The syntax of German

The Syntax of German

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-371

  Haider, Hubert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924015805     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511845314     Document Type: Book

References (291)

1. Abraham, Werner (1995) Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich, Tubingen: Narr.
2. Adger, David (1994) ‘Functional head and interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
3. Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1998) ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491-539.
4. Alexiadou, Artemis and Gisbert Fanselow (2002) ‘On the correlation between morphol-ogy and syntax: the case of V-to-I’, in Jan-Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219-42.
5. ANS (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, see Geerts, Guido, Walter Haeseryn, Jaap de Rooij and Maarten C. van den Toorn.
6. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li (1993) ‘Scope and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141-82.
7. Bach, Emmon (1979) ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533-81.
8. Barbiers, Lambertus Christiaan Jozef (alias: Sjef) (2000) ‘The right periphery in SOV languages: English and Dutch’, in Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 181-218.
9. Barnes, Michael (1987) ‘Some remarks on subordinate-clause word order in Faroese’, Scripta Islandica 38: 3-35.
10. Bausewein, Karin (1991) ‘Haben kopflose Relativsatze tatsachlich keine Kopfe?’ in Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix (eds.), Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, Tubingen: Narr, pp. 144-58.
11. Bayer, Josef (1990) ‘Directionality of government and logical form: a study of focusing particles and wh-scope’, Habilitation thesis, University of Konstanz.
12. Bayer, Josef (1998) ‘Final complementizers in hybrid languages’, Journal of Linguistics 35: 233-71.
13. Bayer, Josef (2001) ‘Two grammars in one: sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages’, in Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), The yearbook of South Asian languages: Tokyo symposium on South Asian languages - contact, convergence and typology, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 11-36.
14. Bayer, Josef (2003) ‘Non-nominative subjects in comparison’, in Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 49-76.
15. Bech, Gunnar (1955) Studien uber das deutsche verbum infinitum, Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (Second unchanged edition (1983), introduced by Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Tubingen: Niemeyer.)
16. Beerman, Dorothee, David LeBlanc and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1997) Rightward movement, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today 17].
17. Beninca, Paula and Cecilia Poletto (2004) ‘Topic, focus and V2. Defining the CP sublay-ers’, in Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52-75.
18. Bennis, Hans (1986) Gaps and dummies, Dordrecht: Foris.
19. Besten, Hans den (1985) ‘Some remarks on the ergative hypothesis’, in Werner Abraham (ed.), Erklarende Syntax des Deutschen, Tubingen: Narr, pp. 53-74.
20. Besten, Hansden and Jean Rutten (1989) ‘On verb raising, extraposition, and free word order in Dutch’, in Dany Jaspers, Wim G. Klooster, Yvan Putseys and Pieter A. M. Seuren (eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 41-56.
21. Besten, Hansden and Gert Webelhuth (1990) ‘Stranding’, in Gunther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 77-92.
22. Bhatt, Rakesh M. (1999) Verb movement and the syntax of Kashmiri, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
23. Blume, Kerstin (1998) ‘A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative comple-ments’, Linguistics 36: 253-80.
24. Bobaljik, Jonathan David (2002) ‘Realizing Germanic inflection: why morphology does not drive syntax’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129-67.
25. Bobaljik, Jonathan David (2004) ‘Clustering theories’, in Katalin E. Kiss and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 121-45.
26. Bobaljik, Jonathan and Hoskuldur Thrainsson (1998) ‘Two heads aren‘t always better than one’, Syntax 1: 37-71.
27. Boskovi?, Zeljko and Daiko Takahashi (1998) ‘Scrambling and last resort’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347-66.
28. Brandt, Margarethe, Marga Reis, Inger Rosengren and Ilse Zimmermann (1992) ‘Satz, Satztyp und Illokution’, in Inger Rosengren (ed.), Satz und Illokution, vol. I, Tubingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 278], pp. 3-89.
29. Bresnan, Joan (1977) ‘Variables in the theory of transformations. Part I: Bounded versus unbounded transformations’, in Peter Culicover, Tom Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, New York, Academic Press, pp. 157-96.
30. Brody, Michael (2004) ‘“Roll-up” structures and morphological words’, in Katalin E. Kiss and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 147-71.
31. Buring, Daniel (1997) The meaning of topic and focus. The 59th Street Bridge accent, London: Routledge.
32. Buring, Daniel (2001) ‘Let's phrase it! - Focus, word order, and prosodic phrasing in German dou-ble object constructions’, in Gereon Muller and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Competition in syntax, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1-37.
