It takes a (virtual) village: crowdsourcing measurement consensus to advance survivorship care planning

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 53-59

  Parry, Carla ^a,c   Beckjord, Ellen ^b   Moser, Richard P ^a   Vieux, Sana N ^a   Padgett, Lynne S ^a   Hesse, Bradford W ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data harmonization; Measurement consensus; Survivorship care planning; Technology mediated social participation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVOR; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS; CROWDSOURCING; DATA BASE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GRID ENABLED MEASURE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SURVIVORSHIP CARE PLANNING;

EID: 84924058091     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0289-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hewitt ME, Ganz PA, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2006.
2. Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient Centered Care (v2). In. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2011.
3. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Palmer SC. Survivorship care plans: an argument for evidence over common sense. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(12): 1392-1393. author reply 1393–5.
4. Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, et al. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2011; 34(3): E1-E10.
5. Faul LA, Rivers B, Shibata D, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012; 30(2): 198-216.
6. Grunfeld E, Julian J, Maunsell E, et al. Reply to Jefford et al. and C.T. Stricker et al. (correspondence). J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1393-1394.
7. Mayer DK, Gerstel A, Leak AN, Smith SK. Patient and provider preferences for survivorship care plans. J Oncol Pract. 2012; 8(4): e80-e86.
8. Blaseg K, Kile M, Salner A. Survivorship & palliative care: a comprehensive approach to a survivorship care plan. Oncol Issues. 2011(May/June): 26–34.
9. Brennan ME, Butow P, Marven M, Spillane AJ, Boyle FM. Survivorship care after breast cancer treatment—experiences and preferences of Australian women. Breast. 2011; 20(3): 271-277.
10. Earle CC, Ganz PA. Cancer survivorship care: don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(30): 3764-3768.
11. Jefford M, Schofield P, Emery J. Improving survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(12): 1391-1392. author reply 1393–4.
12. Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, et al. Increasing rates of breast cancer and cardiac surveillance among high-risk survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma following a mailed, one-page survivorship care plan. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011; 56(5): 818-824.
13. Parry C, Kent E, Forsythe L, Alfano C, Rowland J. Can’t see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(21): 2561-2653.
14. Smith TJ, Snyder C. Is it time for (survivorship care) plan B? J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(36): 4740-4742.
15. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, et al. Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv. 2011; 5(4): 358-370.
16. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(36): 4755-4762.
17. Moser RP, Hesse BW, Shaikh AR, et al. Grid-enabled measures: using Science 2.0 to standardize measures and share data. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(5 Suppl 2): S134-S143.
18. Estabrooks PA, Boyle M, Emmons KM, et al. Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012: 1–8.
19. Moser RP, Beckjord EB, Finney Rutten LJ, Blake K, Hesse BW. Using collaborative Web technology to construct the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). J Health Commun. 2012; 17: 990-1000.
20. Hesse BW, O’Connell M, Augustson EM, Wen-Ying SC, Shaikh AR. Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: engaging community intelligence. J Health Commun. 2011; 16(Suppl 1): 10-31.
21. O’Reilly T. The open source paradigm shift. In: Feller J, Fitzgerald B, Hissam SA, Lakhani KR, eds. Perspectives on Free and Open Source software. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2005.
22. O’Reilly T. Paradigm shift. 2010. http://oreilly.com/tim/articles/paradigmshift_0504.html.
23. Hesse BW, Hansen D, Finholt T, Munson S, Kellogg W, Thomas JC. Social participation in health 2.0. IEEE Computer. 2010; 43(11): 45-52.
24. Pirolli P, Preece J, Shneiderman B. Cyberinfrastructure for social action on national priorities. IEEE Computer. 2010; 43(11): 20-21.
25. Nielsen MA. Reinventing Discovery: the New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2012.
26. Holdren JP. In: Policy EOotPOoSaT, ed. Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President; 2013.
27. The Executive Office of the President. The Open Government Partnership: National Action Plan for the United States of America. In: The Executive Office of the President, (ed). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2011.
28. Hesse BW. Of mice and mentors: developing cyber-infrastructure to support transdisciplinary scientific collaboration. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(2S): S235-S239.
29. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Best Care at Lower Cost: the Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2012.
30. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Informatics Needs and Challenges in Cancer Research: Workshop Summary. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2012.
31. American Society of Clinical Oncology. In: Kris MA, Meropol NJ, Winer EP, eds. Accelerating Progress against Cancer: ASCO’s Blueprint for Transforming Clinical and Translational Cancer Research. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology; 2011.
32. Shneiderman B, Plaisant C. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley; 2010.
33. Chismar W, Horan TA, Hesse BW, et al. Health cyberinfrastructure for collaborative use-inspired research and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2011; 40(5 Suppl 2): S108-S114.
34. Fogg BJ. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Amsterdam; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2003.
35. Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care. Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2013.
36. National Institutes of Health. Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K). Available at http://bd2k.nih.gov/. Accessibility verified April 15, 2014.