Virtual Immersion for Post-Stroke Hand Rehabilitation Therapy

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 467-477

  Tsoupikova, Daria ^a   Stoykov, Nikolay S ^b   Corrigan, Molly ^b   Thielbar, Kelly ^b   Vick, Randy ^c   Li, Yu ^a   Triandafilou, Kristen ^b   Preuss, Fabian ^d   Kamper, Derek ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c SCHOOL OF THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN PARKSIDE   (United States)

^e Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive environments; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES; HAND REHABILITATION; INTERACTIVE ENVIRONMENTS; MULTI-USER VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT; REHABILITATION EXERCISE; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTIONS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTRONIC SENSOR; EXERCISE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GLOVE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; MICROCATHETER; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CONTROL; PILOT STUDY; PINCH STRENGTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION CARE; STROKE PATIENT; SURVIVOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIRTUAL REALITY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; HAND; KINESIOTHERAPY; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; STROKE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84923667138     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1218-y     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adamovich, S., et al. Recovery of hand function in virtual reality: training hemiparetic hand and arm together or separately. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008:3475–3478, 2008.
2. Connelly, L., et al. A pneumatic glove and immersive virtual reality environment for hand rehabilitative training after stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18(5):551–559, 2010.
3. Cromwell, F. Occupational Therapists Manual for Basic Skills Assessment: Primary Prevocational Evaluation. Pasadena, CA: Fair Oaks Printing, 1965.
4. Crosbie, J., et al. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the upper limb after stroke: the user’s perspective. Cyber Psychol. Behav. 9:137–141, 2009.
5. Duncan, P. W., et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 33(1):167–177, 2002.
6. Fugl-Meyer, A. R., et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 7(1):13–31, 1975.
7. Go, A. S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129(3):e28–e292, 2014.
8. Gowland, C., et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 24(1):58–63, 1993.
9. Jang, S. H., et al. Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86(11):2218–2223, 2005.
10. Johnson, D. A., et al. Virtual reality: a new prosthesis for brain injury rehabilitation. Scott. Med. J. 43(3):81–83, 1998.
11. Kwakkel, G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil. Rehabil. 28(13–14):823–830, 2006.
12. Laver, K., et al. Cochrane review: virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 48(3):523–530, 2012.
13. Lenze, E. J., et al. Adverse effects of depression and cognitive impairment on rehabilitation participation and recovery from hip fracture. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 19(5):472–478, 2004.
14. Levy, C. E., et al. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganization in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80(1):4–12, 2001.
15. Luo, X., et al. On the determinants of size constancy in a virtual environment. Int. J. Virtual Real. 8:43–51, 2009.
16. Lyle, R. C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 4(4):483–492, 1981.
17. Merians, A. S., et al. Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 8:27, 2011.
18. Milne, A. D., D. G. Chess, J. A. Johnson, and G. J. W. King. Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal operating range and metal interference. J. Biomech. 29(6):791–793, 1996.
19. Murphy, S. L., J. Q. Xu, and K. D. Kochanek, Deaths: Final Data for 2010, N.C.f.H. Statistics, Editor: Hyattsville, MD, 2013.
20. Onla-or, S., and C. J. Winstein. Determining the optimal challenge point for motor skill learning in adults with moderately severe Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 22(4):385–395, 2008.
21. Smeddinck, J., K. M. Gerling, and S. Tiemkeo. Visual complexity, player experience, performance and physical exertion in motion-based games for older adults. In: Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Article No. 25. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2013.
22. Tsoupikova, D., et al. Use of virtual reality to promote hand therapy post-stroke. Proc. SPIE, the International Society for Optics and Photonics. 8649, The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality 2013, 86490K, 2013.
23. Tsoupikova, D., et al. Virtual reality environment assisting post stroke hand rehabilitation: case report. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 184:458–464, 2013.
24. Wolf, S. L., et al. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32(7):1635–1639, 2001.