Gardening and landscape modification: Butterfly gardens

The Management of Insects in Recreation and Tourism

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 153-168

  Daniels, Jaret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924136867     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139003339.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Bjerke, T. and Ø stdahl, T. (2004) Animal-related attitudes and activities in an urban population. Anthrozoos, 17, 109–129.
2. Blair, R. B. (2001) Birds and butterfl ies along urban gradients in two ecoregions of the US In Biotic Homogenization, ed. J. L. Lockwood and M. L. McKinney Norwell, MA: Kluwer, pp. 33–56.
3. Blair, R. B., and Launer, A. E. (1997) Butterfl y diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biological Conservation, 80, 113–125.
4. Burghardt, K. T., Tallamy, D. W. and Shriver, W. G. (2009) Impact of native plants on bird and butterfl y biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conservation Biology, 23, 219–224.
5. Burghardt, K. T., Tallamy, D. W., Philips, C. and K. J. Shropshire (2010) Non-native plants reduce abundance, richness, and host specialization in lepidopteran communities. Ecosphere, 1, 1–22.
6. Clark, P. J., Reed, J. M. and Chew, F. S. (2007) Effects of urbanization on butterfl y species richness, guild structure, and rarity. Urban Ecosystems, 10, 321–337.
7. Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T. and Bonney, R. (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and Society, 12, 11.
8. Debinski, D. M. and Holt, R. D. (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology, 14, 342–355.
9. Ekroos J., Heliola, J. and Kuussaari, M. (2010) Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 459–467.
10. Fahrig, L. (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100, 65–74.
11. Fahrig, L. (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 487–515.
12. Glassberg, J. (1993) Butterfl ies Through Binoculars: A Field Guide to Butterfl ies in the Boston, New York, Washington Region. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Glassberg, J. (2001) Butterfl ies Through Binoculars: The West. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Glassberg, J. and Minno, M. C. (2000) Butterfl ies Through Binoculars: Florida. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Google Labs (2010) Google Books Ngram Viewer. Available at: http://books.google.com/ngrams, accessed 16 July 2011.
16. Hodges, A. W. and Haydu, J. J. (2003) Commodity Outlook 2003: US and Florida Ornamental Plant Markets. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE374.
17. Kellert, S. R. (1987) Social and perceptual factors in the preservation of animal species. In The Preservation of Species. ed. B. G. Norton. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 50–73.
18. Kellert, S. R. (1989) Human-animal interactions: a review of American attitudes to wild and domestic animals. In Animals and People Sharing the World, ed. A. Rowan. Hanover, NH: University of New England Press, pp. 137–175.
19. Kellert, S. R. (1991) Public views of wolf restoration in Michigan. In Transactions of the 56th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Washington DC: Wildlife Management Institute, pp. 152–161.
20. Kitahara, M., Sei, K. and Fujii, K. (2000) Patterns in the structure of grassland butterfl y communities along a gradient of human disturbance: further analysis based on the generalist/specialist concept. Population Ecology, 42, 135–144.
21. Kocher, S. D. and Williams, E. H. (2000) The diversity and abundance of North American butterfl ies vary with habitat disturbance and geography. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 785–794.
22. Kola-Olusanya, A. (2005) Free-choice environmental education: Understanding where children learn outside of school. Environmental Education Research, 11, 297–307.
23. Kun, A., Oborny, B. and Dieckmann, U. (2009) Intermediate landscape disturbance maximizes metapopulation density. Landscape Ecology, 24, 1341–1350.
24. Lepczyk, C. A. (2005) Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 672–677.
25. Levy, J. M. and Connor, E. F. (2004) Are gardens effective in butterfl y conservation? A case study with the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 323–330.
26. Louv, R. (2005) Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-defi cit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
27. MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. Mauro, D., Dietz, T. and Rockwood, L. (2007) Determining the effect of urbanization on generalist butterfl y species diversity in butterfl y gardens. Urban Ecosystems, 10, 427–439.
29. McCaffrey, R. E. (2005) Using citizen science in urban bird studies. Urban Habitats, 3, 70–86.
30. McKinney, M. L. (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience, 52, 883–890.
31. McKinney, M. L. (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 161–176.
