Chicago economics and institutionalism

The Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 24-39

  Rutherford, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865266240     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781849806664.00009     Document Type: Chapter

References (96)

1. Abbott, E. (1905), ‘A statistical study of the wages of unskilled labor in the United States’, PhD dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
2. Allen, R.A. (1933), ‘The labor of women in the production of cotton’, PhD dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
3. Ayres, C.E. (1917), ‘On the nature of the relationship between economics and ethics’, PhD dissertation, Philosophy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
4. Becker, G.S. (1965), ‘A theory of the allocation of time’, Economic Journal, 75 (299), 493-515.
5. Becker, G.S. (1976), The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Beller, A.H. and D.E. Kiss (2001), ‘Hazel Kyrk’, in Women Building Chicago 1790-1990, Schultz, R.L. and A. Hast (eds), Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 482-5.
7. Beller, A.H. and D.E. Kiss (2003), ‘On the contribution of Hazel Kyrk to family economics’, Paper presented at ‘Institutional and Chicago economics’, History of Economics Society session, Allied Social Science Association meeting, Washington, DC, January.
8. Bernasek, A. and D. Kinnear (1996), ‘Ruth Allen: frontier labor economist’, in Political Economy and Public Policy, vol. 9, Economic Mavericks: The Texas Institutionalists, Phillips, R.J. (ed.), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 75-106.
9. Breckinridge, S.P. (1903), Legal Tender: A Study in English and American Monetary History, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Buchanan, J.M. and G. Tullock (1962), The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Burns, A.F. and W.C. Mitchell (1946), Measuring Business Cycles, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12. Clark, J.M. (1919), ‘Economic theory in an era of social readjustment’, American Economic Review, 9 (1, Supplement), 280-90.
13. Clark, J.M. (1926), The Social Control of Business, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Clark, J.M., W.H. Hamilton and H.G. Moulton (eds) (1918), Readings in the Economics of War, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Coase, R.H. (1984), ‘The new institutional economics’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 140, 229-31.
16. Coase, R.H. (1993), ‘Law and economics at Chicago’, Journal of Law & Economics, 36 (1, part 2), 239-54.
17. Copeland (1921), ‘Some phases of institutional value theory’, PhD dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
18. Davis, K.B. (1900), ‘Causes affecting the standard of living and wages’, PhD dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
19. Dorfman, J. (1959), The Economic Mind in American Civilization, vol. 4-5, 1918-1933, New York: Viking Press.
20. Dorfman, J. (1974), ‘Walton Hale Hamilton and industrial policy’, in Industrial Policy and Institutionalism: Selected Essays, Hamilton, W.H. (ed.), Clifton, NJ: A.M. Kelley, pp. 5-28.
21. Duxbury, N. (1995), Patterns of American Jurisprudence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Emmett, R.B. (1999), ‘Introduction’, in Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight, vol. 1, ‘What is truth’ in economics?, Emmett, R.B. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. vii-xxiv.
23. Emmett, R.B. (2006a), ‘De gustibus est disputandum: Frank H. Knight’s response to George Stigler and Gary Becker’s De gustibus non est disputandum’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 13 (1), 97-111.
24. Emmett, R.B. (2006b), ‘Frank H. Knight, Max Weber, Chicago economics, and institutionalism’, Max Weber Studies, Beiheft 1: Weber and Economics, 101-19.
25. Forget, E.L. (2000), ‘Margaret Gilpin Reid (1896-1991)’, in A Biographical Dictionary of Women Economists, Dimand, R.W., M.A. Dimand and E.L. Forget (eds), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 357-61.
26. Freedman, C.F. (2002), ‘The Xistence of definitional economics - Stigler’s and Leibenstein’s war of the words’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26 (2), 161-78.
27. Friedman, M. (1953), ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3-43.
28. Friedman, M. (1957), A Theory of the Consumption Function, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Friedman, M. and S. Kuznets (1945), Income from Independent Professional Practice, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30. Friedman, M. and A.J. Schwartz (1963), A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31. Goodrich, C.L. (1920), The Frontier of Control: A Study of British Workshop Politics, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe.
32. Grossbard-Sheltman, S. (2001), ‘The new home economics at Columbia and Chicago’, Feminist Economics, 7 (3), 103-30.
33. Hamilton, W.H. (1916), ‘The development of Hoxie’s economics’, Journal of Political Economy, 24 (9), 855-83.
34. Hamilton, W.H. (1919), ‘The institutional approach to economic theory’, American Economic Review, 9 (1, Supplement), 309-18.
