Rhizobium-legume symbioses: The crucial role of plant immunity

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 186-194

  Gourion, Benjamin ^a   Berrabah, Fathi ^a   Ratet, Pascal ^a   Stacey, Gary ^b  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DU VÉGÉTAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

ETI; Immunity; Intracellular defenses; MTI; Nod factors; Rhizobium legume symbiosis

Indexed keywords

RHIZOBIUM;

FABACEAE; IMMUNOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT IMMUNITY; RHIZOBIUM; SYMBIOSIS;

FABACEAE; PLANT IMMUNITY; RHIZOBIUM; SYMBIOSIS;

EID: 84923927639     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.11.008     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Oldroyd G.E., et al. The rules of engagement in the legume-rhizobial symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45:119-144.
2. Deakin W.J., Broughton W.J. Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: rhizobial protein secretion systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:312-320.
3. Bonaldi K., et al. Nodulation of Aeschynomene afraspera and A. indica by photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium Sp. strain ORS285: the nod-dependent versus the nod-independent symbiotic interaction. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24:1359-1371.
4. Capoen W., et al. Sesbania rostrata: a case study of natural variation in legume nodulation. New Phytol. 2010, 186:340-345.
5. Oldroyd G.E., Downie J.A. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59:519-546.
6. Okazaki S., et al. Hijacking of leguminous nodulation signaling by the rhizobial type III secretion system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:17131-17136.
7. Libault M., et al. Complete transcriptome of the soybean root hair cell, a single-cell model, and its alteration in response to Bradyrhizobium japonicum infection. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:541-552.
8. Lohar D.P., et al. Transcript analysis of early nodulation events in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140:221-234.
9. Kouchi H., et al. Large-scale analysis of gene expression profiles during early stages of root nodule formation in a model legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2004, 11:263-274.
10. Lopez-Gomez M., et al. Interplay of flg22-induced defence responses and nodulation in Lotus japonicus. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:393-401.
11. 2 is required for optimal establishment of the Medicago sativa/Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189:8741-8745.
12. Andrio E., et al. Hydrogen peroxide-regulated genes in the Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. New Phytol. 2013, 198:179-189.
13. Marino D., et al. A Medicago truncatula NADPH oxidase is involved in symbiotic nodule functioning. New Phytol. 2011, 189:580-592.
14. Arthikala M.K., et al. RbohB, a Phaseolus vulgaris NADPH oxidase gene, enhances symbiosome number, bacteroid size, and nitrogen fixation in nodules and impairs mycorrhizal colonization. New Phytol. 2014, 202:886-900.
15. Montiel J., et al. A Phaseolus vulgaris NADPH oxidase gene is required for root infection by Rhizobia. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53:1751-1767.
16. Zipfel C. Plant pattern-recognition receptors. Trends Immunol. 2014, 35:345-351.
17. Jones K.M., et al. Differential response of the plant Medicago truncatula to its symbiont Sinorhizobium meliloti or an exopolysaccharide-deficient mutant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:704-709.
18. Aslam S.N., et al. Bacterial polysaccharides suppress induced innate immunity by calcium chelation. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1078-1083.
19. Stacey G., et al. Effects of endogenous salicylic acid on nodulation in the model legumes Lotus japonicus and Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:1473-1481.
20. Peleg-Grossman S., et al. NPR1 protein regulates pathogenic and symbiotic interactions between Rhizobium and legumes and non-legumes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e8399.
21. Penmetsa R.V., Cook D.R. A legume ethylene-insensitive mutant hyperinfected by its rhizobial symbiont. Science 1997, 275:527-530.
22. Sun J., et al. Crosstalk between jasmonic acid, ethylene and Nod factor signaling allows integration of diverse inputs for regulation of nodulation. Plant J. 2006, 46:961-970.
23. Roux B., et al. An integrated analysis of plant and bacterial gene expression in symbiotic root nodules using laser-capture microdissection coupled to RNA sequencing. Plant J. 2014, 77:817-837.
24. Sugawara M., Sadowsky M.J. Enhanced nodulation and nodule development by nolR mutants of Sinorhizobium medicae on specific Medicago host genotypes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27:328-335.
25. Liang Y., et al. Nonlegumes respond to rhizobial Nod factors by suppressing the innate immune response. Science 2013, 341:1384-1387.
26. Maillet F., et al. Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 2011, 469:58-63.
27. Liang Y., et al. Lipochitooligosaccharide recognition: an ancient story. New Phytol. 2014, 204:289-296.
28. Rey T., et al. NFP, a LysM protein controlling Nod factor perception, also intervenes in Medicago truncatula resistance to pathogens. New Phytol. 2013, 198:875-886.
