Dopamine D1/D2 receptors do not mediate the expression of conditioned place preference induced by the aftereffect of wheel running

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Trost, Alexandra ^a   Hauber, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aftereffect; Dopamine; Rat; Reinforcement; Wheel running

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE 1 RECEPTOR; DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR; FLUPENTIXOL; DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; APPETITE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONED PLACE PREFERENCE TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PLACE PREFERENCE; RAT; TREADMILL; TREADMILL EXERCISE; VISION; ANIMAL; ANTAGONISTS AND INHIBITORS; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; RUNNING; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DOPAMINE ANTAGONISTS; FLUPENTHIXOL; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D1; RECEPTORS, DOPAMINE D2; RUNNING; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84924056378     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12868-014-0124-4     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Collier G, Hirsch E: Reinforcing properties of spontaneous activity in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1971, 77(1):155-160.
2. Belke TW, Wagner JP: The reinforcing property and the rewarding aftereffect of wheel running in rats: a combination of two paradigms. Behav Process 2005, 68(2):165-172.
3. Iversen IH: Techniques for establishing schedules with wheel running as reinforcement in rats. J Exp Anal Behav 1993, 60(1):219-238.
4. Lattanzio SB, Eikelboom R: Wheel access duration in rats: I. Effects on feeding and running. Behav Neurosci 2003, 117(3):496-504.
5. Cosgrove KP, Hunter RG, Carroll ME: Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002, 73(3):663-671.
6. Novak CM, Burghardt PR, Levine JA: The use of a running wheel to measure activity in rodents: relationship to energy balance, general activity, and reward. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012, 36(3):1001-1014.
7. Bliss EL, Ailion J: Relationship of stress and activity to brain dopamine and homovanillic acid. Physiol Pharmacol 1971, 10(20):1161-1169.
8. Lett BT, Grant VL, Koh MT, Flynn G: Prior experience with wheel running produces cross-tolerance to the rewarding effect of morphine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2002, 72(1-2):101-105.
9. Lett BT, Grant VL, Koh MT: Naloxone attenuates the conditioned place preference induced by wheel running in rats. Physiol Behav 2001, 72(3):355-358.
10. Lett BT, Grant VL, Byrne MJ, Koh MT: Pairings of a distinctive chamber with the aftereffect of wheel running produce conditioned place preference. Appetite 2000, 34(1):87-94.
11. Bardo MT, Bevins RA: Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacol (Berl) 2000, 153(1):31-43.
12. Cardinal RN: Neural systems of motivation. In Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience, Three-Volume Set, 1-3 Volume 2, edn. Edited by Koob GF, Le Moal M, Thompson RF. Oxford: Elsevier Science; 2010:376-386.
13. Danna CL, Elmer GI: Disruption of conditioned reward association by typical and atypical antipsychotics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2010, 96(1):40-47.
14. Dickinson A, Smith J, Mirenowicz J: Dissociation of pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists. Behav Neurosci 2000, 114(3):468-483.
15. Murschall A, Hauber W: Inactivation of the ventral tegmental area abolished the general excitatory influence of pavlovian cues on instrumental performance. Learn Mem 2006, 13(2):123-126.
16. Lex A, Hauber W: Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell mediate pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Learn Mem 2008, 15(7):483-491.
17. Corbit LH, Janak PH, Balleine BW: General and outcome-specific forms of pavlovian-instrumental transfer: the effect of shifts in motivational state and inactivation of the ventral tegmental area. Eur J Neurosci 2007, 26(11):3141-3149.
18. Wassum KM, Ostlund SB, Balleine BW, Maidment NT: Differential dependence of pavlovian incentive motivation and instrumental incentive learning processes on dopamine signaling. Learn Mem 2011, 18(7):475-483.
19. Weinstein A, Weinstein Y: Exercise, addiction-diagnosis, bio-psychological mechanisms and treatment issues. Curr Pharm Design 2014, 20:680-687.
20. Lett BT, Grant VL, Koh MT: Delayed backward conditioning of place preference induced by wheel running in rats. Learning Motiv 2002, 33:347-357.
21. Trezza V, Damsteegt R, Vanderschuren LJ: Conditioned place preference induced by social play behavior: parametrics, extinction, reinstatement and disruption by methylphenidate. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2009, 19(9):659-669.
