An information literacy snapshot: Authentic assessment across the curriculum

College and Research Libraries

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 170-187

  Holliday, Wendy ^a   Dance, Betty ^b   Davis, Erin ^b   Fagerheim, Britt ^b   Hedrich, Anne ^b   Lundstrom, Kacy ^b   Martin, Pamela ^b  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923643098     PISSN: 00100870     EISSN: 21506701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5860/crl.76.2.170     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Beckie Supiano, "Employers Want Broadly Educated New Hires, Survey Finds," The Chronicle of Higher Education (April 10, 2013), available online at http://chronicle.com/article/Employers-Want-Broadly/138453/ [accessed 28 June 2013];
2. Richard Arum, Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011).
3. Amy Laitinen, Cracking the Credit Hour (New America Foundation), available online at http://newamerica.net/publications/policy/cracking-the-credit-hour [accessed 10 September 2013].
4. Megan Oakleaf, Value of Academic Libraries Report(ACRL), available online at www.acrl.ala.org/value/?page-id=21 [accessed 10 September 2013].
5. "Project Information Literacy: A Large-Scale Study about Early Adults and Their Research Habits," available online at http://projectinfolit.org/ [accessed 28 June 2013];
6. "The Citation Project," available online at http://site.citationproject.net/ [accessed 28 June 28, 2013].
7. "AAC&U Information Literacy VALUE Rubric," available online at www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/InformationLiteracy.cfm [accessed 18 January 2013].
8. Davida Scharf et al., "Direct Assessment of Information Literacy Using Writing Portfolios," Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, no. 4 (July 2007): 462-77, doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.005.
9. Katherine Schilling and Rachel Applegate, "Best Methods for Evaluating Educational Impact: A Comparison of the Efficacy of Commonly Used Measures of Library Instruction," Journal of the Medical Library Association 100, no. 4 (Oct. 2012): 258-69.
10. Scharf et al., "Direct Assessment of Information Literacy Using Writing Portfolios," 2.
11. Megan Oakleaf, "Are They Learning? Are We? Learning Outcomes and the Academic Library," Library Quarterly 81, no. 1 (Jan. 2011): 61-82.
12. Judith T.M. Gulikers, Theo J. Bastiaens, and Paul A. Kirschner, "A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment," Educational Technology Research and Development 52, no. 3 (Sept. 1, 2004): 73, doi:10.1007/BF02504676.
13. Jon Mueller, "The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development," Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 1, no. 1: 2 (n.d.).
14. Brandy Whitlock and Julie Nanavati, "A Systematic Approach to Performative and Authentic Assessment," Reference Services Review 41, no. 1 (Feb. 15, 2013): 35.
15. Barbara J. D'Angelo, "More Than Mere Collections: Portfolios as Direct and Authentic Assessment of Information Literacy Outcomes," IFLA Conference Proceedings (Nov. 2008): 1-12;
16. Scharf et al., "Direct Assessment of Information Literacy Using Writing Portfolios"
17. Karen R. Diller and Sue F. Phelps, "Learning Outcomes, Portfolios, and Rubrics, Oh My! Authentic Assessment of an Information Literacy Program," portal: Libraries & the Academy 8, no. 1 (Jan. 2008): 75-89;
18. Elizabeth Choinski, Amy E. Mark, and Missy Murphey, "Assessment with Rubrics: An Efficient and Objective Means of Assessing Student Outcomes in an Information Resources Class," portal: Libraries and the Academy 3, no. 4 (2003): 563-75, doi:10.1353/pla.2003.0078;
19. Lorrie A. Knight, "Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy," Reference Services Review 34, no. 1 (Jan. 1, 2006): 43-55, doi:10.1108/00907320610640752;
20. Mark Emmons and Wanda Martin, "Engaging Conversation: Evaluating the Contribution of Library Instruction to the Quality of Student Research," College & Research Libraries 63, no. 6 (Nov. 1, 2002): 545-60.\\uc0\\u8221{} \\i IFLA Conference Proceedings\\i0{} (November 2008
21. Diller and Phelps, "Learning Outcomes, Portfolios, and Rubrics, Oh My!" 84.
22. Mark Emmons and Wanda Martin, "Engaging Conversation: Evaluating the Contribution of Library Instruction to the Quality of Student Research," College & Research Libraries 63, no. 6 (Nov. 1, 2002): 559.
23. Elizabeth Choinski, Amy E. Mark, and Missy Murphey, "Assessment with Rubrics: An Efficient and Objective Means of Assessing Student Outcomes in an Information Resources Class," portal: Libraries and the Academy 3, no. 4 (2003): 573.two librarians independent of the librarianinstructor\ nscored student reflection papers using a 5-point scale. Rubric items\nwere considered successful if 75 percent of the students received an\naverage score of three or higher. The results showed that weak areas\nof comprehension are those that require higher level thinking, such as\ nthe ability to distinguish between the popular and academic press. The\nlibrarian-instructor will place more emphasis on these topics in future\nclasses and reword rubric items of questionable design.
24. "DOI":"10.1353/pla.2003.0078","ISSN":"1530-7131","note":"Volume 3, Number 4, October 2003","shortTitle":"Assessment with Rubrics","author":[{"family":"Choinski","given":"Elizabeth"},{"family":"Mark","given":"Amy E."},{"family":"Murphey","given":"Missy"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2003"]]},"accessed":{"date-parts":[["2013",7,25]]}}}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}
25. Lorrie A. Knight, "Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy," Reference Services Review 34, no. 1 (Feb. 2006): 52.
26. Megan Oakleaf, "Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy: An Examination of Methodology and Interrater Reliability," Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 60, no. 5 (May 2009): 969-83.
27. "AAC&U Information Literacy VALUE Rubric."
28. Terrel L. Rhodes, "Show Me the Learning: Value, Accreditation, and the Quality of the Degree," Planning for Higher Education 40, no. 3 (Apr. 2012): 39."ISSN":"07360983","shortTitle":" Show Me the Learning","journalAbbreviation":"Planning for Higher Education","author":[{"fa mily":"Rhodes","given":"Terrel L.1"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2012",4]]},"accessed":{"date-par ts":[["2014",2,10]]}}}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/ csl-citation.json"}
29. Terrel L. Rhodes and Ashley Finley, Using the VALUE Rubrics for Improvement of Learning and Authentic Assessment (Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 2013): 17.
30. Oakleaf, "Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy"
31. Rhodes and Finley, Using the VALUE Rubrics for Improvement of Learning and Authentic Assessment.
32. Diller and Phelps, "Learning Outcomes, Portfolios, and Rubrics, Oh My!"
33. Scharf et al., "Direct Assessment of Information Literacy Using Writing Portfolios."
34. Andrew F. Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff, "Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data," Communication Methods and Measures 1, no. 1 (2007): 77-89, doi:10.1080/19312450709336664.
35. "ReCal for Ordinal, Interval, and Ratio Data (OIR)," available online at http://dfreelon. org/utils/recalfront/recal-oir/ [accessed 12 June 2013].
36. "The Citation Project."