Positive economics for democratic policy: Milton friedman, institutionalism, and the science of history

Building Chicago Economics: New Perspectives on the History of America's Most Powerful Economics Program

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 3-35

  Stapleford, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923514141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139004077.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Records of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Record Group 257, U.S. National Archives II, College Park, Maryland.
2. Records of the National Resources Planning Board. Record Group 187, U.S. National Archives II, College Park, Maryland.
3. Alchon, Guy. 1985. The Invisible Hand of Planning: Capitalism, Social Science, and the State in the 1920s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Backhouse, Roger E., Bradley W. Bateman, and Steven G. Medema. 2011. “The Reception of Marshall in the United States.” In The Impact Alfred Marshall’s Ideas: the Global Dif usion of His Work, edited by T. Raf aelli, G. Beccatini, K. Caldari, and M. Dardi. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5. Banzhaf, H. Spencer. 2006. “The Other Economics Department: Demand and Value theory in Early Agricultural Economics.” In Agreement on Demand: Consumer theory in the Twentieth Century, edited by Philip Mirowski and D. Wade Hands. Durham: Duke University Press.
6. Barber, William J. 1985. From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921-1933. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Berkowitz, Edward D. and Kim McQuaid. 1988. Creating the Welfare State: the Political Economy of Twentieth-Century Reform. New York: Praeger.
8. Biddle, Jef. 1998. “Social Science and the Making of Social Policy: Wesley Mitchell’s Vision.” In The Economic Mind in America: Essays in the History of American Economics, edited by Malcolm Rutherford. New York: Routledge.
9. Brown, E. H. Phelps. 1972. “The Underdevelopment of Economics.” The Economic Journal 82 (325): 1-10.
10. Burns, Arthur F. and Wesley Clair Mitchell. 1946. Measuring Business Cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11. Clawson, Marion. 1981. New Deal Planning: the National Resources Planning Board. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Coase, Ronald. 1984. “The New Institutional Economics.” Zeitschrit für die Gesamte Staatswissenschat 140: 229-231.
13. Cohen, Patricia. 2009. “New Deal Revisionism: theories Collide.” New York Times. April 9.
14. Colander, David. 1992. “Retrospectives: the Lost Art of Economics.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (3): 191-198.
15. Committee of the President’s Conference on Unemployment. 1923. Business Cycles and Unemployment. New York: McGraw Hill.
16. Critchlow, Donald T. 1993. “think Tanks, Anti-Statism, and Democracy: the Non-Partisan Ideal and Policy Research in the United States, 1913-1987.” In The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States, edited by Michael J. Lacey and Mary O. Furner. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press.
17. Despres, Emile, Albert G. Hart, et al. 1950. “The Problem of Economic Stability.” American Economic Review. 40 (4): 501-538.
18. Eakins, David W. 1972. “The Origins of Corporate Liberal Policy Research, 1916-1922: the Political-Economic Expert and the Decline of Public Debate.” In Building the Organizational Society: Essays on Associational Activities in Modern America, edited by Jerry Israel. New York: the Free Press.
19. Emmett, Ross B. 2009. Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American Economics. New York: Routledge.
20. Fink, Leon. 1997. Progressive Intellectuals and the Dilemmas of Democratic Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Friedman, Milton. 1950. “Wesley C. Mitchell as an Economic theorist.” The Journal of Political Economy. 58 (6): 465-493.
22. Friedman, Milton. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Friedman, Milton. 1957. A theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24. Friedman, Milton. 1967. “Value Judgments in Economics.” In Human Values and Economic Policy, edited by Sydney Hook. New York: New York University Press.
25. Friedman, Milton. 1983. Bright Promises, Dismal Performance: An Economist’s Protest. Sun Lake, Ariz.: Thomas Horton and Daughters.
