Time-Series Cross-Section Methods

The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Beck, Nathaniel ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary variables; Fixed effects; Heterogeneous units; Heteroskedasticity; Nonstationarity; Random coefficient models; Spatial autocorrelation; Time series cross sectional methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924083467     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0020     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. ADOLPH, C., BUTLER, D. M., and WILSON, S. E. 2005. Which time-series cross-section estimator should I use now? Guidance from Monte Carlo experiments. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
2. ALVAREZ, R. M., GARRETT, G., and LANGE, P. 1991. Government partisanship, labor organization and macroeconomic performance. American Political Science Review, 85: 539-56.
3. AMEMIYA, T. 1985. Advanced Econometrics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
4. ANSELIN, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
5. BECK, N., EPSTEIN, D., JACKMAN, S., and O'HALLORAN, S. 2001. Alternative models of dynamics in binary time-series-crosssection models: the example of state failure. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Emory University.
6. BECK, N., GLEDITSCH, K. S., and BEARDSLEY, K. 2006. Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly, 50: 27-44.
7. BECK, N., and KATZ, J. N. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89: 634-47.
8. BECK, N., and KATZ, J. N. 2001. Throwing out the baby with the bath water: a comment on Green, Kim and Yoon. International Organization, 55: 487-95.
9. BECK, N., and KATZ, J. N. 2004. Time series cross section issues: dynamics Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University.
10. BECK, N., and KATZ, J. N. 2007. Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments. Political Analysis, 15: 182-95.
11. BECK, N., KATZ, J. N., and TUCKER, R. 1998. Taking time seriously: time-series-cross-section analysis with a binary dependent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 42: 1260-88.
12. BOX-STEFFENSMEIER, J. M., and JONES, B. S. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Political Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. CAMERON, A. C., and TRIVEDI, P. K. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. CAMERON, D. 1978. The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 72: 1243-61.
15. COX, D. R. 1975. Partial likelihood. Biometrika, 62: 269-76.
16. DAVIDSON, J., HENDRY, D., SRBA, F., and YEO, S. 1978. Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditures and income in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 88: 661-92.
17. ENGLE, R., and GRANGER, C. W. J. 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55: 251-76.
18. GARRETT, G. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. GREEN, D., KIM, S. Y., and YOON, D. 2001. Dirty pool. International Organization, 55: 441-68.
20. HAMILTON, J. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. HENDRY, D., and MIZON, G. 1978. Serial correlation as a convenient simplification, not a nuisance: a comment on a study of the demand for money by the Bank of England. Economic Journal, 88: 549-63.
22. HENDRY, D., PAGAN, A., and SARGAN, J. D. 1984. Dynamic specification. Ch. 18 in Handbook of Econometrics, vol. ii, ed. Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23. HSIAO, C. 2003. Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. HUBER, P. J. 1967. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Pp. 221-33 in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. i, ed. L. M. LeCam and J. Neyman. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. IM, K. S., PESARAN, M. H., and SHIN, Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115: 53-74.
26. JONES, B. S., and BRANTON, R. P. 2005. Beyond logit and probit: Cox duration models of single, repeating and competing events for state policy adoption. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 5: 420-43.
27. KING, G., HONAKER, J., JOSEPH, A., and SCHEVE, K. 2001. Analyzing incomplete political science data: an alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95: 49-69.
28. LANGE, P., and GARRETT, G. 1985. The politics of growth: strategic interaction and economic performance in the advanced industrial democracies, 1974-1980. Journal of Politics, 47: 792-827.
29. MAOZ, Z., and RUSSETT, B. M. 1993. Normative and structural causes of democratic peace, 1946-1986. American Political Science Review, 87: 639-56.
30. PARKS, R. 1967. Efficient estimation of a system of regression equations when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62: 500-9.
31. PINHEIRO, J. C., and BATES, D. M. 2000. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer.
32. POIRIER, D. J., and RUUD, P. A. 1988. Probit with dependent observations. Review of Economic Studies, 55: 593-614.
33. PRZEWORSKI, A., ALVAREZ, M., CHEIBUB, J. A., and LIMONGI, F. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Regimes and Economic Well-being in the World, 1950-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. SMITH, A. F. M. 1973. A general Bayesian linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 35: 67-75.
35. STIMSON, J. 1985. Regression in space and time: a statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science, 29: 914-47.
36. STONE, M. 1974. Crossvalidatory choice and assessment of statistical prediction. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36: 111-33.
37. WARE, J. H., LIPSITZ, S., and SPEIZER, F. E. 1988. Issues in the analysis of repeated categorical outcomes. Statistics in Medicine, 7: 95-107.
38. WESTERN, B. 1998. Causal heterogeneity in comparative research: a Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach. American Journal of Political Science, 42: 1233-59.
39. WHITE, H. 1982. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50: 1-25.
40. WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.