Home ranges and social organization of syntopic Peromyscus boylii and P. truei

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 932-941

  Ribble, David O ^a   Stanley, Sherri ^a  

^a TRINITY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fixed kernel density; Home range; Minimum convex polygon; Peromyscus boylii; Peromyscus truei; Radiotelemetry; Social organization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001655956     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1383101     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ADLER, G. H., AND M. L. WILSON. 1987. Demography of a habitat generalist, the white-footed mouse, in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology, 68:1785-1796.
2. BERGSTROM, B. J. 1988. Home ranges of three species of chipmunks (Tamias) as assessed by radiotelemetry and grid trapping. Journal of Mammalogy, 24: 346-352.
3. BURT, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy, 24:346-352.
4. CAMERON, G. N., AND S. R. SPENCER. 1985. Assessment of space-use patterns in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). Oecologia, 68:133-139.
5. CRANFORD, J. A. 1977. Home range and habitat utilization by Neotoma fuscipes as determined by radiotelemetry. Journal of Mammalogy, 58:165-172.
6. DEWSBURY, D. A. 1988. The comparative psychology of monogamy. Pp. 1-50, in Nebraska symposium on motivation (D. Leger, and R. A. Dienstbier, eds.). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 327 pp.
7. DICK-PEDDIE, W. A. 1993. New Mexico vegetation, past, present, and future. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, 244 pp.
8. DOUGLAS, C. L. 1969. Comparative ecology of pinyon mice and deer mice in Mesa Verde National Park, Colorado. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Publications, 18:421-504.
9. EMLEN, S. T., AND L. W. ORING. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197:215-223.
10. FRANK, D. H., AND E. J. HESKE. 1992. Seasonal changes in space use patterns in the southern grasshopper mouse Onychomys torridus torridus. Journal of Mammalogy, 73:292-298.
11. HESKE, E. J. 1987. Spatial structuring and dispersal in a high density population of the California vole, Microtus californicus. Holarctic Ecology, 10:137-148.
12. HESKE, E. J., AND R. S. OSTFELD. 1990. Sexual dimorphism in size, relative size of testes, and mating systems in North American voles. Journal of Mammalogy, 71:510-519.
13. KENWARD, R. 1990. Ranges IV. Software for analyzing animal location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Wareham, United Kingsom. (on disk)
14. KIE, J. G., J. A. BALDWIN, AND C. J. EVANS. 1996. CALHOME: a program for estimating animal home ranges. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24:342-344.
15. KLEINBAUM, D. G., AND L. L. KUPPER. 1978. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts, 556 pp.
16. KREBS, C. J. 1966. Demographic changes in fluctuating populations of Microtus californicus. Ecological Monographs, 36:239-273.
17. MADISON, D. M. 1977. Movements and habitat use among interacting Peromyscus leucopus as revealed by radiotelemetry. The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 91:273-281.
18. _. 1980. Space use and social structure in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 7:65-71.
19. MINEAU, P., AND D. MADISON. 1977. Radio-tracking of Peromyscus leucopus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 55:465-468.
20. MOHR, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American mammals. The American Midland Naturalist, 37:223-249.
21. O'FARRELL, M. J. 1978. Home range dynamics of rodents in a sagebrush community. Journal of Mammalogy, 59:657-668.
22. OSTFELD, R. S. 1986. Territoriality and mating system of California voles. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 55:691-706.
23. _. 1987. On the distinction between female defense and resource defense polygyny. Oikos, 48: 238-240.
24. _. 1990. The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5:411-415.
25. OSTFELD, R. S., AND L. L. KLOSTERMAN. 1990. Microtine social systems, adaptation, and the comparative method. Pp. 35-44, in Social systems and population cycles in voles. (R. H. Tamarin, R. S. Ostfeld, S. R. Pugh, and G. Bujalska, eds.). Birkhaüser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, 229 pp.
26. OTIS, D. L., K. P. BURNHAM, G. C. WHITE, AND D. R. ANDERSON. 1978. Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62:1-135.
27. RIBBLE, D. O., AND J. S. MILLAR. 1996. The mating system of Peromyscus maniculatus as revealed by radiotelemetry and DNA fingerprinting. Ecoscience, 3:423-428.
28. RIBBLE, D. O., AND M. SALVIONI. 1990. Social organization and nest co-occupancy in Peromyscus californicus, a monogamous rodent. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26:9-15.
29. SCHEIBE, J. S. 1984. Sexual differences in the home ranges of Peromyscus truei and Dipodomys panamintinus (Rodentia). The Southwestern Naturalist, 29:7-13.
30. SEAMAN, D. E., AND R. A. POWELL. 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology, 77:2075-2085.
31. SILVERMAN, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, Inc., London, United Kingdom, 175 pp.
32. SUKAL, R. R, AND F. J. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Second ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California, 859 pp.
33. SWIHART, R. K., AND N. A. SLADE. 1985. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology, 66:1176-1184.
34. TAITT, M. J. 1981. The effect of extra food on small rodent populations. I. Deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus). The Journal of Animal Ecology, 50:111-124.
35. TEW, T. E., AND D. W. MACDONALD. 1994. Dynamics of space use and male vigour amongst wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus, in the cereal ecosystem. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34:337-345.
36. WOLFF, J. O. 1985a. Comparative population ecology of Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63:1548-1555.
37. _. 1985b. The effects of density, food, and interspecific interference on home range size in Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63:2657-2662.
38. _. 1989. Social behavior. Pp. 271-291, in Advances in the study of Peromyscus (Rodentia) (G. L. Kirkland, Jr., and J. N. Layne, eds.). Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock, 366 pp.
39. WOLFF, J. O., AND D. M. CICIRELLO. 1990. Mobility versus territoriality: alternative reproductive strategies in white-footed mice. Animal Behaviour, 39: 1222-1224.
40. WORTON, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology, 70:164-168.
41. _. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 59:794-800.