33. Buring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann (1995) ‘All right’, in Uli Lutz and Jurgen Pafel (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today 11], pp. 179-211.
34. Buring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann (1997) ‘Doing the right thing’, The Linguistic Review 14: 1-42.
35. Burzio, Luigi (1986) Italian Syntax: a government and binding approach, Dordrecht: Reidel [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1].
36. Cardinaletti, Anna and Michal Starke (1999) ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of three classes of pronouns’, in Henk C. van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145-233.
37. Cheng, Lisa Laishen (1997) On the Typology of Wh-Questions, New York: Garland.
38. Choi, Hye-Won (1999) Optimizing structure in context. Scrambling and information structure, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
39. Chomsky, Noam (1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Steven Anderson and Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 232-86.
40. Chomsky, Noam (1977) ‘On wh-movement’, in Peter Culicover, Tom Wasow and Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, New York: Academic Press, pp. 71-132.
41. Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
42. Chomsky, Noam (1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
44. Chomsky, Noam (1991) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417-54.
45. Chomsky, Noam (1992) ‘A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.
46. Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik (1995) ‘Principles and parameters theory’, in Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 506-69.
48. Cinque, Guglielmo (1999) Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Cinque, Guglielmo (2001) ‘Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads’, in Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 137-55.
50. Cinque, Guglielmo (2002) ‘A note on restructuring and quantifier climbing in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 617-36.
51. Cinque, Guglielmo (2004) ‘Restructuring and functional structure’, in Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. III, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 132-91.
52. Collins, Chris (1997) Local economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Collins, Chris and Hoskuldur Thrainsson (1996) ‘VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391-444.
54. Corver, Norbert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1994) Studies on scrambling, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Studies in Generative Grammar 41].
55. Corver, Norbert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (1997) ‘The position of the head and the domain of scrambling’, in Bohumil Palek (ed.), Typology: prototypes, item order-ings and universals, Prague, Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, pp. 57-90.
56. Culicover, Peter W. (1997) Principles & parameters. An introduction to syntactic theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Culicover, Peter W. and Michael S. Rochemont (1990) ‘Extraposition and the complement principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 23-47.
58. Czepluch, Hartmut (1988) ‘Case patterns in German: Some implications for the theory of abstract case’, McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax: 79-122.
59. Dehe, Nicole (2002) Particle verbs in English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Deprez, Vivian (1994) ‘Parameters of object movement’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 101-52.
61. Diesing, Molly (1992) Indefinites, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Diesing, Molly (1997) ‘Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 369-427.
63. Diesing, Molly (2001) ‘Multiple questions in and about Yiddish’, in Ji-Yung Kim and Adam Werle (eds.), UMOP 25, The Proceedings of SULA 1 (The semantics of underrepresented languages in the Americas), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 20-22 April 2001.
64. Dikken, Marcel den (1992) ‘Particles’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
65. Dikken, Marcelden (1995) Particles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Dryer, Matthew S. (1988) ‘Universals of negative position’, in Michael Hammond, Edith Moravcsik and Jessica Wirth (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93-124.
67. Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (1966) Der grobe Duden, vol. IV, Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Dudenverlag (second augmented and cor-rected edition, adapted by Paul Grebe).
68. E. Kiss, Katalin (1987) Configurationality in Hungarian, Dordrecht: Reidel.
69. E. Kiss, Katalin and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (2004) Verb clusters. A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
70. Evers, Arnold (1975) ‘The transformational cycle in Dutch and German’, Doctoral dis-sertation, University of Utrecht (distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana).
71. Fanselow, Gisbert (1985) ‘Deutsche Verbalprojektionen und die Frage der Universalitat konfigurationaler Sprachen’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Passau, Germany.
72. Fanselow, Gisbert (1991) ‘Minimale Syntax’, Habilitation thesis, University of Passau, Germany [Published as: Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 32, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen].
73. Fanselow, Gisbert (1993) ‘The return of the base generators’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36: 1-74.
74. Fanselow, Gisbert (1997) ‘Minimal link effects in German (and other languages)’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam. (Related handout from 1996 at www.ling. uni-potsdam.de/~fanselow/mlc.htm).
75. Fanselow, Gisbert (2001) ‘Features, theta-roles, and free constituent order’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 405-37.
76. Fanselow, Gisbert (2002) ‘Quirky subjects and other specifiers’, in Ingrid Kaufmann and Barbara Stiebels (eds.), More than words, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 53], pp. 227-50.
