Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 468-483

  Dickinson, Anthony ^a   Smith, Janice ^a   Mirenowicz, Jacques ^a  

^a UK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DISSOCIATION; LEARNING; MALE; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; RAT; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0033913868     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.3.468     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, C. D., & Dickinson, A. (1981). Instrumental responding following reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 33B, 109-122.
2. Balleine, B. (1992). Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends upon incentive learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 236-250.
3. Balleine, B. (1994). Asymmetrical interactions between thirst and hunger in Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47B, 211-231.
4. Balleine, B., Ball, J., & Dickinson, A. (1994). Benzodiazepine-induced outcome revaluation and the motivational control of instrumental action in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 573-589.
5. Balleine, B., Davies, A., & Dickinson, A. (1995). Cholecystokinin attenuates incentive learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 312-319.
6. Balleine, B., & Dickinson, A. (1991). Instrumental performance following reinforcer devaluation depends upon incentive learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 43B, 279-296.
7. Balleine, B., & Dickinson, A. (1992). Signalling and incentive processes in instrumental reinforcer devaluation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 45B, 285-301.
8. Balleine, B., & Dickinson, A. (1994). Role of cholecystokinin in the motivational control of instrumental action in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 590-605.
9. Balleine, B. W., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Goal-directed instrumental action: Contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology, 37, 407-419.
10. Balleine, B., & Killcross, S. (1994). Effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens on instrumental action. Behavioural Brain Research, 65, 181-193.
11. Bassareo, V., & Di Chiara, G. (1997). Differential influence of associative and nonassociative learning mechanisms on the responsiveness of prefrontal and accumbal dopamine transmission to food stimuli in rats fed ad libitum. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 851-861.
12. Bechara, A., Harrington, F., Nader, K., & van der Kooy, D. (1992). Neurobiology of motivation: Double dissociation of two motivational mechanisms mediating opiate reward in drug-naive versus drug dependent animals. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 798-807.
13. Beninger, R. J., & Miller, R. (1998). Dopamine D1-receptors and reward-related incentive learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 22, 335-345.
14. Beninger, R. J., & Phillips, A. G. (1981). The effects of pimozide during pairing on the transfer of classical conditioning to an operant discrimination. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 14, 101-105.
15. Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: Hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience. Brain Research Reviews, 28, 309-369.
16. Berridge, K. C., & Treit, D. (1986). Chlordiazepoxide directly enhances positive ingestive reactions. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 24, 217-221.
17. Bindra, D. (1974). A motivational view of learning, performance and behavior modification. Psychological Review, 81, 199-213.
18. Blackburn, J. R., Phillips, A. G., & Fibiger, H. C. (1987). Dopamine and preparatory behavior: I. Effects of pimozide. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 352-360.
19. Colwill, R. M., & Motzkin, D. K. (1994). Encoding of the unconditioned stimulus in Pavlovian conditioning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 22, 384-394.
20. Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
21. Crespi, L. P. (1942). Quantitative variations of incentive and performance in the white rat. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 467-517.
22. de Borchgrave, R. (1995). On the involvement of the rat nucleus accumbens in instrumental performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, England.
23. Deutsch, J. A. (1964). The structural basis of behavior. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Dickinson, A. (1997). Bolle's psychological syllogism. In M. E. Bouton & M. S. Fanselow (Eds.), Learning, motivation, and cognition (pp. 345-367). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Dickinson, A., & Balleine, B. (1994). Motivational control of goal-directed action. Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 1-18.
26. Dickinson, A., & Dawson, G. R. (1987). Pavlovian processes in the motivational control of instrumental performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 39B, 201-213.
27. Dickinson, A., & Dawson, G. R. (1988). Motivational control of instrumental performance: The role of prior experience of the reinforcer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 40B, 113-134.
28. Dickinson, A., & Dawson, G. R. (1989). Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41B, 99-112.
29. Estes, W. K. (1943). Discriminative conditioning: I. A discriminative property of conditioned anticipation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 150-155.
30. Flaherty, C. F. (1996). Incentive relativity. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Grill, H. J., & Berridge, K. C. (1985). Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability. In J. M. Sprague & A. N. Epstein (Eds.), Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 1-61). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32. Holland, P. C. (1979). Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive responding in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 178-193.
33. Horvitz, J. C., & Ettenberg, A. (1991). Conditioned incentive properties of a food-paired conditioned stimulus remains intact during dopamine receptor blockade. Behavioral Neuroscience, 105, 536-541.
34. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
35. Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Killcross, A. S., Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1997). Symmetrical effects of amphetamine and alpha-flupenthixol on conditioned punishment and conditioned reinforcement: Contrast with midazolam. Psychopharmacology, 129, 141-152.
37. Ljungberg, T., Apicella, P., & Schultz, W. (1992). Responses of monkeys dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 145-163.
38. Lopez, M., Balleine, B., & Dickinson, A. (1992). Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance by thirst. Animal Learning and Behavior, 20, 322-328.
39. Lopez, M., & Paredes-Olay, C. (1999). Sensitivity of instrumental responses to an upshift in water deprivation. Animal Learning and Behavior, 27, 280-287.
40. Lovibond, P. F. (1983). Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 225-247.
41. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
42. McFarland, K., & Ettenberg, A. (1998). Haloperidal does not affect motivational processes in an operant runway model of food-seeking behavior. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 630-635.
43. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
44. Pecina, S., Berridge, K. C., & Parker, L. A. (1997). Pimozide does not shift palatability: Separation of anhedonia from sensorimotor effects. Pharmacology, Biochemistry & Behavior, 58, 801-811.
45. Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationship between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151-182.
46. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291.
47. Salamone, J. D., Cousins, M. S., & Snyder, B. J. (1997). Behavioural functions of the nucleus accumbens dopamine: Empirical evidence and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 21, 341-359.
48. Smith, G. P. (1995). Dopamine and food reward. Progress in Psychobiology and Physiological Psychology, 16, 83-144.
49. SPIDER [Computer software]. (1987). Cambridge, England: Paul Fray.
50. Tolman, E. C. (1949a). The nature and function of wants. Psychological Review, 56, 357-369.
51. Tolman, E. C. (1949b). There is more than one kind of learning. Psychological Review, 56, 144-155.
52. Willner, P., Chaw-la, K., Sampson, D., Sophokleus, S., & Muscat, R. (1988). Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding. Psychopharmacology, 95, 423-426.
53. Willner, P., Phillips, G., Muscat, R., & Hood, P. (1992). Behavioural tests of the dopamine hypothesis of neuroleptic-induced response decrements. Psychopharmacology, 106, 543-549.
54. Wilson, C., Nomikos, G. C., Collu, M., & Fibiger, H. C. (1995). Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: Importance of drive. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 5169-5178.
55. Wise, R. A., Spindler, J., deWit, H., & Gerber, G. J. (1978). Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: Pimozide blocks reward quality of food. Science, 201, 262-264.
56. Wise, R. A., Spindler, J., & Legault, L. (1978). Major attenuation of food reward with performance sparing doses of pimozide in the rat. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 32, 77-85.
57. Wyvell, C. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2000). Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the pare incentive salience of a Pavlovian cue for food: Enhancement of 'wanting' without either 'liking' or reinforcement. Manuscript submitted for publication.