Ecosystem services based spatial planning decision making for adaptation to climate changes

Habitat International

Volumn 47, Issue , 2015, Pages 267-278

  Onur, A Ceren ^a   Tezer, Azime ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Climate change adaptation; Ecosystem services; Istanbul; Spatial planning; Sustainability indicators

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPING WORLD; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METROPOLITAN AREA; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

ISTANBUL [ISTANBUL (PRV)]; ISTANBUL [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84923349934     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. AGORA I˙klim Modelleri için Veri Dağitim Sistemi 2011, I˙TÜ Avrasya Yer Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Available at. http://agora.itu.edu.tr/node/4.
2. Albayrak I. Ekosistem servislerine dayali havza yönetim modelinin istanbul - Ömerli havzasi örneğinde uygulanabilirliği 2012, (Phd thesis), I˙TÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, I˙stanbul.
3. Awasthi A., Chauhanb S.S., Goyal S.K. Amulti-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2011, 53:98-109.
4. Benítez-López A., Alkemade R., ve Verweij P.A. The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biological Conservation 2010, 143:1307-1316.
5. Bohensky E.L., Reyers B., Van Jaarsveld A.S. Future ecosystem services in a southern African River Basin: a scenario planning approach to uncertainty. Conservation Biology 2006, 20(4):1051-1061.
6. Boyd J., Banzhaf S. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 2007, 63(2-3):616-626.
7. Bryan B.A., Neville D., Crossman D., King D., Meyer W.S. Landscape futures analysis: assessing the impacts of environmental targets under alternative spatial policy options and future scenarios. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26:83-91.
8. Cabello A., Velasco M., Barredo J.I., Hurkmans R.T.W.L., Barrera Escoda A., Sempere T.D., et al. Assessment of future scenarios of climate and land-use changes in the IMPRINTS test-bed areas. Environmental Science and Policy 2011, 14:884-897.
9. Cadenasso M.L., Pickett S.T.A., Schwarz K. Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 5:80-88.
10. Cervero R. Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: a path analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 2003, 62:145-163.
11. City Of Boston Aclimate of progress: City of Boston climate action plan 2011, Boston.
12. City Of London Rising to the challenge: The City of London climate change adaptation strategy 2011, London.
13. City Of New York Climate change adaptation plan in New York City 2010, New York.
14. Costanza R., dArge R., Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
15. Daily G.C. Nature's services: Societal dependence on ecosystem services 1997, 1-10. Island Press, Washington DC.
16. Dunn S.M., Brown I., Sample J., Post H. Relationships between climate, water resources, land use and diffuse pollution and the significance of uncertainty in climate change. Journal of Hydrology 2012, 434-435:19-35.
17. EPA National water program 2012 strategy: Response to climate change full report 2012, Available at. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/climatechange/2012-National-Water-Program-Strategy.cfm.
18. European Environment Agency (EEA) Agro- ecosystems, EU 2010 biodiversity baseline - European agency report 2010, 27-34. No:12, Cophenagen -Luxenburg. M. Asquith (Ed.).
19. European Environment Agency (EEA) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012, Available at. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate-impacts-and-vulnerability-2012.
20. Fagundez J. Heathlands confronting global change: drivers of biodiversity loss from past to future scenarios. Annals of Botany 2012, 1-22.
21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Irrigation water management: Irrigation water needs, Chapter 2: Climate and crop growth 1986, Available at. http://www.fao.org/docrep/S2022E/S2022E00.htm.
22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Global forest resources assessment 2005, Available at. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/A0400E/A0400E09.pdf.
23. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda: A guide for decision-makers 2013, Available at. http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/i3182e/i3182e00.pdf.
24. Forest law (No: 6831) (1956), Date of Acceptance: 31/8/1956, Official Gazette: Date: 8/9/1956 Number: 9402, Publishing Code: Arrangement: 3 Volume: 37 Page: 2457.
25. Füssel H.M. Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustainability Science 2007, 2:265-275.
26. Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 2010, 7:260-272.
27. Hallegatte S., Corfee-Morlot J. Understanding climate change impacts, vulnerability and adaptation at city scale: an introduction. Climatic Change 2011, 104:1-12.
28. Hou Y., Burkhard B., Müller F. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 2013, 127:117-131.
29. Hoymann J. Spatial allocation of future residential land use in the Elbe River Basin. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2010, 37:911-928.
30. IPCC Climate change 2007: Synthesis report 2007, IPCC.
31. IPCC Fourth assessment Report: Climate change 2007, IPCC.
32. ISKI Watershed regulation 2011, Available at. http://www.iski.gov.tr/Web/statik.aspx?KID=1001225.
33. I˙stanbul Orman Bölge Müdürlüğü. (2012), I˙stanbul.
34. I˙stanbul I˙l Tarim Müdürlüğü I˙stanbul I˙l Tarim Master Plani 2006, I˙stanbul.