77. Fanselow, Gisbert (2003) ‘Free constituent order: a Minimalist interface account’, Folia Linguistica 37: 191-231.
78. Fanselow, Gisbert (2006) ‘Partial wh-movement’, in Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Syncom - The syntax companion, chapter 47, Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Fiengo, Robert (1980) Surface structure, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Fleischer, Jurg (2006) ‘Dative and indirect object in German dialects: evidence from rela-tive clauses’, in Daniel Hole, Andre Meinunger and Werner Abraham (eds.), Datives and other cases: between argument structure and event structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins (Studies in Language Companion Series 75), pp. 213-38.
81. Fortmann, Christian (2007) ‘Bewegungsresistente Verben’, Zeitschrift fur Sprachwissenschaft 26: 1-40.
82. Freidin, Robert (1986) ‘Fundamental issues in the theory of binding’, in Barbara Lust (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151-81.
83. Frey, Werner (1993) Syntaktische Bedingungen fur die semantische Interpretation. Uber Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 35].
84. Frey, Werner (2004) ‘A medial topic position for German’, Linguistische Berichte 198: 153-90.
85. Frey, Werner and Karin Pittner (1998) ‘Zur Positionierung von Adverbien’, Linguistische Berichte 86: 489-534.
86. Fukui, Naoki (1993) ‘Parameters and optionality’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 399-420.
87. Gazdar, Gerald (1981) ‘Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155-84.
88. Geerts, Guido, Walter Haeseryn, Jaap de Rooij and Maarten C. van den Toorn (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
89. Grewendorf, Gunther (2002) Minimalistische Syntax, Tubingen: UTB/Franke.
90. Grewendorf, Gunther and Joachim Sabel (1999) ‘Scrambling in German and Japanese: adjunction versus multiple specifiers’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 1-65.
91. Grewendorf, Gunther and Wolfgang Sternefeld (1990) ‘Scrambling theories’, in Gunther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-37.
92. Grohman, Kleanthes (2003) Prolific domains. On the anti-locality of movement depend-encies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
93. Gueron, Jacqueline (1980) ‘On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637-78.
94. Haan, Germen de and Fred Weerman (1986) ‘Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian’, in Hubert Haider and Martin Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 77-110.
95. Haegeman, Liliane (2001) ‘Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 207-32.
96. Haegeman, Liliane and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (1986) ‘Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417-66.
97. Haider, Hubert (1983) ‘Connectedness effects in German’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 23: 82-119.
98. Haider, Hubert (1984a) ‘The case of German’, in Jind?ich Toman (ed.), Studies in German Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 65-101.
99. Haider, Hubert (1984b) ‘Was zu haben ist und was zu sein hat - Bemerkungen zum Infinitiv’, Papiere zur Linguistik 30: 23-36.
100. Haider, Hubert (1985) ‘A unified account of case and theta-marking - The case of German’, Papiere zur Linguistik 32: 3-36.
101. Haider, Hubert (1986) ‘Affect alpha’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 113-26.
102. Haider, Hubert (1989) ‘Theta-tracking systems - evidence from German’, in Laszlo Maracz and Pieter Muysken (eds.), Configurationality: the Typology of Asymmetries, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 185-206.
103. Haider, Hubert (1990) ‘Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax’, in Gunther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93-112.
104. Haider, Hubert (1991) ‘Fakultativ koharente Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen’, Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tubingen) 17. (Reprinted 1994 in Anita Steube and Gerhild Zybatow (eds.), Zur Satzwertigkeit von Infinitiven und Small Clauses, Tubingen: Niemeyer, pp. 75-106.)
105. Haider, Hubert (1992) ‘Die Struktur der Nominalphrase - Lexikalische und funktionale Strukturen’, in Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 304-33.
106. Haider, Hubert (1992/2000) ‘Branching and discharge’ (1992) Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tubingen) 23: 1-31
107. Haider, Hubert (2000) in Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], pp. 135-64.
108. Haider, Hubert (1993) Deutsche Syntax, generativ, Tubingen: Narr.
109. Haider, Hubert (1995) ‘Downright down to the right’, in Uli Lutz and Jurgen Pafel (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today], pp. 145-271.
110. Haider, Hubert (1996) ‘Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, - und die Syntax sie gewahren labt’, in Gisela Niemeyer, pp. 7-27.
111. Haider, Hubert (1997a) ‘Extraposition’, in Dorothee Beerman, David LeBlanc and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1997), pp. 115-51.
