Advancing surgical simulation in gynecologic oncology: Robotic dissection of a novel pelvic lymphadenectomy model

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 38-42

  Kiely, Daniel J ^a,c   Gotlieb, Walter H ^a   Jardon, Kris ^b   Lau, Susie ^e   Press, Joshua Z ^d  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d Division of Oncology and Pelvic Surgery Pacific Gynecology Specialists   (United States)

^e NONE

Author keywords

Anatomic models; Graduate medical education; Gynecology; Lymph node excision; Operative surgical procedures; Patient simulation

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; PROCEDURES; ROBOTICS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MANIKINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84923147821     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000054     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 2013;6:216-24.
2. Bowring J, Shepherd JH, Ind TE. Assessment of an in vitro model for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. BJOG 2007;114:964-969.
3. Hung AJ, Jayaratna IS, Teruya K, et al. Comparative assessment of three standardized robotic surgery training methods. BJU Int 2013;112:864-871.
4. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, et al. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room - a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 2010;199:115-120.
5. Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, et al. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 2013;81:767-774.
6. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004;91:146-150.
7. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Development and validation of a comprehensive curriculum to teach an advanced minimally invasive procedure: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2012;256:25-32.
8. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978-988.
9. Finan MA, Clark ME, Rocconi RP. A novel method for training residents in robotic hysterectomy. J Robotic Surg 2010;4:33-39.
10. Finan MA, Silver S, Otts E, Rocconi RP. A comprehensive method to train residents in robotic hysterectomy techniques. J Robotic Surg 2010;4:183-190.
11. Hoffman MS. Simulation of robotic hysterectomy utilizing the porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:523.e1-523.e2.
12. Hoffman MS, Ondrovic LE, Wenham RM, et al. Evaluation of the porcine model to teach various ancillary procedures to gynecologic oncology fellows. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:116.e1-116.e3.
13. Hammond I, Taylor J, McMenamin P. Anatomy of complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve performance in obstetricians and gynaecologists. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;43:111-114.
14. Hammond I, Taylor J, Obermair A, et al. The anatomy of complications workshop: an educational strategy to improve the training and performance of fellows in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2004;94:769-773.
15. Goff BA. Surgical education for gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:S45-S6.
16. Barrier BF, Thompson AB, McCullough MW, et al. A novel and inexpensive vaginal hysterectomy simulator. Simul Healthc 2012;7:374-379.
17. Marecik SJ, Prasad LM, Park JJ, et al. A lifelike patient simulator for teaching robotic colorectal surgery: how to acquire skills for robotic rectal dissection. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1876-1881.
18. Botden SM, Goossens R, Jakimowicz JJ. Developing a realistic model for the training of the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Simul Healthc 2010;5:173-178.
19. Hong A, Mullin PM, Al-Marayati L, et al. A low-fidelity total abdominal hysterectomy teaching model for obstetrics and gynecology residents. Simul Healthc 2012;7:123-126.
20. Kurashima Y, Feldman L, Al-Sabah S, et al. A novel low-cost simulator for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Innov 2011;18:171-175.
21. Siddighi S, Kleeman SD, Baggish MS, et al. Effects of an educational workshop on performance of fourth-degree perineal laceration repair. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:289-294.
22. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, McDougall EM. Simulating laparoscopic renal hilar vessel injuries: preliminary evaluation of a novel surgical training model for residents. J Endourol 2012;26:393-397.
23. Levine RL, Kives S, Cathey G, et al. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:451-456.
24. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG. Effectiveness of laparoscopic cadaveric dissection in enhancing resident comprehension of pelvic anatomy. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:492-497.
25. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, Macrae H, et al. Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006;244:400-409.
26. Schaverien MV. Development of expertise in surgical training. J Surg Educ 2010;67:37-43.
27. Anders Ericsson K, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993;100:363-406.
28. Jones N. Science in three dimensions: the print revolution. Nature 2012;487:22-23.
29. Lantada AD, Morgado PL. Rapid prototyping for biomedical engineering: current capabilities and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2012;14:73-96.
30. Abboud M, Orentlicher G. Computer-aided manufacturing in medicine. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012;20:19-36.
31. Miller SF, Sanz-Guerrero J, Dodde RE, et al. A pulsatile blood vessel system for a femoral arterial access clinical simulation model. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:1518-1524.
32. Fann JI, Caffarelli AD, Georgette G, et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:1486-1491.
33. Intuitive Surgical®. The da Vinci Surigcal System Web site. Patient side cart. Available at: http://www.intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci-surgical-system/. Accessed March 15, 2014.