Updated hysterectomy surveillance and factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy

Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Cohen, Sarah L ^a   Vitonis, Allison F ^a   Einarsson, Jon I ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Socioeconomic; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; LEIOMYOMA; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY, VAGINAL; INCIDENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; LEIOMYOMA; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; ROBOTICS; UNITED STATES; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84924140318     PISSN: 10868089     EISSN: 19383797     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00096     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5): 1156–1158.
2. AAGL Advancing Minimally Invasive Gynecology Worldwide. AAGL position statement: route of hysterectomy to treat benign uterine disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(1): 1–3.
3. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677.
4. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):1041–1048.
5. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091–1095.
6. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309(7):689–698.
7. HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009. Available at: www.hcupus. ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.
8. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(2 Pt 1):233–241.
9. Zakaria MA, Levy BS. Outpatient vaginal hysterectomy: optimizing perioperative management for same-day discharge. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1355–1361.
10. Perron-Burdick M, Yamamoto M, Zaritsky E. Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(5):1136–1141.
11. Shah NT, Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Einarsson JI, Muto MG. The feasibility of societal cost equivalence between robotic hysterectomy and alternate hysterectomy methods for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:570464.
12. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, Scales CD Jr, Myers ER, Havrilesky LJ. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(3):685–693.
13. Jacoby VL, Fujimoto VY, Giudice LC, Kuppermann M, Washington AE. Racial and ethnic disparities in benign gynecologic conditions and associated surgeries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202(6):514–521.
14. Abenhaim HA, Azziz R, Hu J, Bartolucci A, Tulandi T. Socioeconomic and racial predictors of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for selected benign diseases: analysis of 341487 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(1):11–15.