Reliability of cone counts using an adaptive optics retinal camera

Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 833-840

  Bidaut Garnier, Mélanie ^a   Flores, Mathieu ^a   Debellemanière, Guillaume ^a   Puyraveau, Marc ^a   Tumahai, Perle ^a   Meillat, Mathieu ^a   Schwartz, Claire ^a   Montard, Michel ^a   Delbosc, Bernard ^a   Saleh, Maher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF BESANÇON   (France)

Author keywords

Cell count; Healthy volunteers; Optical imaging; Reproducibility of results; Retinal cone photoreceptor cells

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAMERA; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; PHOTORECEPTOR CELL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETINA CONE; ADULT; CELL COUNT; CYTOLOGY; DEVICES; FEMALE; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CELL COUNT; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OPTICAL IMAGING; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINAL CONE PHOTORECEPTOR CELLS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84923145633     PISSN: 14426404     EISSN: 14429071     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ceo.12356     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Liang J, Williams DR, Miller DT. Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1997; 14: 2884-2892.
2. Chui TYP, Song H, Burns SA. Adaptive-optics imaging of human cone photoreceptor distribution. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2008; 25: 3021-3029.
3. Li KY, Tiruveedhula P, Roorda A. Intersubject variability of foveal cone photoreceptor density in relation to eye length. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 6858-6867.
4. Lombardo M, Serrao S, Ducoli P, Lombardo G. Variations in image optical quality of the eye and the sampling limit of resolution of the cone mosaic with axial length in young adults. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1147-1155.
5. Lombardo M, Lombardo G, Schiano LD, Ducoli P, Stirpe M, Serrao S. Interocular symmetry of parafoveal photoreceptor cone density distribution. Retina 2013; 33: 1640-1649.
6. Lombardo M, Serrao S, Ducoli P, Lombardo G. Eccentricity dependent changes of density, spacing and packing arrangement of parafoveal cones. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2013; 33: 516-526.
7. Park SP, Chung JK, Greenstein V, Tsang SH, Chang S. A study of factors affecting the human cone photoreceptor density measured by adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Exp Eye Res 2012; 108: 1-9.
8. Lombardo M, Scarinci F, Ripandelli G etal. Adaptive optics imaging of idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 1508-1509.
9. Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K etal. High-resolution imaging of the photoreceptor layer in epiretinal membrane using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 873-881.
10. Ooto S, Hangai M, Takayama K, Ueda-Arakawa N, Hanebuchi M, Yoshimura N. Photoreceptor damage and foveal sensitivity in surgically closed macular holes: an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 154: 174-186.
11. Yokota S, Ooto S, Hangai M etal. Objective assessment of foveal cone loss ratio in surgically closed macular holes using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e63786.
12. Gocho-Nakashima K, Benchaboune M, Ullern M etal. Adaptive optics imaging in age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2011; 89: 0. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.4111.x
13. Gocho K, Sarda V, Falah S etal. Adaptive optics imaging of geographic atrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 3673-3680.
14. Zayit-Soudry S, Duncan JL, Syed R, Menghini M, Roorda AJ. Cone structure imaged with adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in eyes with nonneovascular age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 7498-7509.
15. Koozekanani D, Roberts C, Katz SE, Herderick EE. Intersession repeatability of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey 2000 OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1486-1491.
16. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 1791-1795.
17. Muscat S, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of macular thickness measurements with the Humphrey OCT system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 490-495.
18. Polito A, Del Borrello M, Isola M, Zemella N, Bandello F. Repeatability and reproducibility of fast macular thickness mapping with stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123: 1330-1337.
19. Garcia-Martin E, Pinilla I, Idoipe M, Fuertes I, Pueyo V. Intra and interoperator reproducibility of retinal nerve fibre and macular thickness measurements using Cirrus Fourier-domain OCT. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 2011; 89: e23-29.
20. Rahman W, Chen FK, Yeoh J, Patel P, Tufail A, Da Cruz L. Repeatability of manual subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using the technique of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2267-2271.
21. Savini G, Carbonelli M, Parisi V, Barboni P. Repeatability of optic nerve head parameters measured by spectral-domain OCT in healthy eyes. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011; 42: 209-215.
22. Yamashita T, Yamashita T, Shirasawa M, Arimura N, Terasaki H, Sakamoto T. Repeatability and reproducibility of subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal eyes of Japanese using different SD-OCT devices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 1102-1107.
23. Talcott KE, Ratnam K, Sundquist SM etal. Longitudinal study of cone photoreceptors during retinal degeneration and in response to ciliary neurotrophic factor treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 2219-2226.
24. Song H, Chui TYP, Zhong Z, Elsner AE, Burns SA. Variation of cone photoreceptor packing density with retinal eccentricity and age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7376-7384.
25. Garrioch R, Langlo C, Dubis AM, Cooper RF, Dubra A, Carroll J. Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements. Optom Vis Sci 2012; 89: 632-643.
26. Zitova B, Flusser J. Image registration methods: a survey. Image Vis Comput 2003; 21: 977-1000.
27. Kulcsar C, Le Besnerais G, Ödlund E, Levecq X. Robust Processing of Image Sequences Produced by an Adaptive Optics Retinal Camera. Arlington, TX: OSA, 2013.
28. Kuan DT, Sawchuk AA, Strand TC, Chavel P. Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1985; 7: 165-177.
29. Lindeberg T. Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Boston/London/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
30. De Berg M, Van Kreveld M, Overmars M, Schwarzkopf OC. Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, 2nd revised edn. Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer, 2000.
31. Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. Human photoreceptor topography. J Comp Neurol 1990; 292: 497-523.
32. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: measurement error. BMJ 1996; 312: 1654.
33. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error proportional to the mean. BMJ 1996; 313: 106.
34. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ 1996; 313: 41-42.
35. Curcio CA, Sloan KR. Packing geometry of human cone photoreceptors: variation with eccentricity and evidence for local anisotropy. Vis Neurosci 1992; 9: 169-180.
36. Lombardo M, Serrao S, Ducoli P, Lombardo G. Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density. Biomed Opt Express 2013; 4: 1318-1331.