The shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the reception of hellenistic poetry at Rome

The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-162

  Hunter, Richard ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924145968     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618499     Document Type: Book

References (273)

1. Allen, A. 1993. The Fragments of Mimnermus, Stuttgart
2. Alpers, P. 1996. What is Pastoral?, Chicago
3. Asper, M. 2001. ‘Gruppen und Dichter. Zu Programmatik und Adressatenbezug bei Kallimachos’ Antike und Abendland 47: 84-116
4. Ball, R. J. 1983. Tibullus the Elegist, Göttingen
5. Barbantani, S. 1998. ‘Un epigramma encomiastico “alessandrino” per Augusto (SH 982)’ Aevum Antiquum 11: 255-344
6. Barchiesi, A. 1993. ‘Future reflexive: two modes of allusion and Ovid’s Heroides’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333-65
7. Barchiesi, A. 1994. ‘Immovable Delos: Aeneid 3.73-98 and the Hymns of Callimachus’ Classical Quarterly 44: 438-43
8. Barchiesi, A. 1996. ‘Poetry, praise, and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’ Classical Antiquity 15: 5-47
9. Barchiesi, A. 1999. ‘Venus’ masterplot: Ovid and the Homeric Hymns’ in P. Hardie, A. Barchiesi, and S. Hinds (eds.), Ovidian Transformations (Cambridge) 112-26
10. Barchiesi, A. 2005. ‘Learned eyes: poets, viewers, image makers’ in K. Galinsky (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus (Cambridge) 281-305
11. Barigazzi, A. 1963. ‘Il Dionysos di Euforione’ in Miscellanea di studi alessandrini in memoria di Augusto Rostagni (Turin) 416-54
12. Bastianini, G. 1996. ‘ΚΑΤΑΛΕΠΤΟΝ in Callimaco (fr. 1.11 Pfeiffer)’ in M. S. Funghi (ed.), Όδοί διζήσιος, le vie della ricerca. Studi in onore di Fr. Adorno (Florence) 69-80
13. Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. 1998. Religions of Rome, 2 vols., Cambridge
14. Bernsdorff, H. 1994. ‘Die Abfahrt der Argonauten im Hylasidyll Theokrits’ Rheinisches Museum 137: 66-72
15. Bernsdorff, H. 1996. ‘Parataktische Gleichnisse bei Theokrit’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 1996: 71-90
16. Bernsdorff, H. 2005. ‘Offene Gedichtschlüsse’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 153: 1-6
17. Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse: Past and Present in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets, Göttingen
18. Bowie, E. L. 1985. ‘Theocritus’ Seventh Idyll, Philetas and Longus’ Classical Quarterly 35: 67-91
19. Boyancé, P. 1937. Le culte des Muses chez les philosophes grecs, Paris
20. Boyancé, P. 1956. ‘Properce’ in L’influence grecque sur la poésie latine de Catulle à Ovide (Entretiens Fondation Hardt II, Vandoeuvres-Geneva) 169-220
21. Bramble, J. C. 1974. Persius and the Programmatic Satire, Cambridge
22. Breed, B. W. 2000. ‘Imitations of originality: Theocritus and Lucretius at the start of the Eclogues’ Vergilius 46: 3-20
23. Bright, D. F. 1978. Haec mihi fingebam: Tibullus in his World, Leiden
24. Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles, Cambridge
25. Brink, C. O. 1972. ‘Ennius and the Hellenistic worship of Homer’ American Journal of Philology 93: 547-67
26. Brunt, P. A. 1971. Italian Manpower, Oxford
27. Bulloch, A.W. 1973. ‘Tibullus and the Alexandrians’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 19: 71-89
28. Buxton, R. G. 1980. ‘Blindness and limits: Sophokles and the logic of myth’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 100: 22-37
29. Cairns, F. 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry, Edinburgh
30. Cairns, F. 1979. Tibullus: a Hellenistic Poet at Rome, Cambridge
31. Cairns, F. 1992. ‘Theocritus, Idyll 26’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 38: 1-38
32. Cairns, F. 1999. ‘Virgil Eclogue 1.1-2: a literary programme?’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99: 289-93
33. Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and his Critics, Princeton
34. Canfora, L. 1989. The Vanished Library, London
35. Cavarzere, A. 1996. Sul limitare. Il ‘motto’ e la poesia di Orazio, Bologna
36. Chiron, P. 1993. Démétrios, Du style, Paris
37. Clausen, W. 1964. ‘Callimachus and Latin poetry’ Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 5: 181-96
38. Clausen, W. 1970. ‘Catullus and Callimachus’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 85-94
39. Clausen, W. 1987. Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry, Berkeley
40. Clausen, W. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues, Oxford
41. Clausing, A. 1913. Kritik und Exegese der homerischen Gleichnisse im Altertum, Dissertation Freiburg
42. Clauss, J. J. 2004. ‘Vergil’s sixth Eclogue: the Aetia in Rome’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 2004: 71-93
