Clitics: An introduction

Clitics: An Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-369

  Spencer, Andrew ^a   Luís, Ana R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923562395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139033763     Document Type: Book

References (368)

1. Abeillé, Anne, and Godard, Danièle. 2002. The syntactic structure of French auxiliaries. Language, 78(3), 404-52.
2. Abraham, Werner (ed.). 1991. Discourse Particles: Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Ackerman, Farrell, and Stump, Gregory T. 2004. Paradigms and periphrastic expression: a study in realization-based lexicalism. In Sadler, Louisa, and Spencer, Andrew (eds.), Projecting Morphology. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 111-58.
4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. The Tariana Language of Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Aissen, Judith. 1974. The Syntax of Causative Constructions. PhD thesis, Harvard University. Reprinted New York: Garland Press, 1979.
6. Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 1996. Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics, 32, 239-89.
7. Akmajian, Adrian, Steele, Susan M., and Wasow, Thomas. 1979. The category AUX in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(1), 1-64.
8. Alpher, Barry. 1991. Yir-Yoront Lexicon: Sketch and Dictionary of an Australian Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Alsina, Alex. 1997. A theory of complex predicates: evidence from causatives in Bantu and Romance. In Alsina, Alex, Bresnan, Joan, and Sells, Peter (eds.), Complex Predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 203-46.
10. Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1999. Conditions on clitic doubling in Greek. In van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. (ed.), Clitics and the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 761-98.
11. Anderson, Stephen R. 1982. Where's morphology? Lingustic Inquiry, 13(4), 571-612.
12. Anderson, Stephen R. 1984. Kwak'wala syntax and the Government-Binding theory. In Cook, E.-D., and Gerdts, Donna B. (eds.), The Syntax of Native American Languages. Syntax and Semantics 16. New York: Academic Press, pp. 21-75.
13. Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Anderson, Stephen R. 1993. Wackernagel's revenge: clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language, 69, 68-98.
15. Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Anderson, Stephen R., Brown, Lea, Gaby, Alice, and Lecarme, Jacqueline. 2006. Life on the edge: there's morphology there after all! Lingue e Linguaggio, 5(1), 1-16.
17. Andrews, Avery. 1990. Unification and morphological blocking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8(4), 507-57.
18. Andrews, J. Richard. 1975. Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Austin: University of Texas Press.
19. Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. 1983. Morphological levels in English and Kannada; or atarizing Reagan. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax, vol. 19. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.3-16.
22. Aronoff, Mark, and Sridhar, S. 1987. Morphological levels in English and Kannada; or atarizing Reagan. In Gussmann, Edmund (ed.), Rules and the Lexicon: Lublin. Redakcja Wydawnictw Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego, pp. 9-22.
23. Avgustinova, Tania. 1994. On Bulgarian verbal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 2, 29-47.
24. Avgustinova, Tania. 1997. Word Order and Clitics in Bulgarian. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology 5. Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität des Saarlandes.
25. Avgustinova, Tania, and Oliva, Karel. 1995. The position of sentential clitics in the Czech clause. Technical Report 68. Universität des Saarlandes.
26. Awbery, Gwen. 1976. The Syntax of Welsh: A Transformational Study of the Passive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan, and Corbett, Greville G. 2005. The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Baker, Mark. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Baker, Mark, Johnson, Kyle, and Roberts, Ian. 1989. Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 219-51.
30. Barešić, Jasna. 1988. Dobro došli: Gramatika hrvatskog ili srpskog jezika. Zagreb: Škola za Strane Jezike.
31. Barron, Julia. 1998. 'Have' contraction: explaining 'trace effects' in a theory without movement. Linguistics, 36(2), 223-51.
32. Benacchio, Rosanna, and Renzi, Lorenzo. 1987. Clitici slavi e romanzi. Padua: Dipartimento di Linguistica dell'Università di Padova e del Centro per gli Studi di Fonetica del C. N. R.
33. Bennett, David. 1986. Towards an explanation of word-order differences between Slovene and Serbo-Croatian. The Slavonic and East European Review, 64, 1-24.
34. Berendsen, Egon. 1986. The Phonology of Cliticization. Dordrecht: Foris.
35. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, and Luís, Ana R. 2009a. Cyclic domains and prosodic spans in European Portuguese encliticization. Paper given at the Old World Conference in Phonology 6, University of Edinburgh.
36. Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, and Luís, Ana R. 2009b. Cyclic domains and prosodic spans in the phonology of European Portuguese functional morphs. Talk given at the Workshop on the Division of Labour between Morphology and Phonology, Meertens Instituut, Amsterdam, 16-17 January 2009.
37. Beukema, Frits, and den Dikken, Marcel (eds.). 2000. Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. Linguistik Aktuell 30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Bickel, Balthasar, Banjade, Goma, Gaenszle, Martin, Lieven, Elena, Paudyal, Netra Prasad, Rai, Ichchha Purna, Rai, Manoj, Rai, Novel Kishore, and Stoll, Sabine. 2007. Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language, 83, 43-73.
39. Billings, Loren A. 2002. Phrasal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10, 53-104.
40. Billings, Loren A. 2004. Review of Bošković 2001. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12, 285-321.
41. Blake, Barry J. 1990. Relational Grammar. London: Routledge.
42. Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Bögel, Tina. 2010. Pashto (endo)clitics in a parallel architecture. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), The Proceedings of the LFG10 Conference. University of Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 85-105.
44. Bonami, Olivier, and Boyé, Gilles. 2007. French pronominal clitics and the design of Paradigm Function Morphology. In Booij, Geert, Ducceschi, Luca, Fradin, Bernard, Guevara, Emiliano, Ralli, Angela, and Scalise, Sergio (eds.), On-line Proceedings of the Fifth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM5) Fréjus 15-18 September 2005. Bologna: Università degli Studi di Bologna, pp. 291-322.
45. Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
46. Bonet, Eulàlia. 1995. Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, 603-47.
47. Booij, Geert. 1985. Coordination reduction in complex words: a case for prosodic phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry, and Smith, Norval (eds.), Advances in Non-linear Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 143-60.
48. Booij, Geert. 1988. Review article on Nespor and Vogel 1986. Journal of Linguistics, 24, 515-25.
49. Booij, Geert. 1996a. Cliticization as prosodic integration: the case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review, 13, 219-42.
50. Booij, Geert. 1996b. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 1-16.
51. Booij, Geert. 2007. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Morphology. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Booij, Geert, and Lieber, Rochelle. 1993. On the simultaneity of morphological and prosodic structure. In Hargus, Sharon, and Kaisse, Ellen M. (eds.), Studies in Lexical Phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 23-44.
53. Booij, Geert, and Rubach, Jerzy. 1987. Postcycliç versus postlexical rules in lexical phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 18(1), 1-44.
54. Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
55. Borer, Hagit (ed.). 1986. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19. Orlando: Academic Press.
56. Borer, Hagit, and Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1986. Syntactic cliticization and lexical cliticization: the case of Hebrew dative clitics. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 175-217.
57. Börjars, Kersti. 1998. Clitics, affixes, and parallel correspondence. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG '98 Conference. www.CSLi-publications. stanford. edu/LFG/2/lfg 98-toc.html
58. Borsley, Robert D. 1993. On so-called verb-nouns in Welsh. Journal of Celtic Linguistics, 2, 35-64.
59. Borsley, Robert D., Tallerman, Maggie, and Willis, David. 2007. The Syntax of Welsh. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
61. Bresnan, Joan. 1998. Morphology competes with syntax: explaining typological variation in weak crossover effects. In Barbosa, Pilar, Fox, Danny, Hagstrom, Paul, McGinnis, Martha, and Pesetsky, David (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press and MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 59-92.
62. Bresnan, Joan. 2001a. The emergence of the unmarked pronoun II. In Legendre, Geraldine, Grimshaw, Jane, and Vikner, Sten (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 113-42.
63. Bresnan, Joan. 2001b. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
64. Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam. 1986. Grammatical and anaphoric agreement. In Farley, A.M., Farley, P.T., and McCullough, K.-E. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory at the Twenty-Second Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 287-97.
65. Bresnan, Joan, and Mchombo, Sam A. 1987. Topic, pronoun, and agreement in Chichewâ. Language, 63(4), 741-82. Reprinted in Iida, Masayo, Wechsler, Steven, and Zec, Draga (eds.), Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure: Interactions of Morphology, Syntax, and Discourse. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 1-59.
66. Bresnan, Joan, and Moshi, Lioba. 1990. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 147-85. Reprinted in Mchombo, Sam A. (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Bantu Grammar 1. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 47-91.
67. Browne, Wayles. 1974. On the problem of enclitic placement in Serbo-Croatian. In Brecht, Richard D., and Chvany, Catherine V. (eds.), Slavic Transformational Syntax. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Materials, pp. 36-52.
68. Browne, Wayles. 1993. Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, Bernard, and Corbett, Greville G. (eds.), The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge, pp. 306-87.
69. Buchholz, Oda, and Fiedler, Wilfried. 1987. Albanische Grammatik. Leipzig:VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
70. Butt, Miriam. 1995. The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
71. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Roberts, Ian. 2002. Clause structure and X-second. In Cinque, Guglielmo (ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123-65.
72. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of the three classes of pronouns. In van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. (ed.), Clitics and the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145-233.
73. Carstairs, Andrew. 1987. Allomorphy in Inflexion. London: Croom Helm.
74. Chen, Matthew Y. 1990. What must phonology know about syntax? In Inkelas, Sharon, and Zec, Draga (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 19-46.
75. Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Anderson, Stephen, and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, pp. 232-86.
76. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
77. Chomsky, Noam. 1995a. Bare phrase structure. In Webelhuth, Gert (ed.), Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 383-439.
78. Chomsky, Noam. 1995b. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
79. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1-52.
80. Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos, and Zubizarreta, Maria-Luísa (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 133-66.
81. Chung, Sandra L. 2003. The syntax and prosody of weak pronouns in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry, 34, 547-99.
82. Churchward, Clerk M. 1953. A Tongan Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Lingua Descriptive Studies 5. London: Routledge.
84. Condoravdi, Cleo, and Kiparsky, Paul. 2001. Clitics and clause structure. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 2, 1-40.
85. Condoravdi, Cleo, and Kiparsky, Paul. 2004. Clitics and clause structure. The Late Medieval Greek system. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 5, 159-83.
86. Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Corbett, Greville G. 2003. Agreement: the range of the phenomeon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101(2), 154-202.
88. Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language, 83(1), 8-42.
90. Corbett, Greville G., and Fraser, Norman M. 1993. Network morphology. Journal of Lingustics, 29, 113-42.
91. Costa, João (ed.). 2000. Portuguese Syntax: New Comparative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92. Crysmann, Berthold. 2000. Clitics and coordination in linear structure. In Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121-59.
93. Crysmann, Berthold. 2002. Constraint-Based Coanalysis: Portuguese Cliticisation and Morphology-Syntax Interaction in HPSG. Saarbrücken Dissertations in Computational Linguistics and Language Technology 15. Saarbrücken: Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz and Universität des Saarlandes.
94. Culicover, Peter, and Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Blackwells.
95. Cysouw, Michael. 2005. Morphology in the wrong place: a survey of preposed enclitics. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rainer, Franz (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 17-37.
96. Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
97. Dalrymple, Mary, and Nikolaeva, Irina A. 2006. Syntax of natural and accidental coordination. Language, 82(4), 824-49.
98. Daniel, Michael, and Spencer, Andrew. 2009. The vocative - an outlier case. In Malchukov, Andrej, and Spencer, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 626-34.
99. de Bruyne, Jacques. 1995. A Comprehensive Spanish Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
100. Denniston, J. D. 2002. The Greek Particles. Revised edition edited by K. J. Dover. London: Bristol Classical Press.
101. Der Grosse Duden. 2006. Die Grammatik. Band 4. Mannheim/Leipzig/Vienna/Zürich: Bibliographisches Institut & F. A. Brockhaus AG.
102. Dixon, R. M. W., and Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2002. Word: A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Donnellan, Keith S. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review, 75, 281-304.
104. Donohue, Mark. 1999. A Grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
105. Doron, Edit. 1988. On the complementarity of subject and subject-verb agreement. In Barlow, Michael, and Ferguson, Charles A. (eds.), Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 201-18.
106. Dryer, Matthew S. 2005a. Position of case affixes. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-13; available at http://wals.info/.
107. Dryer, Matthew S. 2005b. Position of pronominal possessive affixes. In Haspelmath, Martin, Dryer, Matthew S., Gil, David, and Comrie, Bernard (eds.), World Atlas of Linguistic Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 234-8; available at http://wals.info/.
108. Dzokanga, A. 1979. Dictionnaire lingala-français, suivi d'une grammaire lingala. Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.
109. Embick, David, and Noyer, Robert Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 555-95.
110. Embick, David, and Noyer, Robert Rolf. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In Ramchand, Gillian, and Reiss, Charles (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239-88.
111. Erschler, David. 2009. Modularity and 2P clitics: arguments from Digor Ossetic. In Falk, Yehuda N. (ed.), Proceedings of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics 25. Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, www.linguistics.huji. ac.il/IATl/25/TOC.html
112. Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Typologies of agreement: some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101(2), 203-34.
113. Evans, Nicholas, Brown, Dunstan, and Corbett, Greville. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187-231.
114. Everett, Daniel L. 1987. Pirahã clitic doubling. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 245-76.
115. Everett, Daniel L. 1989. Clitic doubling, reflexives, and word alternations in Yagua. Language, 65, 339-72.
116. Everett, Daniel L. 1996. Why There are No Clitics: An Alternative Perspective on Pronominal Allomorphy. Arlington, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics.
117. Fischer, Susann. 2003. Rethinking the Tobler-Mussafia Law. Data from Old Catalan. Diachronica, 20, 259-88.
118. Fontana, Josep M. 1996. Phonology and syntax in the interpretation of the Tobler-Mussafia Law. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 41-83.
119. Franks, Steven. 2000. Clitics at the interface: an introduction to Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. In Beukema, Frits, and den Dikken, Marcel (eds.), Clitic Phenomena in European Languages. Linguistik Aktuell 30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1-46.
120. Franks, Steven. 2008. Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16, 91-127.
121. Franks, Steven, and King, Tracy Holloway. 2000. A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
122. Fried, Mirjam. 1994. Second-position clitics in Czech: syntactic or phonological? Lingua, 94, 155-75.
123. Friedman, Victor A. 1994. Variation and grammaticalization in the development of Balkanisms. In Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted in Studia Albanica, 32 (1995-99), 95-110.)
124. Friedrich, Johannes. 1960. Hethitisches Elementarbuch. Erster Teil: Kurzgefasste Grammatik. 2nd revised edn. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Verlag.
125. Fulmer, Sandra Lee. 1991. Dual-position affixes in Afar: an argument for phonologically-driven morphology. In Halpern, Aaron (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 198-203.
126. Fulmer, Sandra Lee. 1997. Parallelism and Planes in Optimality Theory: Evidence from Afar. PhD thesis, University of Arizona.
127. Gaby, Alice. 2005. Some participants are more equal than others: case and the composition of arguments in Kuuk Thaayorre. In Amberber, Mengistu, and de Hoop, Helen (eds.), Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 9-40.
128. Garrett, Andrew. 1996. Wackernagel's Law and unaccusativity in Hittite. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 85-133.
129. Gerlach, Birgit. 2002. Clitics between Syntax and Lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
130. Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.). 2000. Clitics from Different Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
131. Ghomeshi, Jila. 1997. Non-projecting nouns and the ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15, 729-88.
132. Göksel, Aslı, and Kerslake, Celia. 2005. Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
133. Good, Jeff C., and Yu, Alan C. 2005. Morphosyntax of two Turkish subject pronominal paradigms. In Heggie, Lorie, and Ordóñez, Francisco (eds.), Clitic and Affix Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
134. Greenough, J. B., Kittredge, G. L., Howard, A. A., and D'Ooge, B. L. 1983. Allen and Greenough's New Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges, 1903. New Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas.
135. Grimshaw, Jane. 1997. The best clitic: constraint conflict in morphosyntax. In Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 169-96.
136. Grimshaw, Jane. 2001. Optimal clitic positions and the lexicon in Romance clitic systems. In Legendre, Géraldine, Grimshaw, Jane, and Vikner, Sten (eds.), Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205-40.
137. Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The Phonology of Polish. The Phonology of the World's Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
138. Hale, Mark. 1996. Deriving Wackernagel's Law: prosodic and syntactic factors determining clitic placement in the language of the Rigveda. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 165-97.
139. Hall, T. Alan, and Kleinheinz, Ursula (eds.). 1999. Studies on the Phonological Word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
140. Hall, T. Alan, Hildebrandt, Kristine A., and Bickel, Balthasar (eds.). 2008. Theory and Typology of Words. Special issue of Linguistics, 46(2).
141. Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alex. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Kenneth, and Keyser, Samuel J. (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 111-76.
142. Halpern, Aaron. 1995. On the Placement and Morphology of Clitics. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
143. Halpern, Aaron. 1998. Clitics. In Spencer, Andrew, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
144. Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.). 1996. Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
145. Harris, Alice. 2000. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language, 76, 593-616.
146. Harris, Alice. 2002. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
147. Haspelmath, Martin. 2000. Periphrasis. In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian (in collaboration with Wolfgang Kesselheim, Joachim Mugdan and Stavros Skopeteas) (eds.), Morphologie/Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-formation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
148. Hauge, Kjetil Rå. 1976. The Word Order of Predicate Clitics in Bulgarian. Oslo: Universitet i Oslo, Slavisk-Baltisk Institutt.
149. Hauge, Kjetil Rå. 1999. A Short Grammar of Contemporary Bulgarian. Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers Inc.
150. Heath, Jeffrey. 1984. Functional Grammar of Nunggubuyu. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies.
151. Heggie, Lorie, and Ordóñez, Francisco (eds.). 2005. Clitic and Affix Combinations. Linguistics Today 74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
152. Heggie, Lorie, and Ordóñez, Francisco. 2005. Clitic ordering phenomena: the path to generalizations. In Heggie, Lorie, and Ordóñez, Francisco (eds.), Clitic and Affix Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
153. Hock, Hans. 1996. Who's on first? Toward a prosodic account of P2 clitics. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp.199-270.
154. Hockett, Charles F. 1965. What Algonquian is really like. International Journal of American Linguistics, 32, 59-73.
155. Holton, David, Mackridge, Peter, and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1997. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.
156. Hosokawa, Komei. 1991. The Yawuru Language of West Kimberly: A Meaning-Based Description. PhD thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
157. Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
158. Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 245-81.
159. Inenliqej, Pjotr I., and Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1967. Iz nabljudenij nad ėrgativnoj konstrukcij v čukotskom jazyke. In Žirmunskij, V. M. (ed.), Ėrgativnaja konstrukcija predloženija v jazykax različnyx tipov. Issledovanija i materialy. Leningrad: Nauka, pp. 246-60.
160. Inkelas, Sharon. 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
161. Insler, Stanley. 1997. The phonological organization of the Rigvedic clitic chain. In Kaiser, Lizanne (ed.), Yale A-Morphous Linguistics Essays: Studies in the Morphosyntax of Clitics. New Haven, CT: Department of Linguistics, Yale University, pp. 75-88.
162. Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
163. Jaeggli, Osvaldo A. 1986. Three issues in the theory of clitics: case, doubled NPs, and extraction. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 15-42.
164. Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Les enclitiques slaves. In Selected Writings II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 16-22.
165. Jelinek, Eloise. 1984. Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 39-78.
166. Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
167. Jones, Michael A. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.
168. Jones, Michael A. 1996. Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
169. Joseph, Brian D. 1988. Pronominal affixes in Modern Greek: the case against clisis. In Macleod, Lynn, Larson, Gary, and Brentari, Diane (eds.), Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part One: The General Session. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 203-14.
170. Joseph, Brian D., and Philippaki-Warburton, Irene. 1987. Modern Greek. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
171. Kabak, Barış. 2007. Turkish suspended affixation. Linguistics, 45, 311-27.
172. Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
173. Kaisse, Ellen M. 1981. Separating phonology from syntax: a reanalysis of Pashto cliticization. Journal of Linguistics, 17, 197-208.
174. Kaisse, Ellen M. 1985. Connected Speech. New York: Academic Press.
175. Kallulli, Dalina, and Tasmowski, Liliane (eds.). 2008. Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
176. Kanerva, Jonni. 1987. Morphological integrity and syntax: The evidence from Finnish possessive suffixes. Language, 63(3), 498-521. Reprinted in Iida, Masayo, Wechsler, Stephen, and Zec, Draga (eds.), Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1987, pp. 61-91.
177. Kari, Ethelbert Emmanuel. 2003. Clitics in Degema: A Meeting Point of Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa (ILCAA), Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
178. Karlsson, Fred. 1987. Finnish Grammar. 2nd edn. Helsinki: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.
179. Kathol, Andreas. 2001. Linear Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
180. Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
181. Kenesei, István. 2007. Semiwords and affixoids: the territory between word and affix. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 54, 263-93.
182. Kiefer, Ferenc. 1998. Morphology and pragmatics. In Spencer, Andrew, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 272-79.
183. Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Word-formation and the lexicon. In Ingemann, F. (ed.), Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference. Lawrence: University of Kansas, pp. 3-29.
184. Klamer, Marian. 1997. Spelling out clitics in Kambera. Linguistics, 35, 895-927.
185. Klamer, Marian. 1998a. A Grammar of Kambera. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
186. Klamer, Marian. 1998b. Kambera intransitive argument linking. Studia Linguistica, 52, 77-111.
187. Klavans, Judith. 1979. On clitics as words. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L., Papers from the 15th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2: 'The Elements': A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 68-80.
188. Klavans, Judith L. 1982. Some Problems in a Theory of Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
189. Klavans, Judith L. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language, 61, 95-120.
190. Koutsoudas, Andreas, Sanders, Gerald, and Noll, Craig. 1974. The application of phonological rules. Language, 50, 1-29.
191. Kroeger, Paul. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Dissertations in Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Revised and corrected version of 1991 Stanford University dissertation.
192. Kroeger, Paul. 2004. Analyzing Syntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
193. Kuhn, Jonas. 2001. Formal and Computational Aspects of Optimality-theoretic Syntax. PhD thesis, Universität Stuttgart.
