Physiological consequences of abnormal connectivity in a developmental epilepsy

Annals of Neurology

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 487-503

  Shafi, Mouhsin M ^a   Vernet, Marine ^a   Klooster, Debby ^b   Chu, Catherine J ^c   Boric, Katica ^c   Barnard, Mollie E ^d   Romatoski, Kelsey ^a   Westover, M Brandon ^c   Christodoulou, Joanna A ^e   Gabrieli, John D E ^f   Whitfield Gabrieli, Susan ^f   Pascual Leone, Alvaro ^a   Chang, Bernard S ^a  

^a BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b EPILEPSY CENTER KEMPENHAEGHE   (Netherlands)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^e MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN CONNECTIVITY ABNORMALITY; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DISEASE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONNECTOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; EXCITABILITY; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HETEROTOPIA; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIVENTRICULAR HETEROTOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT; BRAIN; COMPLICATION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; BRAIN; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; PERIVENTRICULAR NODULAR HETEROTOPIA; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923766011     PISSN: 03645134     EISSN: 15318249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ana.24343     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Scharfman HE The neurobiology of epilepsy. Curr Neur Neurosci Rep 2007; 7: 348-354.
2. Spencer SS Neural networks in human epilepsy: evidence of and implications for treatment. Epilepsia 2002; 43: 219-227.
3. Engel J Jr, Thompson PM, Stern JM, et al. Connectomics and epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurol 2013; 26: 186-194.
4. Jin X, Prince DA, Huguenard JR. Enhanced excitatory synaptic connectivity in layer V pyramidal neurons of chronically injured epileptogenic neocortex in rats. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 4891-4900.
5. Prince DA, Parada I, Scalise K, et al. Epilepsy following cortical injury: cellular and molecular mechanisms as targets for potential prophylaxis. Epilepsia 2009; 50(SUPPL. 2): 30-40.
6. Battaglia G, Granata T. Periventricular nodular heterotopia. Handb Clin Neurol 2008; 87: 177-189.
7. Aghakhani Y, Kinay D, Gotman J, et al. The role of periventricular nodular heterotopia in epileptogenesis. Brain 2005; 128: 641-651.
8. Dubeau F, Tampieri D, Lee N, et al. Periventricular and subcortical nodular heterotopia: a study of 33 patients. Brain 1995; 118: 1273-1287.
9. Kothare SV, VanLandingham K, Armon C, et al. Seizure onset from periventricular nodular heterotopias: depth-electrode study. Neurology 1998; 51: 1723-1727.
10. Li LM, Dubeau F, Andermann F, et al. Periventricular nodular heterotopia and intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: poor outcome after temporal lobe resection. Ann Neurol 1997; 41: 662-668.
11. Tassi L, Colombo N, Cossu M, et al. Electroclinical, MRI and neuropathological study of 10 patients with nodular heterotopia, with surgical outcomes. Brain 2005; 128: 321-337.
12. Barkovich AJ, Kjos BO. Gray matter heterotopias: MR characteristics and correlation with developmental and neurologic manifestations. Radiology 1992; 182: 493-499.
13. Chang BS, Katzir T, Liu T, et al. A structural basis for reading fluency: white matter defects in a genetic brain malformation. Neurology 2007; 69: 2146-2154.
14. Chang BS, Ly J, Appignani B, et al. Reading impairment in the neuronal migration disorder of periventricular nodular heterotopia. Neurology 2005; 64: 799-803.
15. Christodoulou JA, Walker LM, Del Tufo SN, et al. Abnormal structural and functional brain connectivity in gray matter heterotopia. Epilepsia 2012; 53: 1024-1032.
16. Christodoulou JA, Barnard ME, Del Tufo SN, et al. Integration of gray matter nodules into functional cortical circuits in periventricular heterotopia. Epilepsy Behav 2013; 29: 400-406.
17. Archer JS, Abbott DF, Masterton RA, et al. Functional MRI interactions between dysplastic nodules and overlying cortex in periventricular nodular heterotopia. Epilepsy Behav 2010; 19: 631-634.
18. Greicius M. Resting-state functional connectivity in neuropsychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21: 424-430.
19. Guye M, Bartolomei F, Ranjeva J-P. Imaging structural and functional connectivity: towards a unified definition of human brain organization? Curr Opin Neurol 2008; 21: 393-403.
20. Rotenberg A. Prospects for clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation and real-time EEG in epilepsy. Brain Topogr 2010; 22: 257-266.
