Decoupling and displaced emissions: on Swedish consumers, Chinese producers and policy to address the climate impact of consumption

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 134, Issue Part A, 2016, Pages 320-329

  Isenhour, Cindy ^a   Feng, Kuishuang ^b  

^a University of Maine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

China; Climate policy; Decoupling; Efficiency; Sustainable consumption; Sweden

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; GREENHOUSE GASES;

CHINA; CLIMATE POLICY; DECOUPLING; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; SWEDEN;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

EID: 84923902576     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.037     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Alfredsson, E.C., “Green” consumption—no solution for climate change. Energy 29 (2004), 513–524.
2. Allaway, D., Sustainable Consumption: Opportunities and Challenges. Materials Management through Sustainable Consumption Webinar Series, 2012, US Department of Environmental Quality.
3. Atkinson, G., Hamilton, K., Ruta, G., Van Der Mensbrugghe, D., Trade in ‘virtual carbon’: empirical results and implications for policy. Glob. Environ. Change 21 (2011), 563–574.
4. Attari, S.Z., Schoen, M., Davidson, C.I., DeKay, M.L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dawes, R., Small, M.J., Preferences for change: do individuals prefer voluntary actions, soft regulations, or hard regulations to decrease fossil fuel consumption?. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 1701–1710.
5. Barrett, J., Hubacek, K., Inaba, A., Stagl, S., (eds.) Proceedings of the International Workshop on Driving Forces of and Barriers to Sustainable Consumption, 2004, University of Leeds.
6. Barrett, J., Peters, G., Wiedmann, T., Scott, K., Roelich, K., Le Quere, C., Consumption-based GHG emissions accounting: a UK case study. Clim. Policy 13 (2013), 451–470.
7. Berglund, M., Green Growth: a Consumption Perspective on Swedish Environmental Impact Trends Using Input-output Analysis. 2011, Global Energy Systems: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University.
8. 2 Emissions Production-based Accounting Vs. Consumption: Insights from the WOID Database. 2012, ERASME, Ecole Centrale Paris.
9. 2 Emissions in a Globalized World. 2010, German Development Institute, Bonn.
10. Buhr, K., Thörn, P., Hjerpe, M., The clean development mechanism in China: Institutional perspectives on governance. Environ. Policy Gov. 22 (2012), 77–89.
11. Carmondy, G., Can China Change the Coppenhagen Consultations?. The National Forum, March 30, 2009 http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=8733.
12. Carmody, G., Consumption-based emissions policy: a vaccine for the carbon pollution reduction scheme ‘trade flu’?. A Taxing Debate: Climate Policy Beyond Copenhagen, 2011 CEDA Growth Journal no 61.
13. Connolly, J., Prothero, A., Green Consumption: life-politics, risk and contradictions. J. Consumer Cult. 8 (2008), 117–145.
14. Csutora, M., Mózner, Z., Rethinking kyoto compliance from a consumption-based perspective. China-EU Cooperation for a Sustainable Economy, 2012, Corvinus University of Budapest, Aula, Budapest, 177–200.
15. Dauvergne, P., The problem of consumption. Global Environ. Polit 10:2 (2010), 1–10.
16. 2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010.
17. Davis, S.J., Peters, G.P., Caldeira, K., The supply chain of CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011.
18. de Grazia, V., Irresistible Empire: America's Advance through 20th-Century Europe. 2005, Harvard.
19. Deitz, R., O'Neill, D., Enough is Enough: Building a Sustainable Economy in a World of Finite Resources. 2013, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Fransisco.
20. Druckman, A., Jackson, T., The bare necessities: how much household carbon do we really need?. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1794–1804.
21. EEA, Europe's Demand for Resources Reaching Far beyond its Borders. 2012, European Environment Agency.
22. EEA, Unsustainable Consumption: the Mother of All Environmental Issues?. 2012, European Environment Agency.
23. EEA, Trends and Projections in Europe 2013: Tracking Progress towards Europe's Climate and Energy Targets until 2020. 2013, European Environment Agency.
24. EEA, Environmental Indicators Report 2014: Environmental Impacts of Production and Consumption Systems in Europe., 2014, European Environment Aganecy.
25. Erickson, P., Chandler, C., Lazarus, M., Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Consumption: a Methodology for Scenario Analysis. in Working Paper No. 2012-05, 2012, Stockholm Environmental Institute.
26. European Commission, Special Eurobarometer 409: Climate Change. Survey Carried Out in the 28 Member States between 23 November and 2 December 2013.
27. European Commission, Europeans' Attitudes toward Climate Change. 2009, European Commission.
28. European Commission, Public Opinion in the European Union. 2009, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
29. 2 within China Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, 2013, 11654–11659.
