Factors associated with satisfaction in patients undergoing elbow surgery: A prospective study

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 635-644

  Dawson, Jill ^a   Doll, Helen ^a   Boller, Irene ^a   Fitzpatrick, Ray ^a   Little, Christopher ^b   Rees, Jonathan ^c   Carr, Andrew ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD ORTHOPAEDIC CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elbow; outcomes; satisfaction; surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPICONDYLITIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT STIFFNESS; JOINT SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SHORT FORM 36; ADOLESCENT; CONVALESCENCE; ELBOW; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ELBOW; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77953122471     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Altman D.G. Practical statistics for medical research. 1st ed. (1991), Chapman & Hall, London
2. Buchbinder R., Green S., Bell S., Barnsley L., Smidt N., and Assendelft W.J.J. Surgery for lateral elbow pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2002) CD003525
3. Cleary P.D., and McNeil B.J. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 25 (1988) 25-36
4. Dawson J., Doll H., Boller I., et al. The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90 (2008) 466-473
5. Dawson J., Doll H., Boller I., et al. Comparative responsiveness and minimal change for the Oxford Elbow score following surgery. Qual Life Res 17 (2008) 1257-1267
6. Dawson J., Doll H., Coffey J., and on behalf of Oxford and Birmingham Foot and Ankle Clinical Research Group. Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 15 (2007) 918-931
7. Fortin P.R., Penrod J.R., Clarke A.E., St-Pierre Y., Joseph L., Belisle P., et al. Timing of total joint replacement affects clinical outcomes among patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Arthritis Rheum 46 (2002) 3327-3330
8. Gay R.E., Amadio P.C., and Johnson J.C. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and the hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg [Am] 28 (2003) 250-254
9. Hajat S., Fitzpatrick R., Morris R., et al. Does waiting for total hip replacement matter? Prospective cohort study. J Health Serv Res Policy 7 (2002) 19-25
10. Hosmer Jr. D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. (2000), John Wiley & Sons, New York
11. Hudak P.L., Amadio P.C., and Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) [published erratum appears in Am J Ind Med 1996;30:372]. Am J Ind Med 29 (1996) 602-608
12. Jenkinson C. Measuring health and medical outcomes: an overview. In: Jenkinson C. (Ed). Measuring health and medical outcomes. 1st ed (1994), UCL Press, London 1-6
13. Jenkinson C., Stewart-Brown S., Petersen S., and Paice C. Evaluation of the SF-36 version II in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health 53 (1999) 46-50
14. Kennedy D.M., Hanna S.E., Stratford P.W., Wessel J., and Gollish J.D. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21 (2006) 559-566
15. MacDonald D. The shoulder and elbow. In: Pynsent P., Fairbank J., and Carr A. (Eds). Outcome measures in orthopaedics (1993), Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford
16. Moran M., Khan A., Sochart D.H., and Andrew G. Expect the best, prepare for the worst: surgeon and patient expectation of the outcome of primary total hip and knee replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 (2003) 204-206
17. Morrey B.F., and An K.N. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey B.F. (Ed). The elbow and its disorders (1993), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 74-83
18. Pynsent P., Fairbank J.T.C., and Carr A. Outcome measures in orthopaedics. 1st ed. (1993), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
19. Schneider W., and Knahr K. Surgery for hallux valgus. The expectations of patients and surgeons. Int Orthop 25 (2001) 382-385
20. SPSS Inc. SPSS statistical software. Release 15.0 (2007), SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL
21. Ware-Je J., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
22. Wright J.G., Rudicel S., and Feinstein A.R. Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 (1994) 229-234
23. Wright J.G., and Young N.L. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 50 (1997) 239-246