MR and applanation tonometry derived aortic impedance: Association with aging and left ventricular remodeling

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 781-787

  Bargiotas, Ioannis ^a,b   Bollache, Emilie ^a,b   Mousseaux, Elie ^c,d   Giron, Alain ^a,b   De Cesare, Alain ^a,b   Redheuil, Alban ^a,b,e,f   Kachenoura, Nadjia ^a,b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UPMC Univ Paris 06   (France)

^c PARIS CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^d HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^e PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^f IHU ICAN   (France)

Author keywords

Aortic impedance; Left ventricular remodeling; Magnetic resonance imaging; Reflections

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; AORTA FLOW; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY PULSE; FEMALE; HEART AFTERLOAD; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE REMODELING; HEART VENTRICLE REMODELING; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE WAVE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TONOMETRY; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; VELOCITY; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; HEART VENTRICLE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; AORTA; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMALE; HEART VENTRICLES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; VENTRICULAR REMODELING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84923168478     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24620     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Mitchell GF. Arterial stiffness and wave reflection: biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. Artery Res 2009;3:56-64.
2. Chae C, Glynn R, Mitchell G, Taylor J, Hennekens C, Pfeffer MA. Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly. JAMA 1999;281:634-643.
3. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55: 1318-1327.
4. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertens 2001;37:1236-1241.
5. Meaume S, Benetos A, Henry OF, Rudnichi A, Safar ME. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular mortality in subjects >70 years of age. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001;21:2046-2050.
6. Chirinos JA. Ventricular-arterial coupling: invasive and noninvasive assessment. Artery Res 2013;7:2-14.
7. Merillon JP, Fontenier GJ, Lerallut JF, et al. Aortic input impedance in normal man and arterial hypertension: its modification during changes in aortic pressure. Cardiovasc Res 1982;16:646-656.
8. Kobayashi S, Yano M, Kohno M, et al. Influence of aortic impedance on the development of pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy in rats. Circulation 1996;94:3362-3368.
9. Pepine CJ, Nichols WW, Conti CR. Aortic input impedance in heart failure. Circulation 1978;58:460-465.
10. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 1980;62:105-116.
11. Solomon S, Katz SD, Stevenson-Smith W, Yellin EL, LeJemtel TH. Determination of vascular impedance in the peripheral circulation by transcutaneous pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Chest 1995; 108:515-521.
12. Reddy AK, Li Y-H, Pham TT, et al. Measurement of aortic input impedance in mice: effects of age on aortic stiffness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H1464-H1470.
13. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Effects of exercise on aortic input impedance and pressure wave forms in normal humans. Circ Res 1981;48:334-343.
14. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, et al. Effects of age on ventricular-vascular coupling. Am J Cardiol 1985;55:1179-1184.
15. Segers P, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, et al. Noninvasive (input) impedance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection in healthy middle-aged men and women. Hypertension 2007;49:1248-1255.
16. Mitchell GF, Lacourciere Y, Ouellet J-P, et al. Determinants of elevated pulse pressure in middle-aged and older subjects with uncomplicated systolic hypertension. Circulation 2003;108: 1592-1598.
17. Mazzaro L, Almasi SJ, Shandas R, Seals DR, Gates PE. Aortic Input Impedance Increases With Age in Healthy Men and Women. Hypertension 2005;45:1101-1106.
18. Swillens A, Segers P. Assessment of arterial pressure wave reflection: methodological considerations. Artery Res 2008;2:122-131.
19. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Hear J 2006;27:2588-2605.
20. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus Panel report. Eur Hear J 2004;25:1940-1965.
21. Herment A, Kachenoura N, Lefort M, et al. Automated segmentation of the aorta from phase contrast MR images: validation against expert tracing in healthy volunteers and in patients with a dilated aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:881-888.
22. Dogui A, Kachenoura N, Frouin F, et al. Consistency of aortic distensibility and pulse wave velocity estimates with respect to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:11.
23. Redheuil A, Yu W-C, Wu CO, et al. Reduced ascending aortic strain and distensibility: earliest manifestations of vascular aging in humans. Hypertension 2010;55:319-326.
24. Redheuil A, Yu W-C, Mousseaux E, et al. Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1262-1270.
25. Herment A, Lefort M, Kachenoura N, et al. Automated estimation of aortic strain from steady-state free-precession and phase contrast MR images. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:986-993.
26. Hope TA, Markl M, Wigstrom L, Alley MT, Miller DC, Herfkens RJ. Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1471-1479.
27. Grotenhuis HB, Westenberg JJM, Doornbos J, et al. Aortic root dysfunctioning and its effect on left ventricular function in Ross procedure patients assessed with magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2006;152:975.e1-975.e8.
28. Cheng S, Fernandes VRS, Bluemke DA, McClelland RL, Kronmal RA, Lima JAC. Age-related left ventricular remodeling and associated risk for cardiovascular outcomes / Clinical Perspective. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:191-198.
29. Van Bortel LM, Balkestein EJ, van der Heijden-Spek JJ, et al. Non-invasive assessment of local arterial pulse pressure: comparison of applanation tonometry and echo-tracking. J Hypertens 2001;19:1037-1044.
30. Kelly R, Fitchett D. Noninvasive determination of aortic input impedance and external left ventricular power output: a validation and repeatability study of a new technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:952-963.
31. Dujardin J-P, Stone D. Characteristic impedance of the proximal aorta determined in the time and frequency domain: a comparison. Med Biol Eng Comput 1981;19:565-568.
32. Mohiaddin RH, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Age-related changes of human aortic flow wave velocity measured noninvasively by magnetic resonance imaging. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:492-497.
33. Hirata K, Yaginuma T, O'Rourke MF, Kawakami M. Age-related changes in carotid artery flow and pressure pulses: possible implications for cerebral microvascular disease. Stroke 2006;37: 2552-2556.
34. O'Rourke MF, Nichols WW. Aortic diameter, aortic stiffness, and wave reflection increase with age and isolated systolic hypertension. Hypertension 2005;45:652-658.
35. Mitchell GF, Pfeffer MA, Westerhof N, Pfeffer JM. Measurement of aortic input impedance in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1994;267:H1907-H1915.
36. McEniery CM, Yasmin, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1753-1760.
37. Lee H-Y, Oh B-H. Aging and arterial stiffness. Circ J 2010;74: 2257-2262.
38. Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Flint L, Cockcroft JR, Newby DE, Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure in humans. J Physiol 2000;525:263-270.
39. Chen C-H, Ting C-T, Lin S-J, et al. Which arterial and cardiac parameters best predict left ventricular mass? Circulation 1998; 98:422-428.
40. Chirinos JA, Segers P, Raina A, et al. Arterial pulsatile hemodynamic load induced by isometric exercise strongly predicts left ventricular mass in hypertension. 2010;298:H320-H330.