Methodology for the inference of gene function from phenotype data

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Ascensao, Joao A ^a,b   Dolan, Mary E ^a   Hill, David P ^a   Blake, Judith A ^a  

^a JACKSON LABORATORY   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Function prediction; Gene ontology; Mammalian phenotype ontology; Ontology development

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS; SEMANTICS;

BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGIES; FUNCTION PREDICTION; FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION; FUNCTIONAL PREDICTIONS; GENE ONTOLOGY; LARGE AMOUNTS OF DATA; ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY MEASURES;

GENES;

MAMMALIA;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; FACTUAL DATABASE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOUSE; PHENOTYPE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; MICE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84924061680     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-014-0405-z     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gruber TR: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 1993, 5(2):199-220.
2. Hill DP, Smith B, McAndrews-Hill MS, Blake JA: Gene Ontology annotations: what they mean and where they come from. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9(Suppl 5):S2.
3. Gene Ontology Consortium: Gene Ontology annotations and resources. Nucl Acids Res 2013, 41:D530-D535.
4. Gene Ontology Consortium: Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 2000, 25:25-29.
5. Smith CL, Eppig JT: The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a unifying standard for experimental and high-throughput phenotyping data. Mamm Genome 2012, 23(910):653-668.
6. Blake JA, Bult CJ, Eppig JT, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Mouse Genome Database Group: The Mouse Genome Database: integration of and access to knowledge about the laboratory mouse. Nucl Acids Res 2014, 42(1):D810-D817.
7. Ashurst JL, Collins JE: Gene Annotation: Prediction and Testing. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2003, 4:69-88.
8. Groth P, Weiss B, Pohlenz HD, Leser U: Mining phenotypes for gene function prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:136.
9. Tao Y, Li J, Friedman C, Lussier YA: Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(13):i529-i538.
10. Azuaje F, Bodenreider O: Incorporating Ontology-Driven Similarity Knowledge into Functional Genomics: An Exploratory Study. Proc BIBE 2004, 4:317-324.
11. Hoehndorf R, Hardy NW, Osumi-Sutherland D, Tweedie S, Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV: Systematic analysis of experimental phenotype data reveals gene functions. PLOS One 2013, 8(4):e60847.
12. King OD, Lee JC, Dudley AM, Janse DM, Church GM, Roth FP: Predicting phenotype from patterns of annotation. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(Suppl 1):i183-i189.
13. Kemmeren P, Kockelkorn TT, Bijma T, Donders R, Holstege FC: Predicting gene function through systematic analysis and quality assessment of high-throughput data. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(8):1644-1652.
14. Gómez A, Cedano J, Amela I, Planas A, Piñol J, Querol E: Gene Ontology function prediction in Mollicutes using protein-protein association networks. BMC Systems Biology 2011, 5:49.
15. Deng M, Zhang K, Mehta S, Chen T, Sun F: Prediction of Protein Function Using Protein-Protein Interaction Data. J Comput Biol 2004, 10(6):947-960.
16. Deng M, Tu Z, Sun F, Chen T: Mapping gene ontology to proteins based on protein-protein interaction data. Bioinformatics 2003, 20(6):895-902.
17. Wood V, private communication
18. Joslyn C, Baddeley B, Blake J, Bult C, Dolan M, Riensche R, Rodland K, Sanfilippo A, White A: Automated Annotation-Based Bio-Ontology Alignment with Structural Validation. Nature Proceedings 2009< http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2009.3518.1 >
19. Lambrix P, Tan H: Ontology Alignment and Merging. In Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics. Edited by Burger A, Davidson D, Baldock R. London: Springer; 2008:133-149.
20. Manda P, McCarthy F, Bridges SM: Interestingness measures and strategies for mining multi-ontology multi-level association rules from gene ontology annotations for the discovery of new GO relationships. J Biomed Informat 2013, 46(5):849-856.
21. Myhre S, Tveit H, Mollestad T, Lægreid A: Additional Gene Ontology structure for improved biological reasoning. Bioinformatics 2006, 22(16):2020-2027.
22. Dickie MM: New Splotch Alleles in Mouse. J Hered 1964, 55:97-101.
23. Moase CE, Trasler DG: Spinal ganglia reduction in the splotch-delayed mouse neural tube defect mutant. Teratology 1989, 40(1):67-75.
24. Keller C, Arenkiel BR, Coffin CM, El-Bardeesy N, DePinho RA, Capecchi MR: Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas in conditional Pax3:Fkhr mice: cooperativity of Ink4a/ARF and Trp53 loss of function. Genes Dev 2004, 18(21):2614-2626.
25. Degenhardt KR, Milewski RC, Padmanabhan A, Miller M, Singh MK, Lang D, Engleka KA, Wu M, Li J, Zhou D, Antonucci N, Li L, Epstein JA: Distinct enhancers at the Pax3 locus can function redundantly to regulate neural tube and neural crest expressions. Dev Biol 2010, 339(2):519-527.
26. Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: New features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2010, 27(3):431-432.
27. Oliphant TE: Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 2007, 9(3):10-20.
28. Jiang Z, Zhu L, Hu L, Slesnick TC, Pautler RG, Justice MJ, Belmont JW: Zic3 is required in the extracardiac perinodal region of the lateral plate mesoderm for left-right patterning and heart development. Hum Mol Genet 2013, 22(5):879-889.