29. Pietraszewska-Bogiel A., et al. Interaction of Medicago truncatula lysin motif receptor-like kinases, NFP and LYK3, produced in Nicotiana benthamiana induces defence-like responses. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e65055.
30. Madsen E.B., et al. Autophosphorylation is essential for the in vivo function of the Lotus japonicus Nod factor receptor 1 and receptor-mediated signalling in cooperation with Nod factor receptor 5. Plant J. 2011, 65:404-417.
31. Moling S., et al. Nod factor receptors form heteromeric complexes and are essential for intracellular infection in Medicago nodules. Plant Cell 2014, 26:4188-4199.
32. Wang W., et al. Functional analysis of chimeric lysin motif domain receptors mediating Nod factor-induced defense signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana and chitin-induced nodulation signaling in Lotus japonicus. Plant J. 2014, 78:56-69.
33. Nakagawa T., et al. From defense to symbiosis: limited alterations in the kinase domain of LysM receptor-like kinases are crucial for evolution of legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. Plant J. 2011, 65:169-180.
34. Petutschnig E.K., et al. A novel Arabidopsis CHITIN ELICITOR RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (CERK1) mutant with enhanced pathogen-induced cell death and altered receptor processing. New Phytol. 2014, 204:955-967.
35. Shimizu T., et al. Two LysM receptor molecules, CEBiP and OsCERK1, cooperatively regulate chitin elicitor signaling in rice. Plant J. 2010, 64:204-214.
36. Cao Y., et al. The kinase LYK5 is a major chitin receptor in and forms a chitin-induced complex with related kinase CERK1. Elife 2014, 3.
37. Miyata K., et al. The bifunctional plant receptor, OsCERK1, regulates both chitin-triggered immunity and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55:1864-1872.
38. Jones J.D., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
39. Mudgett M.B. New insights to the function of phytopathogenic bacterial type III effectors in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56:509-531.
40. Marchetti M., et al. Experimental evolution of a plant pathogen into a legume symbiont. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000280.
41. Guan S.H., et al. Experimental evolution of nodule intracellular infection in legume symbionts. ISME J. 2013, 7:1367-1377.
42. Saad M.M., et al. The type 3 protein secretion system of Cupriavidus taiwanensis strain LMG19424 compromises symbiosis with Leucaena leucocephala. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78:7476-7479.
43. Dai W.J., et al. Symbiosis-promoting and deleterious effects of NopT, a novel type 3 effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190:5101-5110.
44. Kambara K., et al. Rhizobia utilize pathogen-like effector proteins during symbiosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 71:92-106.
45. Marie C., et al. Characterization of Nops, nodulation outer proteins, secreted via the type III secretion system of NGR234. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2003, 16:743-751.
46. Skorpil P., et al. NopP, a phosphorylated effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234, is a major determinant of nodulation of the tropical legumes Flemingia congesta and Tephrosia vogelii. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 57:1304-1317.
47. Viprey V., et al. Symbiotic implications of type III protein secretion machinery in Rhizobium. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28:1381-1389.
48. Zhang L., et al. Functional analysis of the type 3 effector nodulation outer protein L (NopL) from Rhizobium sp. NGR234: symbiotic effects, phosphorylation, and interference with mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:32178-32187.
49. Xin D.W., et al. Functional analysis of NopM, a novel E3 ubiquitin ligase (NEL) domain effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8:e1002707.
50. Bartsev A.V., et al. NopL, an effector protein of Rhizobium sp. NGR234, thwarts activation of plant defense reactions. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134:871-879.
51. Hubber A., et al. Symbiotic phenotypes and translocated effector proteins of the Mesorhizobium loti strain R7A VirB/D4 type IV secretion system. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 54:561-574.
52. Sugawara M., et al. Comparative genomics of the core and accessory genomes of 48 Sinorhizobium strains comprising five genospecies. Genome Biol. 2013, 14:R17.
53. Kimbrel J.A., et al. Mutualistic co-evolution of type III effector genes in Sinorhizobium fredii and Bradyrhizobium japonicum. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003204.
54. Yang S., et al. R gene-controlled host specificity in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:18735-18740.
55. Tsukui T., et al. The type III Secretion System of Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA122 mediates symbiotic incompatibility with Rj2 soybean plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79:1048-1051.
56. Liu J., et al. Identification of a dominant gene in Medicago truncatula that restricts nodulation by Sinorhizobium meliloti strain Rm41. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14:167.
57. Gourion B., et al. The PhyR-sigma(EcfG) signalling cascade is involved in stress response and symbiotic efficiency in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73:291-305.
58. Mithöfer A. Suppression of plant defence in rhizobia-legume symbiosis. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7:440-444.
