Collaboration, Transferable and Non-transferable Knowledge, and Innovation: A Study of a Cool Climate Wine Industry (Canada)

Growth and Change

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 16-37

  Doloreux, David ^a,b   Shearmur, Richard ^c   Guillaume, Régis ^d,e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b KEDGE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^e Université de Toulouse Jean Jaurès   (France)

^f Cooperation in the French Embassy ^*  (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGROINDUSTRY; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

CANADA;

EID: 84923930800     PISSN: 00174815     EISSN: 14682257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12090     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Abramovsky, L., E. Kremp, A. Lopez, T. Schmidt, and H. Simpson . 2009. Understanding co-operative R&D activity: Evidence from four European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18(3): 243-265.
2. Alonso, D.A. 2011. "Standing alone you can't wine anything": The importance of collaborative relationships for wineries producing muscadine wines. Journal of Wine Research 22(1): 43-55.
3. Andreosso-O'Callaghan, B., and H. Lenihan . 2008. Networking: A question of firm characteristics? The case of the Shannon region in Ireland. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 20(6): 561-580.
4. Aylward, D. 2004. Innovation-export linkages within different cluster models: A case study from the Australian wine industry. Prometheus 22(4): 423-437.
5. Aylward, D. 2006. Global pipelines: Profiling successful SME exporters within the Australian wine industry. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 6(1): 49-65.
6. Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell . 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 31-56.
7. Benko, G., and A. Lipietz . 1992. Les régions qui gagnent. Districts et réseaux. Les nouveaux paradigmes de la géographie économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
8. Berry, B. 1964. Cities as systems within systems of cities. Papers in Regional Science 13(1): 146-163.
9. Boschma, R. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1): 61-74.
10. Brewis, T. 1968. Regional economic policies in Canada. Toronto: Macmillan.
11. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West . 2006. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Clemons, K. 2008. How information changes consumer behavior and how consumer behavior determines corporate strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(2): 13-40.
13. Cohen, W., and S. Levinthal . 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
14. Cooke, P., M. Heidenreich, and H.-J. Braczyk . 2004. Regional systems of innovation: The role of governance in a globalized world. London: Routledge.
15. Dicken, P., and P. Lloyd . 1990. Location in space. London: Harper Collins.
16. Doloreux, D. 2002. What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society 24(3): 243-263.
17. Doloreux, D., and R. Shearmur . 2012. Collaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge-intensive business services. Journal of Economic Geography 12(1): 79-105.
18. Echeverri-Carroll, E., and W. Brennan . 1999. Are innovation networks bounded by proximity? In Innovation, networks and localities, ed. M. Fischer, L. Suarez-Villa, and M. Steiner, 28-49. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
19. Florida, R. 1995. Toward the learning region. Futures 27: 527-536.
20. Fontan, J.-M., J.-L. Klein, and D.-G. Tremblay . 2005. Innovation socioterritoriale et reconversion économique: le cas de Montréal. Paris: L'Harmattan.
21. Gertler, M. 2003. Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or the undefinable tacitness of being (there). Journal of Economic Geography 3(1): 75-99.
22. Gilinsky, A., C. Santini, L. Lazzeretti, and R. Eyler . 2008. Desperately seeking serendipity: Exploring the impact of country location on innovation in the wine industry. International Journal of Wine Business Research 20(4): 302-332.
23. Giuliani, E. 2007. The selective nature of knowledge networks in clusters: Evidence from the wine industry. Journal of Economic Geography 7(2): 139-168.
24. Goulet, E., and R. Morlat . 2011. The use of surveys among wine growers in vineyards of the middle-Loire Valley (France) in relation to terroir studies. Land Use Policy 28: 770-782.
25. Harvey, D. 1973. Social justice and the city. London: Edward Arnold.
26. von Hippel, E. 1994. "Sticky information" and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4): 429-439.
27. Huggins, R., and A. Johnston . 2010. Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity, and firm size. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(5): 457-484.
28. Industry Canada. 2010. The Canadian wine industry. http://www4.agr.gc.ca/AAFC-AAC/display-afficher.do?id=1172244915663&lang=eng (accessed April 2011).
