Susceptibility tensor imaging of the kidney and its microstructural underpinnings

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 1270-1281

  Xie, Luke ^a,b   Dibb, Russell ^a,b   Cofer, Gary P ^a   Li, Wei ^a   Nicholls, Peter J ^a   Johnson, G Allan ^a,b   Liu, Chunlei ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); Gradient multi echo (GRME); Magnetic resonance imaging; Mouse nephron tubule; Quantitative susceptibility mapping; Susceptibility tensor imaging (STI); Tractography

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TENSORS;

CONTRAST MECHANISM; DIFFUSION ANISOTROPY; ISOTROPIC RESOLUTION; MOUSE NEPHRON TUBULE; SUSCEPTIBILITY ANISOTROPY; SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING; SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSORS; TRACTOGRAPHY;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IMAGING; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY MEDULLA; KIDNEY TUBULE; MAGNETISM; MOUSE; NEPHRON; NONHUMAN; SUSCEPTIBILITY TENSOR IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRACTOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CYTOLOGY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IN VITRO STUDY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; KIDNEY TUBULES; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84923136465     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25219     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Beeman SC, Zhang M, Gubhaju L, et al. Measuring glomerular number and size in perfused kidneys using MRI. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2011;300:F1454-1457.
2. Johnson GA, Cofer GP, Gewalt SL, Hedlund LW. Morphologic phenotyping with magnetic resonance microscopy: the visible mouse. Radiology 2002;222:789-793.
3. Maronpot RR, Sills RC, Johnson GA. Applications of magnetic resonance microscopy. Toxicol Pathol 2004;32 Suppl 2:42-248.
4. Nordsletten DA, Blackett S, Bentley MD, Ritman EL, Smith NP. Structural morphology of renal vasculature. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006;291:H296-309.
5. Ortiz MC, Garcia-Sanz A, Bentley MD, et al. Microcomputed tomography of kidneys following chronic bile duct ligation. Kidney Int 2000; 58:1632-1640.
6. Xie L, Cianciolo RE, Hulette B, Lee HW, Qi Y, Cofer G, Johnson GA. Magnetic resonance histology of age-related nephropathy in the Sprague Dawley rat. Toxicol Pathol 2012;40:764-778.
7. Gaudiano C, Clementi V, Busato F, et al. Renal diffusion tensor imaging: is it possible to define the tubular pathway? A case report. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:1030-1033.
8. Gurses B, Kilickesmez O, Tasdelen N, Firat Z, Gurmen N. Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney at 3 Tesla MRI: normative values and repeatability of measurements in healthy volunteers. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011;17:317-322.
9. Kataoka M, Kido A, Yamamoto A, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of kidneys with respiratory triggering: optimization of parameters to demonstrate anisotropic structures on fraction anisotropy maps. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:736-744.
10. Lanzman RS, Ljimani A, Pentang G, et al. Kidney transplant: functional assessment with diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 3T. Radiology 2013;266:218-225.
11. Notohamiprodjo M, Glaser C, Herrmann KA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney with parallel imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 2008;43:677-685.
12. Ries M, Jones RA, Basseau F, Moonen CT, Grenier N. Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:42-49.
13. Cheung JS, Fan SJ, Chow AM, Zhang J, Man K, Wu EX. Diffusion tensor imaging of renal ischemia reperfusion injury in an experimental model. NMR Biomed 2010;23:496-502.
14. Hueper K, Hartung D, Gutberlet M, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging for evaluation of histopathological changes in a rat model of diabetic nephropathy. Invest Radiol 2012;47:430-437.
15. Lu L, Erokwu B, Lee G, et al. Diffusion-prepared fast imaging with steady-state free precession (DP-FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:868-873.
16. Yang D, Ye Q, Williams DS, Hitchens TK, Ho C. Normal and transplanted rat kidneys: diffusion MR imaging at 7 T. Radiology 2004; 231:702-709.
17. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:1471-1477.
18. Liu C, Li W, Wu B, Jiang Y, Johnson GA. 3D fiber tractography with susceptibility tensor imaging. NeuroImage 2012;59:1290-1298.
19. Li W, Wu B, Avram AV, Liu C. Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy of human brain in vivo and its molecular underpinnings. NeuroImage 2012;59:2088-2097.
20. Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage 2011;55:1645-1656.
21. Marques JP, Maddage R, Mlynarik V, Gruetter R. On the origin of the MR image phase contrast: an in vivo MR microscopy study of the rat brain at 14.1 T. Neuroimage 2009;46:345-352.
22. Lee J, Shmueli K, Fukunaga M, et al. Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107:5130-5135.
23. Liu C, Li W, Johnson GA, Wu B. High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. Neuroimage 2011;56:930-938.
24. Lee J, Shmueli K, Kang BT, et al. The contribution of myelin to magnetic susceptibility-weighted contrasts in high-field MRI of the brain. Neuroimage 2012;59:3967-3975.
25. Lodygensky GA, Marques JP, Maddage R, et al. In vivo assessment of myelination by phase imaging at high magnetic field. Neuroimage 2012;59:1979-1987.
