Weak courts, strong rights: Judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law

Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-272

  Tushnet, Mark ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924102337     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (112)

1. Robert H. Bork, Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges (2003)
2. Richard A. Posner, "Foreword: A Political Court," 119 Harv. L. Rev. 31, 85-88 (2005).
3. Roger P. Alford, "In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism," 52 UCLA L. Rev. 639 (2005).
4. Mark Tushnet, "Transnational / Domestic Constitutional Law," 37 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 239 (2003)
5. Mark Tushnet, "When Is Knowing Less Better than Knowing More? Unpacking the Controversy Over Supreme Court Reference to Non-U.S. Law," 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1275 (2006)
6. Mark Tushnet, "Referring to Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation: An Episode in the Culture Wars," 35 Balt. L. Rev. 299 (2006).
7. Steven G. Calabresi & Stephanie Dotson Zimdahl, "The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision," 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 743 (2005).
8. Barbara Singer, "The Right of Publicity: Star Vehicle or Shooting Star?" 10 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L. J. 1,(1991).
9. Mari Matsuda, "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story," 87 Mich. L. Rev. 2320, 2341-48 (1989)
10. Bruce Ackerman, "The New Separation of Powers," 113 Harv. L. Rev. 633 (2000).
11. William Michael Treanor, "Fame, the Founding, and the Power to Declare War," 82 Corn.L. Rev. 695 (1995).
12. Vicki C. Jackson, "Narratives of Federalism: Of Continuities and Comparative Constitutional Experience," 51 Duke L. J. 223 (2001)
13. Vicki C. Jackson, "Comparative Constitutional Federalism and Transnational Judicial Discourse," 2 Int. J. Con. L. 91 (2004).
14. Mark Tushnet, " 'A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind': Referring to Foreign Law to Express American Nationhood," 69 Alb. L. Rev. 809 (2006).
15. Larry D. Kramer, The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review 106-11 (2004).
16. Konrad Schiemann, "A Response to The Judge as Comparatist," 80 Tulane L. Rev. 281, 283-84 (2005)
17. Stephen Gardbaum, "The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism," 49 Am. J. Comp. L. 707 (2001)
18. J. Mark Ramseyer, "The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach," 23 J. Leg. Stud. 721 (1994)
19. Matthew Stephenson, "Independent Judicial Review," 32 J. Leg. Stud. 781 (2003).
20. Peter W. Hogg & Allison A. Bushell [now Thornton], "The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures: (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing After All"), 35 Osgoode Hall L. J. 75 (1997).
21. Christopher P. Manfredi, "The Life of a Metaphor: Dialogue in the Supreme Court, 1998-2003," 23 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. (2d) 104 (2004).
22. Robert Dahl, "Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker," 6 J. Pub. L. 279 (1957).
23. Barry Friedman, "Dialogue and Judicial Review," 91 Mich. L. Rev. 577 (1993)
24. Barry Friedman, "The Importance of Being Positive: The Nature and Function of Judicial Review," 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1257 (2004)
25. Robert W. Bennett, Talking It Through: Puzzles of American Democracy 101-4 (2003).
26. Robert C. Post, "The Supreme Court, 2002 Term-Foreword: Fashioning the Legal Constitution: Culture, Courts, and Law," 117 Harv. L. Rev. 4 (2003)
27. Robert C. Post & Reva B.Siegel, "Legislative Constitutionalism and Section Five Power: Policentric Interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act," 112 Yale L. J. 1943 (2003)
28. Reva B. Siegel, "Equality Talk: Antisubordination and Anticlassification Values in Constitutional Struggles over Brown," 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1470 (2004)
29. Reva B. Siegel, "Text in Context: Gender and the Constitution from a Social Movement Perspective," 150 U. Pa. L. Rev. 297 (2001).
30. Dan T. Coenen, "The Rehnquist Court, Structural Due Process, and Semisubstantive Constitutional Review," 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1281, 1283 (2002).
31. James Bradley Thayer, "The Origin and Scope of the American Doctrine of Constitutional Law," 7 Harv. L. Rev. 129, 144 (1893).
32. William Van Alstyne, "A Critical Guide to Marbury v. Madison," 1969 Duke L. J. 1, 31-32.
33. Ring Lardner, "The Young Immigrunts," in The Ring Lardner Reader 411, 426 (Maxwell Geismar ed., 1963).
34. James Allan & Grant Huscroft, "Constitutional Rights Coming Home to Roost? Rights Internationalism in American Courts," 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1, 25 (2006)
35. Paul C. Weiler, "Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version," 18 U. Mich. J. L. Ref. 51, 81-82 (1984).
36. Peter Russell, "Canadian Constraints on Judicialization from Without," 15 Int'l Pol. Sci. Rev. 165, 167 (1994)
37. John Whyte, "On Not Standing for Notwithstanding," 28 Alberta L. Rev. 347, 351 (1990)
38. William N. Eskridge, Jr., & John Ferejohn, "The Article I, Section 7 Game," 80 Geo. L. J.] 523 (1992)
39. Lee Epstein, Jack Knight, & Olga Shvetsova, "The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government," 35 Law & Soc'y Rev. 117 (2001).
