Engineering Corynebacterium crenatum to produce higher alcohols for biofuel using hydrolysates of duckweed (Landoltia punctata) as feedstock

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Su, Haifeng ^a   Jiang, Juan ^a   Lu, Qiuli ^a   Zhao, Zhao ^a   Xie, Tian ^a   Zhao, Hai ^b   Wang, Maolin ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioengineering; Corynebacterium crenatum; Duckweed; Higher alcohols

Indexed keywords

2 METHYL 1 BUTANOL; ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; BIOFUEL; BUTANOL; GLUCOSE; ISOBUTANOL; ISOLEUCINE; ISOPENTYL ALCOHOL; LEUCINE; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VALINE; PLANT EXTRACT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; STARCH;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOENGINEERING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORYNEBACTERIUM; CORYNEBACTERIUM CRENATUM; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; LANDOLTIA PUNCTATA; LEMNA; METABOLISM; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ARACEAE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ARACEAE; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CORYNEBACTERIUM CRENATUM; LANDOLTIA PUNCTATA; LEMNA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALCOHOLS; ARACEAE; BIOFUELS; BUTANOLS; CORYNEBACTERIUM; FERMENTATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; ISOLEUCINE; LEUCINE; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; PLANT EXTRACTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STARCH; VALINE;