22. Trezza V, Damsteegt R, Achterberg EM, Vanderschuren LJ: Nucleus accumbens μ-opioid receptors mediate social reward. J Neurosci 2011, 31(17):6362-6370.
23. Herzig V, Capuani E, Kovar KA, Schmidt W: Effects of MPEP on expression of food, MDMA or amphetamine conditioned place preference in rats. Addict Biol 2005, 10(3):243-249.
24. Tzschentke TM, Schmidt WJ: Blockade of morphine- and amphetamine-induced conditioned place preference in the rat by riluzole. Neurosci Lett 1998, 242(2):114-116.
25. Solomon RL: The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: the costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain. Am Psychologist 1980, 35(8):691-712.
26. Greenwood BN, Foley TE, Le TV, Strong PV, Loughridge AB, Day HE, Fleshner M: Long-term voluntary wheel running is rewarding and produces plasticity in the mesolimbic reward pathway. Behav Brain Res 2011, 217(2):354-362.
27. Reed J, Buck S: The effect of regular aerobic exercise on positive-activated affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exer 2009, 10(6):581-594.
28. Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ: Acute aerobic exercise and affect: current status, problems and prospects regarding dose-response. Sports Med 1999, 28(5):337-374.
29. Pitts SM, Horvitz JC: Similar effects of D(1)/D(2) receptor blockade on feeding and locomotor behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 65(3):433-438.
30. Packard MG, Schroeder JP, Alexander GM: Expression of testosterone conditioned place preference is blocked by peripheral or intra-accumbens injection of alpha-flupenthixol. Horm Behav 1998, 34(1):39-47.
31. Koob GF, Volkow ND: Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010, 35(1):217-238.
32. Everitt BJ, Morris KA, O'Brien A, Robbins TW: The basolateral amygdala-ventral striatal system and conditioned place preference: further evidence of limbic-striatal interactions underlying reward-related processes. Neuroscience 1991, 42(1):1-18.
33. Pecina S, Cagniard B, Berridge KC, Aldridge JW, Zhuang X: Hyperdopaminergic mutant mice have higher "wanting" but not "liking" for sweet rewards. J Soc Neurosci 2003, 23(28):9395-9402.
34. Hiroi N, White NM: The amphetamine conditioned place preference: differential involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes and two dopaminergic terminal areas. Brain Res 1991, 552(1):141-152.
35. Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG: Cocaine-induced place preference conditioning: lack of effects of neuroleptics and 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. Brain Res 1982, 253(1-2):195-203.
36. Martin-Iverson M, Ortmann R, Fibiger H: Place preference conditioning with methylphenidate and nomifensine. Brain Res 1985, 332(1):59-67.
37. Mithani S, Martin-Iverson M, Phillips A, Fibiger H: The effects of haloperidol on amphetamine-and methylphenidate-induced conditioned place preferences and locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology 1986, 90(2):247-252.
38. Hnasko TS, Sotak BN, Palmiter RD: Cocaine-conditioned place preference by dopamine-deficient mice is mediated by serotonin. J Neurosci 2007, 27(46):12484-12488.
39. Tzschentke TM: Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: update of the last decade. Addict Biol 2007, 12(3-4):227-462.
40. Spyraki C, Fibiger HC, Phillips AG: Attenuation by haloperidol of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 1982, 77(4):379-382.
41. Garcia Horsman P, Paredes RG: Dopamine antagonists do not block conditioned place preference induced by paced mating behavior in female rats. Behav Neurosci 2004, 118(2):356-364.
42. Guyon A, Assouly-Besse F, Biala G, Puech AJ, Thiebot MH: Potentiation by low doses of selected neuroleptics of food-induced conditioned place preference in rats. Psychopharmacology 1993, 110(4):460-466.
43. Delamater AR, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ: Pharmacology of sucrose-reinforced place-preference conditioning: effects of naltrexone. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2000, 65(4):697-704.
44. Agmo A, Galvan A, Talamantes B: Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1995, 52(2):403-414.
45. Pecina S, Berridge KC: Dopamine or opioid stimulation of nucleus accumbens similarly amplify cue-triggered 'wanting' for reward: entire core and medial shell mapped as substrates for PIT enhancement. European J Neurosci 2013, 37(9):1529-1540.
46. Field A: Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
47. Rosenthal R: Meta-analytic procedures for social research, Vol. 6. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1991.