194. Kupść, Anna. 2000. An HPSG Grammar of Polish Clitics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université de Paris 7 and Polish Academy of Sciences.
195. Kupść, Anna, and Tseng, Jesse. 2005. A new HPSG approach to Polish auxiliary constructions. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), The Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 253-73.
196. Lapointe, Steven. 1980. A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
197. Lapointe, Steven G. 1990. EDGE Features in GPSG. In Papers from the Twenty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 221-35.
198. Lapointe, Steven. 1992. Life on the EDGE: arguments in favor of an autolexical account of edge inflections. In Papers from the Twenty-Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 318-32.
199. Lauffenburger, Olivier. 2008. Hittite Grammar.
200. Laughren, Mary. 2002. Syntactic constraints in a 'free word order' language. In Amberber, Mengistu, and Collins, Peter (eds.), Language Universals and Variation. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, pp. 83-130.
201. Launey, Michel. 1999. Introduction à la langue et à la littérature aztèques. Tome 1: grammaire. Paris: L'Harmattan.
202. Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Warlpiri and the theory of second position clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26, 3-60.
203. Legendre, Géraldine. 1996. Clitics, Verb (Non)-Movement, and Optimality in Bulgarian. Technical Report JHU-CogSci-95-5. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
204. Legendre, Géraldine. 2000a. Optimal Romanian clitics: a cross-linguistic perspective. In Motapanye, Virginia (ed.), Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax. Oxford: Elsevier Publishers, pp. 227-64.
205. Legendre, Géraldine. 2000b. Positioning Romanian verbal clitics at PF: an Optimality-Theoretic analysis. In Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219-54.
206. Legendre, Géraldine. 2001. Morphological and prosodic alignment of Bulgarian clitics. In Dekkers, Joost, van der Leeuw, Frank, and van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), Optimality Theory: Syntax, Phonology, and Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.219-54.
207. Lema, José, and Rivero, María Luísa. 1989. Long head movement: ECP vs. HMC. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa, 18, 61-78.
208. Lenertová, Denisa. 2004. Czech pronominal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12, 135-71.
209. Lewis, G. L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
210. Lidz, Jeffrey. 1995. On the non-existence of reflexive clitics. In Dainora, Audra, Hemphill, Rachel, Luka, Barbara, Need, Barbara, and Pargman, Sheri (eds.), Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2: The Parasession on Clitics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
211. Luís, Ana. 2004. Clitics as Morphology. PhD thesis, University of Essex, Department of Language and Linguistics.
212. Luís, Ana, and Otoguro, Ryo. 2004. Proclitic contexts in European Portuguese and their effect on clitic placement. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), The Proceedings of the LFG '04 Conference. www.csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/2/lfg04-toc.html
213. Luís, Ana, and Sadler, Louisa. 2003. Object clitics and marked morphology. In Beyssade, Claire, et al. (eds.), Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 4. Paris: Presses de l'Université de Paris, Sorbonne, pp. 133-54.
214. Luís, Ana, and Spencer, Andrew. 2005. A paradigm function account of 'mesoclisis' in European Portuguese. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), A Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 177-228.
215. Luís, Ana R. 2009. Para uma (re)definição da sufixação no Português Europeu: a adjunção prosódica de enclíticos pronominais. Biblos: Revista da Faculdade de Letras, Universidade de Coimbra, 451-70.
216. Luís, Ana R., and Otoguro, Ryo. 2011. Inflectional morphology and syntax in correspondence: evidence from European Portuguese. In Galani, Alexandra, Tsoulas, George, and Hicks, Glyn (eds.), Morphology and its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 97-134.
217. Luutonen, Jorma. 1997. The Variation of Morpheme Order in Mari Declension. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
218. Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
219. Maiden, Martin, and Robustelli, Cecilia. 2000. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Edward Arnold.
220. Marantz, Alec P. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Hammond, Michael, and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Theoretical Morphology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
221. Marten, Lutz, Kula, Nancy C., and Thwala, Nhlanhla. 2007. Parameters of morphosyntactic variation in Bantu. Transactions of the Philological Society, 105, 253-338.
222. Marušič, Franc, and Žaucer, Rok. 2010a. Clitic doubling in a determinerless language with second position clitics. In Zybatow, Gerhild, Dudchuk, Philip, Minor, Serge, and Pshehotskaya, Ekaterina (eds.), Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Proceedings of FDSL 7.5. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Verlag, pp.101-15.
223. Marušič, Franc, and Žaucer, Rok. 2010b. On clitic doubling in Gorica Slovenian. In Franks, Steven, Chidambaram, Vrinda, and Joseph, Brian (eds.), A Linguist's Linguist: Studies in South Slavic Linguistics in Honor of E. Wayles Browne. Bloomingdale, IN: Slavica Publishers, pp. 281-95.
224. Matsumoto, Yo. 1998. A reexamination of the cross-linguistic parameterization of causative predicates: Japanese perspectives. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), The Proceedings of the LFG '98 Conference. www.csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/2/lfg98-toc.html
225. McCarthy, John. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
226. McCloskey, James, and Hale, Ken. 1984. On the syntax of person-number inflection in modern Irish. Natural Language and Lingustic Theory, 1, 487-534.
227. Mel'čuk, Igor A. 2009. Dependency in natural language. In Polguère, Alain, and Mel'čuk, Igor A.(eds.), Dependency in Linguistic Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.1-110.
228. Milićević, Jasmina. 2005. Clitics or affixes? On the morphological status of the future-tense markers in Serbian. In Dressler, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rainer, Franz (eds.), Morphology and its Demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 39-52.