43. Clay, D. 2004. Archilochos Heros. The Cults of Poets in the Greek Polis, Washington D.C.
44. Clúa, J. A. 1991. ‘Euphorion’s Dionysos: structure and hermeneutics’ Prometheus 17: 111-24
45. Connor, W. R. 1988. ‘Seized by the nymphs: nympholepsy and symbolic expression in classical Greece’ Classical Antiquity 7: 155-89
46. Courtney, E. 1993. The Fragmentary Latin Poets, Oxford
47. Cribiore, R. 1995. ‘A hymn to the Nile’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 106: 97-106
48. Cumont, F. 1929. Les religions orientales dans le paganisme romain, 3rd edn, Paris
49. Dench, E. 1995. From Barbarians to New Men, Oxford
50. Depew, M. 2000. ‘Enacted and represented dedications: genre and Greek hymn’ in M. Depew and D. Obbink (eds.), Matrices of Genre (Cambridge, Mass.) 59-79
51. Dickie, M. 1998. ‘Poets as initiates in the Mysteries: Euphorion, Philicus and Posidippus’ Antike und Abendland 44: 49-77
52. Dunand, F. 1973. Le culte d’Isis dans le bassin oriental de la Méditerrannée I. Le culte d’Isis et les Ptolémées, Leiden
53. DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. 1976-7. ‘Virgil’s fifth Eclogue’ Proceedings of the Virgil Society 16: 18-41 [reprinted in P. Hardie, Virgil (London/New York 1999) i 351-84]
54. DuQuesnay, I. M. Le M. 1981. ‘Vergil’s first Eclogue’ Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3: 29-182
55. Easterling, P. E. 1985. ‘Anachronism in Greek tragedy’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 105: 1-10
56. Fantuzzi, M. 1988. Ricerche su Apollonio Rodio, Rome
57. Fantuzzi, M. 2006. ‘Theocritus’ constructive interpreters, and the construction of a bucolic reader’ in Fantuzzi-Papanghelis 2006: 235-62
58. Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge
59. Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, T. (eds.) 2006. Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral, Leiden
60. Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic, New York/Oxford
61. Farrell, J. 1994. ‘The structure of Lucretius’ “anthropology”’ Materiali e Discussioni 33: 81-95
62. Fedeli, P. 1985. Properzio. Il libro terzo delle Elegie, Bari
63. Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic, Oxford
64. Feeney, D. C. 1992. ‘“Shall I compare thee …?”: Catullus 68b and the limits of analogy’ in T.Woodman and J. Powell (eds.), Author and Audience in Latin Literature (Cambridge) 33-44
65. Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome, Cambridge
66. Feeney, D. C. 2005. ‘The beginnings of a literature in Latin’ Journal of Roman Studies 95: 226-40
67. Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations, Berkeley
68. Floridi, L. 2004. ‘Mendacità del mito e strategie encomiastiche nell’Inno a Zeus di Callimaco’ in R. Pretagostini and E. Dettori (eds.), La cultura ellenistica: l’opera letteraria e l’esegesi antica (Rome) 65-75
69. Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism, Princeton
70. Foulon, A. 1979. ‘Tibulle I, 7 et Callimaque’ Bulletin de la Faculté des Lettres de Mulhouse 10: 79-89
71. Fowler, D. 2002. ‘Masculinity under threat? The poetics and politics of inspiration in Latin poetry’ in E. Spentzou and D. Fowler (eds.), Cultivating the Muse (Oxford) 141-59
72. Fraser, P. M. 1972. Ptolemaic Alexandria, 3 vols., Oxford
73. Freudenburg, K. 1993. The Walking Muse, Princeton
74. Gaisser, J. H. 1971. ‘Tibullus 1.7: a tribute to Messalla’ Classical Philology 66: 221-9
75. Gallavotti, C. 1993. Theocritus quique feruntur bucolici Graeci, 3rd edn, Rome
76. Giangrande, G. 1980. Scripta Minora Alexandrina i, Amsterdam
77. Gigante, M. 1993. Orazio, Una misura per l’amore. Lettura della satira seconda del primo libro, Venosa
78. Godwin, J. 1995. Catullus, Poems 61-68, Warminster, Wilts.
79. Goldhill, S. 1986. ‘Framing and polyphony: readings in Hellenistic poetry’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32: 25-52