EID: 84924099475     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-015-0199-3     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Smith KM, Cho KM, Liao JC. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for isobutanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(3):1045-55.
2. Ni Y, Sun Z. Recent progress on industrial fermentative production of acetone-butanol-ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;83(3):415-23.
3. Ishola MM, Jahandideh A, Haidarian B, Brandberg T, Taherzadeh MJ. Simultaneous saccharification, filtration and fermentation (SSFF): a novel method for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2013;133:68-73.
4. Wang J, Wan W. Comparison of different pretreatment methods for enriching hydrogen-producing bacteria from digested sludge. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33(12):2934-41.
5. Tuo H. Thermal-economic analysis of a transcritical Rankine power cycle with reheat enhancement for a low-grade heat source. Int J Energy Res. 2013;37(8):857-67.
6. Zheng S, Jiang W, Cai Y, Dionysiou DD, O'Shea KE. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of aromatic organoarsenic compounds in TiO2 suspension. Catal Today. 2014;224:83-8.
7. Wang L, Luo Z, Shahbazi A. Optimization of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for the production of ethanol from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) bagasse using response surface methodology. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;42:280-91.
8. Mainguet SE, Liao JC. Bioengineering of microorganisms for C(3) to C(5) alcohols production. Biotechnol J. 2010;5(12):1297-308.
9. Atsumi S, Liao JC. Metabolic engineering for advanced biofuels production from Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19(5):414-9.
10. Su H, Zhao Y, Zhao H, Wang M, Li Q, Jiang J, et al. Identification and assessment of the effects of yeast decarboxylases expressed in Escherichia coli for producing higher alcohols. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;17(1):126-38.
11. Wang Z, Cao G, Jiang C, Song J, Zheng J, Yang Q. Butanol production from wheat straw by combining crude enzymatic hydrolysis and anaerobic fermentation using Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC824. Energy Fuel. 2013;27(10):5900-6.
12. Clomburg JM, Gonzalez R. Biofuel production in Escherichia coli: the role of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86(2):419-34.
13. Crutcher FK, Parich A, Schuhmacher R, Mukherjee PK, Zeilinger S, Kenerley CM. A putative terpene cyclase, vir4 is responsible for the biosynthesis of volatile terpene compounds in the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma virens. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013;56:67-77.
14. Wang W, Liu X, Lu X. Engineering cyanobacteria to improve photosynthetic production of alka (e) nes. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:69.
15. Choi YJ, Lee SY. Microbial production of short-chain alkanes. Nature. 2013;502:571-4.
16. Stomp A-M. The duckweeds: a valuable plant for biomanufacturing. In: El-Gewely MR, editor. Biotechnol Annual Rev, vol. 11. Amsterdam of Holland: Elsevier; 2005. p. 69-99.
17. McCombs PJ, Ralph RK. Protein, nucleic acid and starch metabolism in the duckweed, Spirodela oligorrhiza, treated with cytokinins. Biochem J. 1972;129(2):403-17.
18. Xu J, Zhao H, Stomp A-M, Cheng JJ. The production of duckweed as a source of biofuels. Biofuels. 2012;3:589-601.
19. Chen Q, Jin Y, Zhang G, Fang Y, Xiao Y, Zhao H. Improving Production of Bioethanol from Duckweed (Landoltia punctata) by Pectinase Pretreatment. Energies. 2012;5(12):3019-32.
20. Su H, Zhao Y, Jiang J, Lu Q, Li Q, Luo Y, et al. Use of duckweed (Landoltia punctata) as a fermentation substrate for the production of higher alcohols as biofuels. Energy Fuel. 2014;28(5):3206-16.
21. Miller E, Turner P, Jarboe L, Ingram L. Genetic changes that increase 5-hydroxymethyl furfural resistance in ethanol-producing Escherichia coli LY180. Biotechnol Lett. 2010;32(5):661-7.
22. Geddes CC, Mullinnix M, Nieves I, Peterson J, Hoffman R, York S, et al. Simplified process for ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse using hydrolysate-resistant Escherichia coli strain MM160. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(3):2702-11.
23. Baez A, Cho K-M, Liao JC. High-flux isobutanol production using engineered Escherichia coli: a bioreactor study with in situ product removal. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90(5):1681-90.
24. Atsumi S, Wu TY, Machado IM, Huang WC, Chen PY, Pellegrini M, et al. Evolution, genomic analysis, and reconstruction of isobutanol tolerance in Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6(1):98.
25. Zhang S. Research of fermentation Leucine by Corynebacterium crenatum. Microbiology. 1989;5:264-7 [in Chinese].
26. Zhang S, Lu D. The breeding of leucine producing mutant strains, and fermentation conditions. Acta Microbiol Sin. 1979;2:180-6 [in Chinese].
27. Xu M, Rao Z, Yang J, Xia H, Dou W, Jin J, et al. Heterologous and homologous expression of the arginine biosynthetic argC~H cluster from Corynebacterium crenatum for improvement of (L) -arginine production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39(3):495-502.
28. Tang R, Guo Y, Chen Q. Isoleucine fermentation research: isoleucine fermentation production directly with sugar raw materials. Acta Microbiol Sin. 1978;18(1):45-51 [in Chinese].
29. Eggeling L, Bott M. Handbook of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Boca Raton, USA: CRC press; 2010.
30. Haynes JA, Britz ML. The effect of growth conditions of Corynebacterium glutamicum on the transformation frequency obtained by electroporation. J General Microbiol. 1990;136(2):255-63.
31. Van der Rest M, Lange C, Molenaar D. A heat shock following electroporation induces highly efficient transformation of Corynebacterium glutamicum with xenogeneic plasmid DNA. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;52(4):541-5.
32. Rose R, Rose CL, Omi SK, Forry KR, Durall DM, Bigg WL. Starch determination by perchloric acid vs enzymes: evaluating the accuracy and precision of six colorimetric methods. J Agric Food Chem. 1991;39(1):2-11.
33. Pirt SJ, Whelan WJ. The determination of starch by acid hydrolysis. J Sci Food Agric. 1951;2(5):224-8.
34. Thiex NJ, Manson H, Anderson S, Persson J-Å. Determination of crude protein in animal feed, forage, grain, and oilseeds by using block digestion with a copper catalyst and steam distillation into boric acid: collaborative study. J AOAC Int. 2002;85(2):309-17.
35. Xiao Y, Fang Y, Jin Y, Zhang G, Zhao H. Culturing duckweed in the field for starch accumulation. Ind Crops Prod. 2013;48:183-90.
36. Viles FJ, Silverman L. Determination of starch and cellulose with anthrone. Anal Chem. 1949;21(8):950-3.
37. Hansen J, Møller I. Percolation of starch and soluble carbohydrates from plant tissue for quantitative determination with anthrone. Anal Biochem. 1975;68(1):87-94.
38. Black H. Determination of sodium carboxymethylcellulose in detergent mixtures by anthrone method. Anal Chem. 1951;23(12):1792-5.
39. Iiyama K, Wallis AF. Determination of lignin in herbaceous plants by an improved acetyl bromide procedure. J Sci Food Agric. 1990;51(2):145-61.
40. Iiyama K, Wallis AFA. An improved acetyl bromide procedure for determining lignin in woods and wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol. 1988;22(3):271-80.
41. Lee HS, Rouseff RL, Nagy S. HPLC determination of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in citrus juices. J Food Sci. 1986;51(4):1075-6.
42. Theobald A, Müller A, Anklam E. Determination of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in vinegar samples by HPLC. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(5):1850-4.
43. Connor MR, Liao JC. Microbial production of advanced transportation fuels in non-natural hosts. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):307-15.
44. Brynildsen MP, Liao JC. An integrated network approach identifies the isobutanol response network of Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:277.
45. Wimalasena TT. Phenotypic characterisation of Saccharomyces spp. yeast for tolerance to stresses encountered during fermentation of lignocellulosic residues to produce bioethanol. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:47.