Developmental Changes in Mathematically Precocious Young Children: Longitudinal and Gender Effects

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 145-158

  Robinson, Nancy M ^a   Abbott, Robert D ^b   Berninger, Virginia W ^b   Busse, Julie ^b   Mukhopadhyay, Swapna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002237061     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698629704100404     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abbott, R., & Berninger, V. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478-508.
2. Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P. (1983). Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development, 54, 695-701.
3. Assouline, S., & Lupkowski, A. (1992). Extending the talent search model: The potential of the SSAT-Q for identification of mathematically talented elementary students. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.). Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 223-232). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
4. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-183.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Macintosh user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6. Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
7. Case, R. (1992). The mind's staircase. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (Eds.). (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, Serial No. 246 (Nos. 1-2).
9. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697-705.
10. Connolly, A. (1988). Key Math-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance.
11. Crammond, J. (1992). Analyzing the basic cognitive-developmental processes of children with specific types of learning disability. In R. Case (Ed.), The mind's staircase (pp. 285-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Dale, P. S., Robinson, N. M., & Crain-Thoreson, C. (1995). Linguistic precocity and the development of reading: The role of extra-linguistic factors. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 173-187.
13. Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1990). Enhanced problem translation and short-term memory components of mathematical talent. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 420-429.
14. Dark, V. J., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Differential enhancement of working memory with mathematical versus verbal precocity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 48-60.
15. Duckworth, E. (1987). "The having of wonderful ideas" and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Friedman, L. (1995). The space factor in mathematics: Gender differences. Review of Educational Research, 65, 22-50.
17. Geary, D. C. (1994). Children's mathematical development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Geary, D. C., & Brown, S. C. (1991). Cognitive addition: Strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in gifted, normal, and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27, 398-406.
19. Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
20. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25, 12-21.
21. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
22. Huhn, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69-82.
23. Kamii, C. (1985). Young children re-invent arithmetic. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Kamii, C. (1994). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic, third grade. Implications of Piaget's theory. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. E., Sayler, M. F., & Assouline, S. G. (1993, May). Mathematics achievement of talented elementary students: Basic concepts vs. computation. Paper presented at the Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, The Connie Belin Center for Gifted Education, University of Iowa.
26. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27. Mills, C. J., Ablard, K. E., & Stumpf, H. (1993). Gender differences in academically talented young students' mathematical reasoning: Patterns across age and subskills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 340-346.
28. Mulles, I. V. S., Dossey, J. A., Owen, E. H., & Phillips, G. W. (1993). NAEP 1992: Mathematics report card for the nations and the states (Report 23-STO2, prepared by the Educational Testing Services under contract of the National Center for Education Statistics). Princeton, NJ: ETS.
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
30. Okamoto, Y. (1992a). A developmental analysis of children's knowledge and processes for solving arithmetic word problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
31. Okamoto, Y. (1992b, April). Implications of the notion of central conceptual structures for assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
32. Okamoto, Y., & Case, R. (1996). Exploring the microstructure of children's central conceptual structures in the domain of number. In R. Case & Y. Okamoto (Eds.). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children's thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61, Serial No. 246 (Nos. 1-2), pp. 27-58.
33. Pletan, M., Robinson, N. M., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (1995). Parents' observations of kindergartners who are advanced in mathematical reasoning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 30-44.
34. Plomin, R., & Daniels, J. (1987). Why are children within the family so different from each other? The Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1-16.
35. Robinson, N. M., Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Busse, J. (1996). The structure of abilities in math-precocious young children: Gender similarities and differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 341-352.
36. Robinson, N. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1992). The use of standardized tests with young children. In P. S. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum (Eds.). To be young and gifted (pp. 141-170). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Romberg, T. A., & Collis, K. F. (1987). Different ways children learn to add and subtract. Journal for Mathematics Education Monographs, 2.
39. Siegler, R. S. (1988). Individual differences in strategy choice: Good students, not-so-good students, and perfectionists. Child Development, 59, 833-851.
40. Siegler, R. S. (1991). Children's thinking (2nd ed) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Simon, T. J., Hespos, S. J., & Rochat, P. (1995). Do infants understand simple arithmetic? A replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253-269.
42. Stanley, J. C. (1990). Finding and helping young people with exceptional mathematical reasoning ability. In M. J. A. Howe (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 211-221). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
43. Stanley, J. C. (1994). Gender differences for able elementary school students on above-grade level ability and achievement tests. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development Vol. 2: Proceedings from the 1993 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 141-148). Vandalia, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
44. Starkey, P., Spelke, E., & Gelman, R. (1990). Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 36, 97-127.
45. Thorndike, R., Hagen, E., & Sattler, J. (1986). The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
46. Vogel, G. (1997). The calculus of school reform. Science, 277, 1192-1194.
47. Walberg, H., & Tsai, B. (1983). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359-373.
48. Waxman, B., Robinson, N. M., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (1997). Teachers nurturing young, math-talented children, RM 96228. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
49. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989, 1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
50. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358, 749-750.