Erratum: Self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA origami lattices using cation-controlled surface diffusion (Nature Communications (2014) 5 (4889) DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5889);Self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA origami lattices using cation-controlled surface diffusion

Nature Communications

Volumn 5, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Woo, Sungwook ^a,c   Rothemund, Paul W K ^a,b  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATION; DIVALENT CATION; DNA; NANOMATERIAL; ALUMINUM SILICATE; MAGNESIUM; MICA; SODIUM;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DIFFUSION; DNA; ION EXCHANGE; MICA; NANOTECHNOLOGY;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION; DNA BINDING; NANODEVICE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CONFORMATION; METABOLISM;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; CATIONS; DIFFUSION; DNA; MAGNESIUM; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; SODIUM;

EID: 84923290815     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6610     Document Type: Erratum

References (47)

1. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297-302 (2006).
2. Wei, B., Dai, M. & Yin, P. Complex shapes self-assembled from single-stranded DNA tiles. Nature 485, 623-626 (2012).
3. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414-418 (2009).
4. Dietz, H., Douglas, S. M. & Shih, W. M. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science 325, 725-730 (2009).
5. Ke, Y., Ong, L. L., Shih, W. M. & Yin, P. Three-dimensional structures self-assembled from DNA bricks. Science 338, 1177-1183 (2012).
6. Han, D. et al. DNA origami with complex curvatures in three-dimensional space. Science 332, 342-346 (2011).
7. Ke, Y., Lindsay, S., Chang, Y., Liu, Y. & Yan, H. Self-assembled water-soluble nucleic acid probe tiles for label-free RNA hybridization assays. Science 319, 180-183 (2008).
8. Douglas, S. M., Bachelet, I. & Church, G. M. A logic-gated nanorobot for targeted transport of molecular payloads. Science 335, 831-834 (2012).
9. Derr, N. D. et al. Tug-of-war in motor protein ensembles revealed with a programmable DNA origami scaffold. Science 338, 662-665 (2012).
10. Maune, H. T. et al. Self-assembly of carbon nanotubes into two-dimensional geometries using DNA origami templates. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 61-66 (2010).
11. Bui, H. et al. Programmable periodicity of quantum dot arrays with DNA origami nanotubes. Nano Lett. 10, 3367-3372 (2010).
12. Ding, B. et al. Gold nanoparticle self-similar chain structure organized by DNA origami. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3248-3249 (2010).
13. Voigt, N. V. et al. Single-molecule chemical reactions on DNA origami. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 200-203 (2010).
14. Lund, K. et al. Molecular robots guided by prescriptive landscapes. Nature 465, 206-210 (2010).
15. Gu, H., Chao, J., Xiao, S.-J. & Seeman, N. C. A proximity-based programmable DNA nanoscale assembly line. Nature 465, 202-205 (2010).
16. Wickham, S. F. J. et al. Direct observation of stepwise movement of a synthetic molecular transporter. Nat. Nanotech. 6, 166-169 (2011).
17. Holloway, C. et al. An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: the two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. Antennas and Propagation Magazine, IEEE 54, 10-35 (2012).
18. 2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11868-11871 (2011).
19. Jin, Z. et al. Metallized DNA nanolithography for encoding and transferring spatial information for graphene patterning. Nat. Commun. 4, 1663 (2013).
20. Rajendran, A., Endo, M. & Sugiyama, H. Single-molecule analysis using DNA origami. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 874-890 (2012).
21. Kershner, R. J. et al. Placement and orientation of individual DNA shapes on lithographically patterned surfaces. Nat. Nanotech. 4, 557-561 (2009).