26. Friedman, Milton. 1986. “Economists and Economic Policy.” Economic Inquiry. 24 (1): 1-10.
27. Friedman, Milton and Rose D. Friedman. 1998. Two Lucky People: Memoirs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Friedman, Milton and Simon Kuznets. 1954. Income from Independent Professional Practice. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29. Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. 1963. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
30. Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. 1970. Monetary Statistics of the United States: Estimates, Sources, and Methods. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
31. Friedman, Milton and Anna J. Schwartz. 1982. Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom: their Relation to Income, Prices, and Interest Rates, 1867-1975. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Gordon, Colin. 1994. New Deals: Business, Labor, and Politics in America, 1920-1935. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Graebner, William. 1977. “Federalism in the Progressive Era: A Structural Interpretation of Reform.” Journal of American History. 64 (2): 331-357.
34. Gruchy, Allan G. 1939. “The Economics of the National Resources Committee.” American Economic Review. 29 (1): 60-73.
35. Haavelmo, Trygve. 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica. 12(supplement): iii-115.
36. Hammond, J. Daniel. 1992. “An Interview with Milton Friedman on Methodology.” Research in the History of Economic thought and Methodology. 10: 91-118.
37. Hammond, J. Daniel. 1996. Theory and Measurement: Causality Issues in Milton Friedman’s Monetary Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hammond, J. Daniel. 2001. “Columbia Roots of the Chicago School: the Case of Milton Friedman.” American Social Science Association, New Orleans, LA, January 2001.
39. Hammond, J. Daniel. 2006. “More Fiber than Thread? Evidence on the Mirowski-Hands Yarn.” In Agreement on Demand: Consumer theory in the Twentieth Century, edited by Philip Mirowski and D. Wade Hands. Durham: Duke University Press.
40. Hammond, J. Daniel. 2009. “Early Drafts of Friedman’s Methodology Essay.” In The Methodology of Positive Economics: Rel ections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Hawley, Ellis W. 1974. “Herbert Hoover, the Commerce Secretariat, and the Vision of an ‘Associative State’, 1921-1929.” Journal of American History. 61 (1): 116-140.
42. Hendry, David F. 1980. “Econometrics-Alchemy or Science?” Economica. 47 (188): 387-406.
43. Herman, Edward S. 1995. Triumph of the Market: Essays on Economics, Politics, and the Media. Boston: South End Press.
44. Hicks, John R. 1979. Causality in Economics. New York: Basic Books.
45. Hirsch, Abraham and Neil de Marchi. 1990. Milton Friedman, Economics in theory and Practice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46. Hoover, Kevin D. 2009. “Milton Friedman’s Stance: the Methodology of Causal Realism.” In The Methodology of Positive Economics: Rel ections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, edited by Uskali Mäki. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Karl, Barry D. 1974. Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Keynes, John Neville. 1904. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. London: MacMillan Co.
49. Kitch, Edmund W. 1983. “The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago, 1932-1970.” Journal of Law and Economics. 26 (1): 163-234.
50. Klein, Naomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: the Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Henry Holt.
51. Knight, Frank H. 1924. “The Limitations of Scientific Method in Economics.” In The Trend of Economics, edited by Rexford G. Tugwell. New York: Knopf.
52. Koopmans, T. C. 1947. “Measurement without theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics. 19: 161-172.
53. Krugman, Paul. 2009. “How Did Economists Get It So Wrong?” New York Times. September 6: 36.
54. Leamer, Edward E. 1983. “Let’s Take the Con out of Econometrics.” The American Economic Review. 73 (1): 31-43.
55. Lee, Frederic S. 1990. “From Multi-Industry Planning to Keynesian Planning: Gardiner Means, the American Keynesians, and National Economic Planning at the National Resources Committee.” Journal of Policy History. 2 (2): 186-212.
56. Leontief, Wassily. 1971. “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts.” The American Economic Review. 61 (1): 1-7.
57. Lynd, Robert S. 1939. Knowledge for What? the Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
58. Mäki, Uskali (ed). 2009. The Methodology of Positive Economics: Rel ections on the Milton Friedman Legacy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Means, Gardiner C. 1935. Industrial Prices and their Relative Inl exibility, 74th Congress U.S. Senate Document 13, 1st sess. (Washington: Government Printing Office).