29. Isaksen, A. 2009. Innovation dynamics of global competitive regional clusters: The case of the Norwegian centres of expertise. Regional Studies 43(9): 1155-1166.
30. Isaksen, A., and K. Onsager . 2010. Regions, networks and innovative performance: The case of knowledge-intensive industries in Norway. European Urban and Regional Studies 17(3): 227-243.
31. Jones, G., M. White, A. Owen, R. Cooper, and K. Storchmann . 2005. Climate change and global wine quality. Climatic Change 73(3): 319-343.
32. Lorentzen, J. 2011. Knowledge, science and interactions in South Africa's wine industry. In Innovation and technological catch-up: The changing geography of wine production, ed. E. Giuliani, A. Morrison, and R. Rabellotti, 177-198. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
33. Maillat, D., M. Quévit, and L. Senn . 1993. Réseaux d'innovation et milieux innovateurs: un pari pour le développement régional. Neuchâtel: GREMI/EDES.
34. Markman, G., D. Siegel, and M. Wright . 2008. Research and technology commercialization. Journal of Management Studies 45(8): 1401-1423.
35. Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics: An introductory volume. http://www.marx.org/reference/subject/economics/marshall/index.htm (accessed October 2008).
36. Massey, D.B. 1984. Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. New York: Methuen.
37. McCann, P. 2007. Sketching out a model of innovation, face-to-face interaction and economic geography. Spatial Economic Analysis 2(2): 117-134.
38. Miotti, L., and F. Sachwald . 2003. Cooperative R&D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework analysis. Research Policy 32(8): 1481-1499.
39. Moulaert, F., and F. Sekia . 2003. Territorial innovation models: A critical survey. Regional Studies 37(3): 289-302.
40. Nieto, M., and L. Santamaria . 2007. The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation. Technovation 27(6-7): 367-377.
41. OECD. 2005. Manuel d'Oslo: Principes directeurs proposés pour le recueil et l'interprétation des données sur l'innovation technologique, 2ième éd. Paris: OECD.
42. OECD. 2010. The OECD innovation strategy: Getting a head start on tomorrow. Paris: OECD.
43. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin (OIV). 2010. Definition of vitivinicultural 'terroir', resolution OIV-VITI 333-2010.
44. Ozman, M. 2009. Inter-firm networks and innovation: A survey of the literature. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18(1): 39-67.
45. Piore, M., and C. Sabel . 1984. The second industrial divide. New York: Basic Books.
46. Pittaway, L., M. Robertson, K. Munir, D. Denyer, and A. Neely . 2004. Networking and innovation: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews 5/6: 137-168.
47. Porter, M. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
48. Pred, A. 1977. City-systems in advanced economies. London: Hutchinson.
49. Pred, A., and G. Tornquist . 1973. Systems of cities and information flows. Lund: Lund University Studies in Geography.
50. Sammarra, A., and L. Biggiero . 2008. Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks. Journal of Management Studies 45(4): 800-829.
51. Shearmur, R. 2011. Innovation, regions and proximity: From neo-regionalism to spatial analysis. Regional Studies 45(9): 1225-1244.
52. Siegel, D., R. Veugelers, and M. Wright . 2007. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 23(4): 640-660.
53. Smith, K. 2007. Technological and economic dynamics of the world wine industry: An introduction. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 3: 127-137.
54. Storper, M., and R. Walker . 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Taplin, I. 2010. From co-operation to competition: Market transformation among elite Napa Valley wine producers. International Journal of Wine Business Research 22(1): 6-26.
56. Taplin, I. 2011. Network structure and knowledge transfer in cluster evolution; the transformation of the Napa Valley wine region. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 19(2): 127-145.
57. Taplin, I., and R. Breckenridge . 2008. Large firms, legitimation and industry identity: The growth of the North Carolina wine industry. Social Science Journal 45(2): 352-360.
58. Teirlinck, P., and A. Spithoven . 2008. The spatial organisation of innovation: Open innovation, external knowledge relations and urban structure. Regional Studies 42(5): 689-704.
59. Torre, A. 2008. On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies 42(6): 869-889.
60. Tödtling, F., P. Lehner, and A. Kaufmann . 2009. Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation 29(1): 59-71.
61. Trippl, M., F. Tödtling, and L. Lengauer . 2009. Knowledge sourcing beyond buzz and pipelines: Evidence from the Vienna software sector. Economic Geography 85(4): 443-462.