26. He X, Yablonskiy DA. Biophysical mechanisms of phase contrast in gradient echo MRI. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009;106:13558-13563.
27. Duyn J. MR susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson 2013;229:198-207.
28. Johnson GA, Cofer GP, Fubara B, Gewalt SL, Hedlund LW, Maronpot RR. Magnetic resonance histology for morphologic phenotyping. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:423-429.
29. Johnson GA, Benveniste H, Black RD, Hedlund LW, Maronpot RR, Smith BR. Histology by magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn Reson Q 1993;9:1-30.
30. Jiang Y, Johnson GA. Microscopic diffusion tensor imaging of the mouse brain. Neuroimage 2010;50:465-471.
31. Wu B, Li W, Avram AV, Gho SM, Liu C. Fast and tissue-optimized mapping of magnetic susceptibility and T2∗ with multi-echo and multi-shot spirals. Neuroimage 2012;59:297-305.
32. Wharton S, Bowtell R. Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012;109:18559-18564.
33. Ali Sharief A, Johnson GA. Enhanced T2 contrast for MR histology of the mouse brain. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:717-725.
34. Schofield MA, Zhu Y. Fast phase unwrapping algorithm for interferometric applications. Opt Lett 2003;28:1194-1196.
35. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011;54:2789-2807.
36. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:137-147.
37. Salomir R, De Senneville BD, Moonen CTW. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concept Magn Reson B 2003;19B:26-34.
38. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209-219.
39. Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C, Duda J, Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:625-632.
40. Xie L, Sparks MA, Li W, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of kidney inflammation and fibrosis in type 1 angiotensin receptor-deficient mice. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1853-1863.
41. Hama H, Kurokawa H, Kawano H, et al. Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 2011;14:1481-1488.
42. Kriz W, Bankir L. A standard nomenclature for structures of the kidney. The Renal Commission of the International Union of Physiological Sciences (IUPS). Kidney Int 1988;33:1-7.
43. Kriz W, Koepsell H. The structural organization of the mouse kidney. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 1974;144:137-163.
44. Zhai XY, Thomsen JS, Birn H, Kristoffersen IB, Andreasen A, Christensen EI. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the mouse nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:77-88.
45. Cheval L, Pierrat F, Rajerison R, Piquemal D, Doucet A. Of mice and men: divergence of gene expression patterns in kidney. PloS One 2012;7:e46876.
46. Christensen EI, Wagner CA, Kaissling B. Uriniferous tubule: structural and functional organization. Compr Physiol 2012 Apr;2:805-861.
47. Lameire NH, Lifschitz MD, Stein JH. Heterogeneity of nephron function. Annu Rev Physiol 1977;39:159-184.
48. Einstein A. Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. New York: Dover Publications; 1956: 119.
49. Dieterich HJ, Barrett JM, Kriz W, Bulhoff JP. The ultrastructure of the thin loop limbs of the mouse kidney. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1975;147: 1-18.
50. Millington PF, Critchley DR. Lipid composition of brush borders of rat intestinal epithelial cells. Life Sci Pt 1 Physi 1968;7:839-845.
51. Kawai K, Fujita M, Nakao M. Lipid components of two different regions of an intestinal epithelial cell membrane of mouse. Biochim Biophys Acta 1974;369:222-233.
52. Sampaio JL, Gerl MJ, Klose C, et al. Membrane lipidome of an epithelial cell line. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2011;108:1903-1907.
53. Guan ZZ, Xiao KQ, Zeng XY, et al. Changed cellular membrane lipid composition and lipid peroxidation of kidney in rats with chronic fluorosis. Arch Toxicol 2000;74:602-608.
54. Maunsbach AB, Christensen EI. Functional ultrastructure of the proximal tubule. In Windhager EE, ed. Handbook of Physiology. Renal Physiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 41-107.
55. Lounila J, Ala-Korpela M, Jokisaari J, Savolainen MJ, Kesaniemi YA. Effects of orientational order and particle size on the NMR line positions of lipoproteins. Phys Rev Lett 1994;72:4049-4052.
56. Schwartz MM, Venkatachalam MA. Structural differences in thin limbs of Henle: physiological implications. Kidney Int 1974;6:193-208.
57. Maret G, Schickfus MV, Mayer A, Dransfeld K. Orientation of nucleic-acids in high magnetic-fields. Phys Rev Lett 1975;35:397-400.
58. Scholz F, Boroske E, Helfrich W. Magnetic anisotropy of lecithin membranes. A new anisotropy susceptometer. Biophys J 1984;45: 589-592.
59. Torbet J. Fibrin assembly after fibrinopeptide A release in model systems and human plasma studied with magnetic birefringence. Biochem J 1987;244:633-637.
60. Worcester DL. Structural origins of diamagnetic anisotropy in proteins. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1978;75:5475-5477.
61. Klette R, Torring JT, Plato M, Mobius K, Bonigk B, Lubitz W. Determination of the G Tensor of the Primary Donor Cation Radical in Single-Crystals of Rhodobacter-Sphaeroides R-26 Reaction Centers by 3-Mm High-Field Epr. J Phys Chem-Us 1993;97:2015-2020.
62. Liu C, Li W. Imaging neural architecture of the brain based on its multipole magnetic response. Neuroimage 2013;67:193-202.