60. Mitchell, Lucy Sprague. 1953. Two Lives: the Story of Wesley Clair Mitchell and Myself. New York: Simon and Schuster.
61. Mitchell, Wesley C. 1919. “Statistics and Government.” Publications of the American Statistical Association. 16 (125): 223-235.
62. Mitchell, Wesley C. 1924. “The Prospects of Economics.” In The Trend of Economics, edited by Rexford G. Tugwell. New York: Knopf.
63. Mitchell, Wesley C. 1925. “Quantitative Analysis in Economic theory.” American Economic Review. 15 (1): 1-12.
64. Mitchell, Wesley C. 1927. Business Cycles: the Problem and Its Setting. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
65. Mitchell, Wesley C. 1936. “Intelligence and the Guidance of Economic Evolution.” Scientific Monthly. 43 (5): 450-465.
66. President’s Conference on Unemployment. Committee on Recent Economic Changes. 1929. Recent Economic Changes in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
67. Purcell, Edward A. 1973. the Crisis of Democratic theory; Scientific Naturalism & the Problem of Value. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
68. Reagan, Patrick D. 2000. Designing a New America: the Origins of New Deal Planning, 1890-1943. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
69. Reder, Melvin W. 1982. “Chicago Economics: Permanence and Change.” Journal of Economic Literature. 20: 1-38.
70. Rothbard, Murray N. 1989. “World War I as Fuli llment: Power and the Intellectuals.” Journal of Libertarian Studies. 9 (1): 81-125.
71. Rutherford, Malcolm. 2000. “Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918-1929.” Journal of the History of Economic thought. 22 (3): 277-308.
72. Rutherford, Malcolm. 2010. “Chicago Economics and Institutionalism.” In The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School, edited by Ross B. Emmett: Edward Elgar.
73. Samuels, Warren J. and Steven G. Medema. 1990. Gardiner C. Means, Institutionalist and Post-Keynesian. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
74. Serrano, David Teira and Jesús Bonilla Bonilla. 2009. “The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions from Interested Agents.” In The Methodology of Positive Economics: Rel ections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, edited by Uskali Mäki. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75. Schliesser, Eric. 2010. “Inventing Paradigms, Monopoly, Methodology, and Mythology at ‘Chicago’: Nutter and Stigler.” Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1628102.
76. Sowell, Thomas. 1993. “A Student’s Eye View of George Stigler.” Journal of Political Economy. 101 (5): 784-792.
77. Stapleford, Thomas A. 2007. “Market Visions: Expenditure Surveys, Market Research, and Economic Planning in the New Deal.” Journal of American History. 94(2): 418-444.
78. Stigler, George J. 1988. Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist. New York: Basic Books.
79. Teira, David. 2009. “Why Friedman’s Methodology Did Not Generate Consensus among Economists.” Journal of the History of Economic thought. 31 (2): 201-214.
80. Tucker, Rufus S. 1940. “The National Resources Committee’s Report on Distribution of Income.” The Review of Economic Statistics. 22 (4): 165-182.
81. Tucker, Rufus S. 1942. “Distribution of Income in 1935-36.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. 37 (220): 489-495.
82. Tucker, Rufus S. 1942. “Estimates of Savings of American Families.” The Review of Economic Statistics. 24 (1): 9-21.
83. Wallis, W. Allen and Milton Friedman. 1942. “The Empirical Derivation of Indif erence Functions.” In Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics; in Memory of Henry Schultz, edited by Oscar Lange, Francis McIntyre and Theodore O. Yntema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84. Worswick, G. D. N. 1972. “Is Progress in Economic Science Possible?” The Economic Journal. 82 (325): 73-86.
85. Wunderlin, Clarence E. 1992. Visions of a New Industrial Order: Social Science and Labor theory in America’s Progressive Era. New York: Columbia University Press.