Suppression of EEG visual-evoked potentials in rats through neuromodulatory focused ultrasound

NeuroReport

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 211-215

  Kim, Hyungmin ^a,b   Park, Michael Y ^a   Lee, Stephanie D ^a   Lee, Wonhye ^a   Chiu, Alan ^a   Yoo, Seung Schik ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Korea Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

EEG; focused ultrasound; neuromodulation; neurotherapeutics; suppression; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPH ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; MALE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL MEMBRANE; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSED LOW INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND; RAT; SOUND INTENSITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; ANIMAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; SOUND; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIAL;

ANIMALS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SOUND; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84923643508     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000330     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. Brain stimulation in psychiatry and its effects on cognition. Nat Rev Neurol 2010; 6:267-275
2. Miller KJ, denNijs M, Shenoy P, Miller JW, Rao RPN, Ojemann JG. Real-time functional brain mapping using electrocorticography. Neuroimage 2007; 37:504-507
3. Hamel W, Fietzek U, Morsnowski A, Schrader B, Herzog J, Weinert D, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: evaluation of active electrode contacts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74:1036-1046
4. Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007; 3: 383-393
5. Bystritsky A, Korb AS, Douglas PK, Cohen MS, Melega WP, Mulgaonkar AP, et al. A review of low-intensity focused ultrasound pulsation. Brain Stimul 2011; 4:125-136
6. Plaksin M, Shoham S, Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a predictive bio-piezoelectric mechanism for ultrasonic brain stimulation. Phys Rev X 2014; 4:011004
7. Krasovitski B, Frenkel V, Shoham S, Kimmel E. Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:3258-3263
8. Tufail Y, Matyushov A, Baldwin N, Tauchmann ML, Georges J, Yoshihiro A, et al. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron 2010; 66:681-694
9. King RL, Brown JR, Newsome WT, Pauly KB. Effective parameters for ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 2013; 39:312-331
10. Kim H, Chiu A, Lee SD, Fischer K, Yoo S-S. Focused ultrasound-mediated non-invasive brain stimulation: examination of sonication parameters. Brain Stimul 2014; 7:748-756
11. Kim H, Lee SD, Chiu A, Yoo S-S, Park S. Estimation of the spatial profile of neuromodulation and the temporal latency in motor responses induced by focused ultrasound brain stimulation. Neuroreport 2013; 25:475-479
12. Min BK, Bystritsky A, Jung KI, Fischer K, Zhang Y, Maeng LS, et al. Focused ultrasound-mediated suppression of chemically-induced acute epileptic EEG activity. BMC Neurosci 2011; 12:23
13. You Y, Klistorner A, Graham SL. Visual evoked potential recording in rodents Stimulation and inhibition of neurons. New York, New York, USA: Springer; 2013. pp. 275-285
14. Committee ACS. How to interpret the ultrasound output display standard for higher acoustic output diagnostic ultrasound devices version 2. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23:723-726
15. Duck FA. Acoustic saturation and output regulation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25:1009-1018
16. Plaksin M, Kimmel E, Shoham S. A unifying framework for understanding ultrasonic neuromodulation mechanisms. Focused ultrasound 2014 - 4th International Symposium; October 12-16, 2014; North Bethesda, Maryland, USA
17. Vanneste S, Fregni F, De Ridder D. Head-to-head comparison of transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial AC stimulation, and transcranial DC stimulation for tinnitus. Front Psychiatry 2013; 4:158
18. Deblieck C, Thompson B, Iacoboni M, Wu AD. Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29:662-670
19. de Aguiar V, Paolazzi CL, Miceli G. Tdcs in post-stroke aphasia: the role of stimulation parameters, behavioral treatment and patient characteristics. Cortex 2014; 63C:296-316