80. Gowers, E. 1993. The Loaded Table, Oxford
81. Grandjean, Y. 1975. Une nouvelle arétalogie d’Isis à Maronée, Leiden
82. Graziosi, B. 2002. Inventing Homer, Cambridge
83. Griffin, J. 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life, London
84. Grimal, P. 1969. ‘Le dieu Sérapis et le Genius de Messalla’ Bulletin de la société française d’Égyptologie 53-4: 42-51
85. Gronewald, M. and Daniel R. W. 2004a. ‘Ein neuer Sappho-Papyrus’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 147: 1-8
86. Gronewald, M. and Daniel R. W. 2004b. ‘Nachtrag zum neuen Sappho-Papyrus’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 149: 1-4
87. Gross, O. 1911. De metonymiis sermonis Latini a deorum nominibus petitis, Dissertation Halle
88. Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy, Leiden
89. Gutzwiller, K. 1991. Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies, Madison
90. Gutzwiller, K. 1996a. ‘The evidence for Theocritean poetry books’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 1996: 119-48
91. Gutzwiller, K. 1996b. ‘Vergil and the date of the Theocritean epigram book’ Philologus 140: 92-9.
92. Halperin, D. M. 1983. Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry, New Haven/London
93. Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) 1993. Callimachus, Groningen
94. Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) 1996. Theocritus, Groningen
95. Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) 2000. Apollonius Rhodius, Leuven
96. Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) 2004. Callimachus II, Leuven
97. Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.) 2006. Beyond the Canon, Leuven
98. Hardie, A. 1976. ‘Horace Odes 1, 37 and Pindar Dithyramb 2’ Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 1: 113-40
99. Hardie, A. 1997. ‘Philitas and the plane tree’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 119: 21-36
100. Hardie, A. 2004. ‘Muses and mysteries’ in P. Murray and P. Wilson (eds.), Music and the Muses (Oxford) 11-37
101. Hardie, P. 1986. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium, Oxford
102. Hardie, P. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil, Cambridge
103. Hardie, P. 2006. ‘Cultural and historical narratives in Virgil’s Eclogues and Lucretius’ in Fantuzzi-Papanghelis 2006: 275-300
104. Harmon, D. P. 1986. ‘Religion in the Latin elegists’ Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 16.3 (Berlin/New York) 1909-73
105. Heath, M. 1989. Unity in Greek Poetics, Oxford
106. Henderson, J. 1998a. ‘Virgil, Eclogue 9: Valleydiction’ Proceedings of the Virgil Society 23: 149-76
107. Henderson, J. 1998b. ‘Virgil’s third Eclogue: howdo you keep an idiot in suspense?’ Classical Quarterly 48: 213-28
108. Henrichs, A. 1975. ‘Die beiden Gaben des Dionysos’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 16: 139-44
109. Henrichs, A. 1978. ‘Horaz also Aretaloge des Dionysos: credite posteri’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 82: 203-11
110. Henrichs, A. 1984. ‘The sophists and hellenistic religion: Prodicus as the spiritual father of the Isis aretalogies’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 88: 139-58
111. Henrichs, A. 1999. ‘Demythologizing the past, mythicizing the present: myth, history, and the supernatural at the dawn of the Hellenistic period’ in R. Buxton (ed.), From Myth to Reason? (Oxford) 223-48
112. Heyworth, S. J. 1994. ‘Some allusions to Callimachus in Latin poetry’ Materiali e Discussioni 33: 51-79
113. Heyworth, S. J. 2004. ‘Looking into the river: literary history and interpretation in Callimachus, Hymns 5 and 6’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 2004: 139-59
114. Hinds, S. 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone, Cambridge
115. Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext, Cambridge.