59. Roth L.E., et al. Homology in endosymbiotic systems: the term 'symbiosome'. Molecular Genetics of Plant-Microbe Interactions 1988, 220-225. American Phytopathological Society Press. R. Palacios, D.P.S. Verma (Eds.).
60. Limpens E., et al. Cell- and tissue-specific transcriptome analyses of Medicago truncatula root nodules. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e64377.
61. Berrabah F., et al. Growth conditions determine the DNF2 requirement for symbiosis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e91866.
62. Sinharoy S., et al. The C2H2 transcription factor regulator of symbiosome differentiation represses transcription of the secretory pathway gene VAMP721a and promotes symbiosome development in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 2013, 25:3584-3601.
63. Berrabah F., et al. A nonRD receptor-like kinase prevents nodule early senescence and defense-like reactions during symbiosis. New Phytol. 2014, 203:1305-1314.
64. Bourcy M., et al. Medicago truncatula DNF2 is a PI-PLC-XD-containing protein required for bacteroid persistence and prevention of nodule early senescence and defense-like reactions. New Phytol. 2013, 197:1250-1261.
65. Dardick C., Ronald P. Plant and animal pathogen recognition receptors signal through non-RD kinases. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2:e2.
66. Dardick C., et al. Non-arginine-aspartate (non-RD) kinases are associated with innate immune receptors that recognize conserved microbial signatures. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:358-366.
67. Van de Velde W., et al. Plant peptides govern terminal differentiation of bacteria in symbiosis. Science 2010, 327:1122-1126.
68. Haag A.F., et al. Protection of Sinorhizobium against host cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides is critical for symbiosis. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001169.
69. Puppo A., et al. Legume nodule senescence: roles for redox and hormone signalling in the orchestration of the natural aging process. New Phytol. 2005, 165:683-701.
70. Delledonne M., et al. Nitric oxide functions as a signal in plant disease resistance. Nature 1998, 394:585-588.
71. Gaupels F., et al. Upstream and downstream signals of nitric oxide in pathogen defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:707-714.
72. Cam Y., et al. Nitric oxide (NO): a key player in the senescence of Medicago truncatula root nodules. New Phytol. 2012, 196:548-560.
73. Van de Velde W., et al. Aging in legume symbiosis. A molecular view on nodule senescence in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141:711-720.
74. Mueller A.N., et al. Compatibility in the Ustilago maydis-maize interaction requires inhibition of host cysteine proteases by the fungal effector Pit2. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003177.
75. van der Linde K., et al. A maize cystatin suppresses host immunity by inhibiting apoplastic cysteine proteases. Plant Cell 2012, 24:1285-1300.
76. Alcazar R., Parker J.E. The impact of temperature on balancing immune responsiveness and growth in Arabidopsis. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16:666-675.
77. Zhang C., et al. Crosstalk between the circadian clock and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003370.
78. Reguera M., et al. Boron deficiency results in induction of pathogenesis-related proteins from the PR-10 family during the legume-rhizobia interaction. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167:625-632.
79. Kelly S.J., et al. Conditional requirement for exopolysaccharide in the Mesorhizobium-Lotus symbiosis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013, 26:319-329.
80. Giraud E., et al. Photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium sp. strain ORS285 is capable of forming nitrogen-fixing root nodules on soybeans (Glycine max). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79:2459-2462.
81. Felix G., et al. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J. 1999, 18:265-276.
82. Giraud E., et al. Legumes symbioses: absence of Nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science 2007, 316:1307-1312.
83. Madsen L.H., et al. The molecular network governing nodule organogenesis and infection in the model legume Lotus japonicus. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1:10.
84. Beatty P.H., Good A.G. Plant science. Future prospects for cereals that fix nitrogen. Science 2011, 333:416-417.
85. Charpentier M., Oldroyd G. How close are we to nitrogen-fixing cereals?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13:556-564.
86. Scheidle H., et al. The lipid A substructure of the Sinorhizobium meliloti lipopolysaccharides is sufficient to suppress the oxidative burst in host plants. New Phytol. 2005, 165:559-565.
87. Margaret I., et al. The Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 lipopolysaccharide is not only relevant at early soybean nodulation stages but also for symbiosome stability in mature nodules. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e74717.
88. Arrighi J.F., et al. The Medicago truncatula lysine motif-receptor-like kinase gene family includes NFP and new nodule-expressed genes. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:265-279.
89. Okazaki S., et al. Identification and functional analysis of type III effector proteins in Mesorhizobium loti. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23:223-234.