Moment independent sensitivity analysis with correlations

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 38, Issue 19-20, 2014, Pages 4885-4896

  Zhou, Changcong ^a   Lu, Zhenzhou ^a   Zhang, Leigang ^a   Hu, Jixiang ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Correlation; Importance measure; Moment independent; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DECOMPOSITION;

CORRELATED PARTS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; IMPORTANCE ANALYSIS; IMPORTANCE MEASURE; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; INPUT VARIABLES; MOMENT INDEPENDENTS; OUTPUT DISTRIBUTION;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84924038317     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.047     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal. 2002, 22:579-590.
2. Rahman S. Stochastic sensitivity analysis by dimensional and score functions. Probab. Eng. Mech. 2009, 24:278-287.
3. Saltelli A., Marivoet J. Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output: a comparison of selected techniques. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1990, 28:229-253.
4. Iman R.L., Johnson M.E., Watson C.C. Sensitivity analysis for computer model projections of hurricane losses. Risk Anal. 2005, 25:1277-1297.
5. I.M. Sobol, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matem. Modelirovanie 2 (1990) 112-118. (in Russian). English Translation: Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment 1 (1993) 407-414.
6. Rabitz H., Alis O.F. General foundations of high-dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 1999, 25:197-233.
7. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modelling. Stat. Sci. 2000, 19:377-395.
8. Frey C.H., Patil S.R. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal. 2002, 22:553-571.
9. Park C.K., Ahn K.I. A new approach for measuring uncertainty importance and distributional sensitivity in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1994, 46:253-261.
10. Chun M.-H., Han S.-J., Tak N.-I. An uncertainty importance measure using a distance metric for the change in a cumulative distribution function. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2000, 70:313-321.
11. Borgonovo E. A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2007, 92:771-784.
12. Borgonovo E. Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches. Risk Anal. 2006, 26:1349-1361.
13. Liu Q., Homma T. A new importance measure for sensitivity analysis. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2010, 47:53-61.
14. Castaings W., Borgonovo E., Morris M.D., Tarantola S. Sampling strategies in density-based sensitivity analysis. Environ. Model. Software 2012, 38:13-26.
15. Li G., Rabitz H. General formulation of HDMR component functions with independent and correlated variables. J. Math. Chem. 2012, 50:99-130.
16. Kucherenko S., Tarantola S., Annoni P. Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012, 183:937-946.
17. Xu C., Gertner G.Z. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93:1563-1573.
18. Borgonovo E., Tarantola S. Moment independent and variance based sensitivity analysis with correlations: an application to the stability of a chemical reactor. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40:687-698.
19. Mara T.A., Tarantola S. Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 107:115-121.
20. Plischke E., Borgonovo E., Smith C.L. Global sensitivity measures from given data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2013, 226:536-550.
21. Rosenblatt M. Remarks on the multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 1952, 43:470-472.
22. Lebrun R., Dutfoy A. Do Rosenblatt and Nataf isoprobabilistic transformations really differ?. Probab. Eng. Mech. 2009, 24:577-584.
23. J.C. Helton, F.J. Davis, Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Sandia Report, 2002, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2002.
24. Kaymaz I. Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems. Struct. Saf. 2005, 27:133-151.
25. S.N. Lophaven, H.B. Nielsen, J. Søndergaard, DACE, a Matlab Kriging toolbox. Available at http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~hbni/dace/.
26. Botev Z.I., Grotowski J.F., Kroese D.P. Kernel density estimation via diffusion. Ann. Stat. 2010, 38:2916-2957.
27. Z.I. Botev, Kernel density estimation using Matlab. Available at http://www.mathworks.us/matlabcentral/fileexchange/authors/27236.
28. Liu Q., Homma T. A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2009, 94:1205-1207.
29. Xu X., Lu Z., Luo X. A stable approach based on asymptotic space integration for moment-independent importance measure. Risk Anal. 2014, 34:235-251.
30. Wu Y.T., Shin Y., Sues R.H., Cesare M.A. Probabilistic function evaluation system (ProFES) for reliability-based design. Struct. Saf. 2006, 28:164-195.
31. Zhou C., Lu Z., Li L., Feng J., Wang B. A new algorithm for variance based importance analysis of models with correlated inputs. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37:864-875.
32. Shi Y., Xu W., Qin C., Xu Y. Mathematical statistics 2009, Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese).