Values of beauty: Historical essays in aesthetics

Values of Beauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-359

  Guyer, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924002494     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840876     Document Type: Book

References (154)

1. Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Royal Prussian (later German and Berlin-Brandenburg) Academy of Sciences. 29 volumes. Berlin: Georg Reimer (later Walter de Gruyter & Co.), 1900.
2. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Translated by James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952 (originally 1911 and 1928).
3. Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798). Translated by MaryJ. Gregor. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.
4. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Logic. Translated and editied by J. Michael Young. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
5. Kant, Immanuel. Practical Philosophy. Edited and translated by Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
6. Kant, Immanuel. Religion and Rational Theology. Edited and translated by Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
7. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Edited by Peter Heath and J. B. Schneewind, translated by Peter Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
8. Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Metaphysics. Edited and translated by Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
9. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
10. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Paul Guyer, translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
11. Kant, Immanuel. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Edited by Henry Allison and Peter Health. Translated by Gary Hatfield, Michael Friedman, Henry Allison, and Peter Health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
12. Abrams, M. H. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.
13. Addison, Joseph, and Richard Steele. The Spectator. Edited by A. Chalmers. Eight volumes. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1869.
14. Alison, Archibald. Essays on the Nature and Principles of Taste. Two volumes. Second edition. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute et al., 1811.
15. Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
16. Ashfield, Andrew, and Peter de, Bolla, eds. The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth- Century Aesthetic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
17. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad po- ema pertinentibus (1735)/Philosophische Betrachtungen Uber einige Bedingungen des Gedichtes, parallel Latin and German texts edited by Heinz Paetzold. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.
18. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica (1739). Parallel Latin and German passages in Texte zur Grundlegung der Asthetik, edited by Hans Rudolf Schweizer. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.
19. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Aesthetica (1750-58). Frankfurt an der Oder, 1750-58; reprint, Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1961. Modern edition, edited by B. Croce, Bari: J. Laterza, 1936. Selections, with an introduction and parallel German translations, in Hans Rudolf Schweizer, Asthetik als Philosophie der sinnlichenErkenntnis: EineInterpretation der “Aesthetica”A. G. Baumgartens mit teil- weise Widergabe des lateinischen Textes und deutscher Ubersetzung. Basel and Stuttgart: Schwabe, 1973.
20. Bäumler, Alfred. Das Irrationalitatsproblem in der Asthetik und Logik des 18. Jahrhunderts bis zur Kritik der Urteilskraft. Second edition. Tubingen: Max Niemeyer, 1967.
21. Beardsley, Monroe C. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Second edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 1981.
22. Berkeley, George. Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher. In The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Edited by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. Volume 3. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1950.
23. Bernstein, Jay M. The Fate of Art: Aesthetic Alienation from Kant to Derrida and Adorno. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992.
24. Blair, Hugh. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. London: W. Strahan, 1783.
25. Brandt, Reinhard. “Die Schdnheit der Kristallen und das Spiel der Erkenntniskrafte. Zum Gegenstand und zur Logik des asthetischen Urteils bei Kant.” In Reinhard Brandt and Werner Stark, eds., Autographen, Dokumente und Berichte: Zu Edition, Amtsgeschaften und Werk Immanuel Kants, Kant-Forschungen, vol. 5. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1994, pp. 19-57.
26. Budd, Malcolm. “Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Part 1: Natural Beauty.” British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (1998): 1-18. Reprinted in Budd, The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature: Essays on the Aesthetics of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002, pp. 24-47.
27. Budd, Malcolm. “The Pure Judgment of Taste as an Aesthetic Reflective Judgment.” British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (2001): 247-60.
28. Bürger, Peter. “Critique of Autonomy.” In Kelly, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Vol. I, pp. 175-8.
29. Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Second edition, with Introduction on Taste. London: Robert and James Dodsley, 1759. Modern editions byJ. T. Boulton (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1958) and Adam Phillips (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).
30. Carroll, Nöel. “Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research.” Ethics 110 (2000): 350-87.
31. Carroll, Noël. “Essence, Expression and History: Arthur Danto’s Philosophy of Art.” In Mark Rollins, ed., Danto and His Critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1993, pp. 79-106.
32. (1984): 181-94.
33. Cavell, Stanley. “Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy.” In Cavell, Must We Mean What We Say ? New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969. Updated edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 73-96.
34. Cavell, Stanley. The Claim of Reason. New Ybrk: Oxford University Press, 1979.
35. Caygill, Howard. Art of Judgement. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
36. Cohen, Ted, and Paul Guyer, eds. Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
37. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria, with his Aesthetical Essays. Edited by J. T. Shawcross. 2 vols. Corrected edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1954.
38. Cothey, A. L. The Nature of Art. London: Routledge, 1992.
39. Crawford, Donald W. Ka, nt’s Aesthetic Theory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1974.
40. Crowther, Paul. “The Claims of Perfection: A Revisionary Defence of Kant’s Theory of Dependent Beauty.” InternationalPhilosophical Quarterly 26 (1986): 61-74.
41. Crowther, Paul. TheKantian Sublime: From Morality to Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
42. Danto, Arthur C. “The Artworld.” Journal of Philosophy 61 (1964): 571-84.
43. Danto, Arthur C. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
44. Danto, Arthur C. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
45. Danto, Arthur C. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
46. Danto, Arthur C. The Abuse of Beauty: Aesthetics and the Concept of Art. Chicago and LaSalle: Open Court, 2003.
47. De Man, Paul. “Phenomenality and Materiality in Kant.” In Hugh J. Silverman and Gary E. Aylesworth, eds. The Textual Sublime: Deconstruction and Its Differences. Albany: SUNYPress, 1990, pp. 87-109.
48. Derrida, Jacques. “Economimesis.” Diacritics 11 (1971): 3-25.
49. Devereaux, Mary. “Protected Space: Politics, Censorship, and the Arts.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (1993): 207-15.
50. Dickie, George. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1974.
51. Du Bos, Abbé. [Jean-Baptiste,] Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting and Music. Translated by Thomas Nugent, from the fifth edition. London: John Nourse, 1748.
52. Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
53. Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Essays and Lectures. Edited by Joel Porte. New York: The Library of America, 1983.
54. Faas, Ekbert. The Genealogy of Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
55. Ferry, Luc. Homo Aestheticus: The Invention of Taste in the Democratic Age. Translated by Robert de Loaiza. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.
56. Franke, Ursula, ed. Kants SchlUssel zur Kritik des Geschmacks: Asthetische Erfahrung heute - Studien zur Aktualitat von Kants “Kritik der Urteilskraft.” Sonderheft desJahrgangs 2000 der Zeitschrift fur Asthetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2000.
57. Gadamer, Hans Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Garrett Barden and John Cumming. New York: Seabury Press, 1975.
58. Gardiner, Patrick. Schopenhauer. Baltimore: Penguin, 1963.
59. Gaut, Berys. “Art and Ethics.” In Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes, eds., The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 341-52.
60. Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Taste. London: A. Millar, 1759.
61. Gerard, Alexander. An Essay on Genius. London: W. Strahan, 1774.
62. Gerard, Alexander. Versuch uber das Genie. Translated by Christian Garve. Leipzig: Weidmanns Erbe und Reich, 1776.
63. Ginsborg, Hannah. “Reflective Judgment and Taste.” Nous 24 (1990): 63-78.
64. Ginsborg, Hannah. “Lawfulness without a Law: Kant on the Free Play of Imagination and Understanding.” Philosophical Topics 25 (1997): 37-83.
65. Gottsched, Johann Christoph. Versuch einer critischen Dichtkunst vor dieDeutschen. In Gottsched, Schriften zur Literatur. Edited by Horst Steinmetz. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1972.
66. Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste (1979). Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
67. Guyer, Paul. “Pleasure and Society in Kant’s Theory of Taste.” In Cohen and Guyer, Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, pp. 21-54.
68. Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Experience of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
69. Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Conception of Fine Art.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (1994): 175-85. Reprinted as chapter 12 in the second edition of Kant and the Claims of Taste.
70. Guyer, Paul, ed. Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: Critical Essays. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
71. Guyer, Paul. “Dependent Beauty Revisited: A Reply to Wicks.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57 (1999): 357-61.
72. Guyer, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
73. Guyer, Paul. “The Unity of Nature and Freedom: Kant’s Conception of the System of Philosophy.” In Sally S. Sedgwick, ed., The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 19-53.
74. Guyer, Paul. “From Nature to Morality: Kant’s New Argument in the ‘Critique of Teleological Judgment’.” In Hans Friedrich Fulda and Jurgen Stolzenberg, eds., Architektonik und System in der Philosophie Kants. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001, pp. 375-404.
75. Guyer, Paul. “Ends of Reason and Ends of Nature: The Place of Teleology in Kant’s Ethics.” Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2002): 161 -86.
76. Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Deductions of the Principles of Right.” In Mark Timmons, ed., Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 23-64.
77. Guyer, Paul, ed. Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003.
78. Guyer, Paul. “Kant’s Principles of Reflecting Judgment.” In Guyer, Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays, pp. 1-60.
