Legislating thresholds for drug trafficking: A policy development case study from New South Wales, Australia

International Journal of Drug Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 992-1000

  Hughes, Caitlin Elizabeth ^a   Ritter, Alison ^a   Cowdery, Nicholas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Drug; Law; Policy process; Trafficking

Indexed keywords

3,4 METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; ILLICIT DRUG; METHAMPHETAMINE; TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL; STREET DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG LEGISLATION; DRUG POLICY; DRUG TRAFFIC; DRUG USE; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL PROCEDURE; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HISTORY; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MANAGEMENT;

DRUG TRAFFICKING; HEALTH POLICY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; NEW SOUTH WALES; POLICY MAKING; STREET DRUGS;

EID: 84924032691     PISSN: 09553959     EISSN: 18734758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Blewett N. The National Campaign Against Drug Abuse: Assumptions, arguments and aspirations. Drug and Alcohol Review 1988, 7:191-202.
2. Calman K., Smith D. Works in theory but not in practice? The role of the precautionary principle in public health policy. Public Administration 2001, 79(1):185-204.
3. Dobinson I., Ward P. Drugs and crime: A survey of NSW prison property offenders 1985, New South Wales Bureau for Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney.
4. Dobinson I., Ward P. Drugs and crime - Phase II. A study of individuals seeking treatment 1987, New South Wales Bureau for Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney.
5. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act (NSW) 1985.
6. Drug Misuse and Trafficking (Amendment) Act (NSW) 1988.
7. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Fantasy) Regulation (NSW) 1996.
8. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Flatliner) Regulation (NSW) 1999.
9. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Prohibited Drug) Regulation (NSW) 2003.
10. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Prohibited Drugs) Regulation (NSW) 2011.
11. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Amendment (Prohibited Substance) Regulation (NSW) 2013.
12. Griffiths P., Evans-Brown M., Sedefov R. Getting up to speed with the public health and regulatory challenges posed by new psychoactive substances in the information age. Addiction 2013, 108(10):1700-1703.
13. Harris G. TNI-EMCDDA expert seminar on threshold quantities 2011, Transnational Institute, Lisbon.
14. Houborg E. Methadone: A contested substance - Danish methadone policy in the 1970s. International Journal of Drug Policy 2013, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.008.
15. Hughes B. The role of the quantity in the prosecution of drug offences, ELDD Comparative Study 2003, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon.
16. Hughes C.E. Capitalising upon political opportunities to reform drug policy: A case study into the development of the Australian "Tough on Drugs-Illicit Drug Diversion Initiative". International Journal of Drug Policy 2009, 20(5):431-437.
17. Hughes B. Topic overview 2010, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon.
18. Hughes C. Legislative threshold for drug possession and traffic: An overview of State and Territory differences in Australia DPMP Bulletin No. 18 2010, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney.
19. Hughes C., Ritter A. Monograph No. 16: A summary of diversion programs for drug and drug-related offenders in Australia DPMP Monograph Series 2008, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Sydney.
20. Hughes C., Ritter A., Cowdery N., Phillips B. Australian threshold quantities for 'drug trafficking': Are they placing drug users at risk of unjustified sanction?. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice no. 467 2014, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
21. Kingdon J. Agendas, alternatives and public policy 2003, Longman, New York. 2nd ed.
22. Leader-Elliott I. Sentencing by weight: Proposed changes to the Commonwealth Code's serious drug offences. Criminal Law Journal 2012, 36(5):265-281.
23. Lenton S. Pot, politics and the press - Reflections on cannabis law reform in Western Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review 2004, 23(2):223-233.
24. MCCOC Chapter 6 - Serious drug offences Model Criminal Code 1998, Model Criminal Code Officers Committee, Barton, ACT.
25. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research Trends in serious crime in NSW Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 1 1987, New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney.
26. New South Wales Police Department Report of the Police Department for 1967 1969, Parliament of New South Wales, Sydney.
27. New South Wales Police Department Report of the Police Department for 1968 1970, Parliament of New South Wales, Sydney.
28. New South Wales Police Department Report of the Police Department for 1970 1971, Parliament of New South Wales, Sydney.