116. Hinds, S. 1999. ‘First amongwomen: Ovid, Tristia 1.6 and the traditions of “exemplary” catalogue’ in S. M. Braund and R. Mayer (eds.), amor: roma. Love & Latin Literature (Cambridge) 123-42
117. Hinds, S. 2000. ‘Essential epic: genre and gender from Macer to Statius’ in M. Depew and D. Obbink (eds.), Matrices of Genre (Cambridge, Mass.) 221-44
118. Hollis, A. S. 1976. ‘Some allusions to earlier Hellenistic poetry in Nonnus’ Classical Quarterly 26: 142-50
119. Hollis, A. S. 1982. ‘Teuthis and Callimachus, Aetia Book 1’ Classical Quarterly 32: 117-20
120. Hollis, A. S. 1990. Callimachus, Hecale, Oxford
121. Hollis, A. S. 1996. ‘Heroic honours for Philetas?’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 110: 56-62
122. Hollis, A. S. 2000. ‘The reputation and influence of Choerilus of Samos’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 130: 13-15
123. Hopkinson, N. 1988. A Hellenistic Anthology, Cambridge
124. Hubbard, M. 1974. Propertius, London
125. Hubbard, T. K. 1998. The Pipes of Pan, Ann Arbor
126. Hunter, R. 1983a. A Study of Daphnis & Chloe, Cambridge
127. Hunter, R. 1983b. Eubulus: the Fragments, Cambridge
128. Hunter, R. 1989a. Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica Book III, Cambridge
129. Hunter, R. 1989b. ‘Winged Callimachus’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 76: 1-2
130. Hunter, R. 1992a. ‘Writing the god: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’ Materialie Discussioni 29: 9-34
131. Hunter, R. 1992b. ‘Callimachus and Heraclitus’ Materiali e Discussioni 28: 113-23
132. Hunter, R. 1993a. ‘Callimachean echoes in Catullus 65’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 96: 179-82
133. Hunter, R. 1993b. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies, Cambridge
134. Hunter, R. 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry, Cambridge
135. Hunter, R. 1997. ‘Longus and Plato’ in M. Picone and B. Zimmermann (eds.), Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption (Basel) 15-28
136. Hunter, R. 1999a. Theocritus: a Selection, Cambridge
137. Hunter, R. 1999b. ‘Literarische Gattung. II. Griechisch’ in Der neue Pauly vii (Stuttgart) 261-4 [English version in Brill’s New Pauly vii (Leiden 2005) 652-5]
138. Hunter, R. 2001a. ‘The poet unleaved: Simonides and Callimachus’ in D. Boedeker and D. Sider (eds.), The New Simonides (New York) 242-54
139. Hunter, R. 2001b. ‘Virgil and Theocritus: a note on the reception of the Encomium to Ptolemy Philadelphus’ Seminari Romani di Cultura Greca 4: 159-63
140. Hunter, R. 2001c. ‘On coming after’ (Inaugural Lecture, Cambridge 2001), available on line at http://www.classics.cam.ac.uk/faculty/rlh.pdf
141. Hunter, R. 2002. ‘The sense of an author: Theocritus and [Theocritus]’ in R. K. Gibson and C. S. Kraus (eds.), The Classical Commentary (Leiden) 89-108
142. Hunter, R. 2003a. Theocritus: Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus, Berkeley
143. Hunter, R. 2003b. ‘Literature and its contexts’ in A. Erskine (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Oxford) 477-93