112. Haider, Hubert (1997b) ‘Projective economy. On the minimal functional structure of the German clause’, in Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen (eds.), German: syntactic prob-lems - problematic syntax, Tubingen: Niemeyer, pp. 83-103.
113. Haider, Hubert (1997c) ‘Economy in syntax is projective economy’, in Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin Gartner and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), The role of economy principles in linguis-tic theory, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 40], pp. 205-26.
114. Haider, Hubert (1997d) ‘Precedence among predicates’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 3-41.
115. Haider, Hubert (1997e) ‘Scrambling - Locality, economy, and directionality’, in Shigeo Tonoike (ed.), Scrambling, Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers [Linguistics Workshop Series 5], pp. 61-91.
116. Haider, Hubert (2000a) ‘Scrambling - What's the state of the art?’ in Susan M. Powers and Cornelia Hamann (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 19-40.
117. Haider, Hubert (2000b) ‘Adverb placement - Convergence of structure and licensing’, Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95-134.
118. Haider, Hubert (2000c) ‘The license to license’, in Eric Reuland (ed.), Argument & case: explaining Burzio's generalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 31-54.
119. Haider, Hubert (2000d) ‘OV is more basic than VO’, in Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45-67.
120. Haider, Hubert (2001a) ‘Heads and selection’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67-96.
121. Haider, Hubert (2001b) ‘How to stay accusative in Icelandic and Faroese’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 68: 1-14.
122. Haider, Hubert (2001c) ‘Prosodic signals for reconstructing the basic item order. On the interplay between structure and prosody’, in Bohumil Palek and O. Fujimura (eds.), Item order: its variety and linguistic and phonetic consequences, Proceedings of International Linguistics and Phonetics Conference 2000, Charles University, Prague: The Karolinum Press, pp. 347-66.
123. Haider, Hubert (2003) ‘V-Clustering and clause union - Causes and effects’, in Pieter Seuren and Gerard Kempen (eds.), Verb constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91-126.
124. Haider, Hubert (2004a) ‘Pre-and postverbal adverbials in VO and OV’, Lingua 114 (6): 779-807. (2004b) ‘The superiority conspiracy’, in Arthur Stepanov, Gisbert Fanselow and Ralf
125. Haider, Hubert (2004b) ‘The superiority conspiracy’, in Arthur Stepanov, Gisbert Fanselow and RalfVogel (eds.), The minimal link condition, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 147-75.
126. Haider, Hubert (2005a) ‘Parenthesen - Evidenz aus Bindungsverhaltnissen’, in Franz J. D‘Avis (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie, Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, pp. 281-93.
127. Haider, Hubert (2005b) ‘How to turn German into Icelandic - and derive the VO-OV contrasts’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1-53.
128. Haider, Hubert (2006) ‘Mittelfeldphenomena’, in Henk C. van Riemsdijk and Martin Everaert (eds.), Syncom - The Syntax Companion, chapter 43, Oxford: Blackwell.
129. Haider, Hubert, Sue Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.) (1995) Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
130. Haider, Hubert and Inger Rosengren (1998) Scrambling, Lund: Germanistisches Institut, University of Lund [Sprache und Pragmatik 49].
131. Haider, Hubert and Inger Rosengren (2003) ‘Scrambling - non-triggered chain formation in OV languages’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 203-67.
132. Han, Chung-Hye, Jeffrey Lidz and Julien Musolino (2007) ‘V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1-47.
133. Hiemstra, Inge (1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, Nowele 8: 97-110.
134. Hinrichs, Erhard W. and Tsuneko Nakazawa (1989) ‘Flipped out: AUX in German’, Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL, pp. 193-202.
135. Hinrichs, Erhard W. and Tsuneko Nakazawa (1994) ‘Linearizing AUXs in German verbal complexes’, in John Nerbonne, Klaus Netter and Carl Pollard (eds.), German in head-driven phrase structure grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 46, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 11-37.
136. Hoeksema, Jack (1988) ‘A constraint on governors in the West Germanic verb cluster’, in Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybreghts and Mieke Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity: in honour of Henk Schultink, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 147-61.
137. Hoffman, Donald, D. (1998) Visual intelligence. How we create what we see, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
138. Hohle, Tilman N. (1978) Lexikalistische Syntax: Die Aktiv-Passiv-Relation und andere Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen, Tubingen: Niemeyer.
139. Hohle, Tilman N. (1982) ‘Explikationen fur “normale Betonung” und “normale Wortstellung”’, in Werner Abraham (ed.), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschlage zur syntaktischen, seman-tischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Tubingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 15], pp. 75-153.
