An effective chemical pretreatment method for lignocellulosic biomass with substituted imidazoles

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 25-34

  Kang, Yuzhi ^a   Realff, Matthew J ^a   Sohn, Minjeong ^a,b   Lee, Jay H ^a,b   Bommarius, Andreas S ^a,c  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

1 methylimidazole; Accessibility; Biomass; Lignin dissolution; Pretreatment

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CELLULOSE; DISSOLUTION; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; SUBSTRATES; TEMPERATURE; TRANSPORTATION;

1-METHYLIMIDAZOLE; ACCESSIBILITY; DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATION; IMIDAZOLIUM-BASED IONIC LIQUID; IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT; LIGNOCELLULOSIC SUBSTRATES; PRE-TREATMENT; RENEWABLE ORGANIC RESOURCES;

IONIC LIQUIDS;

PANICUM VIRGATUM; PINUS TAEDA;

1-METHYLIMIDAZOLE; BIOFUEL; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; LIGNIN;

BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HYDROLYSIS; LOBLOLLY PINE; PROCEDURES; SUGARCANE;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; HYDROLYSIS; IMIDAZOLES; LIGNIN; PINUS TAEDA; SACCHARUM;

EID: 84923297647     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Rinaldi R, Schuth F. Acid hydrolysis of cellulose as the entry point into biorefinery schemes. Chemsuschem. 2009;2:1096-1107.
2. Galbe M, Zacchi G. Pretreatment: the key to efficient utilization of lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;46:70-78.
3. Pinkert A, Goeke DF, Marsh KN, Pang SS. Extracting wood lignin without dissolving or degrading cellulose: investigations on the use of food additive-derived ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2011;13:3124-3136.
4. Kang YZ, Bansal P, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. SO2-catalyzed steam explosion: the effects of different severity on digestibility, accessibility, and crystallinity of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Progr. 2013;29:909-916.
5. Luterbacher JS, Rand JM, Alonso DM, Han J, Youngquist JT, Maravelias CT, Pfleger BF, Dumesic JA. Nonenzymatic sugar production from biomass using biomass-derived gamma-valerolactone. Science. 2014;343 (6168):277-280.
6. da Costa Lopes A, Morais KJR, Bogel-Lukasik E, Bogel-Lukasik R. Ionic liquids as a tool for lignocellulosic biomass fractionation. Sustain Chem Process. 2013;1:3:1-31.
7. Sun L, Li CL, Xue ZJ, Simmons BA, Singh S. Unveiling high-resolution, tissue specific dynamic changes in corn stover during ionic liquid pretreatment. Rsc Adv. 2013;3:2017-2027.
8. Singh S, Simmons BA, Vogel KP. Visualization of biomass solubilization and cellulose regeneration during ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104:68-75.
9. George A, Tran K, Morgan TJ, Benke PI, Berrueco C, Lorente E, Wu BC, Keasling JD, Simmons BA, Holmes BM. The effect of ionic liquid cation and anion combinations on the macromolecular structure of lignins. Green Chem. 2011;13:3375-3385.
10. Brandt A, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Murphy RJ, Welton T. The effect of the ionic liquid anion in the pretreatment of pine wood chips. Green Chem. 2010;12:672-679.
11. Zhang SJ, Sun N, He XZ, Lu XM, Zhang XP. Physical properties of ionic liquids: database and evaluation. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 2006;35:1475-1517.
12. Lu B, Xu A, Wang J. Cation does matter: how cationic structure affects the dissolution of cellulose in ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2014.
13. Kilpelainen I, Xie H, King A, Granstrom M, Heikkinen S, Argyropoulos DS. Dissolution of wood in ionic liquids. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:9142-9148.
14. Janesko BG. Modeling interactions between lignocellulose and ionic liquids using DFT-D. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:11393-11401.
15. Verdía P, Brandt A, Hallett JP, Ray MJ, Welton T. Fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass with the ionic liquid 1-butylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate. Green Chem. 2014;16:1617-1627.
16. Lu FC, Ralph J. Non-degradative dissolution and acetylation of ball-milled plant cell walls: high-resolution solution-state NMR. Plant J. 2003;35:535-544.
17. Connors KA, Pandit NK. N-methylimidazole as a catalyst for analytical acetylations of hydroxy compounds. Anal Chem. 1978;50:1542-1545.
18. Fox SC, McDonald AG. Chemical and Thermal characterization of three industrial lignins and their corresponding lignin esters. Bioresources. 2010;5:990-1009.
19. Bommarius AS, Katona A, Cheben SE, Patel AS, Ragauskas AJ, Knudson K, Pu Y. Cellulase kinetics as a function of cellulose pretreatment. Metab Eng. 2008;10:370-381.
20. Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. Determination of the number-average degree of polymerization of cellodextrins and cellulose with application to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules. 2005;6:1510-1515.
21. Bansal P, Vowell BJ, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH. Elucidation of cellulose accessibility, hydrolysability and reactivity as the major limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresource Technol. 2012;107:243-250.
22. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS. Multivariate statistical analysis of X-ray data from cellulose: a new method to determine degree of crystallinity and predict hydrolysis rates. Bioresource Technol. 2010;101:4461-4471.
23. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. Cellulose crystallinity: a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J. 2010;277:1571-1582.
24. Liu LY, Chen HZ. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials treated with ionic liquid [BMIM]Cl. Chinese Sci Bull. 2006;51:2432-2436.
25. Kumar D, Murthy GS. Stochastic molecular model of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for ethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6.
26. Arantes V, Saddler JN. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3:4.
27. Yang B, Dai Z, Ding S, Wyman CE. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Biofuels. 2011;2:421-450.
28. Lee SH, Teramoto Y, Endo T. Enzymatic saccharification of woody biomass micro/nanofibrillated by continuous extrusion process I: effect of additives with cellulose affinity. Bioresource Technol. 2009;100: 275-279.
29. Hong J, Ye XH, Zhang YH. Quantitative determination of cellulose accessibility to cellulase based on adsorption of a nonhydrolytic fusion protein containing CBM and GFP with its applications. Langmuir. 2007;23:12535-12540.
30. Rollin JA, Zhu ZG, Sathitsuksanoh N, Zhang YH. Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:22-30.
31. Gourlay K, Arantes V, Saddler JN. Use of substructure-specific carbohydrate binding modules to track changes in cellulose accessibility and surface morphology during the amorphogenesis step of enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5.
32. Carta G, Jungbauer A. Protein Chromatography: Process Development and Scale-up. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2010.
33. Claus I, Kordsachia O, Schröder N, Karstens T. Monoethanolamine (MEA) pulping of beech and spruce wood for production of dissolving pulp. Holzforschung. 2004;58:573-580.
34. Zheng YF, Zhang SP, Miao SD, Su ZG, Wang P. Temperature sensitivity of cellulase adsorption on lignin and its impact on enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. J Biotechnol. 2013;166:135-143.