144. Hunter, R. 2003c. ‘Reflecting on writing and culture: Theocritus and the style of cultural change’ in H. Yunis (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece (Cambridge) 213-34
145. Hunter, R. 2004. ‘Homer and Greek literature’ in R. Fowler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Homer (Cambridge) 235-53
146. Hunter, R. 2005a. ‘The Hesiodic Catalogue and Hellenistic poetry’ in R. Hunter (ed.), The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions (Cambridge) 239-65
147. Hunter, R. 2005b. ‘Showing and telling: notes from the boundary’ Eikasmos 16: 179-91
148. Hunter, R. 2006a. ‘Virgil, Eclogue 1 and the origins of pastoral’ in Fantuzzi-Papanghelis 2006: 263-73
149. Hunter, R. 2006b. ‘Sweet nothings-Callimachus fr. 1.9-12 revisited’ in G. Bastianini and A. Casanova (eds.), Callimaco: cent’anni di papiri (Florence) 119-31
150. Hunter, R. 2006c. ‘The prologue of the Periodos to Nicomedes (‘Pseudo-Scymnus’)’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 2006: 105-22
151. Hunter, R. and Fuhrer, T. 2002. ‘Imaginary gods? Poetic theology in the Hymns of Callimachus’ in Callimaque (Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique XLVIII, Vandoeuvres-Geneva 2002) 143-75
152. Hurst, A. and Schachter, A. (eds.) 1996. La montagne des Muses, Geneva
153. Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry, Oxford
154. Kambylis, A. 1965. Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik, Heidelberg
155. Karakasis, E. forthcoming. ‘Generic consciousness and diction in Ovid: a reading of Amores III 1’
156. Kennedy, D. 1993. The Arts of Love, Cambridge
157. Kenney, E. J. 1983. ‘Virgil and the elegiac sensibility’ Illinois Classical Studies 8: 44-59
158. Keppie, L. 1981. ‘Vergil, the confiscations, and Caesar’s tenth legion’ Classical Quarterly 31: 367-70
159. Kerkhecker, A. 1999. Callimachus’ Book of Iambi, Oxford
160. Klingner, 1951. ‘Tibulls Geburtstags Gedicht an Messalla (I 7)’ Eranos 49: 117-36 [= Studien zur griechischen und römischen Literatur (Zurich 1964) 519-34]
161. Knox, P. E. 2005. ‘Milestones in the career of Tibullus’ Classical Quarterly 55: 204-16
162. Koenen, L. 1976. ‘Egyptian influence in Tibullus’ Illinois Classical Studies 1: 127-59
163. Koenen, L. 1977. Eine agonistische Inschrift aus Ägypten und frühptolemäischeKönigsfeste, Meisenheim am Glan
164. Konstan, D. 1978. ‘The politics of Tibullus 1.7’ Rivista di Studi Classici 26: 173-85
165. Krevans, N. 1993. ‘Fighting against Antimachus: the Lyde and the Aetia reconsidered’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 1993: 149-60
166. Krevans, N. 2000. ‘On the margins of epic: the foundation-poems of Apollonius’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 2000: 69-84
167. Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur, Stuttgart
168. Lapp, F. 1965. De Callimachi Cyrenaei tropis et figuris, Dissertation Bonn
169. Lausberg, H. 1960. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik, Munich
170. Le Guen, B. 2001. Les associations de technites dionysiaques à l’époque hellénistique, 2 vols., Nancy
