The Theory of Visual Attention without the race: a new model of visual selection

Building Bridges Across Cognitive Sciences Around the World - Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1284-1289

  Andersen, Tobias S ^a   Kyllingsbæk, Søren ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Attention; Modeling; Psychophysics; Theory of Visual Attention; Vision; working memory

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; SIGNAL ENCODING;

ATTENTION; CLINICAL STUDY; EMPIRICAL FINDINGS; ENCODINGS; MODELING; PSYCHOPHYSIC; THEORY OF VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL SELECTION; WORKING MEMORY;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

EID: 84923363859     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Bundesen, C. (1990). A Theory of Visual Attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523–547.
2. Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., & Kyllingsbæk, S. (2005). A Neural Theory of Visual Attention: Bridging Cognition and Neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291–328.
3. Dyrholm, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Espeseth, T., & Bundesen, C. (2011). Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA. [doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2011.08.005]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(6), 416-429.
4. Finke, K., Dodds, C. M., Bublak, P., Regenthal, R., Baumann, F., Manly, T., et al. (2010). Effects of modafinil and methylphenidate on visual attention capacity: a TVA-based study. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 210(3), 317-329.
5. Habekost, T., & Starrfelt, R. (2009). Visual attention capacity: a review of TVA-based patient studies. Scand J Psychol, 50(1), 23-32.
6. Kyllingsbaek, S., Markussen, B., & Bundesen, C. (2011). Testing a poisson counter model for visual identification of briefly presented, mutually confusable single stimuli in pure accuracy tasks. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform.
7. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychol Rev, 103(4), 603-649.
8. Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychol Rev, 108(2), 393-434.
9. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Res, 46(28), 4646–4674.
10. Petersen, A., & Andersen, T. S. (2012). The effect of exposure duration on visual character identification in single, whole and partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, In Press.
11. Shibuya, H., & Bundesen, C. (1988). Visual Selection from Multielement Displays: Measuring and Modeling Effects of Exposure Duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception Performance, 14(4), 591–600.
12. Sperling, G. (1960). The Information Available in Brief Visual Presentions. Psychological Monographs, 74(11), 1-29.
13. Starrfelt, R., Habekost, T., & Leff, A. P. (2009). Too little, too late: reduced visual span and speed characterize pure alexia. Cereb Cortex, 19(12), 2880-2890.
14. Vangkilde, S., Bundesen, C., & Coull, J. T. (2011). Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 218(4), 667-680.