140. Hohle, Tilman N. (1991) ‘Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen’, unpublished MS, University of Tubingen.
141. Holmberg, Anders (1999) ‘Remarks on Holmberg's generalization’, Studia Linguistica 53: 1-39.
142. Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack (1995) The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
143. Hoop, Helen De (1992) ‘Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
144. Hornstein, Norbert (1995) Logical form. From GB to Minimalism, Oxford: Blackwell.
145. Huang, James C.-T. (1982) ‘Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
146. Huber, Walter (1980) ‘Infinitivkomplemente im Deutschen: Transformationsgrammatische Untersuchungen zum Verb “lassen”’, Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universitat Berlin.
147. Iversen, Ragnvald (1918) Syntaksen i Tromso Bymaal, Kristiania: Bymaals-Lagets Forlag.
148. Jacobs, Joachim (1982) Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen, Munich: Fink [Studien zur theoretischen Linguistik 1].
149. Jacobs, Joachim (1988) ‘Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik’, in Hans Altmann (ed.), Intonationsforschungen, Tubingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 200], pp. 89-134.
150. Jacobs, Joachim (1992) ‘Bewegung als Valenzvererbung - Teil I’, Linguistische Berichte 148: 85-142.
151. Jacobs, Joachim (1997) ‘I-Topikalisierung’, Linguistische Berichte 168: 91-133.
152. Jacobson, Pauline (1987) ‘Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous con-stituents’, in Geoffrey J. Huck and Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.), Discontinuous con-stituency, New York: Academic Press [Syntax & Semantics 20], pp. 27-69.
153. Johnson, Kyle (1991) ‘Object positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577-636.
154. Kainhofer, Judith (2002) ‘Monadische Akkusativ-Subjekt-Konstruktionen im Islandischen’, Master thesis, University of Salzburg, Dept. of Linguistics.
155. Kathol, Andreas (2000) Linear syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
156. Kayne, Richard (1981) ‘ECP extensions’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 93-133.
157. Kayne, Richard (1983) ‘Connectedness’, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 223-49.
158. Kayne, Richard (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
159. Kempen, Gerard and Karin Harbusch (2003) ‘Dutch and German verb constructions in performance Grammar’, in Pieter Seuren and Gerard Kempen (eds.), Verb con-structions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185-221.
160. Kerstens, Johan (1975) ‘Over afgeleide structuur en de interpretatie van zinnen’ [On derived structure and the interpretation of sentences], unpublished MS, University of Amsterdam [cited in R.G. Ruys (2001)].
161. Ko, Heejeong (2007) ‘Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization’, Linguistic Inquiry 39: 49-83.
162. Koeneman, Olaf (2000) ‘The flexible nature of verb movement’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
163. Koopman, Hilda (1995) ‘On verbs that fail to undergo V-second’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 137-63.
164. Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi (2000) Verbal complexes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
165. Kratzer, Angelika (1984) ‘On deriving differences between German and English’, unpub-lished MS, Berlin, Technische Universitat.
166. Kress, Bruno (1982) Islandische Grammatik, Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopadie.
167. Kuthy, Cordula de (2000) ‘Discontinuous NPs in German. A case study of the interac-tion of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics’, Doctoral dissertation, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken.
168. Larson, Richard (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-91.
169. Lawrenz, Birgit (1993) Apposition: Begriffsbestimmung und syntaktischer Status, Tubingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 44].
170. Lebeaux, David (1988) ‘Language acquisition and the form of the grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
171. Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera (2007) Beyond coherence. The syntax of opacity in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
172. Leirbukt, Odleif (1978) ‘Uber dativische Appositionen bei akkusativischem Bezugswort im Deutschen’, Linguistische Berichte 55: 1-17.
173. Lenerz, Jurgen (1977) Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen, Tubingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 5].
174. Mahajan, Anoop (1989) ‘Agreement and agreement phrases’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 217-52.
175. Mahajan, Anoop (1994) ‘Toward a unified theory of scrambling’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1994), pp. 301-30.
176. Maling, Joan and Rex A. Sprouse (1995) ‘Structural case, specifier head relations, and the case of predicative NPs’, in Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 167-86.
177. Marantz, Alec (1991) ‘Case and licensing’, Proceedings of ESCOL 8: 234-53.
178. McCawley, James and K. Momoi (1986) ‘The constituent structure of -te complements’, in Shige-Yuki Kuroda (ed.), Working Papers from the first SDF Workshop in Japanese Syntax, La Jolla: Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego, pp. 97-116.