229. Milićević, Jasmina. 2009. Linear placement of Serbian clitics in a syntactic dependency framework. In Polguère, Alain, and Mel'čuk, Igor A. (eds.), Dependency in Linguistic Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 235-76.
230. Miller, Philip. 1992. Clitics and Constituents in Phrase Structure Grammar. NewYork: Garland Publications.
231. Miller, Philip H., and Sag, Ivan A. 1997. French clitic movement without clitics or movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(3), 573-639.
232. Mithun, Marianne. 2003. Pronouns and agreement: the information status of pronominal affixes. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101(2), 235-78.
233. Mišeska Tomić, Olga. 2006. The Balkan Sprachbund: Morpho-syntactic Features. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
234. Monachesi, Paola. 2000. Clitic placement in the Romanian verbal complex. In Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 255-93.
235. Monachesi, Paola. 2005. The Verbal Complex in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
236. Monachesi, Paula. 1999. A Lexical Approach to Italian Cliticization. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
237. Muysken, Peter. 1981. Quechua word structure. In Heny, Frank (ed.), Binding and Filtering. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 8, 279-327.
238. Neeleman, Ad, and Szendrői, Krisztina. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 671-714.
239. Nelson, Diane. 1998. Grammatical Case Assignment in Finnish. NewYork:Garland Publications.
240. Nespor, Marina. 1999. The phonology of clitic groups. In van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. (ed.), Clitics and the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
241. Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
242. Nevis, Joel A. 1986. Finnish Particle Clitics and General Clitic Theory. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.
243. Nevis, Joel A. 2000. Clitics. In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, and Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, vol. 1. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 388-404.
244. Nevis, Joel A., and Joseph, Brian D. 1993. Wackernagel affixes: evidence from Balto-Slavic. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 93-111.
245. Nevis, Joel A., Joseph, Brian D., Wanner, Dieter, and Zwicky, Arnold M. 1994. Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography 1892-1991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
246. Nikolaeva, Irina A. 2012. Towards a typology of finiteness: a canonical approach. In Brown, Dunstan P., Chumakina, Marina, and Corbett, Greville C. (eds.), Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
247. Nordlinger, Rachel, and Sadler, Louisa. 2006. Case stacking in realizational morphology. Linguistics, 44, 459-88.
248. Nordlinger, Rachel, and Saulwick, Adam. 2002. Infinitives in polysynthesis: the case of Rembarrnga. In Evans, Nicholas, and Sasse, Hans-Jürgen (eds.), Problems of Polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 185-201.
249. Noyer, Robert Rolf. 2001. Clitic sequences in Nunggubuyu and PF convergence. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 751-826.
250. Odden, David. 1987. Kimatuumbi phrasal phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 4, 13-36.
251. Odden, David. 1990. Syntax, lexical rules, and postlexical rules in Kimatuumbi. In Inkelas, Sharon, and Zec, Draga (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 259-78.
252. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996a. Sign-based Morphology and Phonology with Special Attention to Optimality Theory. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
253. Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1996b. Suspended affixation: a new look at the phonology-morphology interface. In Kleinheinz, Ursula (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 251-61.
254. Paster, Mary. 2009. Explaining phonological conditions on affixation: evidence from suppletive allomorphy and affix ordering. Word Structure, 2(1), 18-47.
255. Payne, Doris L., and Payne, Thomas E. 1990. Yagua. In Derbyshire, Desmond C., and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 249-74.
256. Payne, John. 2009. The English genitive and double case. Transactions of the Philological Society, 107(3), 322-57.
257. Payne, John, and Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston, Rodney, and Pullum, Geoffrey (eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 323-523.
258. Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words. HIL dissertations 34. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
259. Perlmutter, David. 1970. Surface structure constraints in syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 185-255.
260. Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. NewYork: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.
261. Pesetsky, David. 1985. Morphology and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 193-246.
262. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The Finnish possessive suffixes. Language, 56, 603-21.
263. Plank, Frans. 2005. The prosodic contribution of clitics: focus on Latin. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4, 281-92.
264. Poletto, Cecilia. 1997. Pronominal syntax. In Maiden, Martin, and Parry, Mair (eds.), The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge, pp.137-44.
265. Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
266. Polinsky, Maria. 2003. Non-canonical agreement is canonical. Transactions of the Philological Society, 101(2), 279-312.
267. Polinsky, Maria, and Potsdam, Eric. 2001. Long-distance agreement and topic in Tsez. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19, 583-646.
268. Poser, William J. 1985. Cliticization to NP and Lexical Phonology. In Goldberg, J., MacKaye, S., and Wescoat, Michael (eds.), Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 4. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 262-72.
269. Prinz, Michael. 1991. Klitisierung im Deutschen und Neugriechischen: Eine lexikalisch-phonologische Studie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
270. Progovac, Ljiljana. 1996. Clitics in Serbian/Croatian: Comp as the second position. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 411-28.
271. Radanović-Kocić, Vesna. 1996. The placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: a prosodic approach. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 429-45.
272. Reed, Irene, Miyaoka, Osahito, Jacobson, Steven, Afcan, Paschal, and Krauss, Michael. 1977. Yup'ik Eskimo Grammar. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center/ Yup'ik Language Workshop, University of Alaska.
273. Rhys Jones, T. J. 1977. Living Welsh. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
274. Rice, Keren D. 2000. Morpheme Order and Semantic Scope: Word Formation in the Athabaskan Verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
275. Rivas, Alberto Mario. 1977. A Theory of Clitics. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
276. Rivero, María Luisa. 1991. Long head movement and negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech. The Linguistic Review, 8, 319-51.
277. Rivero, María Luisa. 1994. Clause structure and V-movement in the Clause structure and V-movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 63-120.