171. Lightfoot, J. 1999. Parthenius of Nicaea, Oxford
172. Lipka, M. 2001. Language in Vergil’s Eclogues, Berlin/New York
173. Littlewood, R. J. 1975. ‘Two elegiac hymns: Propertius, 3.17 and Ovid, Fasti, 5.663-692’ Latomus 34: 662-74
174. Livrea, E. 1986. Studi cercidei (P.Oxy. 1082), Bonn
175. Lombardi, M. 1997. ‘Tradizione e innovazione nell’epica prealessandrina: Antimaco di Colofone e Cherilo di Samo’ Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 56: 89-104
176. Luck, G. 1957. ‘The cave and the source’ Classical Quarterly 7: 175-9
177. Luck, G. 1969. The Latin Love Elegy, 2nd edn, London
178. Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1989. Words and the Poet, Oxford
179. Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1998. ‘Latin literature and Greece’ Dialogos 5: 141-4
180. Macleod, C. 1983. Collected Essays, Oxford
181. Magnelli, E. 2002. Studi su Euforione, Rome
182. Maltby, R. 1991. A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies, Leeds
183. Maltby, R. 1995. ‘Tibullus I 2, 1-4 and Meleager AP XII 49’ in Studia classica Iohanni Tarditi oblata (Milan) i 523-6
184. Maltby, R. 2002. Tibullus: Elegies, Cambridge
185. Massimilla, G. 1996. Callimaco, Aitia, libri primo e secondo, Pisa
186. McCall, M. H. 1969. Ancient Rhetorical Theories of Simile and Comparison, Cambridge, Mass.
187. Merli, E. 1997. ‘Ηλιον έν λέσχηι κατεδύσαμεν. Sulla tradizione latina di un motivo callimacheo’ Maia 49: 385-90
188. Mette, H. J. 1980. ‘Neoptolemos von Parion’ Rheinisches Museum 123: 1-24
189. Miller, J. F. 1991. ‘Propertius’ Hymn to Bacchus and contemporary poetry’ American Journal of Philology 112: 77-86
190. Moore, T. J. 1988-9. ‘Tibullus 1.7: reconciliation through conflict’ Classical World 82: 423-30
191. Most, G. W. 1981. ‘On the arrangement of Catullus’ Carmina Maiora’ Philologus 125: 109-25
192. Most, G. W. 1993. ‘Die früheste erhaltene griechische Dichterallegorese’ Rheinisches Museum 136: 209-12
193. Murray, O. 1970. ‘Hecataeus of Abdera and Pharaonic kingship’ Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 56: 141-71
194. Murray, O. 1972. ‘Herodotus and Hellenistic culture’ Classical Quarterly 22: 200-13
195. Nauta, R. R. and Harder, A. (eds.). 2005. Catullus’ Poem on Attis: Text and Contexts, Leiden [= Mnemosyne 57 (2004) 514-656]
196. Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius, Leeds
197. Newman, J. K. 1967. Augustus and the New Poetry, Brussels
198. Nisbet, R. 1978. ‘Notes on the text of Catullus’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 24: 92-115
199. Norden, E. 1899. ‘Ein Panegyricus auf Augustus in Vergils Aeneis’ Rheinisches Museum 54: 466-82 [= Kleine Schriften zum klassischen Altertum (Berlin 1966) 422-36]
200. Nuzzo, G. 2003. Gaio Valerio Catullo. Epithalamium Thetidis et Pelei (c. LXIV), Palermo
201. Obbink, D. 1993. ‘Dionysus poured out: ancient and modern theories of sacrifice and cultural formation’ in T. H. Carpenter and C. A. Faraone (eds.), Masks of Dionysus (Ithaca) 65-86.