179. Meinunger, Andre (2007) ‘About object es in the German Vorfeld’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 553-63.
180. Miyagawa, Shigeru (1997) ‘Against optional scrambling’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1-25.
181. Miyagawa, Shigeru (2001) ‘The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ’, in Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale - A life in linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 293-338.
182. Moltmann, Friederike (1990) ‘Scrambling in German and the specificity effect’, unpub-lished MS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
183. Monachesi, Paola (1999) A lexical approach to Italian cliticization, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications [CSLI lecture notes 84].
184. Muller, Gereon (1995a) A-bar syntax. A study in movement types, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
185. Muller, Gereon (1995b) ‘On extraposition and extraction in German’, in Uli Lutz and Jurgen Pafel (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today], pp. 213-43.
186. Muller, Gereon (1996) ‘Incomplete category fronting’, Habilitation thesis, University of Tubingen [SfS-Report 01-96. Published 1997, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter].
187. Muller, Gereon (1997) ‘Extraposition as remnant movement’, in Dorothee Beerman, David LeBlanc and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1997), pp. 215-46.
188. Muller, Gereon (1999) ‘Optimality, markedness, and word order in German’, Linguistics 37: 777-818.
189. Muller, Gereon (2000) Elemente der optimalitatstheoretischen Syntax, Tubingen: Staufenberg.
190. Muller, Gereon and Wolfgang Sternefeld (1993) ‘Improper movement and unambiguous binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461-507.
191. Muller, Gereon and Wolfgang Sternefeld (1994) ‘Scrambling as A-bar movement’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1994), pp. 331-85.
192. Nash, Lea (1996) ‘The internal ergative subject hypothesis’, NELS 26: 195-209.
193. Neeleman, Ad (1994) ‘Scrambling as a D-structure phenomenon’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (1994), pp. 387-429.
194. Nash, Lea (1995) ‘Complex predicates in Dutch and English’, in Hubert Haider, Sue Olsen and Sten Vikner (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219-40.
195. Neeleman, Ad and Fred Weerman (1999) Flexible syntax - A theory of case and argu-ments, Doctoral, Kluwer [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 47].
196. Nilsen, Oystein (2003) ‘Eliminating positions: syntax and semantics of sentence modifi-cation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
197. Onnerfors, Olaf (1997) Verb-erst-Deklarativsatze. Grammatik und Pragmatik, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksel International.
198. Pafel, Jurgen (1993) ‘Scope and word order’, in Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenossischer Forschung, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 867-80.
199. Pafel, Jurgen (1996) ‘Die syntaktische und semantische Struktur von was-fur-Phrasen’, Linguistische Berichte 161: 37-67.
200. Pasch, Renate (1992) ‘Uberlegungen zur Syntax und semantischen Interpretation von w-Interrogativsatzen’, Deutsche Sprache 3(19): 193-212.
201. Paul, Hermann (1919) Deutsche Grammatik. Vol. III, part IV: Syntax, Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
202. Perlmutter, David M. and John Robert Ross (1970) ‘Relative clauses with split antecedents’, Linguistic Inquiry 1: 350.
203. Pesetsky, David (1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 98-129.
204. Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
205. Pesetsky, David (2000) Phrasal movement and its kin, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
206. Phillips, Colin (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37-90.
207. Pittner, Karin (1995) ‘The case of German relatives’, Linguistic Review 12: 197-231.
208. Platzack, Christer (1986) ‘Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Orders’, in Lars Hellan and Kirsti Koch Kristensen (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 185-234.
209. Poletto, Cecilia (2000) The higher functional field: evidence from Northern Italian dia-lects, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
210. Pollock, Jean-Yves (1989) ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.
211. Postal, Paul M. (1993) ‘Parasitic gaps and the across-the-board phenomenon’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 735-54.
212. Postal, Paul M. (2004) Sceptical linguistic essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
213. Putnam, Michael (2005) ‘An anti-localistic account of why scrambled datives in German can‘t bind anaphors’, SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 287-309.
214. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A com-prehensive grammar of the English language, 4th edition, London: Longman.
215. Reinhart, Tanya (1980) ‘On the position of extraposed clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 621-4.
216. Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation, London: Croom Helm.
217. Reinhart, Tanya (1995) ‘Interface strategies’, OTS Working Paper, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (OTS), University of Utrecht.
218. Reinhart, Tanya (1998) ‘Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 29-56.
219. Reis, Marga (1976) ‘Reflexivierung in deutschen AcI-Konstruktionen. Ein transforma-tionsgrammatisches Dilemma’, Papiere zur Linguistik 9: 5-82.