30. Foster, J.B., Marx's Ecology: Materialism and Nature. 2000, Monthly Review Press, New York.
31. Fuchs, D., Lorek, S., Sustainable consumption governance: a history of promises and failures. J. Consum. Policy 28 (2005), 261–288.
32. Froberg, M., Herodes, F., Jessup, F., Zingmark, A., Final Review of CENTEC, Center for Environmental Technology, at the Embassy of Sweden in Beijing, China. 2013, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Stockholm.
33. Gullestad, M., Nature and everyday life in scandinavia. Folk 31 (1989), 171–181.
34. Halkier, B., Consequences of the politicization of consumption: the example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 1 (1999), 25–41.
35. Halkier, B., Consuming Ambivalences: consumer handling of environmentally related risks in food. J. Consumer Cult. 1 (2001), 205–224.
36. Hobson, K., “Weak” or “Strong” Sustainable Consumption? Efficiency, Degrowth and the 10 Year Framework of Programmes. 2013.
37. Hobson, K., On the making of the environmental citizen. Environ. Polit. 22:1 (2013), 56–72.
38. Hoekstra, A.Y., Mekonnen, M.M., The water footprint of humanity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 (2012), 3232–3237.
39. Hornborg, A., Zero-sum world: challenges in conceptualizing environmental load displacement and ecologically unequal exchange in the world-system. Int. J. Comp. Sociol. 50 (2009), 237–262.
40. IEA, World Energy Outlook 2009. 2009, International Energy Agency.
41. Isenhour, C., Building sustainable societies: a Swedish case study on the limits of reflexive modernization. Am. Ethnol. 37 (2010), 511–525.
42. Isenhour, C., On conflicted Swedish consumers, the effort to stop shopping and neoliberal environmental governance. J. Consumer Behav. 9 (2010), 454–469.
43. Isenhour, C., The devil in the Deal: trade-embedded emissions and the Durban Platform. Ethics, Policy & Environ. Special Issue Durb. Platf. 15 (2012), 303–308.
44. Jackson, T., Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. 2009, Routledge, Abbington.
45. Jenkins, J., Nordhaus, T., Shellenberger, M., Energy Emergence. 2011, Breakthrough Institute.
46. Laitner, J.A., Nadel, S., Elliott, N., Sachs, H., Khan, S., The Long-term Energy Efficiency Potential: what the Evidence Suggests. 2012, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC.
47. Leach, A.M., Galloway, J.N., Bleeker, A., Erisman, J.W., Kohn, R., Kitzes, J., A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment. Environ. Dev. 1 (2012), 40–66.
48. Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., Geschke, A., International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486 (2012), 109–112.
49. Löfgren, O., Being a good Swede. National Identity as a Cultural Battleground. Rapp, R., Schneider, J., (eds.) Articulating Hidden Histories, 1995, University of California Press, Berkeley.
50. Lorek, S., Fuchs, D., Strong sustainable consumption governance: precondition for a degrowth path?. J. Clean. Prod. 38 (2013), 36–43.
51. Martinez-Alier, J., Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment and Society. 1987, Blackwell, Oxford.
52. Matti, Simon, Exploring Public Policy Legitimacy: a Study of Belief-System Correspondence in Swedish Environmental Policy., 2009 Doctoral thesis Luleå: Luleå Tekniska Universitet.
53. Mattoo, A., Subramanian, A., der Mensbrugghe, D.V., He, J., Reconciling Climate Change and Trade Policy. 2009, World Bank.
54. Micheletti, M., Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. 2003, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
55. Mills, J.H., Waite, T.A., Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation, and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2087–2095.
56. Monjon, S., Quirion, P., Which Design of a Border Adjustment for the EU ETS? A Quantitative Assessment. 2011, EAERE conference.
57. Munksgaard, J., Wier, M., Lenzen, M., Day, C., Indicators for the environmental pressure of consumption. Life-cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption – Workshop Proceedings, 2002, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
58. Naturvårdverket, Köttkonsumtionens Klimatpåverkan: Drivkrafter Och Styrmede. 2011, Naturvårdverket, Stockholm.
59. New York Times, China rejects Criticism of its Carbon Emissions. 2007.
60. OECD, Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. 2004, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
61. OECD, Carbon Dioxide Emissions Embodied in International Trade. 2013 STAN Database.
62. O'Sullivan, J., Consumption – Based Emissions Accounting and Pricing: Harness Market Power to Enhance Mitigatiton. 2012 Position Paper submitted to the UNFCCC Secretariat March 5, 2012 http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2012/smsn/ngo/171.pdf.
63. O'Dell, T., Culture Unbound: Americanization and Everyday Life in Sweden. 1997, Nordic Academic Press, Lund.
64. Ölander, F., Thøgersen, J., Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. J. Consum. Policy 18 (1995), 317–357.
65. Parliament, U., Consumption-based Emissions Reporting: Government Response to the Committee's Twelfth Report of Session 2010-12. 2012, Energy and Climate Change.
66. Peters, G.P., From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008), 13–23.