35. Hamilton, W.H. and H.R. Wright (1925), The Case of Bituminous Coal, New York: Macmillan.
36. Hamilton, W.H. and H.R. Wright (1928), A Way of Order for Bituminous Coal, New York: Macmillan.
37. Hammond, C.H. (2000a), ‘Edith Abbott (1876-1957)’, in A Biographical Dictionary of Women Economists, Dimand, R.W., M.A. Dimand and E.L. Forget (eds), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 1-7.
38. Hammond, C.H. (2000b), ‘Sophonisba Breckinridge (1866-1948)’, in A Biographical Dictionary of Women Economists, Dimand, R.W., M.A. Dimand and E.L. Forget (eds), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 81-8.
39. Hammond, J.D. (1996), Theory and Measurement: Causality Issues in Milton Friedman’s Monetary Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Harris, A.L. (1932), ‘Types of institutionalism’, Journal of Political Economy, 40 (6), 721-49.
41. Harris, A.L. (1934), ‘Economic evolution: dialectical and Darwinian’, Journal of Political Economy, 42 (1), 34-79.
42. Hirsch, A. and N. De Marchi (1990), Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
43. Hirschfeld, M.L. (1997), ‘Methodological stance and consumption theory: a lesson in feminist methodology’, in New Economics and Its History, David, J.B. (ed.), Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 191-211.
44. Hodgson, G.M. (2001), ‘Frank Knight as an institutional economist’, in Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels, Biddle, J.E., J.B. Davis and S.G. Medema (eds), London: Routledge, pp. 64-93.
45. Hodgson, G.M. (2004), ‘Veblen in Chicago: the winds of creativity’, in Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 22-A, Samuels, W.J. and J.E. Biddle (eds), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 145-60.
46. Hoxie, R.F. (1917), Trade Unionism in the United States, New York: Appleton.
47. Kitch, E.W. (1983), ‘The fire of truth: a remembrance of law and economics at Chicago, 1932-1970’, Journal of Law & Economics, 26 (1), 163-234.
48. Knight, F.H. (1933), The Economic Organization, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
49. Knight, F.H. (1935), ‘Review of Institutional Economics’, Columbia Law Review, 35 (5), 803-05.
50. Knight, F.H. (1924 [1999]), ‘The limitations of scientific method in economics’, in Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight, vol. 1: ‘What Is Truth’ in Economics?, Emmett, R.B. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-39.
51. Knight, F.H. (1928 [1999]), ‘Historical and theoretical issues in the problem of modern capitalism’, review of Der Moderne Kapitalismus, in Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight, vol. 1: ‘What Is Truth’ in Economics?, Emmett, R.B. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 133-48.
52. Knight, F.H. (1932 [1999]), ‘The newer economics and the control of economic activity’, review of Modern Economic Society, in Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight, vol. 1: ‘What Is Truth’ in Economics?, Emmett, R.B. (ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 172-210.
53. Koopmans, T.C. (1947), ‘Measurement without theory’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 29 (3), 161-72.
54. Kyrk, H. (1923), A Theory of Consumption, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
55. Kyrk, H. (1933), Economic Problems of the Family, New York: Harper & Bros.
56. Leeson, R. (2000), The Eclipse of Keynesianism: The Political Economy of the Chicago Counter-revolution, New York: Palgrave.
57. Leiter, B. (2001), ‘Karl Nickerson Llewellyn (1893-1962)’, in Smelser, N.J. and P.B. Baltes (eds), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York: Elsevier Science, pp. 8999-9001.
58. Miller, H.L., Jr. (1962), ‘On the “Chicago School of Economics”’, Journal of Political Economy, 70 (1), 64-9.
59. Mitchell, W.C. (1903), A History of the Greenbacks, with Special Reference to the Economic Consequences of Their Issue: 1862-65, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60. Mitchell, W.C. (1912), ‘The backward art of spending money’, American Economic Review, 2 (2), 269-81.