220. Reis, Marga (1987) ‘Die Stellung der Verbargumente im Deutschen. Stilubungen zum Grammatik: Pragmatik-Verhaltnis’, in Inger Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik, [Lunder germanistische Forschungen 55], pp. 139-87.
221. Reis, Marga (2000) ‘On the parenthetical features of German was … w-constructions and how to account for them’, in Ulli Lutz, Gereon Muller and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Wh-scope-marking, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 359-407.
222. Reis, Marga (2002) ‘Wh-Movement and integrated parenthetical constructions’, in Jan Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Germanic Syntax Workshop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-40.
223. Reis, Marga (2007) ‘Modals, so-called semi-modals, and grammaticalization in German’, Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 12: 1-56.
224. Reis, Marga and Wolfgang Sternefeld (2004) ‘Review article of S. Wurmbrand “Infinitives. Restructuring and clause structure”’, Linguistics 42(2): 469-508.
225. Richards, Marc D. (2004) ‘Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
226. Richards, Marc D. and Theresa Biberauer (2005) ‘Explaining Expl’, in Marcel den Dikken and Christina Tortora (eds.), The function of function words and functional cat-egories, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistik Aktuell /Linguistics Today, 78], pp. 115-54.
227. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van (1983) ‘The case of German adjectives’, in Frank Heny and Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 223-52.
228. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van (2006) ‘Free relatives’, in Henk C. van Riemsdijk and Martin Everaert (eds.), Syncom - The Syntax Companion, chapter 27, Oxford: Blackwell.
229. Riemsdijk, Henk C. van and Edwin Williams (1981) ‘NP structure’, The Linguistic Review 1: 171-217.
230. Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.
231. Rizzi, Luigi (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281-337.
232. Rizzi, Luigi (2004) (ed.) The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vols. I and II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
233. Roberts, Ian (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423-60.
234. Rohrbacher, Bernhard (1999) Morphology-driven syntax. A theory of V to I raising and pro drop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Studies in Generative Linguistic Analysis 4].
235. Rosengren, Inger (1993) ‘Wahlfreiheit mit Konsequenzen - Scrambling, Topikalisierung und FHG im Dienste der Informationsstrukturierung’, in Marga Reis (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Tubingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 306], pp. 251-312.
236. Rosengren, Inger (1994) ‘Scrambling - was ist das?’ in Brigitta Haftka (ed.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 85-196.
237. Ross, John (1967) ‘Constraints on variables in syntax’, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
238. Ruys, E. G. (2001) ‘Dutch scrambling and the strong-weak distinction’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 39-67.
239. Sabel, Joachim (2000) ‘Das Verbstellungsproblem im Deutschen’, Deutsche Sprache 28: 74-99.
240. Sabel, Joachim (2001) ‘Wh-questions in Japanese: scrambling, reconstruction, and wh-movement’, Linguistic Analysis 31: 1-41.
241. Saito, Mamoru (1994) ‘Additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3: 195-240.
242. Saito, Mamoru and Naoki Fukui (1998) ‘Order in phrase structure and movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439-74.
243. Sauerland, Uli (1999) ‘Erasability and interpretation’, Syntax 2: 161-88.
244. Schenner, Mathias (2004) ‘Naturlichsprachliche Quantifikation und das Partitionierungsproblem’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Salzburg.
245. Schulz, Dora and Heinz Griesbach (1970) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 8th edition, Munich: Hueber Verlag.
246. Sells, Peter (1990) ‘VP in Japanese: evidence from -te complements’, in Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese /Korean Linguistics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 319-33.
247. Sigurosson, Halldor Armann (1989) ‘Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic’, Doctoral dis-sertation, University of Lund [Reprinted 1992 by Malvisindastofnun Haskola Islands].
248. Sigurosson, Halldor Armann (2004) ‘Icelandic non-nominative subjects’, in Peri Bhaskararao and Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137-59.
249. Skopeteas, Stavros and Gisbert Fanselow (2007) ‘Effects of givenness and constraint on free word order’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam (to be published in Caroline Fery and Malte Zimmermann (eds.), Information structure from different perspectives).
250. Stechow, Arnim von and Wolfgang Sternefeld (1988) Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
251. Steedman, Mark (1985) ‘Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61: 523-68.
252. Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1985) ‘Deutsch ohne grammatische Funktionen’, Linguistische Berichte 99: 394-439.
253. Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2006) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
254. Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2007) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2nd revised edition, Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
255. Stiebels, Barbara and Dieter Wunderlich (1994) ‘Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs’, Linguistics 32: 913-68.
256. Szabolcsi, Anna and Frans Zwarts (1993) ‘Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope-taking’, Natural Language Semantics 1: 235-85.
257. Thrainsson, Hoskuldur (2001) ‘Object shift and scrambling’, in Mark Baltin and Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 148-202.
258. Travis, Lisa (1991) ‘Parameters of phrase structure and verb second phenomena’, in Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 339-64.
259. Trosterud, Trond (1989) ‘The null subject parameter and the new mainland Scandinavian word order. A possible counterexample from a Norwegian dialect’, in Jussi Niemi (ed.), Papers from the eleventh Scandinavian conference on linguistics, Joensuu [Joensuun Ylioppilaskunnan Kirjakauppa 1], pp. 87-100.
260. Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995) ‘Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence’, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
261. Uriagereka, Juan (1993) ‘The Syntax of Movement in Basque’, in Joseph Lakarra and John Ortiz de Urbina (eds.), Syntactic Theory and Basque Syntax, International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, XXVII, 417-45.
262. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1985) Dependances et niveaux de representation en syntaxe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
263. Vikner, Sten (1994) ‘Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling’, in Norbert Corver and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 487-517.
264. Vikner, Sten (1995) Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
265. Vikner, Sten (1997) ‘V°-to-I° movement and inflection for person in all tenses’, in Liliane Haegeman (ed.), The new comparative grammar, London: Longman, pp. 189-213.
266. Vikner, Sten (2001) ‘Verb movement variation in German and Optimality Theory’, Habilitation the-sis, University of Tubingen.
267. Vogel, Ralf and Markus Steinbach (1998) ‘The dative - an oblique case’, Linguistische Berichte 173: 65-90.
268. Wali, Kashi and Omkar N. Koul (1997) Kashmiri. A cognitive-descriptive grammar, London: Routledge.
269. Webelhuth, Gert (1992) Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
270. Wegener, Heide (1990) ‘Der Dativ - ein struktureller Kasus?’ in Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix (eds.), Merkmale und Strukturen syntaktischer Kategorien, Tubingen: Narr, pp. 70-103.
271. Wilder, Chris (1989) ‘The syntax of German infinitives’, Doctoral dissertation, University College, London.
272. Williams, Edwin (2002) Representation theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
273. Williams, Edwin (2004) ‘The structure of clusters’, in Katalin E. Kiss and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 173-201.
274. Wiltschko, Martina (1994) ‘Extraposition in German’, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 48-50: 1-30.
275. Wiltschko, Martina (1997) ‘Extraposition, identification and precedence’, in Dorothee Beerman, David LeBlanc and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), pp. 357-95.
276. Wiltschko, Martina (1998) ‘Superiority in German’, in Emily Curtis, James Lyle and Gabriel Webster (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 16 University of Washington (1997), Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 431-46.
277. Wollstein-Leisten, Angelika (2001) Die Syntax der dritten Konstruktion, Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
278. Woolford, Ellen (1993) ‘Symmetric and asymmetric passives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 679-728.
279. Woolford, Ellen (1997) ‘Four-way case systems: ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 181-227.
280. Woolford, Ellen (2006) ‘Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111-30.
281. Wunderlich, Dieter (1983) ‘On the compositionality of German prefix verbs’, in Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwarze and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 452-65.
282. Wunderlich, Dieter (1997) ‘Cause and the structure of verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27-68.
283. Wurmbrand, Susanne (2001) Infinitives: restructuring and clause structure, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Studies in Generative Grammar 55].
284. Wurmbrand, Susanne (2004) ‘West Germanic verb clusters: the empirical domain’ in Katalin E. Kiss and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.) (2004), pp. 43-85.
285. Wyngaerd, Guido van den (1989) ‘Object shift as an A-movement rule’, MIT Working papers in Linguistics 11: 256-71.
286. Yip, Moira, Joan Maling and Ray Jackendoff (1987) ‘Case in tiers’, Language 63: 28-250.
287. Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling and Hoskuldur Thrainsson (1985) ‘Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441-83.
288. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1993) ‘Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach’, Doctoral disserta-tion, University of Groningen.
289. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1995) ‘A note on verb clusters in the Stellingwerf dialect’, in Marcel den Dikken and Kees Hengeveld (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 215-26.
290. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1996) Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to syntax of Dutch, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
291. Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (2000) ‘A head raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch’, in Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, Andre Meinunger and Chris Wilder (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 349-85.