67. 2 embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (2008), 1401–1407.
68. Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L., Edenhofer, O., Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108 (2011), 8903–8908.
69. Peters, G.P., Davis, S.J., Andrew, R., A synthesis of carbon in international trade. Biogeosciences 9 (2012), 3247–3276.
70. Petherick, A., When carbon footprints hop. Nat. Clim. Change 2 (2012), 484–485.
71. PIRC – Public Interest Research Centre, Consumption-Based Emissions Reporting. 2012 Memorandum submitted by the Public Interest Research Centre to the UK Parliament.
72. Press, M., Arnould, E.J., Constraints on sustainable energy consumption: market system and public policy challenges and opportunities. J. Public Policy & Mark. 28 (2009), 102–113.
73. Princen, T., Maniates, M., Conca, K., Confronting Consumption. 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
74. Public Interest Research Centre, Consumption-based Emissions Reporting. Memorandum Submitted by the Public Interest Research Centre to the UK Parliament. 2011.
75. Rees, E., UK's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions an ‘Ilusion’. 2011, The Ecologist.
76. Sassatelli, R., Virgue, responsibility and consumer choice: framing critical consumerism. Brewer, J., Trentman, F., (eds.) Consuming Cultures, Global Perspectives: Historical Trajectories, Transnational Exchanges, 2006, Berg, Oxford.
77. Sato, M., Embodied Carbon in Trade: a Survey of the Empirical Literature. 2012, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute.
78. SEPA., Köttkonsumtionens Klimatepåverkan. 2011, SEPA, Stockholm.
79. SEPA, Förslag till indikatorer för uppföljning av generationsmålet: underlag till den fördjupade utvärderingen av miljömålen 2012. 2012, SEPA, Stockholm.
80. SEPA, Konsumtionsbaserade miljöindikatorer: Underlag för uppföljning av generationsmålet. 2012, SEPA, Stockholm.
81. SEPA, Steg på vägen: Fördjupad utvärdering av miljömålen 2012. 2012, SEPA, Stockholm.
82. SEPA, Uppföljning av generationsmålet: Underlag till den fördjupade utvärderingen av miljömålen 2012. 2012, SEPA, Stockholm.
83. Shove, E., Comfort, Cleanliness, Convinience: the Social Organization of Normality. 2004, Bloomsbury Academic.
84. Shreck, A., Resistance, resdistribution, and power in the fair trade banana initiative. Wright, W., Middendorf, G., (eds.) The Fight over Food: Producers, Consumers, and Activists Challenge the Global Food System, 2008, Penn State University Press, University Park, PA.
85. Sjöström, M., Östblom, G., Decoupling waste generation from economic growth — A CGE analysis of the Swedish case. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2010), 1545–1552.
86. Söderholm, P., Sustainable Households: Environmental Policy and Everyday Sustainability Final Report to the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency from the SHARP Research Program., 2011, Naturvardsverket, Stockholm.
87. Spaargaren, G., Sustainable consumption: a theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Soc. Nat. Resour. 16 (2003), 687–701.
88. Stern, D.I., The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32 (2004), 1419–1439.
89. TCO (The Swedish Confederation for Professional Employees), The Climate Transition and the Transition Climate: TCO's Rio ranking 2012:1. 2012, The Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees, Stockholm, Sweden.
90. UK House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, Carbon Budgets HC 1080. 2011, United Kingdom House of Commons, London.
91. UNEP, Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth, a Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel., 2011, United Nations Environment Program.
92. Weber, C.L., Matthews, H.S., Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecol. Econ. 66 (2008), 379–391.
93. Weidner, H., Mez, L., German climate change policy: a Success Story with some flaws. J. Environ. Dev. 17 (2008), 356–378.
94. Wiedmann, T., A review of recent multi-region input-output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol. Econ. 69 (2009), 211–222.
95. Wilk, R., Consumption embedded in culture and language: implications for finding sustainability. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 6 (2010), 38–48.
96. Wilk, R., Wilhite, H., Household energy decision making. Kempton, W., Morrison, B., (eds.) Families and Energy, Coping with Uncertainty, 1984, Michigan State University, Lansing, 449–459.
97. WMO, Greenhouse Gas Concentrations in Atmosphere Reach New Record. 2013, World Meteorological Organization.
98. World Business Council for Sustainable Business, Sustainable consumption facts and trends. Business Role Focus Area (World Business Council for Sustainable Business) World Trade Organization, 2008.
99. World Economic Forum, Lisbon Review 2010: Toward a More Competitive Europe. 2010, World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland.
100. World Trade Organization & the United Nations Environment Program, Trade and Climate Change. 2009, World Trade Organisation, Geneva.
101. Xinhua News Agency, President Xi Pledges Not to Sacrifice Environment. 2013 http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-05/24/c_132406763.htm.