202. Olson, S. D. and Sens, A. 1999. Matro of Pitane and the Tradition of Epic Parody in the Fourth Century bce, Atlanta
203. Page, D. L. 1981. Further Greek Epigrams, Cambridge
204. Papanghelis, T. D. 1994. H ποιητική τѽν Ρωμαίων ‘νεωτέρων”, Athens
205. Paschalis, M. 1995. ‘Γλνκερόν στόμα: erotic Homer in the Lament for Bion’ Materiali e Discussioni 34: 179-85
206. Paschalis, M. 2005. ‘The narrator as hunter: Longus, Virgil and Theocritus’ in S. Harrison, M. Paschalis, and S. Frangoulidis (eds.), Metaphor and the Ancient Novel (Groningen) 50-67
207. Patterson, A. 1987. Pastoral and Ideology, Berkeley
208. Peek, W. 1930. Der Isishymnus von Andros und verwandte Texte, Berlin
209. Perutelli, A. 2003. ‘Teocrito e Catullo’ in L. Belloni, L. de Finis, and G. Moretti (eds.), L’officina ellenistica. Poesia dotta e popolare in Grecia e Roma (Trento) 317-30
210. Pfeiffer, R. 1949-53. Callimachus, 2 vols., Oxford
211. Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford
212. Pontani, F. 1999. ‘The first word of Callimachus’ Aitia’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 128: 57-9
213. Pretagostini, R. 1984. Ricerche sulla poesia alessandrina, Urbino
214. Pretagostini, R. 2006. ‘Un agglomerato di similitudini. A proposito di Eracle in Callimaco, Aitia fr. 23 Pf.’ in A. Martina and A.-T. Cozzoli (eds.), Callimachea I (Rome) 59-69
215. Putnam, M. C. J. 1970. Virgil’s Pastoral Art, Princeton
216. Reichenberger, S. 1891. Die Entwicklung des metonymischen Gebrauchs von Götternamen in der griechischen Poesie bis zum Ende des alexandrinischen Zeitalters, Karlsruhe
217. Rice, E. E. 1983. The Grand Procession of Ptolemy Philadelphus, Oxford
218. Richardson, N. J. 1980. ‘Literary criticism in the exegetical scholia to the Iliad: a sketch’ Classical Quarterly 30: 265-87
219. Ricks, C. 2002. Allusion to the Poets, Oxford
220. Rimell, V. 1999. ‘Epistolary fictions: authorial identity in Heroides 15’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109-35
221. Rosokoki, A. 1995. Die Erigone des Eratosthenes, Heidelberg
222. Ross, D. O. 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome, Cambridge
223. Rossi, L. E. 1971. ‘Il Ciclope di Euripide come κѽμος “mancato”’ Maia 23: 10-38
224. Rusten, J. S. 1982. Dionysius Scytobrachion, Opladen
225. Salat, P. 1993. ‘Catulle 64, 105-111: coniger et corniger’ Latomus 52: 418-19
226. Sandbach, F. H. 1938. ‘Notes on Propertius’ Classical Review 52: 211-15
227. Schachter, A. 1986. Cults of Boiotia ii (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 38.2), London
228. Schiesaro, A. 1998. ‘Latin literature and Greece’ Dialogos 5: 144-9
229. Schmidt, W. 1908. Geburtstag im Altertum, Giessen
230. Schmitz, T. 1999. ‘“I hate all common things”: the reader’s role in Callimachus’ Aetia prologue’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 99: 151-78
231. Scodel, R. and Thomas, R. 1984. ‘Virgil and the Euphrates’ American Journal of Philology 105: 339
232. Seaford, R. 1981. ‘Dionysiac drama and the Dionysiac mysteries’ Classical Quarterly 31: 252-75
233. Selden, D. 1998. ‘Alibis’ Classical Antiquity 17: 289-412
234. Sens, A. 1997. Theocritus: Dioscuri (Idyll 22), Göttingen
235. Shackleton Bailey, D. R. 1956. Propertiana, Cambridge
236. Sider, D. 1997. The Epigrams of Philodemos, New York/Oxford
237. Skutsch, O. 1985. The Annals of Q. Ennius, Oxford
238. Slater, N. J. 1985. Plautus in Performance, Princeton