40. Robert H. Bork, "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems," 47 Ind. L. J. 1 (1971).
41. Arash Abizadeh, "Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation?," 96 Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 495 (2002).
42. Mark Tushnet, "The Flagburning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution," 61 Colorado L. Rev. 39 (1990).
43. David R. Mayhew, Congress: The Electoral Connection 61-73 (1974).
44. Adrian Vermeule, "The Judiciary Is a They, Not an It: Interpretive Theory and the Fallacy of Division," 14 J. Contemp. Leg. Issues 549, 553 (2005)
45. Ruth Colker & James J. Brudney, "Dissing Congress," 100 Mich. L. Rev. 80, (2001)
46. Mark A. Graber, "The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary," 7 Stud. in Am. Pol. Dev. 35 (1993).
47. Richard A. Posner, "What Do Judges Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)," 3 S. Ct. Econ. Rev. 1 (1993)
48. Frederick Schauer, "Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior" (The Robert Marx Lecture), 68 U. Cin. L. Rev. 615 (2000).
49. David S. Law, "Generic Constitutional Law," 89 Minn. L. Rev. 652 (2005)
50. David Cole, "Enemy Aliens," 54 Stan. L. Rev. 953, 955 (2002)
51. William M. Corrigan, Jr., "The Argument for Lawyers in the Legislature: A Proud History of Service," 59 J. Mo. B. 216 (2003), available at http://www.mobar.org/journal/2003/sepoct/prezpage.htm (visited Jan. 20, 2006).
52. Elizabeth Garrett & Adrian Vermeule, "Institutional Design of a Thayerian Congress," 50 Duke L. J. 1277 (2001).
53. Daryl Levinson, "Empire-Building Government in Constitutional Law," 118 Harv. L. Rev. 915 (2005).
54. R. Sunstein, "Impeachment and Stability," 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 699, 709 (1999)
55. Frank O. Bowman III & Stephen L. Sepinuck, "'High Crimes and Misdemeanors': Defining the Constitutional Limits on Presidential Impeachment," 72 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1517, 1545 (1999)
56. Laurence H. Tribe, "Defining "High Crimes and Misdemeanors": Basic Principles," 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 712, 721 (1999).
57. Herbert Wechsler, "The Political Safeguards of Federalism: The Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government," 54 Colum. L. Rev. 543, 546 (1954)
58. Mark Tushnet, "Evaluating Congressional Constitutional Interpretation: Some Criteria and Two Informal Case Studies," 50 Duke L. J. 1395 (2001)
59. Mark Tushnet, "Non-Judicial Review," 40 Harv. J. on Legis. 453 (2003).
60. Akhil Reed Amar, "On Impeaching Presidents," 28 Hofstra L. Rev. 291, 317-41 (1999)
61. David E. Kendall, "Constitutional Vandalism," 30 N.M. L. Rev. 155, 168 (2000).
62. Anthony Clark Arend & Catherine B. Lotrionte, "Congress Goes to Court: The Past, Present, and Future of Legislator Standing," 25 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 209 (2001).
63. Louis Fisher, "Congressional Abdication: War and Spending Powers," 43 St. Louis U. L. J. 931, 1006 (1999)
64. John C. Yoo, "The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers," 84 Cal. L. Rev. 167, 174 (1996)
65. Peter J. Spiro, "War Powers and the Sirens of Formalism," 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1338, 1355-65 (1993)
66. Abraham D. Sofaer, "The Power Over War," 50 U. Miami L. Rev. 33, 55 (1995)
67. Daniel N. Hoffman, "A Republic, If You Can Keep It," 82 Mich. L. Rev. 997, 1001 (1994)
68. Kenneth A. Shepsle, "Congress Is a 'They.' Not an 'It': Legislative Intent as Oxymoron," 12 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 239 (1992).
69. Louis Fisher, "Constitutional Interpretation by Members of Congress," 63 N.C. L. Rev. 707, 719-20 (1985).
70. Stephen F. Ross, "Legislative Enforcement of Equal Protection," 72 Minn. L. Rev. 311, 360 n. 195 (1987)
71. M. Bryan Schneider, Note, "The Supreme Court's Reluctance to Enforce Constitutional Prohibitions Against Retroactive Income Tax Statutes," 40 Wayne L. Rev. 1603, 1605 (1994)
72. Charles Tiefer, "The Flag-Burning Controversy of 1989-1990: Congress' Valid Role in Constitutional Dialogue," 29 Harv. J. on Legis. 357, 378-79 (1992).
73. Nelson Lund, "Rational Choice at the Office of Legal Counsel," 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 437, 471-72 (1993).
74. Robert J. Goldstein, Burning The Flag: The Great 1989-1990 American Flag Desecration Controversy 168-69 (1996)
75. Mark Tushnet, "The Flagburning Episode: An Essay on the Constitution," 61 U. Colo. L. Rev. 39 (1990).
76. Douglas W. Kmiec, "OLC's Opinion Writing Function: The Legal Adhesive for a Unitary Executive," 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 337, 338-39 (1993)
77. Cornelia T. L. Pillard, "The Unfulfilled Promise of the Constitution in Executive Hands," 103 Mich. L. Rev. 676, 737-38 (2005)
78. Randolph D. Moss, "Executive Branch Legal Interpretation: A Perspective from the Office of Legal Counsel," 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1303, 1311 (2000).