278. Rizzi, Luigi. 1982a. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
279. Rizzi, Luigi. 1982b. A restructuring rule. In Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 1-48.
280. Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. On the status of subject clitics in Romance. In Jaeggli, Osvaldo A., and Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (eds.), Studies in Romance Linguistics. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, pp. 391-419.
281. Roberts, Ian. 2010. The pronominal domain: DP-NP structure, clitics and null subjects. In D'Allessandro, Roberta, Ledgeway, Adam, and Roberts, Ian (eds.), Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-27.
282. Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language, 81, 613-44.
283. Rudin, Catherine. 1997. Agr-O and Bulgarian pronominal clitics. In Lindstedt, M., and Franks, S. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Indiana Meeting 1996. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 224-52.
284. Ryding, Karin C. 2005. A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
285. Sadler, Louisa. 1988. Welsh Syntax. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
286. Sadler, Louisa. 1997. Clitics and the structure-function mapping. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of LFG97. Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications: www.csli-publications.stanford.edu/LFG/2/lfg97-toc.html.
287. Sadler, Louisa. 1998. English auxiliaries as tense inflections. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 24, 1-16.
288. Sadock, Jerrold M. 1991. Autolexical Syntax: A Theory of Parallel Grammatical Representations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
289. Saeed, John. 1999. Somali. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
290. Sag, Ivan, Wasow, Thomas, and Bender, Emily. 2003. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
291. Samvelian, Pollet. 2007. A (phrasal) affix analysis of the Persian Ezafe. Journal of Linguistics, 43(3), 605-45.
292. Schachter, Paul. 1973. Constraints on clitic order in Tagalog. In Gonzalez, A. B. (ed.), Parangal kay Cecilio Lopez. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, pp. 214-31.
293. Schachter, Paul, and Otanes, Fe T. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
294. Schäufele, Steven. 1996. Now that we're all here where do we sit? Phonological ordering in the Vedic clause-initial string. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 447-75.
295. Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
296. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
297. Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura W., and Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, vol. 18. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics. Amherst: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GLSA), University of Massachusetts.
298. Sells, Peter. 1995. Korean and Japanese morphology from a lexical perspective. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 277-325.
299. Short, David. 1993. Czech. In Comrie, Bernard, and Corbett, Greville G. (eds.), The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge, pp. 455-532.
300. Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
301. Siewierska, Anna. 2012. Refining the canonical characterization of the passive. In Brown, Dunstan P., Chumakina, Marina, and Corbett, Greville C. (eds.), Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
302. Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon, R.M.W. (ed.), Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies, pp.112-71.
303. Simpson, Jane. 1991. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
304. Simpson, Jane, and Withgott, Margaret. 1986. Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. Syntax and Semantics 19. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 149-74.
305. Spencer, Andrew. 1989. Morpholexikalische phonologie. In Prinzhorn, Martin (ed.), Phonologie. Special Issue of Linguistische Berichte. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 164-97.
306. Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
307. Spencer, Andrew. 1993. Review of Sadock 1991. Journal of Linguistics, 29, 143-55.
308. Spencer, Andrew. 1999. Chukchee and polysynthesis. In Raxilina, Ekaterina V., and Testelec, Jakov G. (eds.), Tipologija i teorija jazyka - ot opisanija k ob”jasneniju. K 60-letiju Aleksandra Evgen'eviča Kibrika. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul'tury, pp. 106-13.
309. Spencer, Andrew. 2000. Inflection and the lexeme. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 47, 335-44.
310. Spencer, Andrew. 2001. Verbal clitics in Bulgarian. A Paradigm Function Morphology approach. In Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 355-86.
311. Spencer, Andrew. 2003a. Periphrastic paradigms in Bulgarian. In Junghanns, Uwe, and Szucsich, Luka (eds.), Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 249-82.
312. Spencer, Andrew. 2003b. Putting some order into morphology: reflections on Rice (2000) and Stump (2001). Journal of Linguistics, 39, 621-46.
313. Spencer, Andrew. 2005a. Inflecting clitics in Generalized Paradigm Function Morphology. Lingue e Linguaggio, 4, 179-93.
314. Spencer, Andrew. 2005b. Towards a typology of 'mixed categories'. In Orgun, C. Orhan, and Sells, Peter (eds.), Morphology and the Web of Grammar: Essays in Memory of Steven G. Lapointe. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 95-138.
315. Spencer, Andrew. 2008. Does Hungarian have a case system? In Corbett, Greville G., and Noonan, Michael (eds.), Case and Grammatical Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 35-56.
316. Spencer, Andrew. 2009. Case as a morphological phenomenon. In Malchukov, Andrej, and Spencer, Andrew (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185-99.
317. Spencer, Andrew. 2010. Lexical relatedness and the lexical entry - a formal unification. In Müller, Stefan (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG10 conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 322-40.
318. Spencer, Andrew, and Luís, Ana. 2012. The canonical clitic. In Brown, Dunstan P., Chumakina, Marina, and Corbett, Greville C. (eds.), Canonical Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
319. Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Zaring, Laurie Ann, and Rooryck, Johan (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 213-76.
320. Sproat, Richard. 1998. Morphology as component or module: mapping principle approaches. In Spencer, Andrew, and Zwicky, Arnold (ed.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 335-48.
321. Steele, Susan. 1976. On the count of one. In Juilland, A. (ed.), Studies Presented to Joseph Greenberg on his 60th Birthday. Saratoga, CA: Alma Libri, pp. 591-614.
322. Steele, Susan. 1978. The category AUX as a language universal. In Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles, and Moravcsik, Edith A. (eds.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 3: Word Structure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 7-45.
