J, Hutchings A, Black N, van der Meulen JH. Socioeconomic differences in patient-reported outcomes after a hip or knee replacement in the English National Health Service. J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Mar;35(1):115-24. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):867-75.
4. Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
5. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.
6. Dawson J, Doll H, Boller I, Fitzpatrick R, Little C, Rees J, Carr A. Factors associated with satisfaction in patients undergoing elbow surgery: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul;19(5):635-44. Epub 2010 May 10.
7. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
8. Franklin PD, Allison JJ, Ayers DC. Beyond joint implant registries: a patient-centered research consortium for comparative effectiveness in total joint replacement. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1217-8.
9. Rising JP, Reynolds IS, Sedrakyan A. Delays and difficulties in assessing metal-on-metal hip implants. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):e1. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10. Graves SE, Rothwell A, Tucker K, Jacobs JJ, Sedrakyan A. A multinational assessment of metal-on-metal bearings in hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(Suppl 3):43-7.
11. Rumsfeld JS, MaWhinney S, McCarthy M Jr, Shroyer AL, VillaNueva CB, O'Brien M, Moritz TE, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Sethi GK, Hammermeister KE. Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery. JAMA. 1999 Apr 14;281(14):1298-303.
12. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Jun;71(3):262-7.
13. Keurentjes JC, Van Tol FR, Fiocco M, Schoones JW, Nelissen RG. Minimal clinically important differences in health-related quality of life after total hip or knee replacement: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2012 May;1(5):71-7. Epub 2012 May 1.
14. Parker SL, Godil SS, Shau DN, Mendenhall SK, McGirt MJ. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
15. Rothwell A, Hobbs T, Frampton C. New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. New Zealand Joint Registry Thirteen Year Report January 1999 to December 2011. 2012. http://nzoa.org.nz/system/files/NJR%2013%20Year%20Report.pdf. Accessed 2014 May 12.
16. Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Mar;92(3):413-8.
17. Grosse Frie K, van der Meulen J, Black N. Relationship between patients' reports of complications and symptoms, disability and quality of life after surgery. Br J Surg. 2012 Aug;99(8):1156-63. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
18. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90.
19. Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties-a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20:1037-41.
20. Sedrakyan A, Paxton EW, Marinac-Dabic D. Stages and tools for multinational collaboration: the perspective from the coordinating center of the International Consortium of Orthopaedic Registries (ICOR). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21; 93(Suppl 3):76-80.