239. Snipes, K. 1988. ‘Literary interpretation in the Homeric scholia: the similes of the Iliad’ American Journal of Philology 109: 196-222
240. Solodow, J. 1986. ‘Raucae, tua cura, palumbes: study of a poetic word order’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 129-53
241. Spanoudakis, K. 2002. Philitas of Cos, Leiden
242. Spengel, L. 1853-6. Rhetores Gracci, 3 vols., Leipzig
243. Stephens, S. A. 2003. Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria, Berkeley
244. Syndikus, H.-P. 1990. Catull. Eine Interpretation ii, Darmstadt
245. Thomas, R. 1982. ‘Catullus and the polemics of poetic reference (Poem 64.1-18)’ American Journal of Philology 103: 144-64
246. Thomas, R. 1983. ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman poetry’ Classical Quarterly 33: 92-113
247. Thomas, R. 1993. ‘Callimachus back in Rome’ in Harder-Regtuit-Wakker 1993: 197-215
248. Thomas, R. 1998. ‘Voice, poetics and Virgil’s sixth Eclogue’ in J. Jasanoff, H. C. Melchert, and L. Olivier (eds.), Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins (Innsbruck) 669-76
249. Toner, J. P. 1995. Leisure and Ancient Rome, Cambridge
250. Totti, M. 1985. Ausgewählte Texte der Isis-und Sarapis-Religion, Hildesheim
251. Troxler-Keller, I. 1964. Die Dichterlandschaft des Horaz, Heidelberg
252. Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1989. ‘Rome’s cultural revolution’ Journal of Roman Studies 79: 157-64
253. Walsh, G. B. 1990. ‘Surprised by self: audible thought in Hellenistic poetry’ Classical Philology 85: 1-21
254. Weinstock, S. 1971. Divus Julius, Oxford
255. West, M. L. 1965. ‘Tryphon De Tropis’ Classical Quarterly 15: 230-48
256. West, M. L. 2003. Homeric Hymns, Homeric Apocrypha, Lives of Homer, Cambridge, Mass.
257. West, M. L. 2005. ‘The new Sappho’ Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 151: 1-9
258. White, P. 1993. Promised Verse, Cambridge, Mass.
259. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1924. Hellenistische Dichtung, 2 vols. Berlin
260. Williams, G(areth). 1991. ‘Conversing after sunset: a Callimachean echo in Ovid’s exile poetry’ Classical Quarterly 41: 169-77
261. Williams, G(ordon). 1980. Figures of Thought in Roman Poetry, New Haven/London
262. Williams, G(ordon). 1992. ‘Theocritus’ Idyll 7 from a Virgilian perspective’ in R. Hexter and D. Selden (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity (New York/London) 541-56
263. Wimmel, W. 1960. Kallimachos in Rom, Wiesbaden
264. Winkler, J. J. 1985. Auctor & Actor, Berkeley
265. Winkler, J. J. 1990. The Constraints of Desire, New York/London
266. Witt, R. E. 1971. Isis in the Graeco-Roman World, London
267. Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Roman Manhood, Cambridge
268. Wright, J. R. G. 1983. ‘Virgil’s pastoral programme: Theocritus, Callimachus and Eclogue 1’ Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 29: 107-60
269. Wyke, M. 1989. ‘Reading female flesh: Amores 3.1’ in A. Cameron (ed.), History as Text (London) 113-43
270. Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress, Oxford
271. Zanker, G. 1985. ‘A Hesiodic reminiscence in Virgil, E. 9.11-13’ Classical Quarterly 35: 235-7
272. Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, Ann Arbor
273. Zetzel, J. E. G. 2002. ‘Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the development of Augustan poetry’ in T. Woodman and D. Feeney (eds.), Tradition and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace (Cambridge) 38-52