21. Valentin A, Arunachalam R, Mesquita-Rodrigues A, et al. Late EEG responses triggered by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the evaluation of focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 2008; 49: 470-480.
22. Julkunen P, Saisanen L, Kononen M, et al. TMS-EEG reveals impaired intracortical interactions and coherence in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (EPM1). Epilepsy Res 2013; 106: 103-112.
23. Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 9673-9678.
24. Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Thermenos HW, Milanovic S, et al. Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 1279-1284.
25. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage 2007; 37: 90-101.
26. Rorden C, Brett M. Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000; 12: 191-200.
27. Virtanen J, Ruohonen J, Naatanen R, Ilmoniemi RJ. Instrumentation for the measurement of electric brain responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37: 322-326.
28. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 2008-2039.
29. Rossini PM, Barker At, Berardelli A, et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 91: 79-92.
30. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 134: 9-21.
31. Lehmann D, Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 48: 609-621.
32. Komssi S, Kahkonen S, Ilmoniemi RJ. The effect of stimulus intensity on brain responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 21: 154-164.
33. Kahkonen S, Wilenius J, Komssi S, Ilmoniemi RJ. Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 534-542.
34. Badawy RA, Curatolo JM, Newton M, et al. Changes in cortical excitability differentiate generalized and focal epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2007; 61: 324-331.
35. Badawy RA, Macdonell RA, Berkovic SF, et al. Predicting seizure control: cortical excitability and antiepileptic medication. Ann Neurol 2010; 67: 64-73.
36. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995; 57: 289-300.
37. Groppe DM, Urbach TP, Kutas M. Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology 2011; 48: 1711-1725.
38. Hamalainen MS, Sarvas J. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1989; 36: 165-171.
39. Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, et al. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Front Neurosci 2013; 7: 267.
40. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 774-781.
41. Kobayashi M, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 145-156.
42. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 2007; 55: 187-199.
43. Badawy RA, Vogrin SJ, Lai A, Cook MJ. The cortical excitability profile of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2013; 54: 1942-1949.
44. Badawy RA, Vogrin SJ, Lai A, Cook MJ. Patterns of cortical hyperexcitability in adolescent/adult-onset generalized epilepsies. Epilepsia 2013; 54: 871-878.
45. Rogasch NC, Fitzgerald PB. Assessing cortical network properties using TMS-EEG. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34: 1652-1669.
46. Premoli I, Castellanos N, Rivolta D, et al. TMS-EEG signatures of GABAergic neurotransmission in the human cortex. J Neurosci 2014; 34: 5603-5612.
47. Li H, McDonald W, Parada I, et al. Targets for preventing epilepsy following cortical injury. Neurosci Lett 2011; 497: 172-176.
48. Bladin CF, Bornstein N. Post-stroke seizures. Handb Clin Neurol 2009; 93: 613-621.
49. Bonilha L, Nesland T, Martz GU, et al. Medial temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with neuronal fibre loss and paradoxical increase in structural connectivity of limbic structures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012; 83: 903-909.
50. Fox MD, Greicius M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci 2010; 4: 19.
51. Fregni F, Otachi PTM, do Valle A, et al. A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with refractory epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2006; 60: 447-455.
52. Sun W, Mao W, Meng X, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy: a controlled clinical study. Epilepsia 2012; 53: 1782-1789.
53. Wagner T, Gangitano M, Romero R, et al. Intracranial measurement of current densities induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the human brain. Neurosci Lett 2004; 354: 91-94.
54. Fox MD, Buckner RL, White MP, et al. Efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation targets for depression is related to intrinsic functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 72: 595-603.
55. Downar J, Daskalakis ZJ. New targets for rTMS in depression: a review of convergent evidence. Brain Stim 2013; 6: 231-240.
56. Badawy RA, Macdonell RA, Berkovic SF, et al. Predicting seizure control: cortical excitability and antiepileptic medication. Ann Neurol 2010; 67: 64-73.