22. Hung, A. M. et al. Large-area spatially ordered arrays of gold nanoparticles directed by lithographically confined DNA origami. Nat. Nanotech. 5, 121-126 (2010).
23. Penzo, E., Wang, R., Palma, M. & Wind, S. J. Selective placement of DNA origami on substrates patterned by nanoimprint lithography. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 29, 06F205 (2011).
24. Li, Z. et al. Molecular behaviour of DNA origami in higher-order self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13545-13552 (2010).
25. Liu, W., Zhong, H., Wang, R. & Seeman, N. C. Crystalline two-dimensional DNA-origami arrays. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 264-267 (2011).
26. Sun, X., Ko, S. H., Zhang, C., Ribbe, A. E. & Mao, C. Surface-mediated DNA self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 13248-13249 (2009).
27. Hamada, S. & Murata, S. Substrate-assisted assembly of interconnected single-duplex DNA nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6820-6823 (2009).
28. Lee, J. et al. Coverage control of DNA crystals grown by silica assistance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 9145-9149 (2011).
29. Hansma, H. G. & Laney, D. E. DNA binding to mica correlates with cationic radius: assay by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 70, 1933-1939 (1996).
30. Winfree, E., Liu, F., Wenzler, L. A. & Seeman, N. C. Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals. Nature 394, 539-544 (1998).
31. Pastré, D. et al. Adsorption of DNA to mica mediated by divalent counterions: a theoretical and experimental study. Biophys. J. 85, 2507-2518 (2003).
32. Pastré, D. et al. Anionic polyelectrolyte adsorption on mica mediated by multivalent cations: a solution to DNA imaging by atomic force microscopy under high ionic strengths. Langmuir 22, 6651-6660 (2006).
33. Woo, S. & Rothemund, P. W. K. Programmable molecular recognition based on the geometry of DNA nanostructures. Nat. Chem. 3, 620-627 (2011).
34. Thomson, N. H., Kasas, S., Smith, B. L., Hansma, H. G. & Hansma, P. K. Reversible binding of DNA to mica for AFM imaging. Langmuir 12, 5905-5908 (1996).
35. 2-treated mica by varying the ionic strength. Langmuir 19, 2536-2539 (2003).
36. Bezanilla, M., Manne, S., Laney, D. E., Lyubchenko, Y. L. & Hansma, H. G. Adsorption of DNA to mica, silylated mica, and minerals: characterization by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 11, 655-659 (1995).
37. Bezanilla, M. et al. Motion and enzymatic degradation of DNA in the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 67, 2454-2459 (1994).
38. Martin, T. G. & Dietz, H. Magnesium-free self-assembly of multi-layer DNA objects. Nat. Commun. 3, 1103 (2012).
39. Shao, Z., Mou, J., Czajkowsky, D. M., Yang, J. & Yuan, J.-Y. Biological atomic force microscopy: what is achieved and what is needed. Adv. Phys. 45, 1-86 (1996).
40. Pastré, D., Piétrement, O., Zozime, A. & Cam, E. L. Study of the DNA/ethidium bromide interactions on mica surface by atomic force microscope: influence of the surface friction. Biopolymers 77, 53-62 (2005).
41. Rouzina, I. & Bloomfield, V. A. Competitive electrostatic binding of charged ligands to polyelectrolytes: planar and cylindrical geometries. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 4292-4304 (1996).
42. Rouzina, I. & Bloomfield, V. A. Influence of ligand spatial organization on competitive electrostatic binding to DNA. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 4305-4313 (1996).
43. Jahns, R. H. & Lancaster, F. W. in Geological Survey Professional Paper, Vol. 225, 4-27 (United States Government Printing Office, 1950).
44. Güven, N. & Burnham, C. W. The crystal structure of 3T muscovite. Z. Kristallogr. 125, 163-183 (1967).
45. Bailey, S. W. Review of cation ordering in micas. Clays Clay Miner. 32, 81-92 (1984).
46. 1. Am. Mineral. 83, 775-785 (1998).
47. Jeong, S.-J., Kim, J. Y., Kim, B. H., Moon, H.-S. & Kim, S. O. Directed self-assembly of block copolymers for next generation nanolithography. Mater. Today 16, 468-476 (2013).