29. New South Wales Police Department Report of the NSW Police Department 1983-84 1984, New South Wales Police Department, Sydney.
30. New South Wales Police Department Report of the NSW Police Department 1984-85 1985, New South Wales Police Department, Sydney.
31. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary debates: Official Hansard: Posions (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading 1970, August 20.
32. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary debates: Official Hansard: Posions (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading 1970, September 1.
33. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary debates: Official Hansard: Posions (Amendment) Bill - Second Reading 1970, September 2.
34. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Debates: Official Hansard: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Bill - Second Reading 1985, November 26.
35. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Debates: Official Hansard: State Drug Crime Commission Bill and Miscellaneous Acts (State Drug Crime Commission) Amendment Bill - Second Reading 1985, October 15, Retrieved from: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hanstrans.nsf/V3ByKey/LA19851015/$file/482LA058.pdf.
36. NSW Legislative Council Parliamentary Debates: Official Hansard. Drug Misuse and Trafficking Bill - Second Reading 1985, November 28, Retrieved from: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hanstrans.nsf/V3ByKey/LC19851128/$file/482LC076.pdf.
37. NSW Legislative Council Parliamentary debates: Official Hansard. Miscellaneous Acts (State Drug Crime Commission) Amendment Bill - Second Reading 1985, October 22, Retrieved from: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hanstrans.nsf/V3ByKey/LC19851022/$file/482LC061.pdf.
38. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Debates: Official Hansard: Drug Misuse and Trafficking (Amendment) Act - Second reading 1988, May 25, Retrieved from: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hanstrans.nsf/V3ByKey/LA19880525/$file/491LA008.PDF.
39. NSW Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Debates: Official Hansard: Drug Misuse and Trafficking (Further Amendment) Act - Second reading 1988, September 14, Retrieved from: http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hanstrans.nsf/V3ByKey/LA19880914/$file/492LA010.PDF.
40. NSW Parliament Legislative Assembly Legal Affairs Committee Law reform issues regarding synthetic drugs 2013, The Committee, Sydney.
41. Poisons (Amendment) Act 1970 No. 53 (NSW) 1970.
42. Sabatier P. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences 1988, 21:129-168.
43. Selin J., Hakkarainen P., Partanen A., Tammi T., Tigerstedt C. From political controversy to a technical problem? Fifteen years of opioid substitution treatment in Finland. International Journal of Drug Policy 2013, 24(6):e66-e72.
44. Sentencing Council Drug offences guideline: Professional consultation 2011, Sentencing Council, London.
45. Sevigny E.L. The tyranny of quantity: How the overemphasis on drug quantity in federal drug sentencing leads to disparate and anomalous sentencing outcomes 2006, University of Pittsberg, Pittsberg, Retrieved from: http://challenger. library. pitt. edu/ETD/available/etd-07182006-154904/unrestricted/sevignyericl_etdPitt2006. pdf.
46. Sevigny E.L., Caulkins J.P. Kingpins or mules: An analysis of drug offenders incarcerated in federal and state prisons. Criminology and Public Policy 2006, 3(3):401-434.
47. Uitermark J., Cohen P. The origins and future of the Dutch approach towards drugs. Journal of Drug Issues 2004, 34(3):511-532.
48. Uitermark J., Cohen P. A clash of policy approaches: The rise (and fall?) of Dutch harm reduction policies towards ecstasy consumption. International Journal of Drug Policy 2005, 16:65-72.
49. US Sentencing Commission Special report to the Congress: Cocaine and federal sentencing policy 1995, US Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
50. US Sentencing Commission Special report to the Congress: Cocaine and federal sentencing policy 2005, US Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
51. US Sentencing Commission US Sentencing Commission special report to Congress: Cocaine and federal sentencing policy 2007, US Sentencing Commission, Washington, DC.
52. Walsh C. On the threshold: How relevant should quantity be in determining intent to supply. International Journal of Drug Policy 2008, 19(6):479-485.
53. Wilson P., Walker J., Mukherjee S. How the public sees sentencing: An Australian survey Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No. 2 1986, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
54. Winstock A.R., Ramsey J.D. Legal highs and the challenges for policy makers. Addiction 2010, 105(10):1685-1687.
55. Woodward P.M. Report of the royal commission into drug trafficking (Woodward Royal Commission) 1979, Government Printer, Sydney.
56. Zuffa G. How to determine personal use in drug legislation: The "threshold controversy" in the light of the Italian experience Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies No. 15 2011, TransNational Institute, Amsterdam.