323. Steele, Susan, Akmajian, Adrian, Demers, Richard, Jelinek, Eloise, Kitagawa, Chisato, Oehrle, Richard, and Wasow, Thomas. 1981. An Encyclopedia of AUX. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
324. Stjepanović, Sandra. 1998. On the placement of Serbocroatian clitics: evidence from VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 527-37.
325. Stjepanović, Sandra. 2004. Clitic climbing and restructuring with 'finite clause' and infinitive complements. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12, 173-212.
326. Stump, Gregory T. 1984. Agreement vs. incorporation in Breton. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 289-426.
327. Stump, Gregory T. 1993. Position classes and morphological theory. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 129-79.
328. Stump, Gregory T. 1997. Template morphology and inflectional morphology. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1996. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 217-41.
329. Stump, Gregory T. 1998. Inflection. In Spencer, Andrew, and Zwicky, Arnold (ed.), The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13-43.
330. Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
331. Sullivan, Thelma D. 1988. Thelma D. Sullivan's Compendium of Nahuatl Grammar. Translated by Thelma D. Sullivan and Neville Stiles, edited by Wick R. Miller and Karen Dakin. Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press.
332. Suñer, Maria. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 391-434.
333. Sussex, Roland. 1980. On agreement, affixation and enclisis in Polish. In Chvany, Catherine V., and Brecht, Richard D. (eds.), Morphosyntax in Slavic. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers, pp. 187-203.
334. Szczegielniak, Adam. 2005. Clitic positions within the left periphery: evidence for a phonological buffer. In Heggie, Lorie, and Ordóñez, Francisco (eds.), Clitic and Affix Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 283-99.
335. Taylor, Ann. 1996. A prosodic account of clitic position in Ancient Greek. In Halpern, Aaron, and Zwicky, Arnold (eds.), Approaching Second: Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 477-503.
336. Tegey, Habibullah. 1977. The Grammar of Clitics: Evidence from Pashto and Other Languages. PhD thesis, University of Illinois.
337. Testelets, Yakov G. 2003. Are there strong and weak pronouns in Russian? In Browne, Wayles, Kim, Ji-Yung, Partee, Barbara H., and Rothstein, Robert A. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Amherst Meeting 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 515-38.
338. Toivonen, Ida. 2000. The morphosyntax of Finnish possessives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18(3), 579-609.
339. Toivonen, Ida. 2003. Non-Projecting Words: A Case Study of Swedish Particles. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
340. Toman, Jindřích. 1986. Cliticization from NPs in Czech and comparable phenomena in French and Italian. In Borer, Hagit (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 123-45.
341. Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 219-56.
342. Uriagereka, Juan. 2000. Doubling and possession. In Gerlach, Birgit, and Grijzenhout, Janet (eds.), Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 405-31.
343. van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. 1999. Clitics: a state of the art report. In van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. (ed.), Clitics and the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 405-31.
344. van Riemsdijk, Hendrik C. (ed.). 1999. Clitics and the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
345. Vanelli, Laura, and Renzi, Lorenzo. 1997. Personal pronouns and demonstratives. In Maiden, Martin, and Parry, Mair (eds.), The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge, pp. 106-15.
346. Vasil'eva, Anna Nikolaevna. 1974. Particles in Colloquial Russian (Manual for English-speaking Students of Russian). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
347. Veselovská, Ludmila. 1995. Phrasal Movement and X0-morphology. PhD thesis, Palacky University, Olomouc.
348. Vigário, Marina. 2003. The Prosodic Word in European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
349. Vogel, Irene. 2009. The status of the Clitic Group. In Grijzenhout, Janet, and Kabak, Barış (eds.), Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 15-46.
350. Vogel, Irene. 2010. The phonology of compounds. In Scalise, Sergio, and Vogel, Irene (eds.), Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 145-63.
351. Wackernagel, Jacob. 1892. Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen, 1, 333-436.
352. Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
353. Weir Smyth, Herbert. 1920. A Greek Grammar for Colleges. New York: American Book Company.
354. Werle, Adam. 2009. Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, GLSA, Department of Linguistics.
355. Wescoat, Michael T. 2002. On Lexical Sharing. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
356. Wescoat, Michael T. 2009. Udi person markers and lexical integrity. In Butt, Miriam, and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG09 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 604-22.
357. Weydt, Harald. 1969. Abtönungspartikel: Die deutschen Modalwörter und ihre französischen Entsprechungen. Berlin: Gehlen.
358. Whitman, John. 1991. Argument positions and configurationality. In Georgopoulos, Carol (ed.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 615-28.
359. Wunderlich, Dieter. 2001. A correspondence-theoretic analysis of Dalabon transitive paradigms. In Booij, Geert, and van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 233-52.
360. Wunderlich, Dieter, and Fabri, Ray. 1995. Minimalist Morphology: an approach to inflection. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 14, 236-94.
361. Zec, Draga, and Inkelas, Sharon. 1991. The place of clitics in the Prosodic Hierarchy. In Bates, Dawn (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 505-19.
362. Zwicky, Arnold. 1987. Suppressing the Z's. Journal of Linguistics, 23(1), 133-48.
363. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
364. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985a. Clitics and particles. Language, 61(2), 283-305.
365. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985b. How to describe inflection. In Niepokuj, Mary, Van Clay, Mary, Nikiforidou, Vassiliki, and Feder, Deborah (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley.
366. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1986. The general case: basic form versus default form. In Nikiforidou, Vassiliki, VanClay, Mary, Niepokuj, Mary, and Feder, Deborah (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, pp. 305-14.
367. Zwicky, Arnold M. 1994. What is a clitic? Nevis, Joel A., Joseph, Brian D., Wanner, Dieter, and Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), Clitics: A Comprehensive Bibliography 1892-1991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. xii-xx.
368. Zwicky, Arnold M., and Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language, 59, 502-13.