79. Guyer, Paul. “Purpose in Nature: What is Living and What is Dead in Kant’s Teleology?” In DietmarHeidemann and Christina Engelhard, eds., WarumKant Heute? Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2004, pp. 383-413.
80. Hamlyn, D. W. Schopenhauer. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
81. Haskins, Casey. “Autonomy: Historical Overview.” In Kelly, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Vol. I, pp. 170-5.
82. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Arts. Translated by T. M. Knox. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
83. Heidemann, Dietmar H., and Kristina, Engelhard, eds. WarumKant heute? System- atische Bedeutung und Rezeption seiner Philosophie in der Begenwart. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003.
84. Henrich, Dieter. “Kant’s Explanation of AestheticJudgment.” In Henrich, Aesthetic Judgment and the Moral Image of the World: Studies in Kant. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992, pp. 29-56.
85. Herman, Barbara. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993.
86. Hudson, Hud. “The Significance of an Analytic of the Ugly in Kant’s Deduction of Pure Judgments of Taste.” In Ralf Meerbote, ed., and Hud Hudson, associate ed., Kant's Aesthetics, North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, vol. 1. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Co., 1991, pp. 87-103.
87. Hume, David. Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1963.
88. Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1751). Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, third edition revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
89. Hume, David. The Natural History of Religion and Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779). Edited by A. Wayne Colver and John Valdimir Price. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
90. Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40). Edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, second edition revised by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.
91. Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40). Edited by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
92. Hutcheson, Francis. An Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Fourth edition. London: D. Midwinter, et al., 1738. Modern edition, with an introduction and notes, by Peter Kivy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1973.
93. Jones, Peter. Hume’s Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1982.
94. Jones, Peter. “Strains in Hume and Wittgenstein.” In Donald W. Livingston and James T. King, eds. Hume: A Re-evaluation. New York: Fordham University Press, 1976, PP. 191-209.
95. Kames, Henry Home, Lord. Elements of Criticism. Edited by Abraham Mills. New York: Huntington & Savage, 1849
96. Kant, Immanuel. The Only Possible Basis for a Demonstration of the Existence of God (1763). In Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770.
97. Kant, Immanuel. On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intellectual World [Inaugural Dissertation] (1770). In Theoretical Philosophy, 1755-1770.
98. Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785). In Practical Philosophy.
99. Kant, Immanuel. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (1786). In Theoretical Philosophy after 1781.
100. Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason (1788). In Practical Philosophy.
101. Kant, Immanuel. First Introduction to the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1789). In Critique of the Power of Judgment.
102. Kant, Immanuel. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason (1793). In Religion and Rational Theology.
103. Kant, Immanuel. Metaphysics of Morals (1797). In Practical Philosophy.
104. Kelly, Michael, ed. Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. 4 vols. New Ybrk: Oxford University Press, 1998.
105. Kennick, William. “Does Traditional Aesthetics Rest on a Mistake?” Mind 67 (1958): 317-34.
106. Kern, Andrea. Schone Lust: Eine Theorie der asthetischen Erfahrung nach Ka, nt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2000.
107. Kivy, Peter. “Hume’s Standard: Breaking the Circle.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 57-66.
108. Kivy, Peter. Music Alone: Philosophical Reflections on the Pure MusicalExperience. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.
109. Kneller, Jane. “Disinterestedness.” In Kelly, ed., Encyclopedia of Aesthetics. Vol. 2, PP. 59-64.
110. Korsmeyer, Carolyn. “Hume and the Foundations of Taste.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35 (1976): 201-15.
111. Kristeller, Paul Oskar. “The Modern System of the Arts” (1951). In his Renaissance Thought II: Papers on Humanism and the Arts. New York: HarPer & Row, 1965, pp. 163-227.
112. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. Laokoon, oder uber die Grenzen der Malerei und Poesie (1766). In Lessings Werke. Edited by Kurt Wdlfel. 3 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag, 1967.
113. Livingston, Donald W., and James T., King, eds. Hume: A Re-evaluation. New Ybrk: Fordham University Press, 1976.
114. Lohmar, Dieter. “Das Geschmacksurteil tiber das faszinierend HaBliche.” In Parret, ed., Kants Asthetik - Kant’s Aesthetics - L’esthetique de Kant, pp. 498-512.
115. Magee, Bryan. The Philosophy of Schopenhauer. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
116. Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
117. Mandelbaum, Maurice. “Family Resemblances and Generalizations Concerning the Arts.” American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (1965): 219-28.
118. McFarland, John D. Kant’s Concept of Teleology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1970.
119. Meerbote, Ralf. “Reflection on Beauty.” In Cohen and Guyer, Essays in Kant’s Aesthetics, pp. 55-86.
120. Meerbote, Ralf, and Hud Hudson, eds. Kant’s Aesthetics. North American Kant Society Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 1. Atascadero: Ridgeview Publishing Co., 1991.
121. Mendelssohn, Moses. Philosophical Writings. Edited by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
122. Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty (1859). In Essays on Politics and Society. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by J. M. Robson. Volume 18. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
123. Monk, Samuel H. The Sublime. A Study of Critical Theories in XVIII-Century England. Second edition, with a new preface. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.
124. Moore, George Edward. Principia Ethica (1903). Revised edition, with introduction by Thomas Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
125. Mothersill, Mary. Beauty Restored. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
126. Osborne, Harold. “Hume’s Standard and the Diversity of Taste.” British Journal of Aesthetics 7 (1967): 50-6.
127. Parret, Herman., ed. Kants Asthetik - Kant’s Aesthetics - L’esthetique deKant. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1998.
128. Podro, Michael. The Manifold in Perception: Theories of Art from Kant to Hildebrand. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
129. Rind, Miles. “Can Kant’s Deduction of Judgments of Taste Be Saved?” Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (2001): 20-45.
130. Rogerson, Kenneth F. Kant’s Aesthetics: The Roles of Form and Expression. Lanham: University Press of America, 1986.
131. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Reveries of a Solitary Walker. In The Collected Writings of Rousseau, edited by Roger D. Masters and Christopher Kelly. Volume 8. Hanover and London: University Press of New England, 2000.
132. Rush, Fred L., Jr. “The Harmony of the Faculties.” Kant-Studien 92 (2001): 38-61.
133. Santayana, George. The Sense of Beauty: Being the Outline of Aesthetic Theory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1896.
134. Sartwell, Crispin. “Art for Art’s Sake.” In Kelly, Encyclopedia of Aesthetics, Vol. I, pp. 118-21.
135. Savile, Anthony. Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant, and Schiller. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.
136. Scarré, Geoffrey. “Kant on Free and Dependent Beauty.” BritishJournal of Aesthetics 21 (1981): 351-62.
137. Schaeffer, Jean-Marie. Art of the Modern Age: Philosophy of Art from Kant to Heidegger. Translated by Steven Rendell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
138. Schaper, Eva. Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1979.
139. Schiller, Friedrich. On the Aesthetic Education of Man, in a Series of Letters. Edited and translated by Elizabeth M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
140. Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representation. Translated by E. F. J. Payne. Two volumes. Indian Hills, Colorado: The Falcon Wing’s Press, 1958.
141. Seel, Gerhard. “Uber den Grund der Lust an schdnen Gegenstanden: Kriti- sche Fragen an die Asthetik Kants.” In Hariolf Oberer and Gerhard Seel, eds. Kant: Analysen - Probleme - Kritik. Wurzburg: Kdnigshausen & Neumann, 1988, PP. 317-56.
142. Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of. Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times (1711). Edited by Lawrence F. Klein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
143. Shier, David. “Why KantFinds Nothing Ugly.” BritishJournal of Aesthetics 38 (1998): 412-18.
144. Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edited by A. L. Macfie and D. D. Raphael. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
145. Stolnitz, Jerome. “On the Origins of‘Aesthetic Disinterest’.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 20 (1961): 131-43.
146. Stolzenberg, Jürgen. “Das Freie Spiel der Erkenntniskrafte: Zu Kants Theorie des Geschmacksurteils.” In Ursula Franke, ed., Kants Schlussel zur Kritik des Geschmacks: AsthetischeErfahrung heute - Studien zur Aktualitat von Kants “Kritik der Urteilskraft,” Sonderheft des Jahrgangs 2000 der Zeitschrift fur Asthetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2000, pp. 1-28.
147. Strube, Christian. “Das HaBliche und die ‘Kritik der asthetischen Urteilskraft’: Uberlegungen zu einer systematische Liicke.” Kant-Studien 80 (1989): 416-46.
148. Vitruvius The Ten Books of Architecture. Translated by Morris Hicky Morgan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1914.
149. Walton, Kendall. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.
150. Weitz, Morris. “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1956): 27-35.
151. Wenzel, Christian. “Kant Finds Nothing Ugly?” British Journal of Aesthetics 39 (1999): 416-22.
152. Wicks, Robert. “Dependent Beauty and the Appreciation of Teleological Style.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (1997): 387-400.
153. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Second edition. New Ybrk: Macmillan, 1968.
154. Wolff, Christian. Vernunftige Gedancken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen. New edition. Halle: Renger, 1751.