32. McKinney, M. L. and Lockwood, J. L. (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 450–453.
33. Miller, J. (2004) Public understanding of and attitudes toward scientifi c research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273–294.
34. National Gardening Association (2008) Environmental lawn and garden survey. South Burlington, Vermont.
35. National Science Foundation (2006) Science and Engineering Indicators 2006, 2 vols. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
36. National Wildlife Federation (2011) Garden for wildlife. Available at: http://www.nwf.org/Get-Outside/Outdoor-Activities/Garden-for-Wildlife.aspx, accessed 23 August 2011.
37. New, T. R. (1991) Butterfl y Conservation. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
38. Olden, J. D. (2006) Biotic homogenization: a new research agenda for conservation biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 2027–2039.
39. Olden, J. D. and Poff, N. L. (2003) Toward a mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. American Naturalist, 162, 442–460.
40. Olden, J. D. and Rooney, T. P. (2006) On defi ning and quantifying biotic homogenization. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 15, 113–120.
41. Panzer, R., Stillwaugh, D., Gnaedinger R. and Derkovitz, G. (1995) Prevalence of remnant-dependence among the prairie inhabiting insects of the Chicago region. Natural Areas Journal, 15, 101–116.
42. Pyle, R. M. (1981) The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Butterfl ies. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
43. Pyle, R. M. (1984) The Audubon Society Handbook for Butterfl y Watchers. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
44. Rabinowitz, D., Cairns, S. and Dillon, T. (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the fl ora of the British Isles. In Conservation Biology. The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. ed. M. E. Soul é. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc., pp. 182–204.
45. Reed, J. M. (1992) A system for ranking conservation priorities for Neotropical migrant birds based on relative susceptibility to extinction. In Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds, ed. J. M. Hagan III, D. W. Johnson. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
46. Rosenzweig, M. L. (2001) The four questions: what does the introduction of exotic species do to diversity ? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 3, 361–367.
47. Saunders, C. (2003) The emerging fi eld of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10, 137–153.
48. Schultz, C. B. (1998) Dispersal behavior and its implications for reserve design in a rare Oregon butterfl y. Conservation Biology, 12, 284–292.
49. Silvertown, J. (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24, 467–471.
50. Summerville, K. S. and Crist, T. O. (2001) Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation on patch use by butterfl ies and skippers (Lepidoptera). Ecology, 82, 1360–1370.
51. Tallamy, D. (2004) Do alien plants reduce insect biomass ? Conservation Biology, 18, 1689–1692.
52. Tallamy, D. W. (2007) Bringing Nature Home: How Native Plants Sustain Wildlife in our Gardens. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
53. Tscharntke T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kruess, A. and Thies, C. (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecological Research, 17, 229–239.
54. US Census Bureau (2001) US Census of Population and Housing. Census 2000 Summary File 1. Washington DC: US Census Bureau.
55. US Department of Agriculture (1997) Census of agriculture, geographic area series, AC97-CD-Volume 1.
56. US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Washington DC, USA.
57. US Department of Agriculture (2009) Summary Report: 2007 National Resources Inventory, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC, and Center for Survey Statistics and Methodology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 123 pages.
58. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau (2006) National survey of fi shing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington DC: US Census Bureau US Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Projecting land-use change: a summary of models for assessing the effects of community growth and change on land-use patterns. USEPA Report EPA/600/R-00/098, Washington DC.
59. United Nations Population Division (2006) World Population Prospects, 2006 Revision. New York: United Nations.
60. Vickery, M. L. (1995) Gardens: the neglected habitat. In Ecology and Conservation of Butterfl ies. ed. A. S. Pullin. London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 123–134 Vickery, M. L. (2007) Gardens as an aid to the conservation of some butterfl y species. Science Progress, 90, 223–244.
61. Walker, C. (2004) The public value of urban parks. In Beyond Recreation: a Broader View of Urban Parks. Washington (DC): The Urban Institute.