61. Mitchell, W.C. (1925), ‘Quantitative analysis in economic theory’, American Economic Review, 15 (1), 1-12.
62. Nef, J.U. (1932), The Rise of the British Coal Industry, 2 vols, London: Routledge.
63. Nef, J.U. (1934), ‘James Laurence Laughlin (1850-1933)’, Journal of Political Economy, 42 (1), 1-5.
64. Nef, J.U. (1973), Search for Meaning: The Autobiography of a Nonconformist, Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
65. Neill, R. (1972), A New Theory of Value: The Canadian Economics of H.A. Innis, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
66. Parsons, K.H. (1942), ‘John R. Commons’ point of view’, Journal of Land and Public Utility Economics, 18 (3), 245-66.
67. Parsons, K.H. (1976), Interview with Laura Small, University of Wisconsin-Madison Archives, Oral History Project, interview #081.
68. Posner, R.A. (1995), Overcoming Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Reder, M.W. (1982), ‘Chicago economics: permanence and change’, Journal of Economic Literature, 20 (1), 1-38.
70. Reid, M.G. (1931), ‘The economics of the household’, dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
71. Reid, M.G. (1934), The Economics of Household Production, New York: Wiley.
72. Rutherford, M. (2002), ‘Morris A. Copeland: a case study in the history of institutional economics’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 24 (3), 261-90.
73. Rutherford, M. (2003), ‘On the economic frontier: Walton Hamilton, institutional economics, and education’, History of Political Economy, 35 (4), 611-53.
74. Rutherford, M. (2004), ‘Institutional economics at Columbia University’, History of Political Economy, 36 (1), 31-78.
75. Schultz, H. (1928), Statistical Laws of Demand and Supply: With Special Application to Sugar, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
76. Schultz, H. (1935), ‘Correct and incorrect methods of determining the effectiveness of the tariff’, Journal of Farm Economics, 17 (4), 625-41.
77. Schultz, H. (1937 [2000]), ‘The quantitative method with special reference to economic inquiry’, in Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, vol. 18-C: Twentieth Century Economics, Fiorito, L. and W.J. Samuels (eds), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 343-55.
78. Schwartz, A. (2001), ‘Karl Llewellyn and the origins of contract theory’, in The Jurisprudential Foundations of Corporate and Commercial law, Kraus, J.S. and S.D. Walt (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12-53.
79. Simons, H.C. (1934), A Positive Program for Laissez Faire: Some Proposals for a Liberal Economic Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
80. Sowell, T. (1993), ‘A student’s eye view of George Stigler’, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (5), 784-92.
81. Stigler, G.J. (1941), Production and Distribution Theories: The Formative Period, New York: Macmillan.
82. Stigler, G.J. (1947a), ‘The kinky oligopoly demand curve and rigid prices’, Journal of Political Economy, 55 (5), 432-49.
83. Stigler, G.J. (1947b), ‘Professor Lester and the marginalists’, American Economic Review, 37 (1), 154-7.
84. Stigler, G.J. (1954), ‘The economist plays with blocs’, American Economic Review, 44 (2), 7-14.
85. Stigler, G.J. (1976), ‘The Xistence of X-efficiency’, American Economic Review, 66 (1), 213-16.
86. Stigler, G.J. and G.S. Becker (1977), ‘De gustibus non est disputandum’, American Economic Review, 67 (2), 76-90.
87. Stigler, G.J. and C. Friedland (1983), ‘The literature of economics: the case of Berle and Means’, Journal of Law & Economics, 26 (2), 237-68.
88. Stigler, G.J. and J.K. Kindahl (1970), The Behavior of Industrial Prices, New York: Columbia University Press.
89. Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, New York: Macmillan.
90. Veblen, T. (1904), The Theory of Business Enterprise, New York: Charles Scribners.
91. Veblen, T. (1914), The Instinct of Workmanship, New York: Macmillan.
92. Viner, J. (1928), ‘The present status and future prospects of quantitative economics’, American Economic Review, 18 (1), 30-36.
93. Vining, D.R. (1949), ‘Koopmans on the choice of variables to be studied and the methods of measurement’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 31 (2), 77-91.
94. Vining, D.R. (1950), ‘Methodological issues in quantitative economics: variations upon a theme by F.H. Knight’, American Economic Review, 40 (3), 267-84.
95. Vining, D.R. (1962), ‘On the problem of recognizing and diagnosing faultiness in the observed performance of an economic system’, Journal of Law & Economics, 5, 165-84.
96. Wright, H.R. (1922), ‘The political labour movement in Great Britain, 1820-1914’, PhD dissertation, Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.