35. I˙stanbul Metropolitan Municipality (I˙MM) 1/100.000 Ölçekli I˙stanbul I˙l Çevre Düzeni Plani Analitik ve Sentez Raporu 2009, I˙stanbul.
36. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. Amulti-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators 2010, 21:54-66.
37. Lindley S.J., Handley J.F., Theuray N., Peet E., McEvoy D. Adaptation strategies for climate change. Journal of Risk Research 2006, 9(5):543-568.
38. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Key questions on biodiversity in the millennium ecosystem assessment, ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Atoolkit for understanding and action - Protecting nature's Services, protecting ourselves, millennium ecosystem assessment 2007, Island Press, Washington DC/, London.
40. Moss R.H., Edmonds J.A., Hibbard K.A., Manning M.R., Rose S.K., Van Vuuren D.P., et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 2010, 463(7282):747-756.
41. OECD Territorial Reviews: Istanbul - Turkey, policy brief 2008.
42. Özhatay N., Byfield A., Atay S. Türkiye'nin önemli bitki Alanlari 2003, MAS Matbacilik A.Ş, I˙SBN: 975-92433-0-x, I˙stanbul.
43. Pasture law (No 4342) (1998). Date of acceptance: 27.5.2004.
44. Pimm S.L., Raven P. Extinction by numbers. Nature 2000, 403:843-845.
45. Plata-Rocha W., Gomez-Delgado M., Bosque-Sendr J. Simulating urban growth scenarios using GIS and multicriteria analysis techniques: a case study of the Madrid region, Spain. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2011, 38:1012-1031.
46. Polasky S., Nelson E., Pennington D., Johnson K.A. The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environmental and Resource Economics 2011, 48:219-242.
47. Pruett C.L., Patten M.A., Wolfe D.H. Avoidance behavior by Prairie Grouse: implications for development of wind energy. Conservation Biology 2009, 23:1253-1259.
48. Regulation on agricultural land use and protection (No:25766) (2005). Official Journal No. 25766, 25 March 2005.
49. Shearer A.W. Land use scenarios: Environmental consequences of development 2009, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
50. Storch H., Downes N.K. Ascenario-based approach to assess Ho Chi Minh City's urban development strategies against the impact of climate change. Cities 2011, 28:517-526.
51. Tan K.C., Lim H.S., MatJafri M.Z., Abdullah K. Landsat data to evaluate urban expansion and determine land use/land cover changes in Penang Island, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 60:1509-1521.
52. TBMM Council of ministers decision 2012, No: 3573. Available at. http://www.resmi-gazete.org/rega/2012-3573-istanbul-ilinde-bulunan-bazi-alanlarda-gerceklestirilecek-proje-uygulamalari-kapsamindacevre-ve-sehircilik-bakanliginin-yetkilendirilmesine-iliskin-karar-32870.htm.
53. Tezer A. Urban biosphere reserve (ubr) concept for sustainable use and protection of urban aquatic habitats: case of Omerli Wathershed, Istanbul. Ecohydrology &Hidrobiology 2005, 5(4):309-320.
54. Tezer A., Uluğtekin N., Göksel Ç., Ertekin Ö., Terzi F. Ekosistem Servislerinin Kent Planlamaya Entegrasyonu, TÜBI˙TAK 108K615 No'lu Araştirma Projesi Nihai Raporu 2011, I˙TÜ, I˙stanbul.
55. Tezer A., Yiğiter R., Eyüboğlu E., Ertekin Ö., Kerimoğlu E., Koramaz K., et al. Urban-Ist: A policy relevant research for establishing a multi-participatory international network of urban biospheres in Istanbul - UNESCO 2006-2007, participation program project, final report 2008, ITU Faculty of Architecture, I˙stanbul.
56. TMMOB Şehir Plancilari Odasi-I˙stanbul Şubesi 3. Köprü Projesi Değerlendirme Raporu 2012, I˙stanbul. Available at. http://www.spoist.org/dokuman/Raporlarimiz/spoist_3.koprurapor.pdf.
57. Torres A., Palacín C., Seoane J., Alonso J.C. Assessing the effects of a highway on a threatened species using before-during-after and before-during-after-control-impact designs. Biological Conservation 2011, 144:2223-2232.
58. TURKSAT (TÜI˙K) Tarim ve Hayvancilik Veri Tabani 2011, Ankara. Available at. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.
59. TURKSAT (TÜI˙K) Nüfus, Demografik, I˙ş gücü, Gelir Analizleri 2012, Ankara. Available at. http://www.turkstat.gov.tr.
60. UN Convention to combat desertification in countries experiencing serious drought and/or desertification, particularly in Africa 1994.
61. UN Spatial planning, key instrument for development and effective governance with special reference to countries in transition 2008, Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva.
62. UN Habitat Planning for climate change, a strategic, values-based approach for urban planners 2011.
63. UNCSD Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies 2007, UN Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
64. UNDP & Çevre ve Orman Bakanliği Türkiye I˙klim Değişikliği Birinci Ulusal Bildirimi 2007, Çevre ve Orman Bakanliği, Ankara.
65. Xia F., Hea H.S., Hua Y., Bua R., Changa Y., Wud X., et al. Simulating the impacts of ecological protection policies on urban land use sustainability in Shenyang-Fushun, China. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 2009, 1(1-2):111-127.
66. Zhang Q., Ban Y., Liu J., Hu Y. Simulation and analysis of urban growth scenarios for the Greater Shanghai Area, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2011, 35:126-139.
67. Zhao C., Fu G., Liu X., Fu F. Urban planning indicators, morphology and climate indicators: a case study for a north-south transect of Beijing, China. Building and Environment 2011, 46:1174-1183.