79. Elizabeth Garrett, "Harnessing Politics: The Dynamics of Offset Requirements in the Tax Legislative Process," 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 501, 536 n. 134 (1998)
80. Janet Hiebert, "Rights-Vetting in New Zealand and Canada: Similar Idea, Different Outcomes," 3 N.Z. J. Pub. & Int'l L. 64 (2005).
81. Handyside v. United Kingdom, 1 Eur. H.R. Rep. 737 (1976).
82. Clive Walker & Russell L. Weaver, "The United Kingdom Bill of Rights 1998: The Modernisation of Rights in the Old World," 33 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 497, 558 (2000).
83. Janet L. Hiebert, "Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?" 4 Int'l J. Con. L. 1 (2006).
84. Danny Nichol, "The Human Rights Act and the Politicians," 24 Legal Stud. 451, 472 (2004).
85. Joint Comm. on Human Rights, Second Report (2001), available at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt200102/jtselect/jtrights/037/3702.htm.
86. Andrew Evans, "New Setback as Peers Reject Religious Hatred Offence," Press Ass'n, Dec. 13, 2001
87. Ian Craig, "Lords Pass Anti-Terror Law," Manchester Evening News, Dec. 14, 2001, at 4
88. Michael Zander, "The Anti-terrorism Bill-What Happened?" 151 New L. J. 1880 (2001).
89. Gary Peller & Mark Tushnet, "State Action and a New Birth of Freedom," 92 Geo. L. J. 779 (2004).
90. Robert Hale, "Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State," 38 Pol. Sci. Q. 470 (1923).
91. Frank Goodman, "Professor Brest on State Action and Liberal Theory, and a Postscript to Professor Stone," 130 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1331, 1338 (1982).
92. Erwin Chemerinsky, "Rethinking State Action," 80 Nw. U. L. Rev. 503, 506 (1985).
93. Gary Peller, "Neutral Principles in the 1950's," 21 U. Mich. J. L. Reform 561 (1988).
94. Kent Greenfield, "The Place of Workers in Corporate Law," 39 B.C.L. Rev. 283, 314 (1998).
95. "Neutrality, Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court: Some Intersections Between Law and Political Science," 20 Stan. L. Rev. 169 (1968).
96. Antonin Scalia, "The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules," 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1175 (1989).
97. Larry Alexander, "Trouble on Track Two: Incidental Regulations of Speech and Free Speech Theory," 44 Hastings L. J. 921 (1993).
98. Greg Taylor, "Why the Common Law Should Be Only Indirectly Affected by Constitutional Guarantees: A Comment on Stone," 26 Melbourne U. L. Rev. 623, 643 (2002)
99. Charles L. Black, Jr., "Foreword: 'State Action,' Equal Protection, and California's Proposition 14," 81 Harv. L. Rev. 69, 95 (1967).
100. Kenneth Karst, "Equality as a Central Principle in the First Amendment," 43 U. Chi. L. Rev. 20 (1975).
101. Olha Cherednychenko, "The Constitutionalization of Contract Law: Something New under the Sun," Electronic J. Comp. L., vol. 8:1 (March 2004), http://www.ejcl.org/81/art81-3.html
102. Frank R. Cross, "The Error of Positive Rights," 48 UCLA L. Rev. 857 (2001).
103. Rebecca Tushnet, "Copyright as a Model for Free Speech Law," 42 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2000).
104. Kim Lane Scheppele, "A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights," 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1921 (2004).
105. Rosalind Dixon, "Creating Dialogue About Socio-Economic Rights: Strong v. Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited," 5 Int'l J. Con. L. (2007).
106. Michael C. Dorf & Charles F. Sabel, "A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism," 98 Colum. L. Rev. 267, 452-69
107. James S. Liebman & Charles F. Sabel, "The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Post-Desegregation Civil Rights Agenda," 81N.C. L. Rev. 1703, 1720 (2003).
108. Pamela S. Karlan, "Exit Strategies in Constitutional Law: Lessons for Getting the Least Dangerous Branch Out of the Political Thicket," 82 B.U. L. Rev. 667, 667 n. 2 (2002).
109. Charles F. Sabel & James S. Liebman, "A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform," 28 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 183 (2003).
110. Richard A. Epstein, "Classical Liberalism Meets the New Constitutional Order: A Comment on Mark Tushnet," 3 Chi. J. Int'l L. 445, 464 (2002)
111. Stuart M. Benjamin, "Stepping Into the Same River Twice: Rapidly Changing Facts and the Appellate Process," 78 Tex. L. Rev. 269 (1999).
112. Stuart M. Benjamin, "Stepping Into the Same River Twice: Rapidly Changing Facts and the Appellate Process," 78 Tex. L. Rev. 269 (1999).